Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
The debut feature film by novelist Julia Leigh is anything but artistic
29 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The debut feature film by novelist Julia Leigh is anything but artistic, which is a goal that she obviously set out to achieve. Sleeping Beauty follows a university student going from one mundane job to another until she eventually settles into a position where she is put into a coma-like state so that old men can fondle her naked body while she lies in bed, lifeless. This interpretation of the classic fairy tale goes beyond provocative, but falls flat due to the lack of purpose of the main protagonist.

Lucy, played by Australian actress Emily Browning, is the anti-hero without any redeeming qualities. We first see her in a lab, where she is a subject in an experiment. While she sits there, quiet and static, we see the lab technician begin his experiment by testing her gag reflex as he gently shoves a long tube down her throat until she cannot take anymore. It is unnerving and uncomfortable, which sets the tone for the film.

We soon encounter the people in her life, such as her housemates who don't engage with her on a personable level, only on a business level by asking for her rent, and her needing to clean the house (subtle shout out to Cinderella?). Soon we meet Birdmann, a man who lives a small apartment littered with horded possessions, who is supposed to be Lucy's anchor and heart. However, there is something off about their relationship. While she makes him a bowl of cereal (with vodka instead of milk) their interaction is stagnant and to an extent, pointless. Who is this man? How do they know each other? Why doesn't she live with him? Too many questions rise from this relationship, but we are never let in as we are always kept at arm's length from discovering who the characters really are.

Tiresomely, the film goes on and Lucy answers an ad for high-end 'waitressing' for extra cash so she can make rent. This leads to an interview of scrutinous proportions, as she is poked and prodded and intimately examined by the Madame, played by Rachael Blake. She is soon hired, starting her journey as a high-end escort.

Her first gig is to serve a handful of elderly men (and one woman who is Benita from Play School, my childhood is now shattered!!) in a lavish mansion, wearing revealing white lingerie, whilst the other girls wear black (and certainly not sexy as it makes their breast look like baby bottles). The dinner party has somewhat of an Eyes Wide Shut vibe, with the setting and tone, but not as compelling.

Lucy falls deeper and deeper into this lifestyle, eventually offering herself to be put into a coma-like state as mentioned earlier. The film tries to show the softer side to these men in an effort to make us understand their desires, however, this creates long, boring monologues which ends in showing us an old mans cock (excuse my French).

On a positive note, the film looks beautiful. There was precise precision and technique applied to this film to give it a very European look. The sets, costumes and design is a thing of beauty which does keep you entranced. But by the time the third old mans penis came around, I literally could watch no more. There are not many films that I walk out on because as a critic and movie goer, there is a level of respect you must give the filmmakers. However on this occasion, I was at my last tether.

It was the lack of emotion throughout the film which ultimately made it all style without any substance. As much as I wanted to like the film, it was guilty of pretentious overload.
53 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Closer (I) (2004)
7/10
a reflection...
26 January 2005
I liked this movie, just watched it yesterday. I found the script brutally honest in some parts. Lets face it. In real life we cheat, lie and have sex. So do these people.

But...I don't understand how Alice/Jane could be so in love with Dan, but lie to him for four years and not tell him the truth about her name. Thats the one thing I didn't get. I was told that it is explained in the strip club seen with Larry, but I still didn't get what her motivation was.

Overall, I connected with the three characters, not sympathizes. Not Alice though, She is a complicated cat that I just didn't understand at the end. But maybe that was her job as a character. She seemed to be the victim through the whole film, yet when we find out the truth, we feel betrayed as an audience...just like Dan would of. Cos in the end, arn't we supposed to feel sorry for him and Anna? Them being the two main characters who arn't together, even when they love each other.

So anywayz, I see where they are coming from, and it scares me that we as people are like Dan, Anna, Larry and Alice too. Because in the end, we don't like anyone of the characters...yet thats us.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Everyone please pray that movies will not all end up being shot in front of a blue screen!
23 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
OK, and thats what this film is...OK.

Its not brilliant, not visually stunning, not breathtaking. I'm not saying its a bad film, I just don't think it deserves the 'talk up' its getting from other reviews. The blues screen does work for this film, but lets hope that in the future, this won't be the new 'thing'. This will kill actual visually stunning films like A Very Long Engagement and Amelie. Polly Perkins was the 'lead' and was sooo unlikeable just purely because she was the annoying damsel in distress, but she thinks she can handle her own, when obviously she can't. Sky Captain was so sly and shallow, that he doesn't seem to like Polly at all - so why does he let her tag along? Not because of the 'deal' they had, because shes hot. I hate it how he punches her out...thats not funny, that was weird. But lets not bag it too much...it is an enjoyable film...family film. Its not one to call the best film of the year, for that is an overstatement.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I needed to drink to sit through this film
12 January 2005
If it wasn't for the bottle of wine that my girlfriend and I were drinking while watching, I'm sure we would of walked out. Basically this film is good vs evil aka American vs English! Takes you back to the war of Independence doesn't it? GET OVER IT!! Good golly, the line that we just laughed at...not that it was meant to be funny...was when Nic Cage is holding the declaration of Independence in the Liberty Bell tower and quotes "Lets just savor the moment...this document hasn't been in this location since the declaration was signed!" Oh Lordy! CORNBALL!! This film was cheesy propaganda for brain dead adventure/fantasy lovers.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed