I liked this movie for 3 things: the use of real locations rather than very inaccurately rendered studio sets (do you hear me, Steven Spielberg?); the use of actual modern Egyptian actors in various roles; the fact that the female ingénue was allowed to have brains and be resourceful and even save the guy once in a while. (I'm offended by the comment that called her "jiggle interest". That shows the offensive mindset of the poster here and not the movie). Even the mixing of locations mentioned by a couple of other people and the fact that archaeologists supposedly keep field journals on papyrus are worth a giggle and add to the amusement value. That's why I gave it a 5.
I disliked it because of the wooden acting, some of the casting (i.e. Brock Pierce, Stacy Keach) and the stilted dialogue. Then there's the "magical" element. Due to my husband's work I know a lot of archaeologists who been digging in Egypt for decades and nothing sparkly has ever happened on any of their digs.
I disliked it because of the wooden acting, some of the casting (i.e. Brock Pierce, Stacy Keach) and the stilted dialogue. Then there's the "magical" element. Due to my husband's work I know a lot of archaeologists who been digging in Egypt for decades and nothing sparkly has ever happened on any of their digs.