I recently watched this TV serial back-to-back with the Hammer movie version.
It was originally broadcast live, but was recorded off monitors using two different systems. One system only recorded alternate scan lines so the image is often of very low resolution. The recording is also marred by light leakage. In one episode there was clearly a fault with one of the TV cameras. As a result, the image quality is highly variable, but is still good enough for an evaluation of this early TV classic.
It inevitably suffers from the limitations of live broadcasting, but also looks under-rehearsed. Actors are noticeably missing their marks, fluffing their lines, jumping their cues and freezing into 'meaningful' close-ups before the camera is ready for them. Quatermass and the Pit was also broadcast live but is a much slicker production all round.
It was probably too ambitious for its paltry budget. Even without the cost of the BBC contract staff, $20,000 was an impossibly small sum for a three hour drama. In retrospect, the final episode, set in space, was probably a mistake. The asteroid set was just tarpaulins thrown over studio junk - and that is exactly what it looks like. Although the Hammer movie was shot on a tight budget and was only half as long, it still cost ten times as much.
All this can be taken for granted. The real issue is which version tells the story best.
Of course, they were made for different media, so told the story in a different way. The TV version was structured to gradually draw the audience into an increasingly paranoid world, week by week, building steadily towards its climax. The movie had to grab them immediately and lead them from plot point to plot point as efficiently as possible.
This serial was a distinct improvement on The Quatermass Experiment. It had a tighter, more plausible story, more action, less padding and built to a more satisfying climax. But there was room for improvement.
It shows signs of having been written very quickly and could have done with a re-write. When Kneale was hired to write the movie version it was an opportunity to rethink aspects of the story. His overlong screenplay was then trimmed by Jimmy Sangster and Val Guest, who brought a fresh eye to the story and introduced further improvements. A comparison of the two versions demonstrates the advantages of this script development process. I give a few examples.
In the movie, the problems with the atomic rocket are established with a just couple of lines of dialogue.
In the TV version, this takes two complete scenes. Quatermass is checking his rocket because he has heard the sister rocket in Australia has gone into nuclear melt-down. This is then reinforced by a scene where he views footage of the Austalian disaster. However, to allow Robinson time for his costume change, this second scene starts with Paula Quatermass and Pugh discussing the set-back. When Quatermass appears, the scene then simply repeats information we have now already heard twice.
In the movie, Quatermass is introduced to Vincent Broadhead, an MP who is already suspicious about the Winnerton Flats project. He gets Quatermass into the food plant, sneaks off to investigate one of the domes and falls into the corrosive 'food'.
In the TV version, he merely gets Quatermass into a meeting of the investigation committee. He is then possessed by an alien. This means another character has to be introduced to get Quatermass into the plant and it is he who falls into the food. But he is just a PR man. Why would he go snooping around? The movie version is both more efficient and more plausible.
On TV, Quatermass takes a reporter to the workers' village where he gets infected by an alien. Guards turn up to investigate the 'overshot'. Now convinced Quatermass is right, the reporter phones in his story. Spooked by what he says, the workers march on the plant.
In the movie, it is someone else who gets infected. The guards turn up while the reporter is telephoning his paper and shoot him. This provides much better motivation for the workers' subsequent attack on the plant.
On TV, we first see a farmer possessed by the aliens, then Dillon, a little girl, Broadhead, a Minister, the reporter and, finally, Pugh. These multiple possessions contribute to the growing paranoia, but are mostly irrelevant to the plot.
The movie combines the roles of Dillon and Pugh into a single character (Marsh) and omits most of other possessions. They are not really missed.
On TV, we have two climaxes: the destruction of the pressure dome, followed by the destruction of the asteroid in the next episode. The movie combines them, inter-cutting between the rocket base and the siege of the control room. The puncturing of the dome releases the aliens and the destruction of the asteroid kills them, making for a neater and more striking conclusion.
Overall, therefore, the TV version has the advantage of a more measured build-up of tension and can include plot details I regret were not in the movie, but is more diffuse, more obviously padded and less well plotted. The movie is arguably a bit too efficient, but in the final analysis, it is not only better made, it is better written too.
However, I am delighted this TV version is finally available for viewing. It is long overdue. 15 years ago I learnt from a TV programme that it had survived intact and wrote urging the BBC to release it on video. At long last they have.
Now, my only regret is that we will never see if Neale's more expansive screenplay for Hammer might have produced an even better movie.
It was originally broadcast live, but was recorded off monitors using two different systems. One system only recorded alternate scan lines so the image is often of very low resolution. The recording is also marred by light leakage. In one episode there was clearly a fault with one of the TV cameras. As a result, the image quality is highly variable, but is still good enough for an evaluation of this early TV classic.
It inevitably suffers from the limitations of live broadcasting, but also looks under-rehearsed. Actors are noticeably missing their marks, fluffing their lines, jumping their cues and freezing into 'meaningful' close-ups before the camera is ready for them. Quatermass and the Pit was also broadcast live but is a much slicker production all round.
It was probably too ambitious for its paltry budget. Even without the cost of the BBC contract staff, $20,000 was an impossibly small sum for a three hour drama. In retrospect, the final episode, set in space, was probably a mistake. The asteroid set was just tarpaulins thrown over studio junk - and that is exactly what it looks like. Although the Hammer movie was shot on a tight budget and was only half as long, it still cost ten times as much.
All this can be taken for granted. The real issue is which version tells the story best.
Of course, they were made for different media, so told the story in a different way. The TV version was structured to gradually draw the audience into an increasingly paranoid world, week by week, building steadily towards its climax. The movie had to grab them immediately and lead them from plot point to plot point as efficiently as possible.
This serial was a distinct improvement on The Quatermass Experiment. It had a tighter, more plausible story, more action, less padding and built to a more satisfying climax. But there was room for improvement.
It shows signs of having been written very quickly and could have done with a re-write. When Kneale was hired to write the movie version it was an opportunity to rethink aspects of the story. His overlong screenplay was then trimmed by Jimmy Sangster and Val Guest, who brought a fresh eye to the story and introduced further improvements. A comparison of the two versions demonstrates the advantages of this script development process. I give a few examples.
In the movie, the problems with the atomic rocket are established with a just couple of lines of dialogue.
In the TV version, this takes two complete scenes. Quatermass is checking his rocket because he has heard the sister rocket in Australia has gone into nuclear melt-down. This is then reinforced by a scene where he views footage of the Austalian disaster. However, to allow Robinson time for his costume change, this second scene starts with Paula Quatermass and Pugh discussing the set-back. When Quatermass appears, the scene then simply repeats information we have now already heard twice.
In the movie, Quatermass is introduced to Vincent Broadhead, an MP who is already suspicious about the Winnerton Flats project. He gets Quatermass into the food plant, sneaks off to investigate one of the domes and falls into the corrosive 'food'.
In the TV version, he merely gets Quatermass into a meeting of the investigation committee. He is then possessed by an alien. This means another character has to be introduced to get Quatermass into the plant and it is he who falls into the food. But he is just a PR man. Why would he go snooping around? The movie version is both more efficient and more plausible.
On TV, Quatermass takes a reporter to the workers' village where he gets infected by an alien. Guards turn up to investigate the 'overshot'. Now convinced Quatermass is right, the reporter phones in his story. Spooked by what he says, the workers march on the plant.
In the movie, it is someone else who gets infected. The guards turn up while the reporter is telephoning his paper and shoot him. This provides much better motivation for the workers' subsequent attack on the plant.
On TV, we first see a farmer possessed by the aliens, then Dillon, a little girl, Broadhead, a Minister, the reporter and, finally, Pugh. These multiple possessions contribute to the growing paranoia, but are mostly irrelevant to the plot.
The movie combines the roles of Dillon and Pugh into a single character (Marsh) and omits most of other possessions. They are not really missed.
On TV, we have two climaxes: the destruction of the pressure dome, followed by the destruction of the asteroid in the next episode. The movie combines them, inter-cutting between the rocket base and the siege of the control room. The puncturing of the dome releases the aliens and the destruction of the asteroid kills them, making for a neater and more striking conclusion.
Overall, therefore, the TV version has the advantage of a more measured build-up of tension and can include plot details I regret were not in the movie, but is more diffuse, more obviously padded and less well plotted. The movie is arguably a bit too efficient, but in the final analysis, it is not only better made, it is better written too.
However, I am delighted this TV version is finally available for viewing. It is long overdue. 15 years ago I learnt from a TV programme that it had survived intact and wrote urging the BBC to release it on video. At long last they have.
Now, my only regret is that we will never see if Neale's more expansive screenplay for Hammer might have produced an even better movie.