Change Your Image
comicbookfilmfan
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againReviews
The Perks of Being a Wallflower (2012)
The Perks of a Great Cast, Writing and Direction
Spoiler Alert: There will be some spoilers in this review.
I was very fortunate to have finally seen Perks of Being a Wallflower (POBAW) at an advance screening courtesy of a fellow film fanatic and blogger. I had to travel for the most part of a day through a couple of States to get to the screening but it was worth every penny of the toll fees charged.
Disclosure: I read POBAW nearly 10 years ago when I was just about to start college and it remains one of my favorite books alongside works by Thomas Pynchon, Jane Austen, Sylvia Plath, John Irving, Gore Vidal - a very eclectic bunch.
I had also been tracking any plans to make a film version of the novel since 2008 when Chbosky was quoted in an online interview that he was working on a script based on his novel. I thought that's a very hopeful, positive and at the same time brave sign. Around the time I read the novel, I was also totally engrossed in a new drama series on the WB called "Jack and Bobby" which starred a then 12-13 year old actor named Logan Lerman whom I had seen previously in the cult favorite "The Butterfly Effect" as a young Ashton Kutcher and the Hallmark Hall of Fame movie "A Painted House". I was struck by the maturity of Lerman's weekly output in Jack and Bobby and thought at the time that he reminded me so much of Charlie in POBAW.
Fast forward to 2010 when Variety broke the news that Lerman, Chbosky and Emma Watson were all involved in the POBAW film with John Malkovich's Mr. Mudd Productions - I knew then that it was going to be special.
And it is. It is a faithful adaptation of the novel to the screen but not necessarily a set piece-for-set piece accurate one. More than the plot elements and details, it is the story arc and the emotions in the written work that have made a successful transition to the screen. For that I must credit Chbosky for knowing what to cut and what to retain in the film version. Even the use of songs other than those in Charlie's mixtape works because the director and the entire team know the essence of the book and how and why it has affected so many readers and they respected it.
Spoilers: There is no abortion scene, no reading of Dr. Earl Reum's moving poem in the film or some of the scenes with Charlie's extended family over the holidays and yet, I have to agree wholeheartedly with Chbosky's decision on this. Fans of the book should not get into a twist because some of these will not be seen because Charlie's story and more importantly, his unique voice is there in all it's quirky, lovable and emotional beauty.
Don't let the obviously very commercial trailer fool you, the film retains the book's darker moments and the demons which torment the protagonist.
As for the acting, I cannot say enough about how the cast embodied and fully embraced the characters they were playing. First off, those who know Logan Lerman only from his Percy Jackon-franchise should take another look at this promising young actor. I have seen Lerman in other performances in 3:10 to Yuma and My One and Only and always found him to be a mature and sensitive actor. And while his performances in those films are noteworthy, Perks allows him to show his full range and versatility. He is Charlie no doubt about it and imbues the role with sophistication and emotion. I realize the Academy doesn't take notice of younger actors unlike the actress categories but Lerman's performance is truly awards-worthy.
Ezra Miller's portrayal of Patrick may surprise some fans of the book as his characterization may be slightly more flamboyant than the Nothing of the book but he delivers a funny, outrageous but ultimately warm performance.
Now Emma Watson really needs to do more work on her American accent as her natural one flits in and out but it doesn't totally distract from a winsome and winning performance as Sam. Perhaps not in the same league as Lerman and Miller but certainly a departure and breakthrough from just being known as Hermione. The actress knows how to choose material. Also the chemistry between her and Lerman is outstanding.
Mae Whitman, Paul Rudd, Joan Cusack, Kate Walsh, Dylan McDermott and the always great Melanie Lynskey also make wonderful contributions. I wish though that we had seen more of the young actor Chbosky cast as Michael (cut out of the film) and Julia Garner of Electrick Children.
Just a last note, Chbosky makes full use of his Pittsburgh setting to situate the characters in the film. The Christmas/holiday scenes are beautiful visually and so is the RHPS.
If there is one thing I hope fans of POBAW will do is to tell people they know to see the film. This is not your typical teen fare and certainly miles ahead of the Twilight series and the Hunger Games. As a coming-of-age film, I would place this in the same league as "Dead Poets' Society" and the classic "Harold and Maude". More substantial than John Hughes' work. This is real. I would love it if families could see this film together. It deserves nothing less. I hope that there is enough critical mass at TIFF and beyond to elevate this film for the accolades it deserves.
The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
Extremely Engaging - an enjoyable movie experience
As a longtime fan of Batman, I rejoiced every time there was news of a big screen incarnation of the character and his unique, dark story. I liked the 2 Burton films but when Nolan unveiled his first in the trilogy, I was an instant fan. And in the hands of Christian Bale, I felt that fans got the Batman/Bruce Wayne portrayal they truly deserved.
I honestly don't get why some critics found TDKR disappointing. Maybe they prefer the darker, crime movie elements of TDK and the face-off between the Joker and Batman or maybe the 3rd film felt too much like other Nolan films (The Prestige and Inception) with plot twists and an extended closing sequence tying all the threads together. But after having seen the first 2 Batman films before heading off to the theater to see the last installment, I can honestly say that TDKR is my favorite of the trilogy.
Setting aside the unique experience of seeing it unfold on IMAX, the film satisfies on all levels - the emotional core of the film remains intact with Michael Caine's superb Alfred and Bale's deeply wounded Bruce Wayne. There are fresh elements in Anne Hathaway's sexy and mercurial Selina Kyle and JGLevitt's earnest portrayal of John Blake. The rest of the old cast: a wonderful as always Gary Oldman, the reassuring Lucius Fox, even the cameo by Liam Neeson - was enough to send viewers at the screening I attended applaud with glee. Bane was likewise a menacing presence.
TDKR bridges the more conventional elements of the origins film in Batman Begins and retains some of the darkness of TDK. Even better, with each set piece (the motorcycle hostage taking at the NYSE was edge-of-your seat amazing)and quiet moment between key characters, Nolan has given us a great 3rd film.
And lastly, kudos to the director for bringing Bale and Hathaway together on screen. The chemistry between the 2 actors is something I haven't seen in a long time. Positively purrrfecct.