Reviews

12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Terrible movie, but a must-see
8 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Here are the people in this movie if you don't know, and this was in 1991: Chevy Chase, Dan Aykroyd, John Candy, Demi Moore—but even more intriguing is the cameo by Digital Underground, featuring Tupac Shakur and Humpty Hump. With a cast like this, how could this movie possible be bad? If you haven't seen it, there's probably a good reason.

Without going into an attempted plot analysis, because the actual plot of the movie is a few people trying to escape a crazy junkyard/bunker/haunted house while attempted "dark humor" and a few slapstick gags are supposed to be enough to make up for the lack of a back story. To sum it up, you see Dan Aykroyd in some horrible makeup that makes him look like old and disgusting. Without warning there are two fat guys in slimy fat suits who, according to the movie, were kicked out of high school for being too fat. But for some reason they run around in underwear and talk like babies. It might sound funny when reading the description, but it isn't…at all.

Then you have John Candy in drag for no reason except to waste a few minutes with the usual ugly-cross-dressing-man who make comedic passes at one of the stars. While they try to distract you with this, the movie tries to force a "spark" between Demi Moore and Chevy Chase which never works at all and also has no back story to make these character slightly real.

Most of the way through the movie you feel dirty and ashamed that you're watching such a bad movie. But there is a silver lining: Digital Underground.

Completely out of nowhere, Digital Underground shows up at this deserted fortress thing that is supposedly within about 45 minutes of New York City, yet is down some deserted dirt road miles outside of a very small town—this road at one point was described as being parallel with the interstate, yet people get lost there all the time. Furthermore, one part of the movie reveals that all these famous missing people were killed in this crazy junkyard/madhouse. The even find Jimmy Hoffa's ID. So this middle of the nowhere place somehow manages to secretly arrest and/or kill hundreds, if not thousands of people over the years, but no one ever noticed? But luckily, Digital Underground shows up in the courthouse. They say they are musicians, and Dan Aykroyd, as the insane old judge, tells them to play for him. Now this movie turns into a short music video for Humpty Hump and Tupac. They do a nice performance, despite the fact that at one point Ayrkoyd's character is playing some kind of old organ for a solo. The sheer randomness of this music video, along with the complete horribleness of the movie somehow wormed its way into my brain until I decided this movie is awesome and worthy of encouraging other people to watch.

DISCLAIMER: If you watch this movie, do not blame me for the time you wasted. But it will be worth it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jarhead (2005)
9/10
A realistic look at the psychology of a Marine
5 November 2005
If you're expecting this movie to be full of fighting or to make some social commentary on the current war in Iraq, then you will be disappointed. The most profound political statement in the movie is "F--- Politics." The only fighting consists of a few bombing scenes. But you have to remember, this was the first Gulf War, which lasted about 4 days. This movie takes a look at the making of a Marine sniper and the psychological aspects that go along with it. It has some aspects from Full Metal Jacket, but don't count it out as an imitation. It isn't. Swafford, the main character, is a sniper in the Marines. He deals with the pressures of the other Marines, the inbred desire to kill and the strain of having a girlfriend back home while he is stuck in the deserts near Iraq, thinking a massive battle is waiting. As you know from history, there were no major ground battles in the first Gulf War, and these Marines deal with all the anticipation of war with out ever getting to experience it. I think the author of the book compared it to building up for a sexual release and never experiencing it. There are several emotional and mental conflicts in this movie, which I think are excellent. They seem to be the real issue for a soldier, not the actual fighting. It also deals with the difference between soldiers who are in for a short term and the ones who are in for life. I think this is a fascinating aspect of the movie, and is handled brilliantly. So if you want a psychological and emotional look at being a soldier, watch Jarhead. If you want a ton of action and fighting, go watch something else. If you want political commentaries, go watch Fox News or CNN.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mean Creek (2004)
8/10
Good Movie that makes a strong point.
10 October 2005
This movie takes a great look at bullying. A young boy is picked on by a bully who terrorizes many kids at the school. The boy and his brother come up with a prank to pay the bully back. As they spend some time with the bully they realize he isn't a bad person, he is just self-conscious. With peer pressure the boys and a verbal spat with the bully, the prank goes wrong. The kids are left to deal with a major problem and they all have different ideas to deal with it. This movie makes some strong points about bullying and revenge. The acting is good and the script is also good. There is some crude language and some violent and disturbing scenes that many not be appropriate for younger viewers, but would be good to start a discussion about bullying and the consequences. Overall, an excellent movie.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cellular (2004)
5/10
Mediocre acting, overdone plot and weak humor
6 September 2005
This was a classic example of a high-budget movie with a low-budget script. The conspiracy/kidnapping plot is fine, but it had nothing different to set it apart from other movies like this. The idea of the random phone call was OK, but Chris Evans made it worse. He turns from slacker to hero in about 5 minutes. It was not convincing. The worst part of the movie was the pathetic attempts at humor. The stereotypical gay lawyer in the fancy car was just stupid. There were a few other attempts, like Chris Evans yelling at some girl for talking on her phone while driving when he is doing the same thing. It didn't fit with the plot, and it was not funny. Although Kim Bassinger is a good actress most of the time, she had no help with the script. She goes between a helpless, dumb blonde and a brave fighter so many times in the movie. At first she can't do anything then she is saving herself and family then back to being a coward and so on. It got old fast. William H. Macey was the bright spot of the movie. Other than that it was weak.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fog (1980)
9/10
One of the best horror films.
20 August 2005
This movie was a great horror movie. Carpenter is a master at this craft. He didn't waste time making bloody scenes or goofy-looking evil guys in this film. He just used fog and a few silhouetted killers. This is a great example of a horror movie. Back when they realized blood and guts aren't scary, and silent killers you rarely get to see are much scarier than annoying killers who give speeches at the end of the movie. I won't go into detail on the plot. It's basically an eerie fog that sets on a town and the killing begins! This film resists all the temptations to overdo it. There is also an awesome ending. If you haven't seen it, go rent it, now!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Boogeyman (2005)
3/10
Big budgets gone to waste
20 August 2005
For a film with a decent budget, Boogeyman blows.

The plot showed potential at first. A kid who saw "the boogeyman" kill his father (although no one believes him) still fears the dark and closets, and still believes in the Boogeyman. He goes back to his childhood home to face his fears.

This movie could have been a lot scarier. It had the budget for special effects, but for some reason after the first 1/4 of the movie, the plot gets weaker and weaker until the pathetic, very easy, overly lame conclusion. It's like the writers pooped out after the first part of the movie. Then they just threw together some crap and tried to put the movie out of its misery.

If you like lame endings that leave you mad and wanting the 90 minutes of your life back you just wasted, try Boogeyman.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The scariest Disney movie ever!
20 August 2005
This movie terrified me as a child. So I ran across it and had to buy it. I was expecting it to be horrible and cheesy as an adult, but I was wrong.

This movie has some scary parts, even to adults, and I've watched hundreds of horror movies. This one still creates a few chills.

The basic plot is that a family moves to a new house next to some spooky old lady. One of the daughters starts seeing weird things, like a blind-folded girl in the mirror. She also learns the spooky old-lady neighbor had a daughter that disappeared about 20 or 30 years ago. She investigates this mystery despite the scary things that happen.

I promise this movie will at least give you a few chills. The creepy girl in the mirror still freaks me out. It's hard to believe this was a Disney film.
56 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The House of Dies Drear (1984 TV Movie)
7/10
A bizarre movie, but enjoyable
20 August 2005
This is a very strange movie with elements of history, some comedy and horror. I remembered being scared of it as a kid, and as an adult I can still appreciate this film.

It's basically the story of a family moving into a historic house that was owned by Dies Drear, an abolitionist who hid slaves and helped them escape. There is also a rumored treasure hidden somewhere on the land. The family is haunted in the house and meet a strange man who seems to know many of the secrets of the house.

It's a great film. Very clean with some pretty scary elements. No blood and guts and no bad language. It's educational too.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Delightfully Surprised
20 August 2005
I was expecting this film to be horrible, but I was delightfully surprised.

The basic plot is that a serial killer is filming himself kill people while proposing several thought-provoking questions and ideas. The fact that it is supposed to be "home-made" makes any bad camera shots acceptable. In fact, you'd expect some bad-quality scenes from a home-made movie.

The main actor seemed to be over-acting at first, until I realized he was actually acting perfectly for his role. He is supposed to be an arrogant but charming guy, and he does it well. This movie brings up a lot of good thoughts and observations about killing and the human nature. It works because of the low budget.

It's worth the rental.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Darkness (2002)
9/10
A scary film with a great ending
20 August 2005
This film combines elements of the haunted house genre with the possessed family member genre into a scary array of images with plenty of suspense, a decent plot-line and a great ending.

A family moves into a house and the son and dad begin acting very strange. We start to learn that the father has some suppressed memories in his past that deal with the house. The daughter tried to find out what mysteries lie in the house before it is too late.

Besides a poor attempt at romance, this movie did pretty well in all good horror categories. There was a creepy house, some frightening images, a family member turning bad, a dash of the occult, a crazy old man, scary music and plenty of twists (but not the annoying kind.)

I recommend this for any horror enthusiasts.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
86 Minutes of Torture! (Spoiler)
17 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Well I'll start with the good points. The movie was only 86 minutes long, and some of it was so bad it was funny. Now for the low points. My first warning sign came with an actual "warning" on the film. When it started the following "warning" was displayed: "The film you are about to see contains graphic and disturbing images. Because contrary to popular belief being killed is neither fun, pretty or romantic." I should have saved myself the 86 minutes and turned it off then. The first words of the film were: "I'm at the glue factory." It was some guy talking on his phone, and he was referring to a nursing home as a glue factory. I don't know why. So the basis of the movie is some kid is obsessed with the Zodiac Killer and starts imitating him. The budget for this film was at least 50 bucks and they must have used the cheapest cameras they could find. The acting was worse than me reading straight from a script. That's what is looked like they were doing. The script was horrible, and the big "twist" was that this guy who wrote a biography on the Zodiac Killer was actually the Zodiac Killer. Of course they tried to show this subtly but made it totally obvious within the first 10 minutes. Without any more painful details of the plot, here were some horrible highlights of the movie. They try to make the Zodiac Killer compare himself to an "army of one" because soldiers are really just murderers. Then they tried to make an attempt at "Satanic Worship" by showing some guys in black hoods in a meeting. The great "computer hacker" was able to get this kid's address when someone gave him the kid's name and phone number. For some reason he had to hack into the FBI to get someone address. I'm not sure why he didn't just look it up in the phone book or use whitepages.com. There was also a random allusion to 9/11 for no reason. I also learned that no matter where you get shot, blood will come out of your mouth within seconds.

So if you like really bad acting, sub-par scripts, bad camera work and an obvious plot, you'll love Zodiac Killer!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mansquito (2005 TV Movie)
4/10
Mansquito-----The Fly mixed with a werewolf?
17 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I swear the DVD I rented has this movie named as Mosquito Man, but that doesn't matter.

To start out I'll have to say this movie was better than I expected. Most of the acting was above average and the film quality was good. The special effects, mainly on the actual "mansquito" were weak, but the blood and guts were good.

The plot was your typical mutation monster plot like werewolves and the fly. It offers a new twist with having the guy who mutates be a convicted killer, and also has an interesting plot with the Doctor slowly mutating and struggling to stay human. A decent plot if you like mutation/horror films.

But the Mansquito was far too powerful. He had this impenetrable armor for some reason, and his blade-like arm was razor sharp. He devoured an entire SWAT team within seconds and survived a giant explosion. I didn't think he should have been so invincible, but it didn't hurt the film too much. There is also the horrible anti-climatic line "Hey Mansquito!" and then a gun shot followed by explosion.

Overall it was a good film if you like horror movies that are more funny than scary.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed