Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Ninety minutes of my life I'll never get back...
4 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Horror movies are my thing. If it's horror, I'll watch it at least once, even if I know it's going to be dreadful, because usually there's something to at least make fun of--bad acting, not-so-special effects, absurd plot twists...that sort of thing. I kept my expectations extremely low for the dated, poorly-dubbed, heavily-edited version of this movie known as "Horror of the Zombies". When I say "low", I mean "barely above bargain-basement level" here.

My expectations were still not met.

It's not fair to judge the performances of the original actors in the film because this was a Spanish film dubbed into English by audio actors who obviously thought they had better things to do than actually pay attention to the movie for which they were providing voices. The term "phoned in" could have been created for these performances. Seriously. The plot--what there is of it--is silly and meandering. "Oh, hey, let's strand two models in bikinis in the middle of the Atlantic to be rescued by some passing ship as a publicity stunt! What, we lost contact with them? Okay, let's drag one of the model's girlfriends along with us as well as a second-rate college professor to see what happened to them! Oh look, it's a spooky deserted galleon--let's go exploring!" It just gets more ludicrous and improbable from there. The effects are special only in the sense of "riding the short bus" special--a ship that wouldn't even look convincing in a cheap souvenir bottle, a ripped-out throat that consists of fake blood smeared across someone's collarbone, and "zombies" that look about as scary as a ten-year-old's Halloween costume. To top it all off, there's not a single likable character in the bunch, so you find yourself rooting for the satanic zombies.

Do yourself a favor--skip this movie and watch "Carnival of Souls" instead.
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Showgirls (1995)
5/10
The cinematic definition of "so bad it's good"...
21 August 2008
I adore this movie. No, really, I do. If I were rating it solely on my fondness for it, I would easily give it a 9 or a 10. On the other hand, if I were going to judge this movie solely on its merits as "worthy" cinema--story, acting, technical prowess--it would rate a 1 or 2 stars at best.

So, what the hell, I split the difference.

First, let me tell you why I hate this movie. It doesn't work as soft-core porn--the sex scenes are either disturbing, degrading, or just plain silly (or even all three at once). It doesn't work as social commentary--we already knew show business was full of back-stabbing bitches and controlling bastards, so what's new here? It certainly doesn't work as a cautionary tale, though God knows it does its best in places. Indeed, this movie is so full damn of itself it's in danger of exploding like Mr. Creosote in "The Meaning of Life". Either that, or it feels ready to spontaneously condense into a microscopic black hole of sheer pretentiousness.

So what does this movie work as? ENTERTAINMENT! All it takes to love this movie is to know, going in, that none of the characters are likable, you're going to be subjected to a lot of oh-my-gosh-my-golly nudity and naughtiness, and that--most importantly--none of this has any bearing on anything remotely resembling reality. Showgirls takes place in its own little universe of sheer, joyous exploitation for its own sake. And this it does admirably well.

And, after all, isn't entertainment what movies are for? This is a great movie to watch with your friends. Google for a Showgirls drinking game and do tequila shots. You'll be hammered before you know it.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Supernova (2005 TV Movie)
2/10
Hey! You got your thriller in my disaster film!
15 March 2007
This would have made two decent TV-movies--well, okay, one decent TV-movie and one run-of-the-mill Lifetime Network "family threatened by slavering psycho" TV-movie. As it is--well...

I have this mental vision, sort of a cerebral YouTube video, of two harried scriptwriters colliding in a busy hallway. Papers fly everywhere as the two writers scrabble to reassemble their precious screenplays. Trying to sort everything out, one looks up and utters "Hey! You got your suspense-thriller in my disaster film!" The other responds "No, you got your disaster film in my suspense-thriller!" About that time, a producer emerges from his office and overhears the exchange--and thus, Supernova was born.

This movie has a lot of "I used to be famous!" stars, including Luke Perry, Emma Samms, Lance Henriksen, and other names who were popular sometime back in the 1980s. It also features Peter Fonda in a prominent role as an astronomer who is the first to discover the signs of impending doom. Somewhere in there is Tia Carrera, making sour faces and obviously wishing she was still doing Relic Hunter.

I give this movie two stars--one for Peter Fonda, and the other for Tia Carrera. That's probably two more than this movie deserves.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hello! Mixed Messages Alert!
10 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
So I was flipping channels and stumbled across TBN today. I saw a teaser for this movie and thought the stated premise actually sounded fairly intriguing. What if Jesus hadn't come to Earth to be born as a human being until, oh, say, 1990? Let's ignore for the moment the unifying influence the Christian Church had on Western culture, as well as the probability that without the Church (and its detractors), the United States probably wouldn't exist at all. (Hello, Puritans, anyone?) We don't do a lot of history-delving in this movie, nor should it be required. I grabbed some potato chips and sat back, careful to keep my spirits high and my expectations low.

Am I glad I did. I had a hard time for the first fifteen minutes or so telling Jesse (Jesus) from Jude (Judas). Seriously. I was also getting a really weird (and very unintentional) Brokeback Mountain vibe off of these two. Especially when the cheesy 1980s love songs to Jesse started. Yes, yes, I know they were supposed to be allegorical to gospel music. The whole "I love you, Jesse, I miss you so" theme to the funeral number still made me go "Hmmmm".

The story was actually fairly interesting right up to the climactic scene. When Jesse dies, so does the movie. With a resounding splat. It limps along for another fifteen, twenty minutes or so, falls to its knees (like Pete in Jesse's funeral procession), and then finally gasps its last, sides heaving, and goes face-down in the dirt.

Watch if you're bored, or for a giggle.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautifully brainless fun!
13 January 2006
Giant spiders attack a sleepy Arizona mining town. Zany hijinks ensue.

This movie is a nod--or a series of nods, really--to the classic B-movie "giant insect run amok" genre in the spirit of "Them!", "The Praying Mantis", and especially "Tarantula". A mixture of weird science gone wrong and shady double-dealing turns a local exotic spider collection into rampaging, man-eating monsters.

Is it scientifically accurate? Hell, no. Is it great drama? Afraid not. Is it Academy Award material? I don't think so. Is it *fun*? You bet! Part of the fun of this movie is that it *isn't* trying to educate anybody about the environment, the ozone layer, global warming, or terrorist attacks. It's beautifully brainless entertainment and if you like to laugh--a *lot*--you'll love this movie. Rent it! Now!
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not great cinema, but not dreadful.
20 April 2005
I went into watching Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever with few expectations, which is a good thing, because it isn't all that. Even so, it deserves better than the 3.5 average rating it gets here at IMDb. The story held a few surprises, and I'm not easily surprised. Lucy Liu looked fantastic, her moves were spot on, and Antonio Banderas was surprisingly charismatic as an agent with little or nothing to lose. I had a bit of trouble understanding why they justified an R rating; there's almost no blood, no gore or dismemberment, and a (relatively) low body count. There are a lot of explosions, some relatively decent hands-on action, and lots of spent brass in this flick. It has more plot than a lot of recent action films, and I appreciated the choice to make Sever a woman (Sever was originally a male role). While the action occasionally comes across in the spirit of the old MAD Magazine's "Spy vs. Spy" cartoons, it's still worth the watch if you like Banderas, Liu or lots of cars blowing up.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed