Pulgasari (1985)
2/10
Kidnapped by North Koreans Films Director Makes Turkey in Revenge
6 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
My MIND! MY MIND!!!!!! I CAN'T STAND IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm sure years of therapy will erase the scars left by this movie, but I don't have that much time.

Okay lets start with a plot run down and I'll bleed from there...

I'll be brief-

A blacksmith who won't make weapons to stop a rebellion is pitched into jail and starved to death. As a legacy to his children he leaves a small metal doll which comes alive when one of the blacksmith's daughters gets a drop of blood on it.

The monster eats metal and begins to grow.

The rebels battle the government with the monster. The monster grows bigger and bigger and even after the rebels win the monster still goes on eating and growing until some way has to be found to destroy the beast....

Its a weird twist on the Daimajin films from Japan.

The monster is one of the stiffest rubber suits I've ever seen outside of a bondage film and is screamingly funny to look at. You can see how the head piece sits on the body. The actor playing the monster at times looks like a boxer warming up for a fight weaving and rocking in a jerky style that brought giggles to this viewer.(Those of you into bondage may want to see about getting one for yourself since it severely limits movement and is probably torturous to wear)

The "blue screen" work is laughable, simply because the film stocks don't match.

The destruction scenes are surprisingly good and well done, in many ways better than most Godzilla films. The collapse of the buildings seems to be very realistic.

The battle scenes while epic in scale are laughable simply because many of the weapons,say the boulders are, obviously cardboard or plaster. There are thousands of people on screen for some scenes and it looks good but they are often simply running to and fro.

The film is supposedly a North Korean fable about the evils of capitalism and what ever else Kim Jong-il deemed it to be about.

My question is who did they think this film is for? It looks like a TV series blown up to feature size. The level of the story seems to be that of a second or third grade mentality, especially in its humor but it has real animals being carved up, torture, nasty battlefield death and ideas that no child would grasp or care about. Its a childrens film made for adults.

This is one of those its so bad its...something movies. Its a mind warp and complete mess. I like bits of it and other bits leave me with slack jawed disbelief. Frankly I was thinking that if it was suppose to be a tongue in cheek sort of thing then I could consider it a good joke film, but since the film is serious and meant to "mean" something then its a disaster.

AND LEST YOU ASK IF I'M CERTAIN ITS SERIOUS---- The South Korean director was kidnapped by the North Koreans to make movies like this for them. Luckily he eventually escaped.

Do I think you should see this movie?

First how much do you love giant monsters?

Second how drunk can you get and still see the screen clearly?

I don't think you really need to see this unless you want to laugh your ass off with drunken buddies or if you really need to see every rubber suited giant monster movie ever made.

Either way DO NOT WATCH THIS ALONE, you'll need someone to help you pick up your jaw off the floor.

(And no its not one of the worst films I've ever seen, just one of the most inept)
20 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed