Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Arsenal (1929)
10/10
Kinetic, shocking, moving.
21 January 2004
A group of Ukranian soldiers return from World War One to more fighting in the Communist Revolution.

This is an extraordinary, kinetic and moving piece of film making, full of metaphor and of great relevance for people throughout the world today. It isn't necessary to understand the complexities of the times to understand the rich emotional resonance. Particularly innovative is Dovzhenko's use of rhythm and inter-spliced scenes.

I was lucky enough to see a restored version of this at the Cambridge Film Festival 2003, with live musical accompaniment. Particularly memorable scenes are the undefeatable worker, the laughing gas, and the horse team rushing to take a fallen comrade to burial before returning to battle.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rififi (1955)
10/10
It's not just the heist scene
9 January 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Rififi deservedly gets a lot of mention for the famous heist scene, and, indeed, that scene deserves all the credit it gets. It's a masterful piece of suspense, character interaction and photography. But Rififi isn't just this one scene - every scene in the film is as masterfully put together, and as a whole, the film is not only taught with suspense, plot and character, but an adroitly told moral tale that set the scene for film noire for years to come.

Cinematically and technically, the heist sequence may be the most impressive scene of the film, but for me, it's the final scene that holds the most power - Tony le Stéphanois's hallucinogenic drive towards redemption.
56 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Eye (2002)
9/10
Scratching the surface
18 November 2002
I went to see this deliberately without finding out anything about it, I hadn't even seen the trailer. I didn't know what to expect, save for an impression. I'm not a real horror fan, and I wouldn't classify this as a horror, but I am pretty hardened to what cinema can throw at you. Even so, it is scary, and very tense. Very tense. I even said to myself, 'It's okay, it's just a film,' several times during the show. Plot-wise, it's a little weak - it barely scratches the surface of what could have tackled. It starts of edgy, amazing camera-work and effects, and manages to be both pensive and aggressive at the same time. Ultimately though, it's falls away from that edginess into a fairly cheesy Hollywood ending... so ultimately disappointing, after a very strong start. It could have been better, had the directors changed the emphasis. It is pretty much out to scare you - it would have worked well if they had tried to move beyond that.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blade II (2002)
3/10
How to spoil a good thing.
17 April 2002
Blade was cool. Blade was made with a lot of talent and a little money, came out stylish, moody and original. Blade II was made with a lot of money and no talent. They've completely, mercilessly destroyed, spoiled a very good thing in a desperate need to cash in, to up profit margins. It makes me sick, makes me very sad. I really want to cry over this. A sequel was cried out, could have been so good. Instead, we get a load of trite, vacuous, rubbish. some of the sequences are quite good, but the whole thing feels like a tired, talentless, unoriginal action sequnce, scripted by the numbers. Slick, supercool badies are replaced by meaningless monsters, an original view of vampire-land given the Buffy The Vampire treatment. Moody visuals and tight scripting are given over to meaningless special effects and Hollywood cliches. An edgy soundtrack is replaced by... nothing at all. Why? Oh, why?
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed