2/10
Confusing and aimless
26 February 2010
This film has some clever ideas going for it: the idea of using the same conversation in three different scenarios with three different sets of people is an interesting concept, but unfortunately it is not realised effectively. It seems as if the writer has written the conversation for one of the strands first and has clumsily tried to fit them into the other sections unsuccessfully.

I also think that using the 'infinite monkey theory' to bind this story together is a very confusing concept, given that it is only given a small amount of screen time and is barely referred to or acknowledged in the rest of the film. It also doesn't help that the three sections all contain tired,overused clichés.

There are some good ideas, but incredibly poorly executed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed