Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Eastern Plays (2009)
10/10
Perhaps my favorite Bulgarian movie
4 October 2012
Being a Bulgarian who has all but a few years outside of Bulgaria, I am always interested in watching Bulgarian cinema. Most of the time i am disappointed. Its always the same actors playing more or less the same role in the very cliché Bulgarian way; rigid and straightforward so that you cant buy into their character and you can tell they are acting. Oftentimes the roles of the characters don't change much. Characters are bland, Men are either dopey drunken alcoholics with a sense of humor or far too serious, while women are either whores or overly needy

I watched the movie and I was shocked, The characters were so vibrant and original, in fact a lot reminded me of friends I have in Bulgaria, the acting fluid and I didn't see them acting instead they looked so natural as if they were playing themselves.

The movie is about growing up in Bulgaria. One brother rebels against his parents, starts hanging out with soccer hooligans, and slowly beginning to become detriment to society. The other older brother is emerging from that lifestyle, fighting a drug addiction, and trying to put his life back together with art. Each battles on their own, but maintain an active relationship. The two worlds and brothers meet one fateful night and their paths are altered forever.

So I watched the the entire credits hoping to see a friend or someone I knew in them( as many of my friends work in film studios in Bulgaria), and at the end there was a dedication to Christo, The guy who played the main character also named Christo. Turns out the reason that the actors seemed so natural is that most of them were not actors, including Christo,(the main actor, who died of a drug overdose in the middle of filming) but rather the people in Christos life, including his girlfriend. In fact the movie was more or less based on his life, and when the director couldn't find anyone to play Christo, he just got Christo to play himself.

All in all the movie is really worth watching...whether you are Bulgarian or not.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lack of new evidence, jumps to wild conclusions, omits evidence that would contradict the theories presented
4 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
First off I want to say that I based this documentary on the content rather than my political opinions.

The documentary itself frames certain aspects of Obama's past and presidential policies. It presents them as one package under the theory that Obama is "anti-colonialist," and ultimately he is intentionally deconstructing America and the policies that created a superpower, in order to revert to a world without a superpower. Thus he can fulfill his fathers life goal of fighting an oppressive superpower which enslaved the third world, i.e. British colonization of Kenya. The documentary takes it one step further stating that Obama's goal was to take the wealth out of rich peoples hands, adding that even the poor people in America are considered rich by world standards. So effectively Obama wants to ruin the quality of life in America, hence why he is passing laws that do not follow a single traditional political sphere.

Ultimately this documentaries failure is in the fact that it provides very little original evidence/footage. Almost everything is file footage. Any interviews conducted solely for the documentary were with people who had spoken numerous times in past and simply regurgitated the same information again.

If you know nothing about politics, I do not recommend watching this documentary or at least do with a grain of salt, because the evidence is very one sided and damning. Evidence that contradicts the theories is simply omit. One very obvious point that the documentary makes is that Obama is against fighting in the third world, this is why he stayed out of Libya, Syria, Egypt. Yet the documentary does not mention that under Obama there are more troops in Afghanistan then ever before. There are many more instances that I could point out, but then this review would turn into a term paper.

Overall the documentary is persuasive but it relies on having an ignorant viewer. It presents a few facts that are neatly put together to form some sort of logical progression and presents them as undeniable truths. However, any one with a politics background and a neutral political stance can easy find the holes in the documentary.
39 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed