Review of Dune

Dune (2000)
7/10
Very good for a small/indie production budget!
29 June 2005
First of all, this movie should not be compared to the original production. Decades of cinematography and effects separate the two, as does a completely different approach to the film. The only particular difference that must be noted is the storyline for the 2000 production is fairly complete- as one might expect of a mini-series- meaning it does not leave the reader feeling confused throughout and require them to imagine an introduction or resolution. In fact to be true to the book the length of the film is almost necessary.

The acting in the film is quite good. There are not many well known actors (at least for US audiences), but that has the effect of balancing the film; letting it flow around the storyline not a few select characters. There are hints of overacting here and there but usually in awkward scenes where some of the subtle meaning explained in the book would be very difficult to portray.

Special effects are not all that bad. Though the use of CGI/Bluescreen is fairly obvious. Considering the year and budget these are for the most part forgivable. There are three flaws which I cannot forgive: Footage of a Fremen raid on the Harkonnen hanger is used at least three times throughout the film, and the birds which occasionally are rendered (poorly) in the background generally distract and detract from the scenes they are inserted into. Lastly, the lighting is somewhat overdone, appearing to be more in line with theater lighting than a movie set.

Overall this is definitely a film to watch if you like science fiction. You can watch it as a stand-alone piece, or read the various books that Frank Herbert wrote for a more complete understanding of the story.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed