Change Your Image
lindahl-klas
Reviews
Intrusion (2021)
Disappointing
Freida Pinto is awful. Marshall-Green barely ok. Script: horrible.
Got a decent build-up which only makes the fall even worse. Because the unveiling of this horror drama is as predictable as it is despicably bad.
I don't even know why I'm giving this a 4 instead of a 2. Maybe for the cool house and landscape...
Under any standard this.
The Commuter (2018)
Not everyone elses review
Usual comments about Liam Neeson playing Liam Neeson again. Another one of his simple action movies etc etc.
But I disagree. You know why? This man never disappoints. I have yet to see the day when I'm coming out of a cinema (or my living room) saying to myself "nahh, that was bad...".
Because - even when his movies does suck, Neeson himself always brings it to the table and saves the day. Never halfa$$sed day at work. And so sympathetic it always shines through in his characters.
Okay. That being said. This movie has a decent storyline. Everything's not good in it -- far from it -- but he's just bringing us to the finish line one more time and I'm amazed. The guy is 66 or 67, and looks ripped for a 35 year old.
Clapping hands from Sweden!
The Thing (1982)
A true masterpiece
The Thing is in my humble opinion maybe the greatest of all of Carpenter's films. It's great on so many levels, I'm having trouble deciding what I will start with.
All right, first of all, the story is great. We follow a group of researchers, on expedition in Antarctica, far away from civilization. The thought of being helpless in freezing cold conditions without the chance of getting any help is disturbing enough. And as an extra layer of complexity, we have the paranoia and mind-bending element of who-can-I-trust?. Since the group is faced with a never-before seen threat that spreads like a virus no-one knows what to do or who to trust. And the longer times go, and the more of the crew gets tainted by the alien, the more the paranoia grows.
I think essentially why I love this movie so much is because I always try and imagine myself in their situation. Would I panic? Would I turn into MacReady or would I become "the thing"? I get goose bumps just thinking about it.
The score, for once not made by John Carpenter, is really really good. We usually hear Ennio Morricone's music in western movies, but he has done a tremendous job with the music to The Thing. Since the music is so essential to the feeling of a certain film, the composer has a crucial task upon him. Morricone made it with brilliance and finesse, and the mood of the picture hits you right at the first credits. Awesome!
So the special effects might not be comparable with todays CGI technology. That doesn't matter, really, in my opinion. It's not only the realism in monsters that decide how good the scares are in all horror movies. Really good horror movies can always depend on the mood setting, the story and the (un)expectation from the viewer. And those things are all as good as they can be in The Thing. Also, the effects aren't bad to begin with, I just wanted to prove a point.
The ending is fantastic. MacReady does the right thing, and ends the film being a hero. He knew his life (or any other's) couldn't be saved, but instead of crawling into a corner and cry like a little baby he did the only right thing. He went out and put an end to the whole thing by blowing up the place, leaving nothing but the bister winter to keep him company (and Childs who cared to show up some explosions too late). When the end credits roll I'm really impressed by this movie. It has me captured frame-by-frame all through the runtime every time I see it.
The Thing undoubtedly has an important quality -- it makes you think and it makes you involved, and it makes you want to watch compellingly all the way to the end.
The Hitcher (2007)
Terrible and unnecessary
When I hear that a remake has been made for any film classic I get instantly skeptic. And there's plenty of good reasons for that. Remakes never ever seem to live up to the original, and this is no exception.
In fact, this is probably one of the worst remakes ever. Together with that horrendous Psycho-remake with Anne Heche and Vince Vaughn, for example.
Let me tell you in brief why this is so bad: first of all, the original was absolutely awesome. In this remake we see: - instead of the cold-blooded bada§§ Rutger Hauer as John Ryder there's some wimp acting all silly. John Ryder doesen't get that rough character at all that Hauer was able to give him. This was a big disappointment.
- the youngsters are terrible actors, both of them. Sophia Bush only gets on my nerves, Jennifer Jason Leigh was so much better. That guy playing Jim Halsey is also worthless.
- they've tried to copy some scenes almost completely from the original, and all of the attempts fail to be anywhere near as good as in the real Hitcher.
- the directing is a lot worse than Robert Harmon.
- the mood never gets settled in the film. Nothing is truly believable.
I had to force myself through the end. It was a real pain, but I had to.
Don't see this. See the brilliant, and much more terrifying, 1986 original.