Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Roman de gare (2007)
8/10
Solid Entertainment and Performances
17 July 2008
An interesting film with a solid storyline, interesting cinematography, and compelling performances that draw you into the whole effort.

At first I feared the numerous plot twists and turns were going to be too convenient or too obvious as false flags, but the writer and director handled things adeptly when all was said and done.

The three main characters were extremely engaging, and ably supported by the minor players. If you like expressive eyes and two-edged dialog, this is an evening out well spent.

Highly recommended, especially if you need an excuse to start liking the French... (which means you haven't seen Amelie yet). ;-)
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Happening (2008)
8/10
For those with imaginations... and attention spans.
13 June 2008
I'm surprised this movie is getting as many bad reviews as it appears to be getting... but the occasional good review is very telling, especially Ebert's. I'd recommend reading his review because in my opinion he 'got it', and no need to repeat his observations here.

As usual, MNS comes up with a thinking-man's view of what exactly is disconcertingly eerie and/or profoundly horrible... that which you can't really immediately understand... and even more telling, that which is beyond controlling.

But if your imagination is such that the sudden downfall of society doesn't shock after the first random suicide of a person sitting next to you, or your attention span is such that watching a normally calming pan across a countryside turn into something deeply ominous for more than a few frames bores you, then this won't be a movie to your taste.

Within the microcosms created by MNS in his films, I never walked away with a feeling of having to suspend an untoward amount of disbelief... that seems to be a major complaint of many who are panning this movie, but I don't see it. I can only chalk it up to the 'cynical chic' of the South Park generation... those for whom empathy is an alien concept, to whom ennui is epitomized by screen images which don't provide visual bombardments even few seconds, and by whom mean-spirited irreverence is demanded in lieu of actual humorous or heartfelt dialog.

If the dialog seems simplistic, well, look a bit deeper and realize exactly what 'regular folk' might say or do if the events of this Happening actually were occurring... this is the way the world ends, this is the way the world ends... not with the bang of snappy repartee or quotable sound-bytes, but with the whimper of incredulity and dread.

Complaining about the acting or dialog in The Happening is like complaining about the 'jumpy camera work' in Cloverfield. In short, anyone who just doesn't "get it" to that extent really shouldn't be posting their opinions on movies.

Finding the truly human and poignant moments in the outwardly mundane yet intrinsically significant details of his landscapes and characters is one of MNS's great gifts, and he hits the mark here too.

The cinematography was superb, the actors all hit their strides, the story was compelling, the occasional odd character, visual pun, and good-natured joke worked well... no complaints on that score.

I even went in expecting to be underwhelmed by the acting of the two lead characters, but came out pleasantly surprised.

But then again, I loved The Village, and found many good things about The Lady In The Water... so I guess mine will remain the minority opinion.

But if you have admired MNS's previous work, you will enjoy this film as well.
382 out of 748 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Married Life (2007)
5/10
Just an average episode of Masterpiece Theatre. Should have been better.
9 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
While this wasn't a bad movie, it just wasn't all that good either.

Visually compelling, I must give it that... and a glimpse of people with manners and emotional restraint in this day and age of South Park mentalities is refreshing.

But I was expecting much more, and the story in and of itself did not progress beyond the 'merely interesting'.

The young blond, when all was said and done, was unconvincing as a true and deep love interest for the older Cooper... this being confirmed by the manner in which she (seemingly) so easily jumped from his arms to the more believable Brosnan's.

There were a few scenes that were thrown in merely for building suspense that felt like cheap gimmicks after the fact, like when Cooper was stopped by the police. Or the blithe way his wife's affair with that other fellow just conveniently dissipated (especially after such professions of mutual love).

There were some profound things going on that just never seemed to come to a realistic fruition, and thus by the end, where everyone seems to live happily ever after, one can only walk away from the theatre and shrug.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A strong 7, a lot more depth and heart than many reviewers are giving it credit for.
8 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler warning: I can see why many people would not think much of this movie. There were many instances where tying seemingly unrelated or insignificant details together got a bit sloppy, unlike all of his previous movies (and I always felt this was MNS's major skill).

For example, I was convinced the half-muscle guy was going to play the role of the guardian, but there should have been some greater tie-in on why half of his body needed to be super strong (I envisioned him holding the beast by the scruff of the neck with his strong arm while his 'normally-developed' half did something else necessary for the scene to be believable... instead, all he did was stare and then nearly messed up even that simple task).

Also, the young son of the puzzle guy suddenly being the Translator by being able to read symbolic meanings from a wall of cereal boxes was too conveniently deus ex machina, although I can see what MNS was trying to do there, and many fond memories of childhood for us all did indeed entail the morning breakfast study of the cereal boxes in front of us as we ate from our bowls.

But compare that with how clever the 'by listening to the critic we were steered wrong' theme turned out to be... which was a nice twist because everything up to that point seemed reasonable and logical, as far as the critic's advice went... it's a well-known pitfall to judge everything by its cover, or to miss important aspects of life by viewing everything strictly from our own stereotyped experiences, no matter how true they might be MOST of the time... I seem to recall a maxim along the lines of "If you judge things and make your decisions only by what you've seen happen before, you'll be right most of the time, but when you're wrong, you'll be tragically wrong" or something to that effect.

Or how about the 'twist' of Giamatti being, not the Guardian, but the Healer (I call it a twist because by that time I had forgotten that he used to be doctor), the man who himself was in such need of healing, and because of his deep, deep grief being able to spiritually transfer that depth of feeling into saving the Angel, who in fact really wound up saving him, in the end ('thank you for giving me back my life' is how I believe he ended the movie). That's heavy stuff, and extremely moving, especially to those of us who are older and have children of our own.

I don't mind MNS's overt bash at critics or the egocentric casting as writer-whose-ideas-will-change-the-world stuff... I don't judge the movie based upon the director's personal life or motives... in fact, I thought the writer was very human and without the hubris that many here are accusing him of having as a director for playing that role himself... furthermore, I think Giamatti was playing a sort of John The Baptist role (unlike a previous poster who likened the writer to John The Baptist), because the writer himself will become a martyr.

All in all, if this movie is a failure, then it's a noble one. The fact that MNS tried something different, and it wasn't quite the same calibre as his previous work, is no reason to dismiss TLIW lightly.

In fact, I think the movie's reputation will grow as time goes on.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Charming Film And Solid Effort from Start To Finish
23 May 2008
Although this film had all the earmarks of the dreaded stereotypical "chick flick" and/or "yenta-fest", I (a Gentile male) enjoyed it thoroughly, because in the end it was a charming, mature film about real life and real people, one which can be enjoyed on many levels by anyone who has a heart.

The script was solid, the editing spot on, the cinematography taut (especially the close-ups), the actors all on top of their games, and the fact that all these well-known stars are showing their age (and character!) in their faces just added to the feeling of genuine emotion and augmented the audience ability to empathize with the characters.

I went in not expecting much and came out EXTREMELY satisfied... all the more impressed because it was Ms. Hunt's big screen directorial and writing debut.

(Those who would nitpick about the occasional microphone in the frame, well... that's the equivalent of trying to dismiss a person's internet forum thread posting by pointing out typos).
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A nice little movie where all the things that could have been done wrong weren't...
9 November 2007
It was too easy to expect a rug-chewing performance from Michael Douglas as a crazy person, and an exasperated, eye-rolling two-dimensional "oh I'm so put-upon by the world" job from Evan Rachel Wood.

Thankfully, those clichés were avoided in this poignant and ultimately joyful and uplifting (thank God!) story of quiet nobility, personal vision and purpose, and underlying love and strength amongst otherwise "broken" people.

It's refreshing to go into a theatre not expecting much and coming out enlightened by the combined vision of the actors, writer, director, and cinematographer.

Bravo to all involved, and here's hoping to see a strong presence at the Academy Awards.
43 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great art that requires a great audience
30 May 2007
An epic tale of all-too-human characters in a snapshot of time that stands as a grand vision of what used to be taught in the schools as a noble concept... Manifest Destiny... and how that high-falutin' phrase is often simply the embodiment of an individual man's (or woman's) vision, personal desires, and force of will.

It's strength is that it puts a human face on how an open and unsettled country becomes a nation. A story not always pretty or explained in simplistic terms of good-versus-evil... but in the end an ennobling journey nevertheless.

The gist of the tale has been covered already in numerous reviews, so let me just add one observation.

Like all great art, it requires an attention span that obviously isn't present in many of the "reviewers" allowed to post here.

It belongs on any credible list of Top 50 movies... one could even argue Top 20.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Manipulative Dreck
12 April 2007
Expectations were way out of line based upon the buzz that this drivel of a movie generated. I'd give it one or two more stars if it were merely touted as something of interest to an IFC film fan, not the film-flam perpetuated by Oscar's culture vultures.

Comedic moments that lacked comedy, dramatic moments that were mere melodrama.

That this soap-opera-with-pretensions-of-social-significance (which actually does nothing more than confront the all-too-hackneyed stereotypes of WASPdom... safe targets, indeed, for those seeking the Hollywoodland seal of approval) passes as good art in the minds of apparently many is more a comment on the debased standards of the Illiterati (who fancy their opinions worthy of expression) than on the merits of the writer and director, more poetasters than poets.

If you must explore the dark side of suburbia, look for art in Blue Velvet, where the personification of evil is truly evil, not some pain-in-the-ass soccer mom or blow-hard bully.
25 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed