Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good, not great, mostly killing time/setting the scene for Part 2
27 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It was exactly what I expected essentially. First of all, after reading the book, yes, a lot happens in the third installment, but it does not need to be split up into two movies. They could cut out a lot of the slow parts in the book and easily condense it into one movie. However, since this is clearly just a money making technique, they reserve Part 1 simply for killing time and setting up the action that will come in Part 2. This movie consisted solely of Katniss running around depressed and confused in District 13, struggling with her inner conflict of whether or not to accept her role as the Mockingjay, all the while worrying about the safety of her lover Peeta, a romance that after dragging the movies out over 2 years, is pretty dead and lacks chemistry in my opinion. I think that Jennifer Lawrence is an excellent actress, but it is often very difficult to show Katniss's emotional side in the movies due to the fact that the audience is not nearly as "inside her head" as the first person perspective delivers in the books. Honestly, she just comes off as a mopey hard a**, and gets less and less likable and emotion evoking with each movie.

Like I said, it was good, kept me entertained, but I would probably wait, save the money, and just rent it if you want to see it. Just like Harry Potter 7: Part 1, it's really nothing special and just sets the scene for Part 2. If you've been following this series strictly through the movies, it'll probably do more for you than if you've read the books and already know what's coming.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hugo (2011)
4/10
Not at all what it was made out to be, in a bad way
2 July 2012
I had wanted to see this movie for a long time. After getting all these nominations and winning 5 Oscars, beating out The Descendants (which I loved), I figured it had to be good. I was wrong. The only amazing aspect of this movie was the visual. I'll give them that, the costumes, set design, and CGI were really cool to look at, but that's not going to keep me entertained for 2 hours. The plot line was utterly boring and pointless, while the acting from pretty much everyone was over-dramatic and cheesy. I can't seem to understand what all the big fuss is about this movie. From watching the trailers, I got the impression, as did the rest of the world I'm sure, that it was an Action/Adventure movie about an orphan boy in a train station trying to unlock a secret about his father. Sort of like A Series of Unfortunate Events, right? Nope.

Here's a few things that I did not like (the list goes on and on): First, the plot is really boring to begin with. It seems that they spend the first 30 minutes of the movie just setting the scene, with the little boy Hugo just running around the train station. Gets your attention at first, but gets boring really fast. Then, as soon as you think the movie has climaxed and about to get a little better, they completely scrap the already boring plot they had and pursue and even more boring one. If you've seen the movie, then you know that the resolve/ending was just a way for Scorsese to discreetly glorify himself and suck up to the Academy. Definitely don't take the kids to this one. It looks so kid friendly and fun for the whole family, but I promise, you will be asleep within the first hour. And one more thing, why the heck is EVERY character speaking in a British accent when they are in Paris??? Very unrealistic and obnoxious. Easy fix: set it in London! Big picture, I was extremely disappointed in this movie and am still confused as to why it is so critically acclaimed.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dark Shadows (2012)
5/10
Started out good, all downhill from there...
14 May 2012
I was really excited to see this movie after seeing the trailer on TV all the time. I love Johnny Depp and Tim Burton's done some good stuff, so I figured it would be a pretty decent movie. However, the trailers completely give you the wrong image, making it out to be a funny "fish out of water" comedy, when the movie itself it pretty dark and intense. I figured from the trailer it was PG-13 most likely because of language, but it was pretty violent and a bit sexual, not something you want your 6 year old seeing. Another thing, (I hate it when they do this!) ALL THE FUNNY LINES ARE IN THE TRAILER! So if you've seen the trailer, I kid you not, you've seen the entire comedic aspect of the movie.

They could have totally gone in another direction by making this strictly a comedy with not nearly as dramatic and intense a plot. I would have enjoyed it much better if it focused on the funny things Barnabas does while trying to assimilate into society, like the Disney movie "Enchanted" or "Back to the Future." There is one scene where Barnabas sees a McDonald's sign and thinks it's the Devil and another where he rips open the family TV thinking there is a "tiny songstress" inside! Why wasn't there more of that in the movie and why wasn't that the main focus? Instead, the story focuses on a corporate battle and the rivalry between Barnabas and the witch Angelique. Honestly, the rest of the characters are just pointless and do nothing. I get that Tim Burton was trying to stay true to the old TV show, but by doing that, he ends up cramming in a bunch of little subplots that are really pointless and lead no where. He could have appealed to a much larger audience and most likely been more successful if he had stuck with the comedy and even possibly made the film PG. To sum it all up, MORE COMEDY, LESS WEIRD DRAMA.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More Action/Adventure than a Horror movie
4 February 2012
I mean, it wasn't completely AWFUL; it kept me pretty entertained. I thought Bailey Madison did a fantastic job in her role. The story line was kind of stupid though and there were a lot of plot holes that made the whole thing just not make sense and really unrealistic. I kept asking myself "why didn't they just do this?" and "why didn't they just do that?" I don't know why, but I felt like I was watching "The Spiderwick Chronicles" instead of a horror movie. The "scary" scenes just weren't scary. I wanted to see a ghost or some insidious spirit, not a pack of mutant zombie rodents that live in a fireplace! In general, there was just too much fantasy and not enough truly frightening scenes.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rango (2011)
8/10
Great animated movie!
5 March 2011
I went to go see this movie with my family and I definitely enjoyed it more than I thought I would. I mean, don't get me wrong I love Johnny Depp and all, but looked to me like this movie just wouldn't live up to his reputation. I was wrong. The storyline is very well put together, with just enough comedy that's understandable for younger children and just enough action to keep you entertained without having to make the rating PG-13. The character of Rango very much showed traits of Jack Sparrow, probably Depp's most well known character from Pirates of the Caribbean, and was definitely appealing and easy to relate to for the audience (we all want to feel like a hero sometimes!). What blew me away though was the absolutely incredible animation! The characters seem so lifelike and not even the simplest detail is ever forgotten in each scene. Overall, it's a great movie for all ages and I recommend seeing it on your next trip to the theater!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beastly (2011)
7/10
May disappoint readers of the book, but not a bad movie
4 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
If you've read the book Beastly, you're probably pretty psyched about the new movie adaptation that just came out. For those of you who haven't read it, it's basically a modern version of Beauty and the Beast about a selfish teenage boy named Kyle who cares only about his looks, and after blowing off his date to the dance, a witch named Kendra, gets transformed by Kendra into a hideous beast and is forced to live isolated from the world, with only his humorous blind teacher and loving housekeeper for company. The catch to the spell is that Kyle can have his looks back if he can get a girl to fall in love with him and "see him for who he truly is" within a year. Kyle thinks this task impossible, but then fate steps in and leads him to Lindy, a somewhat awkward, but very intelligent girl. Well, this movie is one of many that did not stay true to the book very well, but was still enjoyable for anyone who didn't mind the tweaks or hadn't read the book at all. They didn't butcher it in a bad way, is what I'm trying to say.First of all, many of the names were changed and I don't understand why. It's not as if they needed to change the names; it seems like it may have been something the director(s) just did for fun. Another small concern I had was Vanessa Hudgens, and it's not about her acting. She was way too gorgeous! Whoever did her hair, makeup, and wardrobe, you hit the nail on the head with the beauty factor. I think this is the prettiest I've seen her look, to be honest. And unfortunately, that's just didn't fit with how I pictured Lindy. Vanessa's still gorgeous and I'm definitely not fuming with anger about it, but in an interview, Hudgens said, "Lindy's kind of the girl that no one notices." Umm, not with the way you were looking in that movie! I found it very unrealistic that someone that gorgeous would have the life and social skills of someone like Lindy. I think the directors were trying to stay true to the original Disney's Beauty and the Beast, being that Belle was known for her looks, but odd and independent personality. They may have also done this to emphasize even more how ugly Kyle was! Kyle also was not a furry beast like the Disney movie as it describes in the book. That I can completely understand. That would just be way too much makeup work and too much of their time. What killed me the most about this movie was the ending. It was very rushed and was so abrupt. After reading the book, I had much higher expectations.

Overall, this is a typical chick-flick that is enjoyable and pretty entertaining for those who haven't read the book, but may be a bit angering to those who have because of all the changes that were made. Therefore, if you're not dying to see it or are getting this vibe that you might hate it, just wait until the DVD comes out and rent it. It's a better book than a movie, but still great for just watching for pleasure or with friends. Read the book before or after you watch it and see what you think!
35 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed