Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Let's Be Evil (2016)
2/10
What the hell was this film about?
26 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I like to consider myself a pretty intelligent person. Maybe not the smartest guy to ever live but I hold my own. And I've seen some films that while bad I USUALLY can find some redeeming qualities to.

Lets Be Evil?

None.

No scares.

Boring as the day is long.

The lighting and first person feel is terrible and in the end the 'twist' is not only predicable but we never really even attempt to give or get an explanation for whats actually going on.

Its a techno version of The Blair Witch (which I really didn't like to begin with) that doesn't even must up the brilliant viral campaign Blair had.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Freddy's Nightmares (1988–1990)
1/10
Freddy's Nightmares? More like the viewers nightmares.
19 May 2006
Wow. Simply awful. I was a fan of the original movie, and begrudgingly sat through part 2, 3 was and improvement. 4,5 and Freddy's Dead were pretty bad. But NOTHING is as bad as Freddy's Nightmares. Freddy acts as a Rod Serlingesq host of this anthology series.

I can accept how Freddy became one punchline after another, but at least in the movies the appeal of Freddy carried the movies, but here these were so poorly made, they looked like high school productions of a horror series. The poor actors, if you really want to call yourself that after doing this show were obviously exactly what they paid for. I'm nearly certain this was a stopping point for two types of actors. Ones just starting on the Hollywood ladder, brand new willing to take any part that would put off their having to take that porn job they were offered last week, or seasoned actors on their way down the Hollywood ladder willing to take any part that would put off their having to take that porn job they were offered last week.

I half expected Dana Plato to guest star, but she was already dead by the time this was in production.

To paraphrase Nancy's line in the original Elm St,"What ever you do try not to fall asleep watching this."
4 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beach Balls (1988)
10/10
Better than I imagined
9 March 2006
1st of all this could very well be an undiscovered gem of 80's B movie comedies.

Now don't think your getting the best movie ever made, the actors are headed by the guy that played Chaka in Land of the Lost (no kidding really), but don't let that fool you this movie is actually pretty funny, despite the other reviews here (which I respect, but disagree with).

I don't know, but what can I say, sit back don't over analyze it, and give it a chance it's better than you might think.

Plus what can I say Leslie Danon is pretty hot.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
War of the Worlds (1988–1990)
War of The Worlds the series: What went wrong?
4 March 2006
Ugh what can I say here. I liked this show I really did. Season 1 was pretty good. And overall it was a great concept.

Then came season 2.

I don't mind the idea that the aliens turned the tables and now our hero's had to fight an uphill battle that much. In all honesty it gave the series a more gritty tone it had lacked. I also don't mind the deaths of several of the characters from season 1 it gave the show an air of jeopardy. It upped the stakes.

But really after the season change the show just plain stunk. It was depressingly slow, and boring.

Now onto my main beef here. The DVD set of season 1. What a hunk of crap. Who was in charge of this transfer? It looks like they transfered directly from VHS (actually I have some episodes on VHS that are clearer than these DVD's are) with no clean up what so ever. This is the worst set I have ever purchased by far. The images are not clean, but distorted and barely watchable. NOt to mention their actually edited episodes. Cause the first episode has not even been restored to it's original airing cut that included Dr. Blackthorn as a child watching the war machines fall.

Avoid this DVD set at all costs. That is not a warning I've ever issued EVER!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
SeaQuest 2032 (1993–1996)
SeaQuest has its issues, but shouldn't be dismissed.
4 March 2006
At it's heart SeaQuest wasn't a bad show. I think done today it would greatly benefit from the fact that computer graphics have become so commonplace and affordable. An issue that was one of the major problems at the heart of SeaQuest. At 1 Million an episode (Unheard of at the time)there was obvious cuts that showed up on screen. The perfect example it in an episode where the SeaQuest has a giant bioillumenesant squid invading through the moon pool. The interior scenes have a number of old tricks that were obvious lifted from 1950's monster flicks. "Don't go in that room captain! It's in there!" and a clear rubber tentacle with blink lights, that is without a doubt silly looking and a budget crunched effect. Very Lost in Space-ish.

The next issue at hand is story. While not being awful in the first season the plots are often centered around you taking away an ocean lesson, which would later be echoed by Dr. Robert Ballard of Titanic fame. More often the not what was meant to be fun, comes off as silly, and what should be threatening or action packed is not. The menacing ball pit from Brothers and Sisters comes to mind. Even with these issues SeaQuest doesn't show any weaknesses that any other first season Sci Fi show hasn't had. It's struggling to find an identity, and establish itself. The first seasons of Star Trek:The Next Generation, and Deep Space 9 have the same sort of growing pains as well, but turned out fine once they had found it's voice.

The third issue which doesn't really show on screen is Roy Scheider himself. Roy clearly hated the show, and put the bad mouth on it as often as he could. In interviews both in print and on TV. In reflection the cut corner effects, and silly plot devices may have had something to do with Scheider's complaints, but face it when the star of a show torpedo's it how much longer is it likely to survive? Season 2 of SeaQuest saw a change in were it was filmed, which helped, and unfortunately a change in cast as well. Most of the principal cast stayed on, but the loss of Stacy Hiduk (spelled wrong I know) stunk. However we did get several new cast members that balance out the losses.

The effects didn't really get any better, but I think the crew got better at making the show, and it's effects budget run and look better.

The stories were starting to shape up a bit as well, but unfortunately not well enough.

Budget, coupled with sinking ratings, and the star bad mouthing the show made the changes that were coming for season 3 unavoidable.

Season 3 changes the format of the show considerably. It takes place years later, and Roy is replace by a man who has been in seemingly every bad movie ever Michael Ironside. While the show is dead in the water at this point. The stories started to get better, and were actually beginning to become something that might work.

Only problem is it was way too late. Ratings were in the toilet, the show was pre-empted for everything. It no longer had a standard day, or time slot. The cast had yet again another round of changes made for season three, and most of what the audience was familiar with had changed so much it no longer held interest to the fans that could find the show.

I gotta be honest. I loved SeaQuest, and as I watch season 1 on DVD I still do. I really wish SciFi channel would resurrect it like it did with Battlestar Galactica.

I recommend it with a sense of not overanylizing the show. If you do that I guarantee you won't like it, but given half a chance I think you'll find a buried treasure of sorts.

Did I use enough bad sea related jokes in this review?
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I know people didn't like it, but after watching it I've changed my mind
3 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I heard an awful lot about how bad this movie was. And when it came on late one nite I intended to watch for only a half hour to see how bad it really was. I found myself incredibly surprised. Yes reports were true production value is less than the original,and some of the more special FX shots were recycled from the original,however they made up for that by developing the newest bug that inhabits people. And instead of this movie being a galaxy spanning tale they kept it contained in the confines of the outpost which added a certain amount of paranoia to the flick. The performances were top notch, and the one thing I hated about the original was the WWII ish ads.**STAMP OUT THE BUGS** ugh. Thankfully that stuff only happened at the very bigging,and the very end.

Over all I implore you don't pass on this movie based on what you may have heard. Keep an open mind going into it. It's not as good as the original, but it really is pretty decent.

Plus a naked Kelly Carlson doesn't hurt either! ;)
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I love this movie!
14 February 2005
This movie is perhaps one of the worst acting examples ever,cheesy,silly,and and just all out bad acting.BUT! It is funny as hell.If it was remade with perhaps a better cast,and higher production values it might be a cult classic.If you liked Killer Klowns from Outer Space then you'll love this! Don't pass on it! Some of my favorite lines:Devil-"Say this wines a little dry.It's not his blood is it?", Devil-"So I said to Jesus if you wanna drag the crowds in you gotta spice up the act a little,instead of this the Mead shall inherit the earth,and that fan club he started for himself what does he call it? Christianity?", Chaser-"But he(god) had those damn Poloroids!"
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Arggggg Living Undies!!!!
12 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This movie gets a bad rep unedited it's great movie.Very suspenseful and terrifying! Now edited for television? It is one of the funniest movies ever the killer who in the unedited version kills women while he's naked,has a pair of undies matted in over his more sensitive areas,obviously frame by frame,and as a result his undies tend to look nearly alive on him! It's like the Venom creature from Spiderman comics! His 'living' undies also tend to change colors,from black to tan from scene to scene.

But my favorite thing was the editing of the dramatic,and violent end chase scenes.In the unedited version the chase tends to run around the half hour mark.Edit it for TV,and it wraps up in nearly 10! I love this movie either way!
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed