Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
A snail's pace with no payoff
20 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
After viewing the trailer, I was hopeful that Broken Flowers might prove to be a subtly humorous and sweet film such as Lost in Translation, which I very much liked. But by the end I, and my family, couldn't believe we had been made to sit through two hours of excruciatingly slow pacing for no seeming reason.

I am not a film buff, but am a theater person. Though I don't know all of Jarmusch's previous films, tactics, or techniques, I do understand some basic principles of storytelling, and I feel that this did not meet them satisfactorily. It is a beautiful and satisfying thing for the writer to leave something to the audiences' imagination, making them engage their imaginations to complete the story rather than remain passive viewers who are spoon fed answers and entertainment.But this can be taken too far, and I felt that the film left too much to the audience, without providing enough meat to sink our imaginations into.

The one really touching moment came,I thought, when at the end of his list of former girlfriends, he visits a graveyard and the gravestone of a former flame. A close shot catches Murray with tears welling in his eyes. This would have been a terrific moment...if we hadn't been made to wait so long that we didn't even care.

I agree with other comments that I saw little to no trace of the Don Juan that could have attracted so many women (including the four women in the film whom he supposedly bedded the same year). Even if he had had an incredible vigor in the past, why would he have a gorgeous girlfriend apparently 20 years his junior at present? And what does he want? I was never able to discover that. Without any seeming motivation and without the development of relationships or any type of build that culminated in anything significant, I felt cheated by the end. Any point that could be made in the film feels like it could have been made in the first 30 minutes. After that it was just more of the same. Whereas Lost in Translation made a statement about the loneliness of two people in a foreign country by its slow pace, it also interwove the pacing with a touching and unconventional relationship that gave the audience something to engage in and watch develop. Nothing seemed to develop here. Which raises the question, Why should we care?
136 out of 201 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Irreversible (2002)
Unnecessary violence, unnecessary film
22 November 2003
This movie was perhaps the worst movie I've ever seen in my life. During the rape/beating scene and the murder scene I had to mute the television and look away. I was so devastated and livid afterwards and those feelings have lingered for a week.

I am a performing artist, and I can understand that the ideas that a writer or director presents in a film, play, or other medium do not necessarily represent his/her viewpoints. But the question that kept pounding in my head throughout and after watching this film was WHY?

What can possibly be the point of the two obscenely graphic violent scenes in this movie? Why write this? Why shoot it? Why make actors portray it? To desensitize us to violence? Hardly. To de-glorify acts of violence? Well, these scenes are certainly less than glorious, but I am lost on any possible larger meaning. In a movie like Saving Private Ryan the creators show war in all its bloody realism in the hopes of de-glorifying what so many other films make look patriotic, noble, black and white. But did anyone think that rape or murder was glorious before watching this film?

Perhaps they did it to drive the plot? That can't be, since due to the reverse order of the film we hear about the young woman being raped and attacked and see her after it happens BEFORE we see the actual rape. We can imagine the actual attack with one look at her coma-stricken body - we absolutely do not need to see it. The only reason I can imagine that the director decides to show us this scene is to make the audience empathetic with the men when they seek revenge. But THEY do not see the actual attack - so they are basing their actions solely on her appearance after the attack. That's all we, the audience, would have needed to see.

The reverse plotline order is only interesting for the first few scenes and seems more tacked on rather than an intrinsic part of the movie. And is all of the explicit gay bashing language at the beginning of the film really necessary, not to mention all of the graphic and extreme gay club activities? They don't add anything to the film.

As a woman watching this movie, I have no idea what the director intended for me to come away with. I ended up feeling extremely angry, scared to ever walk alone, and like getting my blackbelt in karate would be an excellent idea.

Perhaps my biggest complaint it that the explanation of the film on the box was not more accurate. This is hardly a "sexy thriller."
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed