Change Your Image
ianwizard
Reviews
The Satanic Rites of Dracula (1973)
Can you say BORING?
Satanic Rites of Dracula was awful. AD 1972 was OK but Satanic Rites was a joke! What happened to the excellent series that was centered in the Victorian period like Scars Of Dracula? And I mean the opening starts with a satanic group sacrificing a topless woman! How sick. I was really shocked to see such a pathetic sequel. I personally think that the Hammer Horror Dracula series should have all centered around the Victorian era and not present day. I really enjoyed Horror Of Dracula, Brides Of Dracula, Prince Of Darkness, Risen From The Grave then at Taste The Blood Of Dracula it started to go downhill, I did enjoy Scars Of Dracula but AD 1972 and Satanic Rites are just to boring and the plots are horrible! Yuck.
Dracula Has Risen from the Grave (1968)
A Fangtastic Sequel ! One Of The Best!
I am a huge Dracula fan. I've always loved the Christopher Lee version of Dracula. When I saw the first one Horror Of Dracula I fell in love with it. After that I saw Dracula Prince Of Darkness it was even better than the first one! After Prince of Darkness I went in order and watched ...Risen From The Grave and it was amazing!. In Dracula Has Risen From The Grave it leaves off from Prince Of Darkness when Dracula drowns under water. I was amazed how Dracula had just risen out of the cold frozen water. A local priest is put under Dracula's spell and goes bad. Dracula hides out in a local bar and preys on the the bar maid Zena. Zena as well as the priest is put under Dracula's spell and is soon asked to preform a task for Dracula. Unfortunately Zena fails her task for Dracula, and Dracula destroyed Zena and orders for the priest to burn her in the fire place. The gore and blood is very unrealistic which makes the movie easy to handle. I loved it and I think you will to.