Brent Leung is genuine in his own search for truth and understanding. He also chose to share his discoveries with us. Having been in academics and clinical research myself, I have often been annoyed with colleagues who seem to forget what the scientific method is. A few times I have witnessed such overt bias in work performed, my level of exasperation has shifted to anger. I have been presenting information on the H1N1 Influenza A issue since it arose in January of 2009. This is a parallel situation to the HIV / AIDS pathway. Now, the European Parliament (Council of Europe member states) have launched an inquiry on the influence of the pharmaceutical companies on the global swine flu campaign, focusing especially on the extent of big pharma's influence on the World Health Organization. Thanks to the initiative of Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, the Health Committee of the EU Parliament unanimously passed a resolution calling for the inquiry. This step is a long-overdue move toward public transparency of the relationship of drug corruption between the WHO, the pharmaceutical industry and academic scientists. The EU member Greece, mandated via legislation that all of its citizens had to be vaccinated. Such moves were made in other countries, including the US. How many lives have been devastated or destroyed? From January to October, out of 305+ million people, there were less than 500 deaths in the US from H1N1. Then vaccinations began in October. The death rate rapidly climbed to 1,000; President Obama declared a "health emergency". By the end of November, the death rate was 2,000 in the US and increasing. What changed over these 2 months compared to the prior 9 months? Vaccinations began. The incidence of new H1N1 cases had already declined worldwide, including Mexico BEFORE the vaccinations began. Aside from those who have died, how many now have permanent neurologic damage? Prior to release of the vaccinations, big pharma made certain they could not be held legally accountable. This premise is false too. If injury was expected with as little testing as was done on this new vaccination format, then these "legal protections" were put in place to cover pre-meditated assault and murder. Is this acceptable? Only time will reveal the real answer; will enough of the citizens of the world awaken to what is being done to them by international corporations that lack accountability and lack fundamental ethics. A corporate entity has no conscience or feelings. It is seemingly too easy for a CEO and board of directors to become indifferent toward their fellow human beings. They must be held accountable individually and collectively. If the Federal Government wants to create a separation, then the government should purchase vaccinations and make them available through government sponsored outlets. This does not mean it is acceptable under the US Constitution for government to force vaccinations upon US citizens and it never means the government has the authority to ignore informed consent or intentionally hide potential adverse events.
Medical Doctors are held to the highest standards of accountability via the lengthy, detailed and involved malpractice laws, at least in the US. Why are geneticists, molecular biologists or other scientists involved in the arena of health, or the environment, held to lesser standards of conduct and ethics?
What about the law-makers? The legislators are our direct representatives within the government. They spontaneously retain the greatest responsibility to protect the public they were elected to serve. Why are legislators who knowingly participate in these actions, by passing laws which protect a few from legal redress of the harm they have caused, any less guilty of the murder and destruction which occurs in the lives of those who now suffer the outcome of legislative mandates? What happened to the legal concept of "informed consent"?
Legislative proposals included gag order provisions which would have prevented physicians from discussing the potential adverse outcomes to their patients. What kind of invasive, dictatorial thought process is this? This proposal did not pass in the final legislation, yet, why are the citizens of these State jurisdictions failing to hold those same legislators, who attempted to inflict this upon them, accountable? Will this mindset and hostile activity be forgotten by the time such nefarious characters are up for re-election? Will citizens vote them back into office?
Accountability is woefully lacking.
I shall hope that Mr. Leung continues to pursue a career in documentary films. I would be thrilled to see him do a follow-up inquiry into the H1N1 fiasco as a comparative film to "House of Numbers".
Medical Doctors are held to the highest standards of accountability via the lengthy, detailed and involved malpractice laws, at least in the US. Why are geneticists, molecular biologists or other scientists involved in the arena of health, or the environment, held to lesser standards of conduct and ethics?
What about the law-makers? The legislators are our direct representatives within the government. They spontaneously retain the greatest responsibility to protect the public they were elected to serve. Why are legislators who knowingly participate in these actions, by passing laws which protect a few from legal redress of the harm they have caused, any less guilty of the murder and destruction which occurs in the lives of those who now suffer the outcome of legislative mandates? What happened to the legal concept of "informed consent"?
Legislative proposals included gag order provisions which would have prevented physicians from discussing the potential adverse outcomes to their patients. What kind of invasive, dictatorial thought process is this? This proposal did not pass in the final legislation, yet, why are the citizens of these State jurisdictions failing to hold those same legislators, who attempted to inflict this upon them, accountable? Will this mindset and hostile activity be forgotten by the time such nefarious characters are up for re-election? Will citizens vote them back into office?
Accountability is woefully lacking.
I shall hope that Mr. Leung continues to pursue a career in documentary films. I would be thrilled to see him do a follow-up inquiry into the H1N1 fiasco as a comparative film to "House of Numbers".