Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Jessica Jones (2015–2019)
6/10
Things fall apart
26 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
After having watched most Marvel movies, I was interested in Jessica Jones. I have quickly become bored of the artistic direction, rhythm and characters of the movies, so the promise of a different take was appealing. I have heard of, but not seen the Daredevil series yet, though I plan on watching it.

I just want to highlight a few things in this review, but in short, it is an above average show, with unremarkable directing that falls apart in its second half.

The characters and dialogue "Jessica Jones" offers up a lead character who is presented to as fairly complex. I write this because a large portion of the first episode's dialogue has characters deliver exposition about her character to her, which really bothered me, as it is just an easy method to say things about the character, without having actual creative ways to (visually) reveal it. There are so many sentences where characters tell each other who they are (you are this, you are that, you are selfish, you are kind on the inside etc.) that it boggles the mind. Just count the number of "you are" and "I am" sentences. They are a lazy solution to character development and make scenes that should have a strong emotional punch feel flat. Most of the other dialogue doesn't fare any better.

To regular movie consumers there is nothing exceptional about Jessica Jones' character, but that is possibly because of the pulp nature of the material. I felt the unnatural dialogue hurt some scenes, while the chemistry between characters supposedly romantically involved, was simply not there. Again, jumping back, there is an instance of her friend talking to Jessica Jones after talking to her and another character and then literally telling Jessica Jones that they have chemistry, that he obviously has feelings for her and she for him. If your characters don't have chemistry, and I think it was painfully lacking, than having her friend talk about this supposed electricity at length just seems misplaced and again, it is a lazy solution, and makes the scene, like quite a few dialogue driven one's just flat out boring.

Out of the cast David Tennant and Carrie-Anne Moss are highlights, but they also have two of the more interesting characters so it's not that surprising, although Moss's character gets less screen time in the shows second half, which is a shame. Krysten Ritter is enjoyable, however as the series went on the most enjoyable scenes were the ones with Tennant, so when he was off screen the show lost much of its dynamism.

The two parts of the season The series can be broken down into two halves, the first being a more noir-inspired, smaller scale affair, while the second is bigger, messier, with an inflated roster. To put it simply, the series somewhat loses its way through its second part. Episodes feel padded, scenes and characters could have been cut, the rhythm is off. Tennant really saves the second-half as there is not much of an arc to speak of, but at least the way we come to look at his character as we get to know him more is interesting. The first half feels much more urgent and has more style, though not by much. It gets by on a noir-inspired atmosphere, even though the direction or the scenes are never really visually interesting or do anything inspired with lighting, shadows, mood... I may have to watch it again, but on first viewing I found nothing visually compelling about the show, or just the general look of the show.

A quick word on the action-scenes and special effect: they are bland, cheap, just really not enjoyable, the choreography is non-existent and are just too predictable to create tension.

The story I wouldn't like to spoil much about the story. It is the type of story that on first glance makes you think like it was written for adults, and sure it has blood and mood and brooding, but it's just that: the surface image of mature material without the depth. It is completely acceptable as such.

What I appreciated All in all it was a serviceable series that sadly fell apart in its second-half and delivered an anti-climactic, but expected finale. However there was one other thing I noticed. As a Caucasian man who loves noir and older movies I never really appreciated just how "natural" it seemed to have white males dominate most roles (both negative and positive). Because I was primed by media previews and reviews to look at this series as a show that gives more space to female characters I noticed that white males were a very small portion of this cast. Indeed in the first episode the most prominent white male is just some idiot in a sports car and throughout the series there are only 2 (and a half) prominent white male characters. Now, the fact that the rest of the cast was made up of more women, or non-white males doesn't make it a better show, but it did help me realize that the white-male dominated movies which I grew up with, and hence, had considered "normal", were just as much of a choice on the producers and marketers part as the casting of this series. So for that, it was worth viewing.
14 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fateless (2005)
3/10
Worse than expected
21 February 2005
My school rented an entire cinema last Friday, so we could see the movie together. I read reviews of it before, but I didn't expect it to be this bad. I had a bad feeling before going to the cinema, because I thought, that while most movies, that are filmed after books are made in 10-15 years this was made in 4, with problems on the set slowing down filming.

It's about a Jewish boy in Hungary, who is taken to Auschwitz and Buchenwald and other camps during the end of WWII. It's hard to tell where he is most of the time, because we only get the boys narration telling us about it, but he never says why he was taken there, which is really frustrating.

The acting if fair, but there are some awful performances like Gyuris neighbor Annamária. I don't know how the director aloud that performance to be in the film. Most of the support cast are good, but most of them don't really have anything to do, or say, they just look like they were meant to be really moving.

The direction is the worst part of the movie, in my opinion. I never wanted to see a dynamic picture, but this was too much for me. The theme of direction is that we get a lot of episodes divided by fade ins and fade-outs. This is incredibly boring and monotonous and makes it hard to watch. Especially when most of the scenes are 1-2 minutes long and sometimes they have no end, or beginning. (Spoiler) Like when Gyuri is at the camp with tents in it. One night its heavily raining and Gyuri comes out from under the tents and goes towards the washing-troughs. It takes him 1 or 2 minutes to get there, because he always slips in the mud. This is a little boring after a while, so one can't help but wonder, why in the world is he going there. It's raining so it can't be that he wants to wash himself. So we wait patiently for him. And just as he reaches his destination what happens? Fade-out...(Spoiler off) We never get to know why he went or what happened there. Frustrating really. And there are some more scenes like this one. No beginning, no end, no meaning, no affect on the story, it's just there.

Another stupid thing about the scenes is that they mostly end with the camera taking a shot of Gyuris face. Most of the times he looks really sadly/seriously at something or is just staring into the "great beyond" (like Ben Affleck does, but this kid is better at it). Now this also gets boring after a while. And we never see what he is looking at or those sort of things. we just get to have his face. And this takes up at least a half hour of the movie.

Another flaw is that the movie is just too beautiful. You know, I never thought Buchenwald was such a pretty place. Most of the scenes are shot like this. Very picture-like, they are like small compositions (maybe thats why people don't move too much). And the fact that the colors are mostly black, pale-white and decay-yellow also add to the feeling that this movie is not life-like. Although I thought the book was good because of that fact.

The music is bad. I love Ennio Morricones music, but here it's just plain old bad. Too romantic... bad.

The dialogs aren't a strong point either. Imre Kertesz's novel was great, but after this movie it's clear that he is no screenwriter. Awkward sentences and words that don't really belong there.

The fact that there are some downright stupid things about it,(Spoiler) like when Gyuris is half-dead in a pile of other dead people, we see everyone naked, except Gyuri. It's not that I want to see the kid naked, but this sort of thing is just too dumb.(Spoiler off) These things make this movie seem a whole lot worse than it could have been.

After Schindler's List there isn't really anything shocking about the film, but that would be alright because the objective of the picture should have been to look at the story of the Holocaust through the eyes of a kid, from another point of view than we have had already seen many times. But the movie fails in that aspect too.

All in all, I am disappointed. This movie adds nothing new to the world of cinema. There is nothing outstanding about it. This movie could have been so much better. But it messed up up. Too bad. Maybe in a 50 years we'll get a good adaptation.
21 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed