Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Best one of the series
3 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Great film, I don't know what all the negative reviews are about. The Lord of the rings and the hobbit hits home for its symbolism of real internal human struggles.

In this one, the dwarf king swaying from his core principles and 'losing himself' in greed and mental illness after finding crazy amounts of gold and wealth. Him eventually realizing that he's become lost, and breaking out of his illness was an inspiring moment in the film.

Also bilbo the hobbit whose humility is a light to others who are caught up in the insanity and power struggles of the world.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
art and the mysterious
1 September 2010
The way i see it, this movie is meant to be ambiguous and mysterious as it tries to represent the greatest mystery of them all - the universe, and our existence. Kubrick does not try and give us the answers in this film, so don't over-analyze and go looking for them! What Kubrick tries to do here is imbue us with this ancient sensation of awe and wonder for the mysterious (in particularly, the mystery of the universe).

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Extreme anti-drug sentiment
21 June 2010
Shallow, narrow minded, opinionated and a overall heavy-handed opinion on drugs. Aronosfsky's 'Requiem for a dream' manages to holds our attention with interesting and unique cinematography which is used to paint a subjective experiences of several drug-addicted/influences characters. Unfortunately, this is done in such a extreme anti-drug sentiment that it leans more towards some sort of anti-drug propaganda than true, insightful art.

Empty of sub-text and any sort of thought-provocation, Aronosfsky holds our hand through this highly implied story and suggests that if we touch a drug, we could end up having our arms amputated, or working as a prostitute for cash. Was this Aronosfsky's intention? I cannot say - but this is what seemed to be implied in the film. If he had high ambitions for the films overall impact, it certainty fell short. I found this film like Riefenstahl's Nazi-propaganda piece "Triumph of the will", great cinematography, masterfully crafted - but it's overall message highly disagreeable.

This could have been a great film if the story was handled more carefully without these disgustingly over-the-top vilification of drugs. It's true that drug's lead to bad places. But while i am not the seasoned drug taker, i certainly know that mama's fat-loss pill's will not to lead to a torturous brain lobotomy!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9 (I) (2009)
4/10
Secretly a children's movie
5 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
They base the film's world on the ever-so original "robot apocalypse" cliché'. And as my friend mentioned to me, merges it with this Lord of the Rings-like 'quest' to save the world bullshit. It is all done in a PG-13 way, and never venture as dark or as intellectual as the many film's it originally re-uses.

The Small puppet's trying to make a difference in a apocalyptic world much bigger than them. Reminds me of small hobbits trying to make a difference in a apocalyptic 'middle-earth' much bigger than them. Is it a coincidence that Ellijah Wood is voice acting 9? Probably not.

The all seeing eye/spotlight was a lot like the one in lotr. A lot of the monsters seem like sentinel's from the matrix with the red camera eyes. The standing, tripod machine really looked like a cartoonified version of the machines in War of the Worlds.

There was no intellectual discussion in the film, it's just 'gripping' *cough* action sequences designed to entertain a 12 year old. Everything is high implied and obvious, which attributes itself to a children's film.

I was expecting something more, but then it abruptly ended at probably an 1 1/2 hour film. I treated it like a talented animation student's technical exercise. A student which doesn't have any particular intention to show anything new or original in terms of story, but simply showcase his animation art.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A very important film by a very important filmmaker
16 December 2009
If there ever was a revolution this film would be cited in history text books years from now for evoking class struggle in America. Needless to say, Michael Moore would also be in there, a documentary filmmaker whose influence precedes none.

I can't imagine him making any more documentaries after this, this film is just the icing on the cake for his body of anti-corporate, morally based work. The themes he deals with, capitalism and greed, have ran through all his films and this last one almost feels like an accumulation, or even a final presentation of a Mooreian ideology which he has developed.

Moore is at times dishonest, he is a show, I wouldn't have him politician. Yet he does it all to good reason. He fights from a moral stand point in a system which has gone out of control with greed and fear. He wants to instigate change. He wants people to rise up out of their seats and yell...

"I'M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!"
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cass (2008)
2/10
Failed. Unoriginal, ambitious.
15 December 2009
I watched this film unwillingly with some friends thinking it was some violent-glorification of ugly, football hooligans Looking back, I would have preferred this much more than what the film actually was - a lame 2 hour drama which had to be endured rather than enjoyed.

I felt so disengaged throughout the whole movie - possibly because of how amateur and unoriginal the film looked and felt. Its ambitious attempts to be dramatic and truthful failed miserably.

The script does have a strong moral center about racism, being an outcast, belonging and family. Unfortunately these story elements are lost in a badly executed production.
2 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A nice little horror film
13 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Is this film scary? yes. But not in the traditional Hollywood excessive, gore fest. There is no twisted monster or psychotic, masked killer. Instead the film appeals to our imaginations, those paranoid thought we had when we were a kid and we would hear footsteps, or creaks inside the house. Or times you may have woken up in a sweat of fear, sensing someone was in the room.

What this film achieves is expanding on those fears, and capturing the eerie silences and noises of the night. What's more, it comes off as the real deal, like some horror footage found after the incident. I agree with many and say that it will be hard to get to sleep after viewing this film, those midnight noises will become so much more to those with strong imaginations. The eerie silence of the night will become unbearable.

However the film is nothing ground breaking in the horror genre. Its a simple horror film which narrowly escapes the horror cliché's attached to the setting of a suburban house at night. It does what it does well, providing a scare. But nothing more.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Revenge...morality...
29 November 2009
Revenge is something that would define Quentin Tarantino. You only have to look to Kill Bill 1+2 to see how Tarantino dances outside the boundaries of morality and humanity and appeals to ugly, violent human urges of blood lust and revenge.

What is different in this film is that we see Tarantino appealing to a greater, social hostility to Third Reich and the Nazi Reigeme. We've all sat through history classes, seen the pictures of mutilated, malnourished corpses..maybe read books such as "Night", or seen films such as "Schindlers list". Needless to say, the Nazi reigeme has come to represent the dark depths of humanity.

What Inglorious basterds may do (for some) is to satisfy an urge, an ugly urge to get even with Nazi's. It's Tarantino's version of history, the awesome version where Brad Pitt and his Jewish, Nazi-hunting crew collect Nazi scalps as accolades.

Some viewers may be shocked. They may argue "an eye for an eye makes the world go blind". I have to admit, I wasn't sympathetic with the Basterds cause after "the bear jew" beat a helpless Nazi officer to death with a baseball bat. Or when the cinema burned down with helpless patrons running towards locked doors as 2 of the basterds unloaded rounds of lead into the fleeing crowds. But yet, this movie was not meant to be morally profound, this movie is, of course, Tarantino.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed