Reviews

First season was interesting and somewhat original. I rated it 8/10. But this second season is just plain boring and full of liberal propaganda. In every episode in second season there are at least two mentions of "toxic masculinity", "mansplaining", "white male privilege", etc. Then there are mentions of "anti-feminist" behaviour where those who say or do something deemed anti-feminist are being judged. Not to mention that the main character is a feminist, her 2 female best friends are lesbian couple and her best friend is gay black man. People are tired of liberal propaganda being forced down their throats, they just want to enjoy the show. But this show unfortunately has a clear agenda, especially in season 2. Supergirl was the first and only TV series that I had to stop watching because of heavy feminist propaganda (next to poor acting and even poorer special effects) and now You is the second TV series I have lost desire to watch. Unfortunately everything today is about propaganda, especially liberal and feminist propaganda. Many iconic and legendary franchises are being destroyed or targeted like Star Wars, Marvel movies, Oceans 11, now 007, etc. It's all about politics.

I don't know where to start. First it's really boring/pointless/stupid, you name it, to watch same main actor from Bloodsport II and III playing a different character in Bloodsport IV. Then plot... Just OMG... Totally uninteresting, poor acting, the story is awful, there are situations where you ask yourself "WTF is this" and "really?!", like when that policewoman is spilling drink over paper-made rose to find out secret message, also when it comes to shooting scenes in that bar at the start of the movie... I just can't understand how they were able to make such a poor movie, I wouldn't be able to do so even if I give my best. I think that 15 years old kid would make better movie and better plot. I give it 4/10 and that's me being really really generous! Bloodsport I was nice, Bloodsport II was watchable. But III and IV were just terrible!

Not interesting at all, plot is also bad. Bloodsport I was okay, II was kinda watchable, but III and IV are terrible! Poor acting, poor fighting scenes... This movie is one of those movies where you want to leave the cinema although you paid to watch it. Of course I didn't watch it in the cinema, but I was like "dear God, will it end already". You get bored watching it, you know the ending, there are no surprising parts, twists, nothing. I give it 5/10 while being very very generous! It's better than Bloodsport IV, but hey, that's not so hard since IV is one of the worst movies ever made! It would be better for director if he hadn't made sequels after first Bloodsport movie with van Damme. I'm really disappointed.

I watched first part of "Sniper" movie and it was decent. But this part 2 is just retarded! I needed like 45 mins into movie to figure out who is the "bad guy", where he's from, where's this movie taking part, why are they talking different language than supposed and how did they manage to place Serbian town Požaervac into Hungary, how the hell muslims lived 600 years in Eastern Europe etc.

For all of you who don't know the facts, let me help you:

1. This movie is filmed in Hungary, the story of the movie is taking place in Hungary too, but it's supposed to be taking place in Serbia 2. Actors speak Hungarian language, but they are supposedly Serbs 3. They transport imprisoned Cole from Hungarian town to Požarevac (Serbian town), like those 2 towns are in the same country and there are no borders 4. Sophia's brothers have Serbian names, but they speak Hungarian 5. That rifle isn't German Mauser by the way 6. It's not the muslims (Bosnians) who lived there for 600 years, but Serbs and Croats 7. It's not Serbs who were killing and expelling Bosnians but vice versa 8. That "Serbian" general they want to kill doesn't have Serbian name at all and he's obviously a Hungarian according to his name 9. A helicopter which "Serbian" special forces used in film has 'SFOR' inscription on it, which means "Stabilisation Force" and it was NATO's "peacekeeping" force, not Serbian 10.This is just another biased anti-Serbian movie, made to once more represent Serbs as terrorists, heartless murders and worst people

Bottom line: this movie insults the intelligence of average man. I put it into top 3 worst movies I've seen in my life. I don't know is it director's ignorance and stupidity, but knowing how America wants to represent Serbs I bet this is just another biased movie funded by American imperialists and masons, probably by George Soros, who himself is Hungarian. So many misleading and wrong historical facts, language replacement, countries swaping, geographical errors.

IF YOU READ THIS - DON'T BOTHER WATCHING THIS CRAP MOVIE!

Biased movie, made just in time to show the world once more that "Serbs are terrorists and war criminals that did atrocities to Muslim Bosnians" just before Muslim Albanian terrorists in Kosovo proclaimed independence 1 year later. I'm not trying to make this political simply because this movie is political itself! I hope Gere received a lot of money for this, because being a humanitarian and acting in biased movies that show false picture of serious things, like civil wars are, is really hilarious. It was Gere back in 2007, now in 2011 it's Angelina Jolie making another movie about "Serbian monsters and Bosnian helpless people". I wonder how much money did she get for directing something like that. Anyway, back to this movie, as I said, it's not worth watching, unless you have low IQ and you allow others to construct your own opinion about something that you, they and no one else know, except those people who actually lived there, saw and heard things and survived that civil war.