Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Miami Vice (2006)
7/10
better than expected
27 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Flashbacks of a white suit worn to the wedding of an ex-girlfriend's sister went through my mind when I saw that there was another Television show Turned Movie. Go ahead and laugh, but I am sure more than one of the men out there had an Angel's Flight suit or some other Don Johnson wannabe be piece of 80's kitch clothing.

I was very doubtful of the outcome until I saw they handed Miami Vice to director/writer Michael Mann. Mann, who brought us Heat, Ali, and Collateral adds another action film to his collection of hits with this version of the Miami Police Department's vice detective team of James 'Sonny" Crockett and Ricardo Tubbs. They're the guys who show up and make happen what the CSI folk figure out later.

In this Vice story, our heroes are about to break up a prostitution ring when they get a call from a non-active informant saying that there is something major going down and he is leaving. That this first story line goes away is good because it will give you a chance to get up to speed with the movie which starts above the speed limit in the very first frame and you need to get ready for the ride. This informant leads them to be assigned to an FBI task force investigating a drug ring that is going to involve Russians, Skinhead Nazis, Colombians and anyone else that can be thrown in. But that's not the important part. What is important is that the FBI task force has a leak that is getting agents killed. And since Miami PD is not part of it, Crockett (Colin Farrell from Phone Booth, Daredevil) and Tubbs (Jaime Foxx from Jarhead, Ray, Collateral) can be trusted to help the Feds get to the bottom of it.

Part of the charm of Vice, is that it doesn't stop to explain things to the slow kids in the audience. To Mann's credit, he doesn't dumb down the dialog to let us know the intricacies of what the main characters are talking about. There's no "Gee, if there is a bullet in his brain he was probably killed by the impact of it" pabulum that invades television cop shows. The characters all know what they are talking about and expect us to keep up or catch up during gunfire scenes. Also to Mann's credit, he does not throw in a stupid twist like Crockett and Tubb's boss is part of the conspiracy. That would have sucked. Don't worry, their boss is a good guy, like them.

The violence of Vice is another thing that is not dumbed or numbed down in this film. You don't just see a man getting shot and flying backwards from the impact, you see his insides come outside as each piece of lead tears apart the body. This is an R-rated film and it earns it. A strong warning to parents here if you think that the kids have seen cop shows and this is going to be the same..... NO.... This is lots of violence and it's not hidden by quick cuts and editing. And for those parents who don't mind their kids seeing bodies being ripped apart sinew by sinew, there are people having SEX, too! Good sex. With a 228 mile boat ride full of foreplay.

And speaking of those racing boats I have a quick side note here. This may be a plot problem but I am not sure. You know those Go-Go boats? The really fast racing ones? Do they have enough range to get from Miami to Havana? I didn't know the answer to that one and it might be something that needs 'xpalining. But by the time you see this scene, you will probably be completely entrenched in the story and can't wait to see the two characters in the boat get to Havana for a mojito and sex that you won't care.

I had been dreading this movie because if Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx were expected to act at all like their predecessors, it would have been a long couple of hours. But that did not happen. Farrell gets more screen time than Foxx, but they are both terrific. In looking back at Foxx's career, it was in another Mann film, ALI, that his career truly turned and he began getting away from the dufus parts to the serious Leading Man roles that he has had since. It was good to see him team up with Mann for the third time. He is an actor who is honing his craft and has become a reason to see a film. The best acting in the movie is turned, however, by John Ortiz, who plays Jose Yero, a mid-level management type in the crime syndicate. He is smart, and not so much evil as ruthless in running the business. Yero has been a lot of crime movies - The Opportunists, Narc, Ransom - but never anywhere close to top billing. This film could and should get him a lot more work, higher up the cast list. The Farrell love interest (there always IS one - it's in his contract) is Li Gong, last seen as the bad ass hooker Hatsumomo in Memoirs of a Geisha. I feel she was a little stilted and tight, but that might be the language block. When she is in scenes where she does not speak - and just relies on her body language, we see more of her abilities The soundtrack and sound are also terrific. Gunshots are loud and jarring and the background music makes you feel the heat on screen.

I enjoyed Miami Vice. It was much better than I expected and that does not happen enough for me. You need to like action flicks. Or watching Foxx and Farrell and Gong. But that is not difficult - Let it be your own little vice.
116 out of 209 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dark Arc (2004)
1/10
Its only April, and I have my worst movie of the year
14 April 2006
Review of Dark Arc Many people tell me they are jealous because I get to see lots of movies for free and all I have to do is write a page or so about them for FilmMonthly.com. I point out to them that it's not all wine and roses. Some of the movies I see are downright.....what's the phrase.... Steaming piles of maggot infested dog droppings. Case in point: Dark Arc.

Last night I subjected myself (and worse, my wife) to see what generously can be called a "quirky" independent film at the American Cinematheque's Egyptian Theater in Hollywood. Since you can tell where this review is going, let me at least say something positive: American Cinematheque is a great nonprofit that is dedicated to promoting everything about film - from the 100 year old silents through the current flicks by up and comers (and in some cases - down and outers). But let's go back to Dark Arc.

Regular readers of this reviewer are familiar with my theory of The Unholy Triumpherate of Film - whereby if one person Writes, Directs and Acts (as lead) in their film it is most likely going to be unwatchable because there is no one to look over this person's shoulder and at the least giggle, and at the most, tell them their "cinema vision" is a bunch of crap.

The latest member of my UTofF club is Dan Zukovic. This is his second Writer/Director/Actor effort. His first was The Next Big Thing. Don't try to find it, it has not been released on DVD. Not even for foreign release. So what does THAT tell you. When he is not doing his "Create my own vision" thing, Zukovic is taking minor roles in films to try and cobble together what can gratuitously be called a career in film (he played Disgruntled Agent in Agent Cody Banks and The Man with the Toupee in Feeling Called Glory). But back to Dark Arc.

It's official plot outline reads: "A mysterious comedy about love, lust, art and the power of the "charged image", Dark Arc follows the eccentric love triangle between an artist, a graphic designer and their inspiring muse." Wow. Now that is a movie I would like to see.

Zukovic secondarily explains it with one quote from his character, Viscount Laris, "Everyday there are a handful of images that stay with us. We see them by accident or design, create them consciously, or unconsciously, some stay with us for a day or two... most are forgot in minutes, seconds.... and of those images, maybe there's one that sticks out beyond all the others... the most powerful image of your life." OK, my Good Sense of Entertainment starts to tell me that these are the words of someone who feels himself an Artist of Film. And I am scared.

The acting in this film can best be characterized as... Worse than amateur. I have seen student films where the acting was better. The main figures, Ed Smith, Juxta, and the Viscount seem bored with themselves and everything around them. They should have seen the audience. There was a Q&A with the director etc. after the film and most of us were too bored with the movie to stay. In case you have gotten this far in the review, let me be clear: I have not hated a movie this much since The American Astronaut, and Dead Women in Lingerie. PEOPLE WHO MAKE MOVIES LIKE THIS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO MAKE MOVIES.
9 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed