Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
She Made Me Cry Over a Goldfish!
5 November 2005
Early on in this film, one of our main characters, a shoe-salesman by the name of Richard still reeling from his separation from his wife and trying to deal with his closed-off sons, bemoans to his co-worker, "I don't want to have to do this, this living. I just walk around. I want to be swept off my feet, you know? I want my children to have magical powers. I am prepared for amazing things. I can handle it." Here then does writer/director/star Miranda July begin to turn our heads and show us how to look at the world with new child-like eyes in this remarkable little movie.

Having read nothing but glowing reviews since it's early buzz at Sundance where it received the Jury Prize, I was expecting a sweet little indie about people trying to connect to each other in an increasingly erratic and overloaded society. That's exactly what I got, but there was so much more. July is a poet, her scenes unfold effortlessly like an excited whisper shushing us into the lives of her cast of lonely souls. While several story lines play out, strolling past each other more so than interconnecting, the camera zooms around the inhabitants of Richard's small neighborhood illuminating moments of daring and bravado, innocence and shame, confusion and longing.

July plays Christine, a part-time cab driver for the elderly and aspiring performance artist. Her passengers sit up front as she chauffeurs them around, she and the old man she regularly picks up from the rest home talk about each other's lives, they share, they notice things around them (the goldfish!) that others are too busy to see. When Christine accompanies her charge to the shoe store, she is drawn to Richard after he talks her into buying a pair of pink vinyl flats to ease the pain caused by her low ankles. After Richard leaves work, setting off down the street for his car, Christine joins him in a walk towards the end of the block that turns into a metaphor for relationships and she shares a lifetime with him before they reach their destinations. But Richard, while he may be waiting for "amazing things to happen", becomes suddenly fearful and he pushes Christine away in bewilderment. He's a man perplexed by life and struggling to reach through the silence of his boys. John Hawkes, a notable cult actor who's been in countless films and television shows, gives such a wonderful and haunted performance here. His sharp and beakish features give him a hollowed, haggard look, but his eyes are wide and lit up, staring back at us with hopeful equanimity and searching for magic in his surroundings.

We're introduced to the other adults orbiting Richard's and Christine's daily existence, but midway through the film July starts to delve into the routines and discoveries of the children connected to this neighborhood. The film shifts its focus and now we witness sex, family, technology, and the concept of togetherness through their eyes. The teenagers have a sobering, almost clinical approach to their sexuality, and in one startling scene, the two local girls solicit Richard's oldest son into judging their oral talents. Yet, it's the youngest children who make the biggest impression. Brandon Ratcliff as Richard's youngest, Robby, and Carlie Westerman as their neighbors' daughter give two luminous performances, the type where only children can impart so much truth in a single expression. It's the world of consumerism and the internet filtered through their perceptions that July is most interested in, casting a pall of dread in several scenes, but also allowing a hopefulness for the future to flow from their gaze as they survey the adults clanging quarters, seeking acceptance, and bustling through their misery all around them.

A truly poetic film without a hint of pretension, I applaud July as a singular new voice in independent cinema and one that I'll be watching closely. I'm anticipating her next film already.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zelig (1983)
9/10
A Delightful Story In An Engaging Format
27 March 2005
Was this the first "mockumentary"? I checked out IMDb and it predates Guest, Reiner and co.'s This Is Spinal Tap by a year. Not only was it a fake documentary, it sustained the format throughout, never once breaking into an enacted scene. Allen told his story, set in his favorite time period, The Roaring 20's, using special lenses to create the old style newsreels. Using photo stills, mixing real footage with his, and providing exposition via modern-day "historians" and aged characters, he gave this innovative film such an authenticity that if one didn't know any better, you would swear there had been an actual Leonard Zelig.

Allen plays Leonard, a man so devoid of identity, so eager to assimilate, that he literally takes on the appearance or, at least, the attributes of anyone he comes in contact with. Mia Farrow plays his psychiatrist, Dr. Eudora Fletcher, and taken in smaller doses, she actually is perfect in this role. There are a few moments when you get to see an extended dialogue between the two, most notably when her brother is filming "The White Room" sessions at her country estate. This is the only time that Allen's shtick gets to flex, as he cracks jokes about teaching a Masturbation class. Advanced. I also loved Zelig groaning about Eudora's terrible cooking under hypnosis. Eventually, Dr. Fletcher is able to cure him, and with his newfound personality, he and Eudora fall in love.

Allen also introduces the idea of Zelig's story being filmed as a movie, so he inter cuts some of the news sources with scenes from the film (very funny). The one thing that really stood out for me, though, was this revelation towards the end of the film. Woody as Leonard Zelig was smiling. A lot. It was kind of weird to see, but his happiness actually imbued the film with positive emotion and charmed the pants off me (not literally, of course) to such a degree that I will undoubtedly be repeating my viewing pleasure many more times.

I'll be honest. There were moments early on that I perhaps wondered if he was going to be able to sustain my interest. I thought he might be playing this conceit a little too long. What had, in the first 20 minutes, been enchanting and amusing seemed to dwindle in the middle of the film. Would he really succeed at telling an engaging story in this method? Well, I stuck with it and I'm glad I did. He layers so many meanings into his character's transformations, and all of his historians offer different interpretations. The importance of being yourself. How Zelig's journey was America's journey during the tumultuous and wild 20's. He also has a great running gag about Moby Dick that lampoons the Great American Novel.

Will Allen ever be this innovative and original again? Well, it appears he's making an attempt with his newest film, Melinda and Melinda, in which he tells the same story twice, with one tone being humorous, while the other is tragic. If nothing else, he at least continues to strive for an authentic voice in this littered landscape of movie franchises and ridiculously insulting comedies. Go Woody.
63 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed