Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
North Country (2005)
7/10
North Country Fair
30 October 2005
This is surely a good film. It has all the right ingredients--great acting (especially from Charlize Theron and Frances McDormand), a powerful story that deserves to be told, and a stirring (albeit unrealistic) courtroom scene. Yet, I felt unattached to the characters, who seem to be going through the actions with little or no obvious motivation. Indeed, aside from the those played by Theron, McDormand, and Thomas Curtis (who played Theron's son), everyone seems incredibly one-dimensional. Then, the ending is so absurdly neat that it seems like it was crafted for a Disney cartoon.

When placed against the best films of the genre--"Norma Rae," "Silkwood," and, to a lesser extent, "Erin Brockovitch"--this film doesn't hold up. It's good, and it's worth seeing, but it aspires to a greatness it does not achieve.
0 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prime (2005)
5/10
A Prime Disappointment
30 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The premise of "Prime" is that Meryl Streep plays a Jewish psychologist named Lisa who learns from her 37-year-old Christian patient, Rafi (Uma Thurman), that she is romantically involved with Lisa's son, David, who is 23 (37 and 23 are both prime numbers). Streep then continues to treat Rafi, listening to the details of the couples sexcapades and on-again, off-again romance. If you can buy this premise (and surely it would warrant Lisa facing disciplinary action), then you might like the movie, which is certainly funny enough, for a while.

But as the film drags on, it becomes decreasingly funny and seems to morph into the sad scenes from "When Harry Met Sally," while layering on additional angst about interreligious relationships. Then, it just ends. This is clearly the result of weak direction and an uninspired script.

Streep and Thurman put in good performances, and some of the comic scenes are indeed funny, but when all is said and done, this is a prime disappointment.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Almost a Documentary
8 October 2005
"Good Night, and Good Luck," tells the story of CBS Newsman Edward R. Murrow's courageous fight against Senator Joseph McCarthy. As a student of both history and journalism, I have viewed Murrow as a hero and was very excited to see this film. Overall, David Strathairn's performance is impeccable, capturing Murrow's nuances, genius, and even the cigarette addiction that eventually killed him.

George Clooney directed this film and plays Fred Friendly, who produced Murrow's broadcasts. Clooney also is credited with co-writing the screenplay, and that's where the problem arises. Aside for the lengthy film footage of actual Senate sub-committee testimony, and the genuine, on-screen words of Murrow and others, the screenplay is sparse.

We get very little insight into the characters of Murrow, Friendly, and CBS President William Paley (played by Frank Langella). In addition, Clooney wastes a superb supporting cast including Patricia Clarkson, Robert Downey Jr., and Jeff Daniels.

Clearly, George Clooney has made a noble film that captures the spirit of the time and the words of those involved, and if there was ever any doubt that McCarthy was a self-serving hypocrite, it is erased by this film. But the director failed to develop characters that were interesting in their own right. As such, the film is only slightly more involving than a documentary on the subject might have been.
37 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In Her Shoes (2005)
8/10
Brilliant!
24 September 2005
Calling "In Her Shoes" a chick flick, as some have done, is absurdly dismissive. If a movie has to have killing, explosions, and car chases to not be a chick flick, then count me among the men who would rather see a film like this any day. This is a great screenplay from a fine book, directed flawlessly by Curtis Hanson (whose previous films have little resemblance to anything chick flick-like).

It also stars three actresses at the top of their form. Cameron Diaz does her best work by far, and Toni Collette surpasses her Oscar-nominated performance in "The Sixth Sense." Then there is Shirley MacLaine, who puts on an acting clinic--a perfectly calibrated performance by a truly remarkable talent.

Ridley and Tony Scott, who co-produced and executive produced this film (and who also produce the TV show "Numbers"), are clearly tuned into the joys and difficulties of being siblings. This film is about sisters who share history, baggage, a confused father, and a few important but differently interpreted events. If you need a car chase, drive as fast as you can to the theater to see this film.
21 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Corpse Bride (2005)
7/10
A Genre-Bending Marvel
23 September 2005
So, how do you classify Tim Burton's Corpse Bride? It's a story about true love temporarily interrupted...so it must be a romance. It's got several original song and dance numbers...so it's a musical. It has enough puns and double entendres to make anyone laugh...so it is a comedy. It's about corpses, ghouls, and skeletons....definitely horror material. And oh yes, it's done entirely in stop-action animation, suitable for all family member, except maybe the very young.

I've got it. Tim Burton's Corpse Bride is the first of a new genre--a romantic musical comedy horror animated family feature film. I wonder if the Golden Globes will create a new category.

But whatever you call it, this film is a marvel. Despite a few cloying characters (the Peter Lorre maggot being one) and songs of uneven quality, this is a movie worth watching...and watching. It is a visually stunning film with an enjoyable script that is voiced perfectly by an A-list cast. To borrow a line, you should definitely keep an eye out for it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Man (2005)
2/10
Why Can't They Do Better?
12 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I went to see this because at their best, Samuel L. Jackson and Eugene Levy are very likable and watchable actors. Unfortunately, this is not anyone's best--instead it is two actors rehashing old roles (Shaft meets Jim's Dad) in a cliché plot that relies on bathroom humor (peeing in the pool, a cavity search, and repeated bits about flatulence) rather than on any semblance of intelligent screen writing.

In fact, the whole plot around a multi-million dollar arms deal is based on the premise that the only way the arms dealer can identify his supposed buyer is that the buyer has a USA Today newspaper. Gee, that sure narrows it down, especially when meeting in a diner within walking distance of a major hotel. It only gets more stupid from there.

And maybe it's me, but I have trouble with someone (even Samuel L. Jackson) uttering lines like, "If you don't talk, I'm gonna beat you like a runaway slave." This is a bad screenplay being performed by actors who seem like they are phoning it in. When all is said and done, "The Man" should be thrown into the can.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
When the Whole Doesn't Equal the Sum of its Parts
6 September 2005
Here's a quiz: When do a great story, a good screenplay, and excellent acting add up to a mediocre movie? Answer: When the director gets in the way.

The Constant Gardener is based on a John LeCarre book with a screenplay by Jeffrey Caine. It stars Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz, who are superb in their roles, as is nearly every other actor in the movie. The problem is that Brazillian director Fernando Meirelles, making his first English-language film, shoots almost the entire film in hand-held close-ups, often intentionally blurry.

As a result, you are constantly reminded that you are watching a movie, which removes you from the thrilling experience this story is intended to evoke. It's like a 15-year-old future film student saying, "Hey I've got this new camera, and look at all the neat stuff I can do with it."

This should have been one of the year's best movies. Instead, it is difficult (and sometimes nauseating) to watch. I truly hope this is not a new trend in film-making.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Eye (2005)
3/10
More Plot Holes than I Thought was Possible.
22 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The main reasons to see "Red Eye" are Rachel McAdams, who delivers a stellar performance, and Jayma Mays, who is wonderful as the Assistant Hotel Manager. On the other hand, Cillian Murphy overacts so badly that he becomes cartoonish. The rest of the movie is riddled with plot holes, on which I will elaborate.

Please do not read further if you don't want to know what happens!

Here is a synopsis of the plot. Rachel McAdams's character (Lisa) manages a hotel where the new hard-nosed Homeland Security Director plans to stay that night. Rachel is returning to Miami from a funeral, but fielding calls from her assistant up until the plane leaves. In the meantime, someone is stationed outside the house of her father, Joe (played by Brian Cox), ready to kill him if Cillian Murphy (Jackson) calls. All Lisa has to do is phone the hotel and move the Director's suite to one where Jackson's cohorts are planning to fire a guided missile (from a fishing boat) to kill the Director and his family.

So, here are some of the plot holes or absurd coincidences:

1. Jackson finally convinces Lisa to make the call, and in the middle, the phones in the plane lose their connection. Lisa tries to fake that she is making the call, but coincidentally, a guy across the aisle from Jackson is also making a call and starts banging his phone to indicate it is dead. Jackson catches on and grabs the phone from Lisa.

2. At one point, Jackson head-butts Lisa and she, of course, gets knocked out...but only for 30 minutes.

3. Jackson catches Lisa writing a note on the mirror in the (extraordinarily large) lavatory, and he bangs her around a bit. Miraculously, the only one who hears anything is an 11-year-old girl, whose word, of course, is discounted.

4. Lisa stabs Jackson with a pen in the throat as the plane is landing, steals his cell phone, and makes a mad dash for the exit, fitting down the aisle between the seats and 18 rows of standing passengers. Despite knowing there is a passenger with a pen stuck in his throat, the flight attendants oblige Lisa by opening the door to the jet-way.

5. OK, all those are reasonable (if not highly unlikely). But here's where it gets really stupid. Lisa gets into the terminal at Miami Airport, and there is no cell phone signal (every major airport in America has great cell phone reception).

6. She runs through the airport with Jackson in hot pursuit, and no security officers even delay them.

7. Jackson, who lost Lisa in the Airport while the train from the gates pulled away to the terminal, has lost some of his voice from the pen in his throat, but he can still be somewhat understood. However, he doesn't bother to call his man outside of Joe's house. (PS: There is no train at Miami Airport, but the one they showed looked an awful lot like the Orlando Airport).

8. Lisa steals a car and rides away. Of course this time, when she goes to make a call, the cell phone says "low battery" and soon shuts off (when will they stop using this inane plot device?).

9. While the phone still said "low battery," Lisa had reached her assistant just in time to save the Director and his family from the guided missile launched by the fishing boat to the window of the room on the 40th floor to which the Director had been moved. Of course, they expect us not to notice that the hotel is surrounded on 3 sides by ocean, so the missile could have probably been launched at the first suite, thereby negating the need for the whole Lisa-Jackson plot. What's the story here? Was the Director's original room on the 38th floor one of the only rooms in the hotel with a lousy view? Nevertheless, everyone gets out just before the missile hits.

10. Lisa drives to Joe's house to save her father only to see the killer outside. Although she runs him over (as he is shooting at her) by crashing her Jeep into the house, no one in the neighborhood seems to notice or bother to stop by.

11. Jackson arrives at Joe's house and knocks him out (we don't see how...maybe another head butt). He then explains to Lisa that he didn't kill dad yet because he wanted dad to see Lisa die first (Give me a break. What is this? Saturday morning cartoons?).

12. For the rest of the movie (about 20 minutes), Jackson chases Lisa around the house, and she resourcefully fights him off. Of course a real killer (i.e. one maybe played by Jason Statham) would have done away with Lisa (or for that matter anyone who is not a trained killer) in the first 30 seconds. During the course of this chase, Jackson steps over Joe at least once without bothering to kill him.

13. Finally, Jackson prevails, and he is about to kill Lisa when (you guessed it) he is shot by Joe.

So, here's my suggestion...tell Wes Craven to stick to horror. Or maybe he should get together with Michael Bay (who directed the equally stupid "The Island") and make "Red Island."
86 out of 155 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Filthy Fun
15 August 2005
OK, I walked out of this movie feeling dirty. Most porn films have more taste than this film...it is just the lewdest movie I have ever seen or heard. That said, I remember several instances in which I was laughing hysterically, even as I questioned myself for laughing. This film is so off-color and so crude that it has to be laughed at. It essentially has 100 comedians (and 1 mime) telling (and/or commenting on) the same joke. It seems that this joke, and I won't tell it here, differs greatly depending on who is telling it, and the more foul and profane it becomes, the funnier it is.

As such, if you are remotely prudish, shy, wary of foul language, or if you prefer entertainment that is politically or socially correct, stay away from this film. If, like me, you can suspend your better sensibilities for an hour and a half in order to simultaneously laugh and grimace, try it out.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Quirky Genius
15 August 2005
This is a delightful little film about love in the digital age. It combines outstanding comedy with honest emotion to present a series of scenes about a number of interrelated people, each of whom is a bit odd, but real nonetheless. Writer/Star Miranda July reminds us of Rachel Griffiths with an unusual half-smile, which she uses to great effect to convey a wide range of emotions. There are no big-name stars, and I imagine no studio bosses to decide what audiences will or will not accept. So instead, what remains is an honest portrayal of real people with all their quirks, problems, and joys. Ms. July also manages to portray children and teenagers quite effectively as the real people they are, rather than the precocious know-it-alls or predictable archetypes to which most movies subject us. Overall, this is an enjoyable, surprising film that should be seen by anyone who truly likes movies.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fantastic Four (I) (2005)
6/10
Ignore the Reviews
10 July 2005
If you're going to a superhero movie to see intense drama and brilliant character development, get over it. That seems to be what the professional reviewers are looking to see in this movie. As a result, they tend to give it low scores or "thumbs down." However, if you want to see a visual reenactment of a comic book series that features outstanding action and characters that don't take themselves too seriously, this is a good film. There are several things that differentiate the Fantastic Four from other comic book superheroes. The first is that they don't wear masks or have hidden secret identities...they are who they are. Another key differentiator is that they rarely work alone, choosing instead to combine their powers into a super team...sort of like the New England Patriots. Actually, this is a good lesson for teams of all kinds, that each member has strengths that can be drawn upon for the success of the team. This movie depicts these differences and has fun doing so. So, ignore the reviews and go have some fun for yourself by seeing "The Fantastic Four."
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed