Review of Home Alone 3

Home Alone 3 (1997)
This Movie Sucks
16 June 2000
This movie should not have been made. It in no way is a sequel. I finally realized after watching this how Macaulay Culkin is not that bad of an actor after all. Home Alone was good, Home Alone 2 was also good, but this movie sucks.

This kid gets left at home, not mistakenly, because he has the chicken pox. His parents leave on and off, he's not left with a babysitter, and this group of "intelligent high tech" criminals are after his fire truck? This movie has "This sucks" written all over it.

You can probably tell from reading this that I'm not ten years old. I have to say that I took my nephew to see this a few years back. I'll tell you this, he would have liked "Boogie Nights" better! Not to say that Boogie Nights was a bad movie, because it wasn't. It's just that he fell asleep during this production that should not have ever been considered made.

What were the adults in this movie thinking? NO Macaulay Culkin, no Joe Pesci, no Daniel Stern, no Catherine O'Hara, etc. Nobody, not even John Hughes or Chris Columbus had anything to do with this movie. It isn't even worth half a star. That's all.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed