Exists worse some cinematographic experience of what to attend a film of the director Michael Bay? Serious, exist trams more mediocre, characters and lack complete of the minimum capable even though to entertain the spectator? Not! And the critical still says of Ed Wood and Uwe Boll.
" Armageddon" this is accurately everything: it is a film of Michael Bay. That is, it waits to leave the session with the ears aching, since the only thing that the film tries to supply the mediocrity is with the effect special. E is logical that it does not function.
Worse: the film is long, seems that never it goes to finish. And the cast? Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck are completely lost . Billy Bob Thornton and Liv Tyler seem to have shame of what they are making.
Anyway, between meteors that destroy world-wide metropolises and a cliché romance to the sound of Aerosmith, " Armageddon" and all the career of director Michael Bay shows what Hollywood has of worse: productions without content, with innumerable effect, everything to only gain money of the spectator. A shame!
" Armageddon" this is accurately everything: it is a film of Michael Bay. That is, it waits to leave the session with the ears aching, since the only thing that the film tries to supply the mediocrity is with the effect special. E is logical that it does not function.
Worse: the film is long, seems that never it goes to finish. And the cast? Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck are completely lost . Billy Bob Thornton and Liv Tyler seem to have shame of what they are making.
Anyway, between meteors that destroy world-wide metropolises and a cliché romance to the sound of Aerosmith, " Armageddon" and all the career of director Michael Bay shows what Hollywood has of worse: productions without content, with innumerable effect, everything to only gain money of the spectator. A shame!