Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Androgony before it's time
15 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Sylvia Scarlett is not as bad as many claim it is. However at the time some of the ideas in the movie such as cross dressing where not considered appropriate and/or funny in 1936.

Hepburn plays Sylvia Scarlett, living with her father in France at the beginning of the film. After her mother's death, her father tells her that he's gambled away all of their money and that the only hope they have lies in his profiting off of the lace Syliva's mother leaves her.

Refusing to stay behind, Sylvia decides to go with her father to England dressed as a boy. Cutting her hair very shortly and dressing in men's slacks and jackets, she passes along as a very young boy.

Grant, aka Jimmy Monkley, a cockney scoundrel and thief, joins the father/daughter(son) team and they soon begin a series of cons (everything from Hepburn pretending to be a poor penniless French lad to get charity, to trying to steal from Monkley's friend Maudie (who happens to work as a maid in a rich home).

After a series of misfortunes as con artists, the three, joined by Maudie, decide to go on the road and perform as roadside performers.

On the road, Hepburn meets and falls for Michael Fane. He's very attracted and drawn to her as a boy, but when she reveals she's a girl, he simply cannot stop laughing at her.

Natalie Paley plays Fane (Brian Ahrene's) cruel girlfriend.

There's a great scene where Paley is torturing Sylvia's father (who is drunk and in a stupor thinking Maudie is cheating on him) and Hepburn comes right up to her and smacks her in the face. Very funny in my opinion.

After Sylvia reveals herself to Fane she gives up dressing like a boy, while her father goes mad after Maudie leaves him suddenly.

Hepburn and Grant are now on their own until they find Paley's character trying to drown herself. Hepburn and Paley did the actual stunts and the current almost knocked them out to sea in reality.

Monkley and Paley's character take off together while Fane and Scarlett go after them, at the same time finding that they have real feelings towards each other.

The movie as a whole isn't the greatest, but there are individual scenes that are very good, and Hepburn is great throughout it, even if just to look at. The New York Times remarked back in 1936 that Hepburn was "better looking as a boy."
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Morning Glory (1933)
8/10
Hepburn's first Oscar winner
14 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"Morning Glory" is a charming tale of Eva Lovelace (her stage name) who tries and tries to get into the theatre in a great part, but keeps being turned down by producers (Menjou).

Hepburn was essentially Lovelace and did have the ambition and ego in real life so this was a perfect suit for her.

Douglas Fairbanks Jr. is Sheridan the playwright and Menjou as Easten the producer. C.Audrey Smith was perfect as H.R. Hedges, the English actor, who serves as Eva's acting coach for a short time.

The editing in the film is not that great and it's never really quite clear if Hepburn's character actually went to bed with Menjou (the very thought to me is disgusting! Why be fascinated with him when Fairbanks Jr. is the real romeo!) Apparently Hepburn and Fairbanks did the balcony scene from Romeo and Juliet in full get up costume, but it was cut from the film.

It's been rumored that Hepburn won the Oscar for the scene where a drunken Eva starts reciting Shakespeare starting with Hamlet and then going into Romeo and Juliet.

It's a shame we never get to see the actual show within the movie- "The Golden Bough" or however it's spelled.

I think the movie Stage Door presented a very similar situation and scenario, yet was executed in a more proficient manner. Hepburn is great in both of course.

The ending is very peculiar because the audience is left not knowing if Eva's star will stay shining or if in fact she will be a "morning glory" - a flower that fades before the sun fully shines.

This was Hepburn's third film and her first Oscar nomination and win, which is quite remarkable considering these days most actresses are nominated several times before they win (Roberts, Kidman, Zellwegger..)- but then again none of them can ever compare with Hepburn. She was a rare breed, a rare personality, and a rare genuine actress that will forever be remembered and forever loved and respected.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not as bad as they say
9 August 2006
I honestly went into this movie thinking it would be god awful like the critics said. I guess I'm prejudice when it comes to Katharine Hepburn.

You might say that the way Waterloo Bridge photographed Vivien Leigh is similar to how Hepburn is photographed in Break of Hearts.

Her face and her eyes are aglow in nearly every scene. I don't think she was over acting at all like some have said.

Boyer does a decent job as the famous composer Franz Roberti.

It really isn't a variation of "A Star is Born" like one reviewer has said.

Sure the plot's basically mush, but I still enjoyed seeing Hepburn at the height of her youth.

It's a good film for Hepburn fans at least.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Vivien Leigh shines in a tale of a woman drifting much like herself.
27 July 2006
I have to disagree with the comments that Warren Beatty made this movie. I thought his Italian accent was poor and most of the time he sits and pouts.

Vivien Leigh made this movie for me. She related to Karen Stone because at the time she was a manic depressive and was receiving shock treatments.

This role is very similar to Blanche Dubois and Mary Treadwell.

I've read the novella by Tennessee Williams and the movie does make a very good adaptation of it.

The cinematography is beautiful and so is the costuming.
37 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed