Reviews

21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Long Shot (2019)
8/10
Better than I expected
29 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Sure, it's a mix of comedy and some poignancy that seems to whipsaw you from one place to another, but it kinda almost works. The comedy is pretty funny - sometimes very broad comedy. And the development of the relationship between Fred (Rogan) and Charlotte (Theron) is nice to watch. Both have well-defined characters that start to work out their idiosyncrasies and eventually find the real romance between them.

It was a bit hard to believe the original premise, that Charlotte, the "youngest Secretary of State ever" would not have a lifestyle of power and association that is so strong that they could succeed to one of the highest, most powerful offices in the federal government and yet that strength of will to achieve their goals didn't fence off an encounter with someone of limited success and influence like Fred.

But if you suspend your disbelief and let the story unfold, it's fun and rompy with a nice ending to remind us all that true love will overcome the most difficult circumstances.

There was an interesting set of moments, one right after the other, when Fred discovers that he not only might not know Charlotte that well or even Lance, but himself. I thought that was a missed opportunity for more, but given the pace/rhythm of the movie, it was mentioned and then the movie moved along. It was a plot point, but it was one of the more interesting, almost-lost moments.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fisk (2021– )
9/10
Criminally undernoticed comedy series
23 January 2024
I had no idea what I was getting into when I started this series, but I was hooked in the very first episode. It is a slightly absurdist take on life of a divorced woman returning to a career after her marriage to a dillweed has collapsed. She finds herself employed/employable at a bottom-of-the-rung legal firm in Melbourne that handles estates, wills, and the like. Her father is a retired judge who now has male live-in partner, her rival/peer in the office is a martinet about the office kitchen, the owner does whatever he can to avoid actually working for clients, and the front desk guy does just enough to allow him to pursue his first love, which is streaming his gaming activity with Twitch.

The main character is not perfect, not by a long shot, but somehow her general goodness/usefulness comes through as she deals with the odd lots from the community who need help with their estates or with claiming one.

This series relies upon understated comedy and comedic scenes, and events early on in the series will have a payoff sometime by the second season.

I've been working full-time for almost 50 years now, and no matter how absurd a movie or TV show is about office work, I never doubt that what I see could happen because I see offices just like this one whether it's for a legal firm trying to get by on the leavings from small wills or a large megacorp trying to leapfrog its competitors with inferior, unwanted products.

I laugh not only at what I see here, but what I see here as a reflection of life in Western capitalism.

Kitty Flanagan is unknown in America, and that's too bad, because she is brilliant. Witty, sly, reserved, and able to point out that much of what we see in life as normal is actually quite, quite funny.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
After (I) (2019)
2/10
Why was this made?
18 October 2023
This was Not Good.

A high school graduate goes away to a nearby college (hey, they drove there) and she is paired with a dorm mate several years older who takes her to a party where she drink and flirts with the Bad Boy and this the first ten minutes of a movie that will not surprise with a single plot speed bump.

To say this is dreadful and plodding is to give far too much attention to a movie that should have stayed in the camera.

The main actors, *COLLEGE STUDENTS*, are incapable of the slightest interest in school but instead waste their precious youth being incredibly incurious about their freedom but instead continuously mumble their lines and lurch through scenes that are dreadfully paced.

The is not a single surprise in this movie except the surprise that you wasted time watching it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bravetown (I) (2015)
4/10
An incoherent storyline with a talented cast.
15 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
We watched this because of the "talented musician and dancing" tagline.

Perhaps that tagline oversells the movie a bit.

The acting is fine. The cast is fine. The intent of the story is poignant.

But the actual plot is, in a word, unbelievable.

There is an entire town in North Dakota that regularly sends its best and brightest off to war, and they return broken--or not at all.

And the entire town is traumatized, generation after generation, by their deaths.

But the boys go off to war, friends and family stay behind, and the cycle continues

BUT ALSO this tiny town in Western North Dakota somehow becomes the host of the statewide high school cheer dance off which is filled with cheer teams from across the state all dancing in the most suggestive poses and steps and outfits possible, something that notoriously conservative North Dakota is known for.

These two threads are maybe connected.

But how they are connected is a thread too fine to see.

None of these people *for generations* will talk about their grief.

And yet they are completely accepting of Las Vegas showgirls as cheer squad. Because that's how small towns are in America's heartland.

It's not a terrible movie. The actors are fine, and the production values are good.

But ultimately this film just doesn't land.

3/10 stars.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Holly Star (2018)
1/10
Nothing can save this film
24 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Avoid this completely.

We generally will watch anything for fun as we are relaxing by the fire after a busy day in the Christmas season.

This film had promise. The initial setup seemed like a good start. A puppeteer in NYC fails at a must-make-it job and then returns to her parents' home in Maine, convinced she is finished in life.

A "quirky" cast of characters intersect with her life, especially when she has a flash of insight about a mysterious past even when she narrowly escapes death.

But the clews in her premonition aren't enough to solve the mystery, so she tries to recover her past through hypnosis and then by repeating the near-death experience.

Then, near the end of the movie, she has a flash of insight and finds the real meaning of the dream/premonition because -

Ope. The movie just ends.

Yikes.

We watched this with another couple and all of us shouted our dismay at this terrible, manipulative ending. NOTHING THAT HAPPENED IN THE FILM MATTERED.

The protagonist "learned something special." Everything else was just a set of MacGuffins.

The puppeteer aspect? DID NOT NEED TO BE A PART OF THIS AT ALL.

The near-broken down car? What?

The "Chekov's gun" in the first scenes? (The walkie talkie.) Not used to advance the plot in any way that mattered.

The love interest? More like the love skim and turn away. Not a single spark between them.

Nothing made sense with regards to plot or pacing or character development or anything that makes a movie something that is more than 90 minutes of colorful lights on the screen.

I do not fault the actors. They played their roles well, but their roles/characters were limited by the script, and as usual with these Christmas movies, they couldn't make obvious inferences from events or ask the right questions or learn from previous mistakes.

This was a terrible script.

I think about how there are so many directors and producers and actors and stagehands and all the rest who are looking for work, and Netflix throws money at these films that seem to be put together by a film crew working as hostages.

It seems that the film itself was recomposed in the editing room, but it still didn't make sense.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Better than dreck, but not by much
12 December 2021
We watched this. It was not uniformly terrible. There were some moments of levity. But it felt like a long series of comedy sketches in search of a punchline. There are moments of maudlin sincerity grafted into situations that have almost no connection to the emotional statement. The acting/characterization is completely two dimensional. The comedic actions arise because no one has ever thought to ask the next question. At least three of the families here are super rich to the point of owning estates and incredibly expensive cars, and yet they act like helpless children in the face of trivial adversities to the point that you begin to believe that the foolishness of the English elite of Downton Abbey is not a one-off but is part of being rich and English.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Are you willing to listen and see?
1 November 2021
Lotta people see CK as how is portrayed in their media streams. I get that.

But there's a real person behind the stories. This series attempts to help us hear and see this person. If you're looking for a perfect kid or perfect man, you're not going to find it in this story because that doesn't. You're going to see someone who is attempting grow up--as we all do--with the added complexities of Being Black in a country that does not acknowledge that about anyone who is Black.

Sure, it's going to tell more than the story of CK. It's going to give you the background of the nation that sees Black men as objects for entertainment and profit who have narrowly defined limits of what is allowed. And for a lot of viewers, it is deeply disturbing and uncomfortable to be confronted not with what we are looking at but what we want to see.

I'm enjoying the series. It's not just a football story or a footballer story. It's a story of Being Black as expressed in the entertainment industry--which is what sports is--and trying to find your own identity w/o conforming to what is demanded of you.

You can be free, or you can be invisible. Those are the options.
64 out of 143 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fatherhood (I) (2021)
9/10
Sweet and touching
8 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Beautiful film that felt very real. Kevin Hart is known for his comedic chops and for his over-the-top style of comedy.

But he has more than that, and this film lets him show much more of who he is.

There is no one right way to handle the death of a loved one. We all have to balance our feelings, our imaginations, our realities, our fear of the changes to our lives. And in this film, Hart, playing the real-life person, has outbursts of grief and rage and destructive outbursts as well as tender moments of deep connection and understanding with himself as well as the people around him who try to love him in his pain and isolation.

The character of Maddy is a standout star. Melody Hurd holds herself well in a demanding role for a young child. She feels believable in her forthrightness as well as in her need of her father. DeWanda. Wise, playing Swan, feels (and looks like) a bit of a young Whitney Houston, but she handles her role competently.

Unfortunately I was not as impressed with Hart's wingmen, Lil Rel Howery (Jordan) and Anthony Carrigan (Oscar), who felt too cardboard-ish as the clueless men who think that you can power through grief. But I'll give them some grace as I imagine that we're seeing them through the eyes of the protagonist and not as they are in real life. Alfre Woodard (Marion) and Frankie Faison (Mike) play Hart's in-laws, and handle their small roles well.

Is this an absolutely great movie? Not really, but not because of talent or production. Hart and The film itself is going to pull us into a very private moment of grief with a young child, and it is very good for what it is trying to accomplish. My eyes were drawn to Woodard who always makes her role as big as she wants them to be, and of course Hart "exceeded my expectations," as they say. I was expecting a much more comedic movie and role, as I knew nothing about this film before I saw it, and while the movie itself was much deeper and more emotional than I expected, Hart was perfectly cast here.

Kudos to the entire production team for creating this gentle, emotional, rich film that faces not only death but how we have to grapple with it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lupin (2021– )
8/10
Solid fun - just go with the roller coaster
23 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I'll admit I knew nothing about this character or story before I watched it, so I had zero expectations. And it's in French, with English subtitles!

But I loved it. Omar Sy is perfectly charming as a thief--or is he?--who is a raconteur and a pursuer of justice and sometimes a picker-upper of stuff that's quite valuable.

The first episode sets up Lupin for us--Arsene Lupin, the main character, is Senegalese living in Paris where he was (apparently) born and raised. A series of unfortunate incidents, revealed throughout these episodes, helps us understand what has shaped him, and helps us understand what is driving him.

There are plenty of twists and turns, and we learn that Lupin is way more than we first understood in the first episode. But what those understandings are would be spoilers--let's just say he is a deeper and richer character than just a happy-go-lucky thief with light fingers and a wide smile.

I loved hearing it in French because there is a flavor to patois that you don't get from an English translation. It appears to be set and filmed mostly in Paris or environs, and the sets are wonderfully detailed.

This is at once a high-concept fantasy and a very real-feeling story.

I wanted to like it more, but if anything, the writing from the first episodes just didn't carry over into the following episodes. I hope they can find their groove and make this into a stellar series that lasts more than eight episodes. (The first four are available now as "Season 1.")
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Upload (2020– )
10/10
Light-hearted and yet deeply philosophical about life
3 May 2020
What makes us human? What makes a "good" life? Do we affect anything in our actions when we intend good or bad?

The series tackles these most human of questions, but in a wacky comedy/thriller/romance/sci-fi mashup that feels all to real in spots and hilariously dysfunction with technology that is more advanced but still with the same broken people. (The entire subplot of Byron contains so, so many zings. WHY WOULD TECHNOLOGY OFFER THESE BENEFITS?)

It takes aim at current cultural, social, and business trends. (The "5-star system" is the new "work at will" law, with arbitrary goals and demerits designed to make sure that the most desperate can never succeed.)

The creatives here are brilliant. Just enough new stuff to make this feel slightly futuristic, but not so much that we don't retain that human connection with these people. Well, are they *all* really people?

Thoroughly enjoyed this. Binge-watched it. Unbelievable brilliance.
133 out of 193 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just Mercy (2019)
9/10
Sometimes a movie is more than a movie
19 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Sometimes a movie is just a movie. It entertains. It thrills. It chills. It amuses.

But sometimes a movie a slice of life so real that you are in the film, right alongside the characters, wondering if your own actions will help ensure the triumph of right over evil--and maybe a little bit scared that you will be the one with the flashlight and the gun and the key and the belt and access to the electrical switch.

I found myself in such a place with this movie. Sure, everyone likes to be the hero of their *own" movie--that's part of being human. But I was wincing and blinking at the sheer terror that is meted out to our brothers and sisters, casually, confidently, with the assurance that such cruelty is the way of the Lord. (The movie subtly weaves the church in with the injustice, noting that the presence of the community of believers is the effectual working out of injustice--it's planned and ordained by the Good Lord Himself. I'm a believer, and a sinner, and I'm daily appalled at the fallenness of my own people. But, that's a discussion for another time--it is not this movie's theme.)

I have seen Michael B. Jordan (Bryan Stevenson) in other movies, and have enjoyed his presence. (Who doesn't like him as Killmonger? C'mon.) I just want to say, his acting here is incredible--and perhaps because it is representational. His journey in this movie from holding a strong, confident belief that right will prevail through the middle where his confidence is broken to the end where he is wiser, grateful, but much more knowledgeable about how things "really work" is a sobering delight to watch. This is *acting*.

Jamie Foxx (Walter McMillan) is caged despair and rage and nearly erased hope. There is only a metal screen left in his world as the view to the rest of society, a society that saw him as guilty of capital crime a year before he was convicted. Any Black man can be picked up and criminalized because every Black man is guilty. That's the appalling truth at the end, spoken aloud to the audience in the courtroom because often the judge, jury, and audience want to believe that Justice-with-a-capital-J is what drives us. It's not justice, though. It's free-floating anger and fear, and it's revenge against an inchoate enemy. But God is good, y'all, and even though the system is set against the character of Walter--a touch of spring appears after a 500-year-long winter: Walter is finally seen.

The other characters are all fine, and I note with pleasure that this is a Black story centering Black characters with Black redeemers. This is not a white savior movie. (And thank God for that. Enough with movies like Green Book.) Brie Larson's Eva is an assistant who pops in when needed, and Tim Blake Nelson's Ralph is the pivotal villain who is manipulable in his fears by the system determine to find a Black man--any Black man--guilty. He's finally led to tell the truth. He is not the hero for doing so, but merely no longer impeding justice in his fears.

There is an awful secret in America about existing as Black, a secret that is discoverable if we have the slightest curiosity, and this movie does not demand that we see it. It does, however, provide an opportunity in the privacy of a darkened theater to consider whether we are going to seek our own ways, or if we will seek just mercy. And then, maybe, we'll decide to move.

Nine/Ten stars for a bit of over-the-top music and montages. They are wonderful to experience, satisfying conclusions of our own hopes at redemption, but I think in comparison to the rest of the movie they take us out the moment. It's not bad to do so, because it does ground us in our own reality. It is a slight fault in the craft of the movie-as-a-movie. Otherwise, the movie is just outstandingly created, shot by shot, in a way that leaves you breathless at the creativity and strength of the production team. Costumes are invisibly accurate to the times, and sets and lights are wonderfully done--it is difficult to light Black skin appropriately, but the combination of skillful lighting and filming keeps the actors from disappearing into shadow.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
21 Bridges (2019)
8/10
Satisfying, well-crafted cops-and-robbers with great actors
8 December 2019
I enjoyed it far more than I thought I would. I generally do not like films where people die on screen. I'm not someone who can watch violence easily. But while there was violence, and people die violent deaths, at least the deaths are quick and do not emphasize gore. (Definitely deserves the R rating for onscreen violence and death.)

One of the things that made this film good is the many twists along the way. I won't spoil it for you, but there are some surprises. And the actual filming has many clues scattered along the way that, if you're paying attention, bring a satisfying close.

Chadwick Boseman is, of course, excellent. The man can inhabit a thousand tongues of dialect. And he is an action hero in this film with its *many* on-foot chase scenes through Manhattan--not just on the streets, either.

Stephan James ("If Beale Street Could Talk") plays one of the two "bad guys" who perhaps has stumbled upon something bigger than he realizes, and who sees the ground constantly dissolving under his feet as he is betrayed again and again. He is wonderfully active and athletic--as he needs to be, as he becomes the Most Wanted Man in Manhattan.

Sienna Miller plays Boseman's sidekick who is fierce and dedicated, and maybe has a few secrets.

J.K. Simmons is, of course, J.K. Simmons, and does not disappoint. I thought he was better in "Whiplash," but he's still J.K. Simmons everywhere he appears on screen.

I was disappointed in the casting of Keith David in a throw-away role, and I wish the casting agents had found a better vehicle for him. He is adequate in the small part he plays, but he could do much better than this.

I'm not familiar with Taylor Kitsch, who plays Stephan James' partner in crime, but he does well as the violent criminal with few regrets about his actions.

I was surprised to see Alexander Siddig in the credits, as I didn't instantly recognize him in his role as the "laundromat." He had a good arc, and in the later scenes there are broadly placed clues that remind us that what we see is not always what we think we should see.

There were a few loose ends, but it might have been my inattention in this 100 minutes of this movie. It moves quite fast, but there aren't wild leaps of logic--just incredible revelations of systemic corruption.

As far as the underlying world of this film vis-a-vis the police--Boseman is a police detective, and does an admirable job of moral certitude in a world of grays and fog. But there are also other police officers who are more comfortable with the ambiguity of doing what seems right by doing what is actually wrong. There's no paean to cops, and there isn't an incessant critique either. The humans of New York have humans as their imperfect defenders and martyrs.

I gave it a "8" for the satisfying craft that went into the development of this film. It's a solid cops-and-robbers film with surprising twists and satisfying conclusions.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Holiday Rush (2019)
8/10
Sweet and poignant
2 December 2019
It's hard to write a Christmas movie that is more than a Hallmark moment. You need some conflict and some emotion--and there's enough here to carry this movie. The ending is sweet and tidy, and there's enough difficulty to make it worth watching.

There's some solid acting in Sonequa Martin-Green's Roxy. She carries the scenes she's in, and my goodness but does Deon Cole steal the scene every time he's on. I appreciated Romany Malco as Rush Williams, a DJ who loses his perch as the number one radio host, and the change in the lives of his family as a result.

I'd like a little more of Tamala Jones here--she can do a lot more than the role she plays.

The kids were good. It's hard to be completely sympathetic to their situation, as they go from what seems to be super well-off to being just solidly upper-middle class--but the effort is there to make it more believable.

What does everyone learn in this story? That family matters for Christmas. That it's not the number of presents but the presence of each other. And that the star on the tree lights the way home for everyone.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ambitious and direct--with great interviews by contemporary voices
23 September 2019
This is an exceedingly ambitious film, condensing 400 or more years of history and theology and work into an hour examination of America itself through the eyes of the American white Protestant beliefs and behaviors.

It was great to see so many familiar faces, great to see honest truth spoken plainly, great to see people of all demeanors and styles, from serious and earnest to hopeful and happy.

Racism is a sin, period. It seems to be the one sin that cannot be examined in the American church. It has led to grievous behaviors by white Christians for 400+ years, and it still causes the witness of the American church to be grossly stained.

This film is an attempt not to fix that--no film can do that, and the film and the speakers say that--but it is an attempt to get people, especially Christians, and most especially white Protestants, to examine themselves, what they really want, and how much do they want what they say they really want.

I watched this straight through, starting at 1130 pm when someone forwarded me the link. I couldn't go away from this the entire time.

Kudos to the entire production team on this most excellent film. Please, more of this!
21 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
America's Dream (1996 TV Movie)
8/10
Good, but feels shaved for time
24 December 2018
I am reviewing only "The Boy Who Painted Christ Black"

This is a short film based upon the short story by Dr. John Henrik Clarke, and I would first encourage you to find and read the original short story.

The film is an abridged version of the short story, and while it does a fine job with what it does show, it feels a little rushed and unfinished. Snipes does a good job with his role as a black leader in a small town school, struggling to promote excellence and yet abide in a system where he is a pawn of the state who must be certain of his place. Carhart is the white county school superintendent who placates the black community with empty words and promises, but really is in charge of the black schools in order to maintain order and decency. (His language is cleaned up from the short story.) Calloway is a black teacher working to teach and inspire her class, and is a fierce protector of the lives and imaginations and hopes of her charges. And Golden is the young Aaron who paints the picture of the Black Christ because of how he thinks Christ is, is how Christ should look -- "kind, like black people, not like white people."

You could have an interesting theological discussion just about that statement. But the story is bigger than that. It's about pride and vision and compromise and lost dreams and how do you find a place to live in the in-between spots in America, where the dream is dangled before you if you just work hard enough, but the reality is, for a significant portion of Americans, that dream will be continually deferred.

The story ends with some satisfying conclusions, even though it might not tie up all the ends you want finished.

A bittersweet story told forthrightly. Good, could use some further development, and in my opinion would benefit from being as honest as the short story is.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Tremendous, brutal, funny, gripping
13 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I had no expectations of this other than it has been getting mad props from my friends all over America who've already seen it in the past few days since it opened.

The gist of the story is a singular black cop on the otherwise all-white Colorado Springs police force who on a wild impulse decides to interact with the KKK. Because he is young and impulsive, he dials the KKK directly and uses his real name. Because a black man would not be able to fit in, he enlists the help of a white cop for in-person interactions, but keeps his phone interactions, especially with David Duke. (Yes, THE David Duke.) One thing leads to another, and the KKK thugs in Colorado Springs are broken apart--but his work is shredded and the police department decide to pretend nothing happened at all.

All this is most wonderful, especially the final scene in the first part, which is a final phone call between the black cop and David Duke. The audience broke up shouting and laughing at this, and it was emotionally satisfying.

But the movie isn't over.

This final scene is followed by intercuts of recent actions in today's America, and the mood of the audience--and myself--changed to one of sober reflection and emotional distress. In summary: nothing much has changed, and even the heroism of many people has done almost nothing to affect the rise of Naziism and fascism and race-hatred in America.

With all that said --

The movie is very well constructed, and feels very late-70s. I enjoyed seeing and hearing the lives of people living in that time--costumes and sets and dialog were pretty much spot on. The entire premise was believable even though the story comes about because an eager black cop decides to take on the KKK and then finds he can't get by without the help of his friends.

The movie would be one, complete thing had it ended at the phone scene--and yet the movie would not be complete without the codicil that confronts us with our world of today, where the KKK and Nazis and fascists and white nationalists and alt-rightist are sometimes clowning--but are becoming more and more bold and more and more invasive and more and more successful.

Charlottesville happened not just because people don't stand against Nazis at all levels, from the farm house to the White House, but because too many people feel "it just can't happen here."

Good work, Mr. Lee and others.
49 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Neshoba (2008)
10/10
Excellent summary of past events and recent actions in Neshoba, Mississippi
20 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
So the best thing about this is the rawness and humanness of the people--both the people you feel for when you hear the awfulness of their pain at their loss remembered from 50 years ago (June 21, 1964), and the people you feel bewildered by as they express their frank racism and express astonishing ignorance about people.

The story of Cheney, Goodman, and Schwerner is perhaps well-known. Goodman and Schwerner came down from New York, eager to do the right thing. They joined up with James Cheney, a native, and attempted to get people to register to vote or otherwise simply express their civil rights. They were arrested for speeding, jailed, and then released.

Somehow (!) the Ku Klux Klan was notified that the three were traveling in the area. Three or four dozen men of Neshoba and the surrounding area attacked them after they were released, beat them, tortured them, really, and then killed them. (James Cheney, as the black guy, was especially tortured.) They buried the three in an earthen dam, and dozens and dozens of people were told about this act, as the men boasted of their actions to shut down the troublemakers.

There was some activity in 1964 to indict these men, but nothing happened to most of them. Some served a few years for civil rights violations, but no murder charges.

Forty years later, many of the culprits were still free. One of them, the ringleader, a preacher named Edgar Ray Killen, was still talking about it.

A coalition of citizens got together just to talk about the situation, to find ways for reconciliation. Gradually they got more and more attention until the State of Mississippi took Killen to trial for the murders of these young men who were simply trying to help ordinary Americans exercise their civil rights.

I won't tell you the ending. It's not what I expected.

I will say that the documentary was extraordinary, because it comprises interviews of people from both sides of the situation--some who support the three guys, some who support the actions taken against them. (It is just astonishing to me to hear such racism be expressed so openly and proudly.) Somehow the filmmakers got people to trust them to open up and pour out their ideas and the secret things of their hearts.

An excellent documentary not just for the subject matter, but also for the quality of the production and the craft that was used to get people to talk.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Garden State (2004)
2/10
At last, a movie that doesn't require acting
1 April 2008
While this movie is not repugnant (hence the 2), it is not really a movie of any value. It's just as if a camera crew took the lens cap off and started filming. Then, at some point, the film ran out.

If you like a film that would not be much different no matter which order they showed the reels, then this is the film for you.

Zach apparently sat down at the typewriter one day and said to himself, "if I type all the letters of the alphabet in random order and a random number of times, that will make a movie script."

And that's how Garden State was born, dear children.

If you are given a choice between this movie an an appendectomy without anesthesia, choose this movie. Because there are no physical scars when you're done.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ugh
29 February 2008
Awful. Simply awful.

If you like a film that has no moral center, that is aimless and plot less, where there is no difference _at all_ between what you think is good action and what you think is bad action - then this is your film.

Sure, you wasted $9.50 to see this. Sure, the directors are laughing all the way to the bank - _their_ morals include making money off yokels who see a film because everyone else says "this is a powerful film." Well, mold is powerful, too. It can destroy foundations. This film is mold. It is the type of film where pushing a woman in front of a speeding bus and pushing out of the way of a speeding bus would be seen as the same action with the same reasons and results.

Ugh. This is the kind of film you make when you've lost faith in humanity and lost hope in the future.

One nice thing: Tommy Lee Jones' face is like the map of West Texas: craggy, full of mysterious lines and trails, and worn down by years of harsh sun and dusty winds. If you could clip the film down to just Tommy Lee Jones, then you'd have something worth watching.

But this film as it stands is simply disgusting. It does not even rise to the level of dreck.

This film has one redeeming feature: Now Gigli is no longer the worst film ever made.
21 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful - avoid wasting a CENT on this movie
21 April 2007
I've walked out on two movies in my life - one was Laserblast, and now this is the second. Now I must apologize to Laserblast for holding them to too high of a standard - an industry that can release such dreck as "Perfect Stranger" means that any movie made or that will be made in the future 'til the sun explodes in a super nova will be better than this movie.

What's not to absolutely hate about this movie? Well, nothing. This is the kind of movie that you find out later that all the stars had been blackmailed into being in this film. Halle Berry and Bruce Willis, among others, play odious unlikeable characters in such a way that you dislike them from the moment you first meet them until the final moments when ugly things happen but not ugly enough to satisfy your need for punishment - for indeed anyone connected to this movie should be brought up on charges for criminal misuse of talent and resources.

Oh, and I really didn't like it, either.
15 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Reign Over Me (2007)
5/10
A terrorist attack is not a "plane crash"
1 April 2007
Um, excuse me, but the guy lost his family in a terrorist attack, not a "plane crash." What an odd way to refer to the deaths of 3000. I suppose the in WTC1 and WTC2 died due to gravitational forces or something?

It seems to me that what gives the story more pathos is that this protagonist has to deal with the tragedies of the past. And like most people, even though he has dealt with his past, the effects of the past keep reaching into his present state. There is the grief of the past, and the flux of the future, both that grind against him as he seeks to re-create his life.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed