Change Your Image
moviestar26
Please feel free to share any thoughts and feelings that you may have.
The Canyons
Basic instinct
Killer inside me
Hot Tamale
Jackie Brown
Lost Highway
Blood and wine
Kill Me Again
Palmetto
Bound
Wild Things
Red Rock West
The Hot Spot
Delusion
Intersection
Fashion
U Turn
King of new york
Pulp Fiction
Satya
Waisa bhi hota hai
Baarah Aana
Charlie's angels
Private Detective
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
The Canyons (2013)
Erotic neo noir
"The Canyons" is Hollywood's latest offering in noir genre. This is more akin to the extra marital affair theme. The trailers were very intriguing at first that never seemed to reveal any elements of the plot. The only thing that was depicted was that the film involved the complex relationships between three main characters. From the start I had the doubt that this will not have much in terms of substance or plot. After seeing it my doubts were confirmed. I was disappointed with the lack of narrative.
Directed by Paul Shrader, whose previous works such as 'american gigolo, raging bull, and taxi driver received much appraise and he became renowned as a high level director. However I would give the man more due for his writing capabilities as many of his screenplays have been original. Though I feel pity for him seeing that he never won any awards which he truly had deserved. Some of his works may have inspired Abel Ferrara's ideas like 'Ms 45' and 'Driller Killer. This movie doesn't categorise under his speciality but he deserves credit for attempting something that most directors would refuse to do.
The theme of adultery in it self is something that many film studios no longer have the interest to invest in. It is a risky venture that has minimum profitability and generates less revenue than big budget movies. It doesn't seem to attract producers neither the audiences. But in this situation if there are established stars mixed with a little erotic and sex, it can go a long way. This film takes a different look at relationships. The common aspects are still existent. There is less emphasis on the female star but more depth to the character of the male. Certain qualities of his are difficult to accept, but here the lead actor is depicted as in obsessive and intelligent individual. It is almost as if the roles have been reversed. It reminds one very much of Michael Douglas from 'A perfect murder'. Very devious and cunning. The elements of affairs, deception and murder are all included in the film. However there was an opportunity to do more with the script. But I guess with the limited budget there was restrictions with the plot. The film is very straightforward. There is mystery to solve. What is intriguing is how each character is developed and the interactions and relations they have with one another. This is the unique element of the movie. They play mind games and try to conceal link ups they have.
The screenplay has been written by Bret Easton Ellis who is formally renowned for his famous 'American Psycho' novel and many others., which was adapted to the screen in hilarious fashion. I appreciated his 'Informers' that came across as shocking for it's self destruction content. This enabled me to understand Bret's imagination more. He prefers to dwell in to the psyche of the individual rather than telling a story. He seems to have a very negative view on human behaviour. Although I could agree on some of his perception of people. But he seems to depict the entertainment industry and struggling celebrities as people who are hungry for sex to achieve fame. I would agree on certain elements of his thoughts. But how about showing the industry in positive light?. It is almost as if he is trying to send a message out to people. Initially I thought 'The Canyons' was based on one of his novels, but it turned out to be a fresh screenplay. I was surprised to say he has done a commendable job. His style is very reminiscent of his novels. There is nothing new in terms of a plot but the highlight of the film is the interactions and conversations that the characters have with one another. And I was very keen to see how this would end.
As I mentioned, this is not a movie to admire for it's plot. But what is unique are the performances and the dialogues the actors have with one another. Breat Easton has managed to depict another side of the human mind. Here people are portrayed as ambitious individuals who will go to any extent to achieve their dreams and ambitions. I found Christian's character to be quiet hard to believe. He seemed to have double standards having open relationships with other women, but was hostile when he discovers Tara seeing someone. This makes it difficult to a certain extent to accept him. In relation to the climax he neither takes the typical form of revenge, but instead his alternate action is understandable. It reminded me very much of what Richard Gere had done when he discovered his wife was seeing somebody in 'Unfaithful'. Once again as in a majority of neo noir films the female is portrayed as the innocent victim. Tara is selfish but desiring to reacquaint a relationship with somebody from the past was absurd. However I would not say I was dissatisfied with the ending. It was just a surprise.
This film marked the debut of adult film star James Deen. He seemed very convincing and gave an honest performance. Initially I was curious to see how he would act in a mainstream film. I was surprised that his screen presence was suitable on camera. But in the end his psychotic behaviour seemed overrated. Lydnsey Lohan gives possibly the best performance of her career to date. Many film audiences have criticised her acting for being below standard. But here she proves them wrong. Overall the film has nothing new to offer in terms of plot. This may be a issue for some, but instead it gives a different perspective on relationships. The entire film has a 50's atmosphere. Perhaps if shot in black and white it could have had a different outcome. The erotic scenes may encourage some to see it.
Basic Instinct (1992)
Sharon Stone's finest hour
'Basic Instinct' was a film that rebooted the noir genre after it became rare in the early eighties. Prior to this the Coen brother's 'Blood Simple' attempted to revive the genre, but the industry was changing with the shift in audience's movie preferences. However this is more akin to being a sex thriller which also happens to incorporate a suspense element. 'Basic Instinct' takes the viewer back in time to the golden era of cinema when the femme fatales were glamorising the screen and became every male's dream fantasy. The film has been considered a classic and has not dated with time. The theme has been beautifully been
One of my cult classic favourites from the 1990s. Whenever I catch a scene randomly on television, it brings back nostalgic memories of my childhood. I can still remember waking in the middle of the night just so I could record this movie secretly on my VCR. This is the movie that catapulted stone's career to international stardom. She immediately became a sex symbol and every man began dreaming of her. She immortalised a role that was so deep in characterisation. 'Catherine Trammel' was someone that was not only devious but smart, clever and manipulative. A role model so to speak that will certainly serve as an influence to many aspiring actresses and writers in the future. The role possessed every element that a negative character would have.
Joe Esterhas is the writer. Previously he wrote 'Flash dance' and 'jagged edge' Most of his themes are similar. All negative roles about killers and murderers. 'Showgirls' and 'Jade' were also adapted for the screen. Unfortunately they failed at the box office and did not work. I think the audiences had higher expectations. 'Basic Instinct' has a fantastic script. This is the reason why the film worked. And then there is Paul Verhoeven who is a well known director in his home land. He has beautifully combined sex with the suspense genre. I am not very familiar with his Dutch movies. But he always had the style of depicting the theme of 'sex' as a weapon. I enjoyed the movie immensely, and being more of a reader than a movie- goer I jumped at the chance to read the book subsequent to seeing the motion picture. However, I feel that much of which made the movie great owes gratitude to the incredible soundtrack, imagery and skill of the actors; sometimes movies can be successfully novelised, but with Basic Instinct being the stimulus-rich move that it is I feel this was a failed attempt. The characters come off as threadbare and unexplored, lacking in depth or substance of any kind, and the seductively dark tone of the movie is lost on the page; it becomes rather humdrum and glancing, as if each page were written to keep up with the flow of the movie to be read within the hour. Where I was hoping to see some of the twisted, genius logic of Catherine Tramell explored on the page instead I found her to be de-powered, humanised and lacking of a great deal of her appeal as a result. It's worth the read for big fans of the Basic Instinct movies if only to explore the idea through a different form of media,
(SPOILER) A San Francisco police detective who is investigated the murder of a retired rock star. The main suspect happens to be a novelist. She is under suspicion. She is released due to lack of evidence. Meanwhile the detective has maintains his belief that she is involved. He decides to pursue her and monitor her movements. The deeper his investigation proceeds, he succumbs to her charm and falls in love in spite knowing he is risking his life. His infatuation distances him from people around him and he refuses to listen to others. People he know become murdered. Eventually he finds it difficult to accept that she is a murderer as he begins to doubt his psychiatrist's past. (END OF SPOILER)
The film is made with a sexy noir thriller tone. It brings back memories of Lawrence Kasden's 'Body Heat'. This was the last time a lead actress made an impression with a memorable role. Kathleen Turner became a popular star. At many moments the film feels like a horror thriller. There are many scenes that evoke a frightening feeling. What makes 'Basic Instinct' so unique is we are watching a women manipulating us with her attractive appeal that makes us want to believe she can be a killer. Her seductive charm works on the male protagonist, which leads to confusion. At the end we are eager to want to see her apprehended because we are disgusted how someone can desire to get away with murder for no reason. The sex scenes were unique and were the closest that could be categorised as 'soft porn'. This was one of the appealing factors that mad the film a success.
'Basic Instinct' has sustained it's quality over the years. It has managed to preserve it's quality and has not paled in front of movies that released recently. Due credit goes to Sharon Stone's performance and a winning script by Esterhas. The movie does follow true to the noir conventions. Anyone who is familiar with this will be able to notice them. However some of the typical noir rules were missing. There was no themes related to adultery or blackmailing. But it's relevance or lack of it doesn't seem significant as the this was a character driven film.
Jerry Goldsmith's background score is specifically suited to the film's mood and atmosphere. It is still memorable and has different shades throughout the movie. It blends well with scenes and evokes the intriguing and haunting feeling.
The Killer Inside Me (2010)
An improvement than the 70's version
Noir genre has declined at an exceptionally high rate after the end of the 90s. As trends and movie preferences change cinema continues to evolve. Post the year 2000 there have been a coupe of releases that have managed to look appealing. Creating a original theme is really rare. Recent releases such as 'kiss kiss bang bang, black dahlia hadn't received the appreciation it received. They were highly criticised by not only the critics but also by audiences also. Many writers had to resort to making movie adaptations. 'The killer inside me' is a very recent release which attempts to depict a genuine movie version of Jim Thompson's 1956 novel. Micheal Winterbottom has been making Hollywood movies for some time now and this has been a debut for making a movie of this theme. Noir can't be everyone's terrority. However the director has managed to create dark and brutal picture of a sadistic and violent mind. His version is convincing, unfortunately some may have alternative opinions. The original adaptation was made in the seventies. Similarities are very near but there are a couple of elements that set both films apart. For instance John Curran who is the screenwriter has incorporated some graphic violence at 3 intervals. And has given the main character a deep rooted psychotic and sexually demented appearance.
Jim Thompson is one of my favourite crime authors. However not all of his classic works have been adapted for the screen. But some of the main novels that made it to the big screen have been accepted and appreciated by his fans. With the exception of 'After dark my sweet' 1990, all have been high standard movies. His themes have always been related to crime characters. From con men in 'The grifter' to bank thieves in 'The Getaway'. Th standard has pretty much been similar amongst all his stories. Conflict and betrayal have always been the main themes. This is not very prominent in 'The killer inside me' In this case the main character is a small deputy sheriff who lets his own personal revenge create a spiral leading to his own downfall. At a time when economic progress was occurring in the country, people's lives were changing too. This basic scenario is very rare for a Thompson novel. And I wonder sometimes why he had chose a different subject at the start of his writing career. The protagonist is negative man. This is very rare for the noir theme. As till now it has always been the female that has played it. But this was a change from the usual.
SPOILERS Lou Ford is a small Texas town deputy sheriff. He is instructed by the construction firm owner Chester Conway to pay off a a prostitute by the name of Joyce. She was blackmailing the son of Conway and Lou has to force her to leave town as soon as possible. However they end up having an affair and together they plan to extort $10,000 from Conway. But has an alternative plan. He violently beats up Joyce to death and makes it look like a murder after planting the gun on her after killing Chester's son too. Surprisingly Joyce is to be taken to Forth Worth for surgery to her injuries. Lou hopes she doesn't survive. Later he is informed that she died. The construction union leader Elias Koteas suspects Lu is behind the murders and suggests to him that he leave town as many are doubting him. He reconsiders despite his long time girlfriend Amy feels the same way. Lou becomes mad and his psychotic tendencies get the better of him and he murders Amy. The alcoholic bum who was blackmailing Lou for knowing about the murders stumbles upon Amy's body. He is then shot by a another deputy as he tries to escape Lou from chasing him with a knife. It is later discovered that Amy had left a note trying to encourage Lou to go straight. This falls in to the hands of two detectives and Lou is then admitted in to a insane asylum. An attorney bails Lou out and states that authorities do have evidence against him connecting him to the murder of Joyce and Chester. Lou decides to plot his own death by drenching his home in gasoline. Just after this moment the authorities arrive with Chester Conway and Joyce, who surprisingly survived and is walking. She says to Lou that she forgives him and will not testify in court. However in rage Lou stabs Joyce and gunfire ensues that sets the house on fire and it explodes killing everyone inside. END OF SPOILERS
There are many differences between the novel, the 70's movie and this latest version. The novel was more deep with it's narrative and structured story telling. The original 701's movie adaptation was more close to the book. What makes this movie any different is the the theme of sadomasochism. The element is used highly in the film. Casey Affleck's character is portrayed like a lustful man. I guess this makes the film a little unique.In comparison to the novel, the film does feel limited in terms of content.
There are many moments that evoke the atmosphere of a James Hadley Chase novel. Many of the standard plot points have been incorporated in the film. Right from the blackmailing to the central character's downfall was a standard in every Chase novel. This is easily a film that the Coen Brothers could have directed. It would have been interesting to see how it would turn out differently. As a matter of fact there are many shades of 'No country for old men' present in specific scenes. Though 1990's 'The Hot Spot' is very evident also. Once again the 50's decade is used as the backdrop of the film. The makers have obviously tried to preserve the authenticity and original feeling. But perhaps setting it in present times would have given the viewer a different experience.
Hot Tamale (2006)
Curse of Tarantino lives on
Just recently I was browsing through a couple of titles of crime and noir thrillers and I stumbled upon 'Hot Tamale'. With a witty title I decided to give it a watch. I also happened to discover that Diora Baird was credited in the movie. When when watches on one can't avoid noticing the Tarantino elements that are present at every stage of the movie. 'Hot Tamale' is one of those movies that still attempted to carry on the Tarantino craze of the 90s and was suffering from heavy hangover too. Independent cinema continues to survive with the constant influx of new directors and writers who have innovative scripts and different visions of movie making. The director Michael Damien who was well known for the daytime television series 'The young and the restless' makes a movie directorial debut. He also happens to be the co writer for the movie too. His television style directing is very evident in the feature. His effort in movie directing is impressive however I wish I could say the same for the script. Firstly this is a movie which is to be appreciated more for it's art form as opposed to the story. And the reason as why it received funding was purely due to the comedy and humour elements. I wished there was more to offer in terms of narrating a story, but I guess a larger budget would have been required. It did not receive a theatrical release however won best picture at the Boston film festival. It succeeds as a independent movie. Much portion of the movie is shot indoors which actually corresponds with the budget.
'Hot Tamale' is a updating of the wrong guy in the wrong situation theme. This was very popular in the 40s and 50s era. Many may remember Alfred Hitchcocks' 'North by northwest and even the recent 'Luck number sleven'. Even Quentin Tarantino's 'True Romance' will appear vaguely similar. The noir elements are very limited but the presence of hit men and devious women character would make this appealing to anyone who searches for those aspects. The entire movie focuses on the the retrieval of some priceless diamonds. Not exciting initially. But the Diora Baird and Randy Spelling's screen time together makes it pleasurable to watch. This is the part where 'Snatch' immediately came to mind. But the main similarities end there. In terms of content, the movie falls by a few points. But the style factor is balanced throughout at all times.
SPOILERS Randy Spelling is an unlucky living in the peaceful town of Wyoming. Bored with his boring existence he decides to move to LA to become a salsa band drummer. Along the way he stops by a roadside diner. A anonymous guy played by Jason Priestly speaks to him for a while before disappearing to the restroom in a hurry. A couple of minutes later two men enter and ask Randy about the other guy. Meanwhile Jason hides a batch of diamonds in Randy's vehicle. Randy drives away. As Jason attempts to leave he is wounded and placed in the trunk of the men's car. Randy arrives at LA and a Puerto Rican friend gives him a apartment to stay while he is out of the city for a while. Waking up the next morning he discovers a women in the apartment (Tuesday) played by Diora Baird. She looks after the place and Randy and her become close friends. Meanwhile the two hit men are curious to where their possession is by torturing the diner guy. The two men head for LA after knowing his license plates number. Randy and Diora become emotionally comfortable with each other as time progresses. As Randy is away practising is drummer skills the hit men arrive at the apartment and kidnap Diora. They make a call to Randy to turn up with the diamonds or her life will be at risk. END OF SPOILERS
The Tarantino style is clearly a influence in the movie right from the two hit men which resembled Samuel L Jackson and John Travolta to the drug attack Randy Spelling has. But the entire premise is more on the comedy crime drama side. Many segments have a Indy atmosphere and a made for TV feel. 'Hot Tamale' is a movie that one wishes had more to offer in terms of content. During the middle portion one can't help getting a feeling that the writer may have edited out parts of the script to achieve the minimum funding for the movie. This is pretty much acceptable, however the comic interactions between characters is the plus point. A movie which can be more desired more for it's style rather than it's substance, can sometimes backfire. However the comedy is the saving grace and the director has integrated some funny moments and dialogues in certain scenes.
On the scale of a re watch the movie becomes more appealing the high expectations become less meaningful. Randy Spelling is a competent actor. I'm surprised why his film career did not take off. But his performances appeared a little too reserved. Diora Baird was a revelation In fact she became popular after this movie and went on to doing more feature films. Her presence in the movie is a high point. Her expressions and performance makes the movie worth watching. But her portions were a speed breaker in the middle. The two hit men played by Mike Star and Steven Blackmore give a humorous tone to somewhat serious characters. However as hit men they were not convincing. For instance why did it take so long for them to reach LA and what was the purpose of kidnapping Tuesday when all they had to do was wait for Randy at the apartment.
Jackie Brown (1997)
Tarantino's honest contribution to Noir
Quentin Tarantino is a force that can't be reckoned with. When I was at grad school I discovered his movies and became an instant fan. I truly appreciated his understanding and perception of cinema. His individual style has been very unique from the beginning. Not many directors have managed to replicate or plagarise his work at all. Many have made Tarantino esque movies, but they have never lived up to becoming a huge success. His vision has been shared many times with Robert Rodriguez, with whom he has made joint collaborations. It has almost seemed like Tarantino has a patented license for all his works.
Since his debut feature 'my best friend's birthday', it was evident that had talent not only as a write but also as a director. His first big feature 'Reservoir dogs' set his career in to motion from the outset. 'Pulp Fiction' later followed which won multiple awards. Many have regarded it as one of the best movies of all time. Unfortunately the recent 'Inglorious Basteards' didn't receive my approval. But I understood that he enjoys to experiment with different genres of movies. I'm eagerly awaiting his next venture 'Django'.
'Jackie Brown' is his third directed movie. And it follows in the traditional crime and gangster theme. Upon viewing this feature it is evident that it was his tribute to the 70s blaxploitation cinema. Movies such as 'Superfly' and 'Snatch' still create echos to this day on. And Tarantino has given his offering. He has also incorporated his witty humour. The movie also helped to relaunch Pam Grier's movie career. Many still remember her from the 70's movie 'Coffy' and 'Foxy Brown'. Her portrayal of the bad revenge seeking woman is still very memorable to some. However she doesn't exactly get chance to relive those moments due to the different nature of this movie. This is an adaptation of Elmore Leanord's novel 'Rum Punch'. Tarantino has changed the location from Florida to California. The novel also had a blonde white woman as it's central character. He has cleverly managed to alter a few elements of the novel while still maintaining it's authenticity.
The movie doesn't fall in to one category immediately. There is a atmosphere of noir as well as crime elements. The central theme involves a pair of cops that intend on apprehending a gun runner with the help of a flight attendant. She has a choice whether or not to cooperate. Not giving assistance means spending a few years in prison due to possession of illegal drugs. I fell that this is the closest that Tarantino could come to making a noir movie. Many of the conventional noir aspects exist, right from the double crosses to the deceitful female characters. And the main theme surrounding cash and deception is at the top of the list here. However one of the most common elements such as extra marital affair scenario does not exist. Every character is very well depicted and each contribute positively to the plot.
SPOILERS Ordell (Samuel Jackson) is a gun runner who profits from selling unlicensed and unregistered firearms. One day a associate of his is arrested by the authorities. Ordell approaches a bails bondsman Max Cherry (Roberty Forster) to get the young guy's bail. But his real intention is to murder him so that he doesn't say anything to the police that would place his life in jeopardy. Ordell is reunited with his old accomplice De Niro and also has a female woman Melanie (Bridget Fonda) to help out with the odd jobs occasionally. Meanwhile a flight attendant Jackie Brown (Pam Grier) is stopped by two cops to be checked and searched. They discover a sachet of cocaine and a few bundles of hard cash. She delivers money to Ordell through her airline flights. And is asked to cooperate with the authorities to bring Ordell to justice otherwise spending a few years behind bars. She accepts and the plan is to apprehend him after a cash delivery is to be made. However Jackie has plans of her own and decides to keep the money and share it with Max, but the authorities will be unaware of this. Meanwhile Melanie become devious too as she wishes to take the money also. Unfortunately all does not go as planned and Melanie is shot by De Niro. The money was taken by Max and after Ordell discovers about this from De Niro, he is killed too. Jackie and the cops devise a plan again, this time to get Ordell to come for the money and so they can make the move on him. END OF SPOILERS
With a running time of 2 hours 30 minutes the movie does seem pretty heavy going. But Tarantino has incorporated all the small detail from the novel so there is nothing lacking. I found that there was a dramatic atmosphere absent in the movie. One scene progresses to the next at a steady pace, But the sheer quality is at the surprising moments, for example De Niro's death scene. The director makes many scenes effective even without the use of a background score. The 70's soundtrack compliments many scenes nicely. Clearly this is an example of substance over style as Tarantino has concentrated on narrating a story rather than just throwing style in our faces. While viewing the movie I had a strange thought that this felt like a combination of two movies put together. 'Bound' and 'Pulp Fiction' came to mind instantly. The money scenario from Bound and the undercover cop from Reservoir dogs.
I could not help but noticing that Bridget Fonda, De Niro and Samuel L Jackson's characters were lacking common sense to a small extent in their roles. They weren't capable of achieving their intentions like they should have.
Lost Highway (1997)
Remarkable mystery noir
David Lynch is one of the few directors that have managed to sustain a niche audience for his movies. His perception of movie making and how he views the world was very evident from his debut "Eraserhead". Many critics have questioned his style and some have not been convinced also. Many people refer to him as the master of mystery and horror. However a majority of his features have dwelled more in to the mind of the individual rather than presenting a linear story. It has not been his style to present everything understandably. To confuse the viewer and raise questions has been his speciality. Each one of his movies have been different to each other. But the common factor has always existed, character driven. One element that has been very repetitive in his movies is 'black comedy'. This theme he manages to beautifully blend with mystery and horror. I admire his obsession with the mystical world and surrealism. He really has the ability to depict all this in a convincing and believable manner. He is a director to be reckoned with. One would have hoped that he would make movies more occasionally. In recent interviews Mr Lynch has commented on saying that he draws inspiration from dreams and nightmares that he has. This is easy to relate to and this is transcended to the screen. Many of the mystery elements that pervade in his movies have never been explained by him. But he is an artist and I feel that as a movie viewer one should admire and appreciate his work as a piece of art or a painting rather than attempting to decipher and unravelling it.
Lost Highway is one of his movies that I highly regard as having cult status. It may well be in the archives for being the most complicated movie to understand. However I doubt it could hold a candle to the recent "Inception". It is presented in a mobius strip format where the beginning comes back in full circle. The noir elements very much exist in every form and character, right from the Patricia Arquette's femme fatale wife to Robert Loggia as the gangster. David Lynch used his own residence in the first 40 minutes. It may have saved on production costs but the setting was appropriate for mysterious environment. Initially we feel that we are about to watch a movie about a couple trying to discover who is sending them videotapes with the footage of their house. But this leads to more suspense and mystery after the wife is murdered. And the movie takes a totally different turn. The movie could have turned in to a murder mystery, but Lynch cleverly averts that. Barry Gifford supported Lynch on the script and has presented a fabulous outcome. A simple plot has been presented in a complicated manner. Every scene mystifies and raises questions to the point that it feels difficult to digest. Lynch once stated that O.J Simpson's murder trail inspired him to make this movie. To what extent that is true, I could not say.
SPOILERS Fred Madison and Renee are couple that live together who seem to have secrets that are hidden from each other. Fred doubts Renee about what she may be doing in her free time meanwhile Renee acts very mysteriously. One morning Renee picks up a video tape from the door step. They watch it together and there is a footage of the exterior of their residence. Later that night after a miserable session of attempted sex, Fred begins to doubt Renee even more as she sympathises with him. The next morning they receive another tape. This time it shows footage of them the couple sleeping together. This immediately become a concern to them and they contact the authorities. Two detectives arrive and after inspecting the residence fail to find any signs of forced entry. The same night at a party of Renee's friend Andy, a mysterious short man calls Fred's house and surprisingly he himself answers. The couple return back home to find nothing. Fred is then arrested and given the death sentence for Renee's murder. He however does not recall anything. After complaining of headaches his identity changes to a young mechanic Pete played by Baltzar Getty. He is released from prison and two detectives watch his movements. Surprisingly a woman who resembling Renee appears with the gangster Mr Eddy, by the name of Alice. She is a adult movie performer. Both Pete and Alice romantically acquaint secretly. However she holds a secret and has intentions of her own. END OF SPOILERS
This is one of those movies that really requires attention to the highest level. Uninterrupted concentration too can help fully enjoy the feature. To truly appreciate the movie for what is it is I would recommend that the direction and cinematography is payed attention to. The sub conscious mind also has to be engaged while viewing. Lynch and Gifford have written a script that is flaw less. They have incorporated their imagine to the full potential to create a mystery noir. This is one of Lynch's less disturbing movies but is full of psychological moments. There is confusion at every turn. Everybody will have their own individual theories and takes on the mystery elements. But I can't recall ever having heard of any being an official.
The background score by Angelo Baddlamenti is top rate and suits the tone of the movie perfectly. Many camera shots are sound effects help to assist the movie in terms of special effects. Bill Pullman has the best performance in the movie. The role required a lot of emotional acting and less dialogues and his paranoid expressions are speechless. Patricia Arquette is ravishing in her two different get ups. For a 2 hour 10 minutes movie it may seem long, but it is worth it for a true noir movie fan.
Blood and Wine (1996)
Good performance and dialogues make for pleasurable viewing.
Bob Rafelson and Jack Nicholson supported each others careers in the 70s with movies like 'The king of Marvin gardens' and 'Five easy pieces'. 'Blood and wine' was the third part in the trilogy. Rafelson's movies were very unique in their own way with Nicholson. His movies were very highly focused on relationships and this formed the core in every movie. In 'Blood and wine' Nicholson is playing the father and son and again delivers another fantastic performance. Regardless of the role, Nicholson is always in top form and most times has the ability carry the movie independently. The noir atmosphere is not continuously present in the movie. The theme of betrayal, greed and loyalty is common to all in this genre and the movie covers this field on a large scale. The only noir factor that missing is the femme fa tale element. However this does not take away any charm from the movie. Many intriguing and suspenseful moments are directed in a unique way that makes the movie's routine theme appear eye capturing. In the initial phase of the movie one would immediately assume that this is a heist movie. However the second half dispels all doubts.
The basic theme revolves around the theft of a expensive diamond necklace and how bitter relations leads the characters in to a game of cat and mouse. The character interactions in the second half progresses the movie steadily and there is never a irrelevant segment. In terms of plot, the writer (Nick Viltues) has accomplished some good writing but many criticised the movie for it's lack of character depth and even for it's climax. In my opinion only on a re watch the movie's real quality can be appreciated. If one views the movie with concentration and focus, he/she will realise that the u.s.p of the movie is in the performances and dialogues. 'Blood and wine' is not a classic but truly a milestone for introducing the noir genre in to the nineties. Later movies like 'U Turn' and 'Lost Highway' followed.
SPOILERS AHEAD Nicholson plays a wine merchant who is having a bitter relationship with his wife (Davis) and son (Dorff). His neglecting attitude has created a rift in relations in the household. He and Caine who plays a ageing safe-cracker on parole plan to steal a expensive necklace from the a rich family's residence while they are on vacation. They aim to achieve to do this with the help of a maid played by (Lopez). On the day they plan to steal they discover the maid has lost her job, however with a little inconvenience the pair still manage to get their hands on the necklace. Nicholson plans to travel to New York to sale it for a good price. He books a flight with Lopez who he is having an affair with. Unfortunately his wife discovers this which leads to a brawl and Nicholson becomes unconscious. Dorff arrives on the scene and him and his mother escape. Later Nicholson awakes and finds out that they took the suitcase that the necklace was hidden in. Him and Caine try to locate the mother and son but a high speed pursuit turns nasty which leads to the death of Dorff's mother. After this Dorff decides to get revenge with genius methods. He pits Caine against Nicholson and attempts to lure Nicholson with the necklace with the aid of Lopez. END OF SPOILERS
For a small thriller the movie extracts brilliant performances from all involved. This element is the core of the movie and brings out life from a routine script. Plot twists are at a minimum however this does not deters ones' enjoyment from the movie. Every clever surprising plot development that occurs happens to the viewer's attention. Bob Rafelson's direction is standard and is in tone with the movies theme. Many close up shots of the character's faces are mesmerising. It captures feelings and emotions very realistically. Florida has become a common setting for movies of this nature. Body Heat, Palmetto and Wild things too used this location. This is another highlight for the movie but many scenes are shot indoors so outdoor scenery is restricted to a certain extent. The background score is very thin. It is not used at every point. Music is incorporated at moments when it can feel most effective with the scene.
This was the first time pairing of Micheal Caine and Jack Nicholson. They are legends in their own right and make the movie worthy of watching whenever they appear on screen together. Their interactions and witticism are a highlight in the movie. Nicholson impresses in a negative role. This is something that he very renowned for. Stephen Dorff is commendable in the second half as his involvement is greater. He was an upcoming star and his facial and emotional expressions are on the mark. Jennifer Lopez was at the early stages of her career with this small role but her role serves it's purpose at the very end. Her Cuban accent attempt is was very charming.
For those that enjoy cinema with a distinctive noir taste, this is highly recommended as performances are impressive.
Kill Me Again (1989)
Can some men be anymore stupid ?.
Prior to 'Red rock west', John Dahl made 'Kill me again'. This movie was his first attempt at the noir genre. In fact this seemed to be the template for 'The last seduction' as the theme is very similar. His inspiration is clearly evident in the plot itself. There is a feeling of 50s noir cinema in the movie. Every element from the detective to the cheating femme fa tale is present. Dahl writes and directs his own movies. He is obviously talented in the in the writing field, so this is what he should have continued doing. However in terms of direction the certain edge is lacking. As it became frequent to direct in television style, maybe his movie making career did not sustain. Though many scenes have clever camera angles and close up shots that enhance intrigue factor and suspense. But this becomes irrelevant as the movie progresses with a interesting moment to a next.
As I stated the movie contains all the ingredients of the typical noir movie. The disloyal characters, double crosses and money are at the core of the plot. John Dahl has incorporated all these elements intelligently. Everybody who is a fan of noir cinema will immediately find this theme very familiar. It has been a routine concept in the 50s. The deceiving woman requiring assistance from the innocent man, however is later betrayed is noticeable territory. For many this movie will bring back memories of 'Body Heat' and 'Double Indemnity' to mind instantly. The plot is highly similar. The main character is the female character. Everything that happens revolves around her. Therefore this does not complicate the movie at any level. Those searching for a simple and short movie will be happy with this feature. One element which is devoid however is adultery. The theme is not existent at any point. But this does not mean that there would be no scope for intimate scenes.
SPOILERS AHEAD The plot begins with the conning pair of Madsen and Whalley Kilmer who steal $875000 from the mob in the Nevada state. However Whalley Kilmer does not intended to keep acquaintance with Madsen for much longer and leaves for Vegas after leaving him unconscious in a restroom. She is aware that he will attempt to trace her down for the money so she has a plan. We are then introduced to Jack (Val Kilmer) who is a private detective who happens to be in dept to some bad guys and has a troubled past. Whalley Kilmer approaches him with a faking a death plan. He agrees in return for a good payment. They set the scenario up at a motel room. Upon leaving the scene Whalley Kilmer intentionally leaves a piece of paper with Jacks name on it. Later he is questioned by the authorities and given a cautionary warning. Meanwhile Madsen notices news of Whalley Kilmer's murder in the press and goes to Jacks office to find a lead. Jake later discovers that Whalley Kilmer has left him and headed to Reno. He locates her though the mob too are searching for the stolen cash and notice it at a casino. The pair hitch up again and flee from the hotel room after killing some of the mob's men. Madsen is hot on their tails after Jake's friend gives information on Jacks whereabouts. Who gets possession of the money forms most of the part of the climax. END OF SPOILERS
The unique point of the movie is obviously the plot. Dahl has written the script with maturity. It is totally flawless. However to this date I have never seen a movie with not one but two men attempting to hitching back on to a woman after being betrayed. This was one element in the movie that I was scratching my head over. Many moments in the movie seemed like a Jim Thompson novel. But what sets this movie apart the the typical noir ending is that the innocent man escapes. The movie contains many double crosses. This is actually the highlight of the plot and will raise eyebrows constantly. Secondly Micheal Madsen's performance. Unfortunately he does not get much scope. But when he appears on screen he steals the scene. Every scene is integral to the movie and there are no side tracks. Plot wise the movie is very reminiscent of 'Pink Cadillac' and 'The Getaway'. In fact one could say that this is a clever combination of both movies. Madsen played the same role in 'The Getaway' too. However Dahl has avoided plagiarism and has managed to think of his own ideas. Background music appears very old fashioned. But is suitable to the tone of the movie. It has been implemented at a minimum level, however only at important moments when required.
Initially many viewers will misinterpret this for a Cohen brothers movie. The look and atmosphere is highly reminiscent of 'Blood Simple'. Maybe Dahl's career with noir movies would have continued but they were overshadowed by the Coen Brothers. Performance wise Jaoanne Whalley Kilmer gives a reasonable effort. Her facial expressions are on the mark. Val Kilmer disappoints with a look of uninterested. Overall if you like your noir movies to be short and simple this would be recommended. But I could not say that one would feel the urge to watch it more than three times.
Warm Texas Rain (2000)
not bad
Steve Bauer continues to stay persistent in starring in movies. In this movie he is tempted in to doing a job for Jim Metzler. Unfortunately he gets a surprise as realises that everything is not what meets the eye.
The movie has a very b grade style to it. The duration is short however the plot is very routine and it is been there done that material. Performances are to standard and the direction is not too bad. I think the plot twists were very predictable.
The performances were good especially Metzler. He gave an honest attempt to play his character. Bauer was just about exceptable. Maybe if another director took on this movie the outcome would have been substantially better.
Palmetto (1998)
Best James Hadley Chase adaptation.
Just recently I came across the late author James Hadley Chase. I was surprised at the huge number of novels he had written over the 50s and 60s. A movie I had also watched a movie earlier which was giving reference to behind the inspiration used. I decided to dwell in to the writers works and discover what made him so popular. After reading one I could not give up. I was surprised by the themes and characters that were involved in the novels. Many times it felt like I was not reading a book, but watching a movie. Given the fact that his books were not long made it more easier to complete them. Many of Chase's novels have been adapted in to movies. The trend of Chase adaptations became a cult trend for french and Italian cinema. However here in the west it never took off. Novels like 'Miss Shunaway waves a wand', 'The set up' and 'Hit and run' were adapted for the big screen. Unfortunately they did not make bells ring at the box office. The novel 'Just another sucker' is made in to a movie and The theme became instantly familiar to me as the first few minutes begin to roll. The name of the novel has been changed to 'Palmetto' for the movie. As one watches on you realise the noir atmosphere is prevalent in almost every scene. An old novel's transition to modern day cinema makes an impressive outcome. Both Woody Harrelson and Elizabeth Shue were perfect choices for the casting. Their performances really make the movie for what it is.
Volker Schlondorff makes a sincere attempt at presenting his perception of the novel. He has incorporated all his basic understanding of the theme and there is never a feeling that a foreign director made the movie. He has made many dull moments enhanced by capturing the character's expressions. There are a few scenes and moments that make the movie longer in duration but this does not put the viewer off. It was disappointing that the movie did not have huge box office status when it released. Since the theme of kidnapping was used, and one has to contend with releases like 'fargo' and 'The big lebowski', I would assume that this movie went unnoticed. I think that the reason behind its failure was directly due to the incorrect release date. Maybe a year early or late would have had some positive impact on the movie's success ratio.
*********************SPOILERS AHEAD********************* Woody Harrelson plays Harry Barber who is released from prison after spending two years there for no reason. He considers going to Miami but his girlfriend (Gina Gershon) persuades him to not leave. At a bar he encounters a woman who who is the wife of a rich man by the name or Mr Malroux. She tempts him in to a fake kidnapping scheme where her step daughter (Chloe Sevigny) will be involved in. The ranson will be 500,000 dollars. All that Harry has to do is make a phone call and send the threatening letter demanding the ransom. Initially Harry does not approve but later he convinces himself. After meeting the step daughter the plan is put ahead. The girl stays away from home for a short time and her father delivers the money in a suitcase to the location mentioned. He is later shocked to discover that the girl has been killed and he has a body to dispose of that is not easy to do. The local authorities are on the case and 1 plus 1 does not seem to be adding to two for Harry. Plus what he received was not cash at all. The situation becomes more and more sinister and paranoia begins to take over him. To his surprise he later discovers that at every step of the way more and more clues will point towards him as the culprit behind Mr Malroux's daughters disappearance. He realises eventually that he was just used for the whole plan. Eventually he has to prove his innocence to the authorities. ************************END OF SPOILERS**********************
I could not help getting a dejavu of 'Body Heat' while watching this movie. Many situations were reminiscent of the classic. The setting of Florida too was an indicator of this. The constant sweating faces and sexual intimidating scenes also were a giveaway. But the similarities end there. Movies like 'Derailed and 'Out of time' too had a similar concept. The director has incorporated many slow moving frames which highlight plot twists and key moments which are crucial. These are a highlight and really create the right tone at certain intervals. With a running time of 1 hour and 53 minutes the movie does tend to take long to get the plot to progress. Much of the first hour is spent behind planning the kidnapping. However the second hour's pace builds up. Much of that specific portion of the movie delivers plot twists after plot twists. These makes for a very intriguing experiences as the movie progresses. The usage of a background score is very minimum. But the sleazy sounds do appear regularly at important moments because you can't have a noir movie without them. This is one of Woody Harrelson's best performances. He has managed to blend many moods and shades in to one role. We can feel sympathy for his character as well as hating him. We can sense his paranoia and unsettling feeling while just watching him. There are certain moments where one would also laugh at him. He truly did play the man in despair from the heart. Elizabeth Shue would have given any actress from the 40s and 50s a run for their money as she played a femme fatale brilliantly. Her body language and acting were just on the mark.
Overall this is the perfect treat for fans of noir. I would also recommend watching it with others.
Bound (1996)
Noir Movie in Gangster genre.
Prior to the Matrix trilogy, the Wachowski brothers first feature movie was the movie 'Bound', which released in late 1996. Their directorial debut was a fantastic and impressive attempt at a tribute to the noir genre. The camera work and stylish close up shots proved to the audiences that they had the ability to make good movies. What I did not understand was how they ventured in to the sci fi genre with 'Matrix'. Maybe if they continued with this theme they could have had the opportunity to offer great noir movies like the Coen brothers have. Upon viewing this movie I asked myself 'what makes these directors and the movie in particular special ?'. Firstly for a noir movie fan, it has every element present. Greed, betrayal, money and murder. All factors were taken in to consideration. In fact it contains the perfect menu. However if I had the opportunity to add some ideas of my own, I would integrate a few more plot twists in the second half and increase the pace in the first half.As far as the director duo are concerned, there directing techniques and camera angles are brilliant. To direct a movie within a room setting can be a challenging task. So I feel that they are due all the credit they deserve. In terms of plot the movie is not complicated, but straightforward because a plan is made and then implemented. I have to be honest. It was very ingeniously thought out. The Warchowski brothers have wrote a great script. Much of their thoughts and ideas stem from the traditional noirs from the 50s era. Even Jennifer Tilly looked reminiscent of the evil women of the yester years. Her hair style and dresses were evident of this.
***************************SPOLIERS AHEAD********************** Tilly is the girlfriend to money launderer Palantinio. They stay in apartment next door to where Gershon who is a decorator fix it woman. At first glance both women have a liking to one another and it turns in to a relationship. Meanwhile Palantino recovers a large amount of cash from a fellow member that he has to pass on to his boss 'Gino'. Gino has a son by the name of 'Johnny', who Palantino does not get along with. This gives Gershon and Tilly the idea to devise a scheme of taking the money and placing the doubt of Johnny in to the min of Palantino. Their plans works out. Unfortunately Palantino reacts in a unpredictable manner and kills Gino and his son to save himself. Tilly and Gershon predict that he would go on the run however Palantino is persistent to get the money back. After he is unsuccessful he makes over plans that may spill more blood.******************END OF SPOILERS***********************
Two factors stay in ones mind after watching the movie. The plot and the performances. Both are truly to the highest standard. They compliment each other very well. The noir theme has been combined beautifully with the backdrop of gangster characters. The black and grey set designs create the appropriate atmosphere and environment of a noir movie. If the movie was shot even in black and white I don't think it would have made much difference. The impact would have been similar. The close up shots are filmed very stylishly and seemed to be the source of inspiration for many of the Matrix movies. The pace of the movie is moderate. However the first half sets the plan in motion therefore it takes time for the movie to get going. After the midway point the movie progresses at a immense speed to satisfying climax. The lesbian context did not have much scope and neither was it core to the lot. But it proved a reason for the story to develop. I for one has not admired the movie just for that element. I can not help but assume that Tarantino may have been inspired to make 'Jackie Brown' after seeing this movie, despite it being based on a novel. The theme is very similar. The 'blame game' factor was also used in an Indian movie from 2003 called 'Boom'.
The movie does contain many memorable and iconic scenes. I especially adored the part when Palantino kills Gino and his son. It is truly a nervous moment. As we can sense how Palantino would be feeling at the time. All performances were very good. However I would give special mention to Joe Palantino. He was under the skin in his character and mastered the accent wonderfully. He is the main attraction of the movie. Gina Gershon did not get much scope in the second half. While Jennifer Tilly gives a haunting performance. Any man would not be able to resist her charm and beauty. She played the dangerous woman character fantastically.
Overall this is recommended to those who enjoy cinema of this genre. Good performances and a witty plot make for enjoyable viewing.
Private Detective: Two Plus Two Plus One (1997)
India's First Noir movie.
In 1997 the Indian film industry were slowly awaking to the genre of art cinema. In fact this is the first noir movie made in the country of India. Theatre actor Rajat Kapoor makes an impressive debut in the field of writing and direction. As well as this the man is a talented actor and has acted and in and made many quality movies. Every movie of his has been based on different themes. 'Mithya' was one of his earlier best efforts. His association with Saurabh Shukla and Ranvir Shorey has encouraged good cinema. 'Private Detective' was Rajat's first movie. The movie itself is very much like a tribute to Hitchcock if keeping the theme in mind. But at the same time it contains the ingredients of a perfect noir movie. It is evident that in the initial phase much research was undergone prior to writing the script. This is clearly a movie aimed at those people who enjoy indulging in to the character's minds and interplays. The movie has a haunting atmosphere and many sequances have been captured imaginatively. All 4 actors in the movie have a depth of realism to their character. For some one may symphatise and for others hate. I state this because the movie itself is a performance orientated feature. Every character holds a secret in their minds and deceiving one another. This is a common element between them.
**************************SPOILERS AHEAD************************* The main synopsis revolves around two couples that are very close to each other. Aly Khan and Sambhavi Kaul and other being Kashmera Shah and Kenneth Desai. Kenny suspects that his wife (Kashmera) is being unfaithful. He has hired Naseerudin Shah (the detective) to watch and monitor her movements. The detective presents feedback to him in the form of photographs proving a illicit relationship between her and Aly, his best friend. Kenny is speechless and takes no action in response to this. He informs the detective to not be seen again and he is paid. Later at a nightclub Aly's wife (sambhavi) doubts Kashmera maybe involved with her husband. She notices her looking at her husband in an anxious manner. The next day Sambhavi shoots Kashmera at her residence and leaves. The detective stumbles upon the scene and decides to dispose the body at a far off location. Kenny is notified of this however the authorities discover the body and a murder investigation begins. The photos end up in the police's possession which give them the doubt to believe that Aly is the murderer. He is arrested and placed in custody. Meanwhile Sambhavi learns of this and is desperate to have him released as she knows he is innocent. Meanwhile the detective and Kenny are in a conflict themselves as they feel that each other are to blame for the murder. **********************END OF SPOILERS*****************************
I would however warn that this movie requires a vast amount of concentration, patience and attention to small detail. Despite a running time of two hours, the movie moves at a slow pace. However every scene is relevant to the story. But every scene is so carefully shot that it contributes to the experience well. For example the dream sequance gives a picture of guilt and despair from Sambhavi's character. It was also reused in 'mithya'. The first hour is the main highlight in the movie. But the second does disappoint to a small extent in terms of plot. It is probably the most unproductive phase of the movie. Naseerudin Shah's involvement is limited and he does not have much opportunity to display his acting talent neither. I would say though that his narrating segments are interesting. Rajat's direction is on the mark. Every camera angle and scene has been captured in beautifully and enhances the overall quality in the movie. I was dissatisfied with the choice of background score. It was unsuitable to the movie and the sounds used were lacking matureness. Every actor gave their best effort to the role. Sambhavi could have been replaced by someone else, but Aly performed well. Naseerudin and Kashmera too played their parts well.
This is highly recommended for those who like international noir movies. However it is advised that the use of subtitles is helpful.
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)
High octane action in MTV style
The Angels are back after the hugely hyped 'Charlie's Angels' from 2000. McG directs his grand style. In comparison to the prior movie this time there is more emphasis towards the action sequences. The realism is actually lacking due to the imagination put in to full force which is incorporated. If these action sequences were to be taken out, not much in the movie would be left to be desired. However I give full credit to the special effects and computer graphics department for creating the variety of impossible situations. The movie is clearly aimed towards the young generation. This is evident from the MTV look that has been given throughout most of the portions of the movie. Action movies are not one of my favourite genres but I do have to admit that I quiet enjoyed what I saw. Initially it was difficult to adapt my mind and emotions to viewing mindless action. But once I was inclined to it, it was a riveting experience. One tends to eagerly await for one action scene to the next. McG has used his own directing style which is very similar to how a music video would be shot. The individual has received more recognition for being a writer rather than being in the directors chair. The appeal of the movie is very reminiscent to 'Bad Boys 2'. But similarities end there. I perceive this movie as more of a action flick rather than a mystery.
The story revolves mainly around 2 titanium rings which contain the profiles of people with new identities that are on the federal witness protection programme. Both have been stolen and the angels have been assigned the mission to retrieve them at whatever cost. The methods include taking up the usual disguises and facing life risking situations. The first scene is akin to the parody of 'james bond'. Robert Patrik is freed from some Hungarian hostages after one ring is stolen. The clues they discover leads them from one character to the next. This brings them face to face with Demi Moore (ex angel), who is in possession of the rings and is hell bent on selling it to any criminal connections for a high bidded price. The movie has its fair share of comedy speed breakers which at a few times disturb the decent pace of the movie. Bernie Mac is irritating to the core. I did not find him to be funny. I only wished they kept Bill Murray.
The movie has many highlights. The bike racing scene and the climax on the rooftop were the highly enjoyable moments in the movie. Yet some scenes seemed ridiculously impossible and unrealistic. But those are the elements that my make the movie exciting for a few to watch. The humour and wit is very much contained in the dialogues. The interactions between Drew, Cameron and Lucy is pure chemistry. All three of them performed to the best of their abilities. However I was slightly disappointed with Lucy Liu's involvement. She seemed to not have much focus in the movie. Tia Carrera would have been a better replacement. That is my opinion. The pace of the movie is perfect. Upon viewing I found the first 40 minutes ot being rather unproductive. Since their was not much development plot wise. After that point it was pretty straightforward and more interesting. Many good song numbers are incorporated in to the scenes which compliment them very well. It enhance the viewing pleasure. The John Cleese track seemed forced in to the narrative and it appeared vague and irrelevant to the plot.
In regards to the performances, Cameron Diaz overshadows the other two girls. She was awesome and funny at the same time. Drew Barrymore gave good support and her outfits suited her well. Demi Moore is surprising as the bad woman. She really worked her body well for the role.
Overall in comparison to the first movie, this is high on style but low on substance. But not a disappointment.
U Turn (1997)
Oliver Stone in the NOIR mode.
According to my opinion this movie is a cult classic. The atmosphere and humour contained within is such an addiction. I truly rate this movie as being ranked in the top 100 best movies of all time. When I first watched it I was immediately absorbed in to it completely that I viewed it on repeated occasions. After that it changed my entire perspective on movies.
Oliver Stone is a director to be reckoned with. His distinctive style of directing is in a class of its own. No other director can match up to his calibre. His previous movies such as 'jfk' and 'natural born killers' received much criticism and box office success. However this venture was in a different category. He has managed to make a brilliant adaptation of John Ridley's novel 'straw dogs'. It stays loyal to the novel as well. The transition of the novel to the screen has resulted in a spectacular outcome. For Oliver Stone this movie probably did not require as much effort on his part due to the simplicity of the plot itself, but still the movie is high on quality.
***************SPOILERS AHEAD********************** The movie centres around the theme of 'bad luck' The main lead bobby 'sean Penn' is a desperate individual who is determined to fulfill his mission of paying back a Russian gangster a loan. He is forced to take a stop in the small town of Superior (Arizona) due to car trouble. He leaves it in the company of Billy Bob Thornton. Meanwhile he tempted to spend time with Jeniffer Lopez though afterwards he discovers that she is married to Nick Nolte. Later a robbery in a store ends in his money being shredded. He is then talked in to killing Lopez by her husband, however he felt unable to. After his attempt to leave the town is unsuccessful he decides to go ahead with the plan to kill Nolte for his hidden stash of cash with Lopez. ********************END OF SPOILERS**************************
The main character is suffering from a case of bad luck syndrome. The movie presents this from a humorous perspective. Bobby's character has negative as well as positive shades. The movie totally relies on his presence to progress through all the segments. The theme is in the same vain as 'body heat', 'the hot spot', and 'red rock west'. Many situations will seem reminiscent from those movies. This is a symbolic movie and many metaphors are present in the scenes. In regards to the plot, substance is low. However the cinematography, close up camera angles really add to the movies quality. At certain points the movie will feel like a comedy drama with elements of seriousness. The close up frames captures the human feelings of the characters at those moments. The cinematography is truly the highlight of the movie as well as the scenes between Billy Bob and Sean Penn. The chemistry in the interactions between the two make history. The pace of the movie is slow but the viewer's curiosity for the character makes one watch on in eagerness. Maybe a ten to fifteen minute edit would enhance it overall.
Ennio Morricone's background score injects life and a certain atmosphere in to the movie. The combination of western sounds with his Italian style of music is a treat to listen to. The music compliments to the atmosphere of the movie and to the feeling of the landscape of Arizona.
This is the perfect getaway movie if you enjoyed 'Thelma and Louise'.
Wild Things (1998)
Brilliant Modern Day Noir.
John Mcnaughton has not made many movies that have been blockbuster hits. However this movie for sure is a classic. His previous movies 'mad dog and glory' and 'henry, portrait of a serial killer' simple movies. But this movie is a step ahead from the rest. Mcnaughton has brought to the screen a complex and ingenious script in grand style. In my opinion much credit is due to the writer for creating such a novel idea.
The movie is based on how characters manipulate others to commit murders and plans while maintaining a devious secret association with a second individual. The theme itself is not groundbreaking or completely original as it has this type of plot device as been used in a 1979 made for TV movie 'Murder by Natural Causes'. Each character is involved in a scheme which turns deadly and risky as the element of greed takes its turn. All the necessary elements and ingredients are contained in the movie to fulfil everyone's tastes. Not forgetting that two scenes of a erotic nature are placed at appropriate moments to exhalerate the interest.
*****************SPOILERS AHEAD******************** Matt Dillon is a high school guidance councillor who is accused of rape by Denise and Neve. This is a surprise to him as he is against the allegations. Defense attorney Bill Murray is approached by Matt to fight his case. In the lead up to the court trials he losses his self respect, home and girlfriend. However at the trail it turns out eventually that he was wrongfully accused as Neve admits the truth behind her accusation. Eventually Matt is compensated a large amount by Denise's mother (Theresa Russel) after a lawsuit is filled. Howvever it turns out later that the trio of Neve, Denise and Matt have preplanned and staged this drama act scheme for the money. Kevin Bacon the detective senses foul play and intends to investigate further to to prove his doubts. The stakes get higher and becomes involved within the characters plan of murder and faking deaths. *************END OF SPOILERS**************
The movie has a fantastic atmosphere which is complimented with a good background score by George Clinton. He has understood the tone of the movie to incorporate the relevant music. The simple piano tune's charm can be noticed in the final 10 mins of the movie, which in my opinion can be eligible for on of the greatest climax in movie history. The first hour of the movie sets the background to the plot as well character development. However the movie's speed increases after the court trial sequence. It is after then where Neve and Kevin's character bring larger involvement in to the plot, as we can experience a 'colombo' de ja vu. The pace is steady in the movie and neither does any portion tend to move fast or slow. Much of the second half is full of character twists and turns that bring the movie to a nail biting climax. The background to the plot twists are revealed in the end credits which is another highlight to the movie. The locations of sourthern Florida is beautifully shot and realism sets in well. My only advice is not to watch the trailer as this reveals much of the plot and surprises and it tends to spoil the movie's true enjoyment.
Kevin Bacon gives a mature performance and there are two different shades to his character that he balances well. Neve Campbell performs well. She is devious as well as evil in the second half. Denise Richards is seductive and sexy but does not have much involvement in second half neither. However she does exhibit her body to the full potential.
Body Double (1984)
Voyeurism At It's Best.
Brian De Palma is one of the few directors that has made a movie on possibly every genre that is in existence. Whether it has been a horror with 'carrie' or even action with 'mission impossible', he has proved that he can make a good movie regardless of the theme. He has never specialised on any particular genre, but has experimented with many different themes. This movie however is one of those that has never been a box office hit but has been criticised as a Hitchcock inspired feature. The movie is filled with many moments that are reminiscent of Hitchcock's style of suspense and camera work. Upon viewing it will seem like you are watching a combination of 'rear window' and 'psycho'. The male lead suffers from claustrophobia anxieties. This will indeed make a reference to the movie 'vertigo'. As James Stewart was afraid of heights. De Palma has been inspired and this is his attempt to pay homage to the classics of the 40s and 50s cinema era. The movie is truly a piece of work that is high in quality. The movie tackles the subject of voyeurism. But it is perceived in a enjoyable manner.
**************************SPOILERs AHEAD****************************** Craig wasson is a struggling b grade horror movie director who after discovering another man with his wife has to find another residence. He meets Gregg henry who to wants to break in acting as well He gives Craig a special place to stay in. As a surprise Gregg informs him of a woman who gives a special private dance routine across the street. Craig is tempted to follow the woman (Deborah Shelton) where ever she goes. To his surprise he notices that an Indian is interested in her too. Caig warns her that she is being followed. But Deborah is aware. Later that night she is murdered by the Indian despite Craig's attempts to stop it from happening. A police detective has suspicions that Craig is behind it. However he is let off with a warning. While watching television that same night a porn actress (Melanie Griffith) dances in the exact similar manner. This urges Craig to want to meet Melanie to uncover the mystery behind the murder as he has doubts that it was most probably her that was dancing at night to his attention.*******************END OF SPOILERS***********************
Many movies on women murders have been made over the years; From 'laura' to 'twin peaks' to 'the gift'. Each has been a novel experience. However Body Double is of a different nature. The movie does not present to us a line up of suspects but we have to discover what the killer's motive is behind the murder. This element in fact reduces the suspense element. The movie is also devoid of many twists and turns plot wise, this reduces the level of intensity in goings on. However when the murder happens, the movie is in to the mid point. After that stage it is pretty self explanatory. It is difficult to understand why the killer would want to set Craig up as a witness, instead of framing him. The whole point was to frame him for the murder however this is not clear revealed in the movie, which I view as a potential flaw. Brian De Palma's direction is of top standard and the photography supports the movie well. There are many close up frames within the nail biting sequences. These actually enhance the standard of enjoyment. The murder and telescope sequences are well handled. To my surprise there was not a single scene without Craig wasson. The entire movie progresses with his involvement. Pino Donnagio's background score is sensually fabulous. The tracks are incorporated well in to the important scenes. They really enhance the viewing pleasure.
Craig Wasson gives a good performance however he responds slow to certain situations. Deborah Shelton evokes eroticism in her character. She carries herself well. Everything from her clothes to looks are given top priority. It was disappointing that she did not have much scope to perform and if she had running time in acquaintance with Craig, it would have made one to more emotionally connect with the characters. Melanie Griffith did a good job. She has about 4 scenes in the movie, but her funny dialogues keeps her character in your mind after watching the movie. However I for certain would rather appreciate her acting abilities than her exposure.
Fashion (2008)
Insight of a woman's journey in to the fahion industry.
Ever since Madhur Bhandarkar made the critically acclaimed movie 'chandni bar', one after another he has been making movies on exposing the negative side of different societies. His previous works such as 'corporate' and 'page 3' I regard as his best movies. They had a engaging synopsis and depicted the business and celebrity world in an authentic manner without any over exaggeration. 'Fashion' is in a league of its own. The movie charts the rise and downfall of a super model. After the 2 hour 45 minute duration we can see how much investment had been put in the production of this picture. Madhur has clearly put a lot of time and research behind making this movie however if more attention was given to the plot, the movie would have become a more solid substance. From his point of view he has given a very biased one sided perception of the fashion and modelling world. He tends to put forward to us a negative view and that there is nothing positive. Why ? is what I ask. There surely has to be something positive in this world.
This is a feminist movie and in my opinion many men and woman who are / or aspire to be a model will find it interesting. However a few people who have no interest or knowledge about the fashion world will most probably need to give the movie a second viewing to give their honest judgement.
************************SPOILERS AHEAD************************ We are introduced to meghna mathur (priyanka chopra) who is a small town girl from Punjab who aspires to become a super model. Against her fathers wishes she is persistent so she leaves for Mumbai and stays at a relatives residence. Initially she goes through a struggling phase from giving auditions, photo shoots as well as attending hotel parties so she can get noticed. At this point Janet (mugda godse) becomes her friend and guides her along the way. Meghna agrees to pay 50,000 for a high class photo shoot which leads her being put forward to the agency panache. At this moment she meets the owner Mr sareen (arbaaz khan), who makes her the brand model as well acquainting himself romantically with meghna. From that moment onwards her career takes a downfall due to having an abortion and later having a one night stand with a stranger. However after a year or two she is still mentally obsessed with the profession and decides to make a comeback. In the end she becomes a positive person and realises that to become successful in life it is not always correct to take the short cuts. *********END OF SPOILERS*********************** Without a doubt this is Priyanka's best performance to date. She has groomed herself in to the role well and really sunk her teeth in to the character. She displayed the grey shades with ease as well. Her portrayal of a model was realistic. The full potential in her acting talent was unleashed before us. The movie contained many shades of 'page 3' and was very reminiscent. Many people made cameo appearances. Just as I mentioned earlier the movies length in duration goes against the movie. As it can often make the viewer loose interest and concentration at times. The main plot does not begin until after the first hour. Maybe a few minor editing and cuts would have helped the movie. There are many ramp walk show and good looking bodies at display in every moment in the movie, which certainly raises a few eyebrows. These portions actually add to the movie's duration. I feel that special mention has to be given to the cinematography department. The quality of many scenes and moments were enhanced by wonderfully capturing it. Salim Suleiman's background score has its hear in the right place. However a few moments did not require music, this eradicated the feeling at certain turning moments. Afew scenes would have had a good enough impact even without the use of music. Many fashion designers have been shown to be gay in the movie. Madhur fails to interpret the reason behind this. It was not an assumption that I could swallow. I was impressed by Mugda Godse's acting debut. Keeping in mind that she was previously a model, she has proved that she has great potential to be an actress. I could not understand why her character had no involvement in the plot or even in Priyanka's story. There was no intervention on behalf of her, neither from Samir Soni. Kangana Ranaut overshadowed Priyanka on many occasions. It was a shame that she did not have much scope. It would have been a pleasure to have seen more of her. However she is beginning to become type-casted in the 'woman in distress' roles. Arbaaz Khan was the wrong choice for the role. He did not display any emotion or expressions through the character. Someone more established would have fitted the role better.
Overall this is an enjoyable movie which can attract much attention from the female audiences. Plus there is a good in-depth insight in to different routes that are taken in to becoming a model. Priyanka's performance is another plus aspect. The 2 negative aspects such as a shallow plot and long running time of the movie might possibly deter viewer from giving their two thumbs up.
26/10
Baabarr (2009)
I was impressed, better than I expected.
A movie which know one has heard of came as a surprise to me. Ashu Trika's movies never have been highly anticipated. Right through from 'Deewanapan' to 'Alag' his features had came and went unnoticed. They never made the bells ring at the box office either. 'Baabar' is altogether a different experience. Since I am very familiar with the underworld and gangster genre, to me it was just another bad guy movie. It preaches the same message that we have heard time and time again 'those who live by the gun, die by the gun' and ' crime never pays'. I was again subjected to the same routine police shoot ups, plot and regular goings on as depicted in previous seen movies. However the second half proved to be surprisingly enjoyable, as the movie progresses with a plot. There is more focus on the police authorities as well as the the main gangster character. This bared a slight resemblance to a earlier 2005 movie called 'sehar' Unfortunately this movie did not fall in to the same high league. However it does raise a eye brow. Maye if Sanjay Gupta directed it he would get some recognition as a director.
************************SPOILERS AHEAD************************* Amanganj in U.P is the backdrop in the move. A boy 'baabar' enters in to the world of crime by killing someone. A few years pass and and he is one the most feared gangsters in the area. He has had countless cases against him ranging from extortion to kidnapping and murder. Tinnu Anand plays the senior who he works for and Mukesh Tiwari is his accomplice. Mithun enter the area as the s.p cop who had been transfered and has vowed to bring baabar to justice dead or alive. Meanwhile baabar has old scores to settle with his rival enemy 'sushant singh' after he looses a contract to him. Later Mithun makes a plan to capture Baabar while catching Om Puri as being the cop on the take. Om later has no choice but to assist Mithon in catching Baabar by using suppression and torture tactics. It proves difficult as baabar's accomplices are not willing to give his whereabouts that easily. Urvashi Sharma (his girlfriend) is however used eventually to get to Baabar. After his arrest corrupt politicians are afraid that he may leak out their secrets. So following Om's plan they decide to have him killed in transit journey. However there are other plans that are made to make it look different.***************END OF SPOILERS***************
The movie has a good pace and there is never a dull moment. All the songs have been interwoven in to the scenes. Ashu's direction is not up to the standard that is required. Jiggering camera work does not leave an impact. Due to the low production cost the film at times feels like a b grade flick. However there are a few plus points, instead of chronicaling the life of a gangster, much attention is on the police force and the method and tactics they use to bring baabar to justice. This is the highlight of the script. Newcomer Soham Shah gave a decent performance and has much potential. Sushant is good as always and appears in the same roles. Mithon is brilliant and mesmerises us again. Urvashi did not impress considering this was her second or third movie. Special mention has to be given to Om Puri who is the heart of the movie. His role is interesting and brings the movie forward at every level as well as influencing it. Both 'shakti Kapoor and Govind Namdev were wasted in roles which lasted 5 to 10 mins. There involvement was very minimum. The background score is pathetic and did not add to the experience. The sudden twist in the ending came as a surprise.
I could not help commenting on the scenes of police brutality that were shown. When will Indian cinema give a positive image of the law enforcements ?. It is getting too much.
Satya (1998)
A Trendsetter
When I first heard about this movie years ago when I was studying, I became very eager to watch it. No doubt it was a masterpiece for Indian cinema. Ram Gopal Verma made a movie that sent shock waves all around. His perception of the mumbai's underworld gangland gave a very realistic picture to everyone. There has rarely been a movie that released since then that has been able to match up to the true authenticity of this movie. Ram Gopal Verma opens the door to a world where criminals and gangsters do not walk around in suits and live life in luxurious lifestyles. They maintain a low profile. It is a story of conflicting ideologies and gang rivalries. As far as my opinion is concerned, this is undoubtedly one of Verma's best works till date. Movies like 'D', 'Vaastav' and 'Gang' were good but attempted to continue the genre's popularity as long as it would last. Not many directors have ventured in to this field of late due to the fact that there has not been much of a cult following. A great detail of research was undergone to bring the characters and the story to life. Both the actor Saurabh Shukla and writer Anurag Kashyap wrote a mind blowing script incorporating real life incidents and personal knowledge and experiences.
************************SPOILERS AHEAD*********************** This is more of story about how one man becomes an influential member in a gang more than climbing the ranks to the top senior level. He achieves this through attaining friendship with his friend. J.D Chekravarthy is a man who comes to Mumbai to escape a bad phase. He becomes a object of humiliation and endure bullying tactics by Jeeva who is a local don in the area, after he gets a job in a bar. By fighting back he ends up in jail and befriends Bajpai. who is a gangster. Both become close and upon release satya is given a flat and involvement in the gang itself. In pursuit of revenge and to gain his self esteem back he kills Jeeva. This leads to a gang war erupting between them and Guru Narayan (Jeeva's colleague). Later a new police commissioner comes in to town who vows to take out the underworld elements. This however puts the gang in to making some important decisions regarding their survival.Bajpai's senior is the politician 'Namdev', whose orders and commands are not obeyed which eventually leads to the downfall of the syndicate.**********END OF SPOILERS********************************
The movie is truly a work of art and delivers a big impact. The movie progresses at a slow pace, but much time was required to set the scenario. Upon viewing one will realise that the production value of the movie was quiet low. But this does not prevent the movie from loosing any quality. I noticed a slight similarity to 'State Of Grace (1990), when the characters were being killed towards the end. The reason appeared to be the same. Chekraverty's performance was very wooden. I personally felt that he was the wrong choice for the role. His emotional acting abilities were very amateur in a few segments. Someone who had a more deeper understanding of the role and was experienced would have done a better job. It was his decisions that lead the syndicate to tore apart. The movie clearly does tend pose the moral message that if commands and orders of the senior level individuals are not abided to, then this can put gang member's lives at stake. Verma's directorial skills are at their full potential. Many of the close up shots are very moving and help to enhance the tension in the scenes to the highest level. It is this level of direction that is lacking from most of his movies these days. It just does not appear to have the same quality. Fans of Urmila will be disappointed as she is playing a non glamorous role and downed in to a saree. Her scope is limited as she only plays a love interest. However her involvement in the climax changes everything. Bajpai became famous with his portrayal of the gangster. He became an idol. The background score suited the mood of the scenes and situations perfectly. However the tone was slightly high in a few scenes.
Truly this movie is a must see !!!!!!!!
Delusion (1991)
Classic Road Movie Noir
absolutely adore road movies. I first overcame this movie in 1999. I watched it for the first time and I kept it on VHS since then. A movie which I have watched at least once every month. This movie in my opinion is a cult classic for anybody who enjoys this genre of cinema.
Directed and written by a newcomer from Europe. A guy called Carl Coplert has impressed me by his vision of characters in desperate moments. He has written and sketched out each character in so much depth and detail to the extent that one can relate to them. This is truly a character driven movie whereby the performances takes the viewer attention to the end. *************************CONTAINS SPOILERS************************** Set in California and the Nevada desert, Jim Metlzer is a redundant software employee who embezzles company money ad takes to Reno in his vehicle to set up his own business. However on the highway he gives a lift to a couple who need to get to a destination (Rubin and Secor). A disagreement and conflict occurs when Metzler refuses to take them further beyond the Mexican border. Soon we realise the Secor is a hit-man and has a hit on Jerry Orbach and Metzler. Metzler survives and is determined to get his money and vehicle back. However neither Secor or Metzler is aware that Rubin has the money.************END OF SPOILERS************************ The movie wonderfully captures the landscape of the Nevada desert. The cinematography and direction is on top level. The atmosphere feels very tense at certain times. With a running time of roughly 95 mins, the plot progresses at an immense quick pace. There is never a dull or irrelevant moment. Innitially the movie has a distinct European style which eventually becomes similar to spaghetti western showdown. The final 15 mins really stirs with one inner feelings as the wind can be heard in the background. The background score by Barry Adamson is fantastic and really suits the mood of the movie's theme.
I found Jim Metzler's character to be very reminiscent to Nicholas Cage's from 'Red Rock West'. He had personal intentions which became distorted by becoming a good samaritan. Jim plays his role well. His transition from being calm to loud was convincing.
Jennifer Rubin's role was well written and stood out from the rest. A tragic background is evident in her chilling reaction to violence. She comes across as intelligent but ill-bred, the consummate wounded survivor of a hard life. Yet, on a different level, she shows courage. Rubin is absolutely amazing in this role. She brings uncommon realism to that "girl from the wrong side of the tracks" who finds herself in an abusive and shallow relationship but never succumbs to it. Her life is clearly shaped by lack of options, yet when faced with choices, she responds in surprising but entirely believable fashion. She does intend to forsake anyones life for money. She had many shades. One of her best performances.
Kyle Secor was played his part good too. His accent is wonderful. He is a dominating character. Though it is not understood why his vehicle tumbled off the highway. His conversations and dialogues with Rubin made interesting viewing pleasure. However to me he did not convince as a hit-man.
The highlights are truly the conversations that take place in the car between the characters not forgetting the climax showdown.
Pulp Fiction (1994)
LA's Crime Characters
When this movie released in 1994 it totally redefined the gangster movie genre forever. They can't be a single soul had not seen this movie. By far it became a classic and received cult status and was given many academy awards at the Oscars. Quentin Tarantino became a popular director and the youth were inspired from his movies. However with this movie in particular he caught everyone's attention. Many movies later became inspired from this. Doug Liman's GO and SEVEN DAYS IN THE VALEEY were speculated with pulp fiction style. Hence why many directors were influenced by this movie and attempted to copy its style. Guy Rithie was very inspired by this movie. This was very evident in 'SNATCH'. This movie was a lot like a homage to the gangster genre. Influances of french and Asian cinema are clearly seem in the visuals. It also contained many moments that leads the viewer to watch on in anticipation as to what will happen next. It is an intriguing adventure none the less. This is the genre that I had wished Tarantino had stayed with. 'Reservoir dogs' and 'Jackie brown' were also were also some of his finest works. However his association with Robert Rodriguez led him on to the path of making vampire and zombie movies, which was not really to my taste. Im sure most of his fans may have adored them.
**************************CONTAINS SPOILERS*********************** Many of Tarantino's movies have been shot in LA. So there has been no better way to portray the underworld realistically. We are given an insight in to a group of characters, some which are directly and indirectly related to the crime world. The movie is more like a collection of 6 stories collaborated in to one movie. One segment moves to the next. They have a linear pattern but they are shown in a non chronological order. Two hit men 'jackson and travolta' recover a suitcase and kill a boy accidentally in their car. They require quick assistance to to deal with the situation. Later on they go to a diner where the place will be robbed by a couple. We are then introduced to a black gangster's white wife that one of the hit men has to spend an evening with. He saves her life from a drug overdose. Afterwards a boxer turns his back on the gangster he had taken payment from but enters in to a situation whereby he is forgiven. These stories all sum up a 2 day period in LA. *************END OF Spoilers******************************* Upon viewing the movie one will notice that there is not really a plot to bite on. Instead we are witnesses to a number of situations that arise in coincidently and how the characters will pull themselves out of it. We are shown how members of the underworld operate and that they are very organised people. The movie is filled with witty dialogues and scenes of a violent nature. However I have seen korean movies that have depicted more. The movie is high on style and substance but is very character driven. I know LA is a very frightening city to live in and even innocent people can be hurt in gang wars. The movie clearly shows this. A lot of concentration and patience is require in some of scenes, diner scenes especially. Due to the fact they are very conversational. Many scenes are long stretched whereby a little editing would of helped the film. There is no background music in the movie at all. Tarantino instead incorporated music tracks in to many of the scenes to add to the atmosphere. It did not take away any quality what so ever surprisingly. A good example of this was when Butch was going to his apartment. Bruce Willis, Harvey Keitel, and Samuel L Jackson without a doubt give one of their best performances. However I could not understand what led Rosanna Arquette to do this role. I felt she was wasted.
All is said this can surely be an exciting and enjoyable ride for anyone who understands and is a fan of gangster movies. It is nearly on line with 'the godfather'.
Barah Aana (2009)
Not Bad Indian Kidnapping Caper
Just saw a promo of this movie a couple of weeks ago, so I decided to give it a watch. I have seen quite a few movies on the kidnapping genre and they have been pretty interestingly made. All movies from Fargo to Big Lebowski and Chaos have been different and enjoyable in their own unique way.
Bollywood too has made some good movies too on this subject. This time round we have a short movie for a change from a debutant person by the name of Raja Menon. Surprisingly This guy has displayed that he is talented and can make a good movie. ***********************CONTAINS SPOILERS**************************** The main plot revolves around 3 down on luck guys who are scraping a living through their dead end jobs. Naseerudin Shah who incidentally seems to get all the best movie projects, is a chauffeur. He does not seem to speak until the end, for some reason which is unexplainable. Vijay Raaz is a watchman for a resident apartment complex. Again he delivers a brilliant performance which is just so amusing. In any movie he is amazing and really can make us laugh. The third guy who Is a newcomer is unemployed and strikes a unlikely friendship with a Italian girl who is a resident of Bombay. Her background is not what it seems however. They all are friends and eventually realise that earn a decent living more money is required. After falling in to the company of a unconscious man that Raaz beats up in a brawl, they find a solution to make lots of money. They decided to kidnap people off the streets and ask for ransom money.***************END OF SPOILERS*************** The movie initially upon viewing will not seem like anything groundbreaking or spectacular. But given the fact that it depicts real people, in real surroundings acting in a realistic manner, sets the movie apart from the trash that has come out of late. The first 30 mins or so gives the viewer an introduction to the basic characters however this seems to take longer than is required and we are left to wonder when the main plot will begin. This element really lets the film down. I also expected more meat in the plot as it was too simpler story to tell. The movie could have been more enjoyable if the script writer had implemented some twists and turns. Vijay Raaz is the main attraction of the movie. The man is a genius. His acting is fantastic every time. However I feel he does need to put more weight on. Nasserudin gets through his part effortlessly. But the surprising element in the movie is the Italian actress. She was a delight to watch. Which goes to show that international actors too can be part of Indian films, if they are given the right role.
Overall if you are a fan of movies that belong to the kidnapping genre, this one is for you.
'D' (2005)
Well Above D Grade Quick Gangster Flick
I was very keen in wanting to watch this Rgv movie as soon as I had seen the first look of it in 2005. Upon viewing it I was not disappointed. However the movie had suffered a serious hangover from Verma's previous movies like 'satya' and 'company'.The movie did not have much new to offer. There was an extension of a sub-plot from 'company' This being the 2 sons of a senior crime lord behaving in a negative manner towards their peers.
If I compare this movie to Verma's earlier movie 'satya', 'D' depicted a more realistic transition of a individual turning in to a gangster. Though Randeep Hooda's character did not evoke much emotions or feelings as compared to J.D Chakraverthy. Most of the time he chooses to hide behind his shades and speak in a rock stone manner. The movie has a short running time of 100 mins, so the pace was very fast. The director and writer being newcomer vishram sawant wasted no time in moving with the plot. He tells the story from his perspective in the most honest way.Its inspired from Rgv's movies. The grittiness of Mumbai life and the local scenery is authentically used.
****************************SPOILERS AHEAD************************* Inner gang rivalry is the subject here once again. But it is narrated from a different angle. Hooda is a mechanic who comes back to Mumbai due to sudden death of a relative. However he becomes a witness to a killing a nd is put under pressure to not testify by a crime boss, while being forced on the other side by the law to point out the culprits in a line-up. Later in wanting to get revenge he approaches goga kapoor's gang to join. But as he popularity increases, goga's 2 sons 'sushant' and yashpal' become jealous and attempt to hinder hooda's attempts to bring prosperity to the gang. The gang becomes segmented and each are designated their area of priorities. However rivalry becomes even more bitter.***********************END OF SPOILERS*********************** Without a doubt vishram sawant has proved that he can write and direct. There are many good camera angles both close and wide that he has used. Howver the dubbing is terrible and the there is hardly any background surround sound. Viewing pleasure would be enhanced if these two elements were given more consideration. The background score is fantastic and really suits the mood of the movie. Different pieces of music are used in accordance with what the scene demanded. Though it was used too much in some places when it there was no requirement for it. Randeep Hooda gives a just about acceptable performance as a gangster. There was room for improvement. He did not seem to get under the skin of the character. He did not frighten either. Goga acts well for his age but acted very confused in the second half. There is a lot of intensity in the second half of the movie as characters turn to brutal ways and creating misunderstandings about others.
In the future I hope more good Indian gangster movies should release. However only time will tell. If you like verma's crime flicks, be sure to check this out.
King of New York (1990)
Another Gangster Movie
When I was at University I was a fan of Abel Ferrara's movies. I would make the best effort to catch any movie of his when it came on the television. A few I rented from the local video store. Ferrara began his career with ultra low budget flicks like 'the driller killer' and 'ms 45'. The movies were humorous as well as being serious. In the 90s the quality of his projects improves with 'the bad lieutenant' and 'body snatchers. His movies have always been character driven as depicting the mental state of mind going in to the negative stage. He genre has always differed, so he has demonstrated that he has versatility. His movies mostly are shot in New York, just like Martin Scorsesee.
This is a gangster movie. I have always been a fan of this genre and I have seen many. The plus point of this movie is that it's short, but the linear pattern of the movie somewhat feels disjointed. One scene moves to another without a certain flow. However this film does not have the ability to contend with the likes of 'scarface' and 'goodfellas. It is not a classic either, but that does not mean that one would not enjoy it. Abel has clearly demonstrated that he can make gangster movies. Though I did not have much high opinion in regards to 'the funeral'. It was dull and slow paced.
*************************SPOILERS AHEAD************************** The plot centres around a crime boss that is played fantastically by Christopher Walken, who is released out of jail after doing time. He decides that he wants to start afresh and distribute his wealth and profits to the poor and needy by investing to build a hospital. He aims to accomplish this by killing his rival enemies and being the dominant in the city. However this does not prove easy as a group of cops are hellbent on taking him down. Walken's gang is eradicated after Caruso (the cop) plan an undercover operation. However Walken attempts to fight back.**********************END OF SPOILERS******************* Wesley Snipe's 'New jack city' was far more superior than this movie. It was everything that this movie was lacking. It contained everything within that king of new york did not have. It has a short paper thin plot but Walken's performance substitutes for that. After this he got many bad guy roles. There's plenty of violence for the viewer to enjoy thus the movie would be incomplete without it. The movie would have been more better if the plot was more enhanced and involved the cops more in to the story. The focus on them was lacking. The movie does have its fair share of flaws which tends to take away the true realism. For example 'does a gang boss really have to kill people himself ?', and 'why does know one get shot even at close range during the car chase on the bridge ?'. The highlight of the movie was the confrontation scene between Walken and the detective in the apartment near the end. Walken's facial expressions and emotional acting just made me feel for him.
28/8
Waisa Bhi Hota Hai Part II (2003)
Ironic Look at the Mumbai Underworld
I saw this movie 2 months after it released in 2003 and brings back many good memories of that time. A different take on life in the mumbai underworld through the view of an outsider that is played by Arshad Warsi. This film helped him to come back in to the limelight before Munnabhai mbbs released. Here he plays a copywriter for a ad agency who ends up in a situation to help a gangster, played by prashant who is wounded by bullets on a side road. He donates some blood and from here begins the start of a friendship. Both begin to learn about each others professions from a humorous point of view. Meanwhile that gangster's boss has a feud with with a rival woman gangster. Later on its found out that arshad's brother was a police informer and that is why he was killed by prashant much earlier before this. Prashant is told to kill prashant but is unable to. What happens in the remainder of the movie is to be watched.
Sandhya Mridul also stars in this movie as arshads cop girlfriend. This was her second role after the movie 'saathiya'. She is a good actress. I don't know why we don't see much of her. Prashant Narayanan is a revelation. He played the role of a goon so realistically. He even had the dark skin to match.
Shashanka Ghosh is a good director. I don't know where he has disappeared off too.
If you know what true Indian cinema is about and appreciate good movies even on gangsters lives, this is a movie that I strongly recommend. If anyone has watched it let me know what you thought