Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
That was no lady that was a Narf.
28 July 2006
I have been pulling for M. Night Shyamalan as he has bravely battled his ego all of these years. I loved The Sixth Sense. I found Unbreakable flawed but intriguing. I loved both Signs and The Village all the way up until their endings drove both of their plots to Dopeyville. In all of these I could see M. Night held a truly great talent, but also saw that no matter how talented anyone else thought he was, M. Night's opinion of his talent was immeasurably higher. In fact I have been expecting a day when he starts insisting that his name be followed by the phrase "Super Genius" like Wile E. Coyote back when he talked. (M. Night came dangerously close to that when he gave himself the largest screen credit in film history at the end of Signs.)

Well something worse than that has happened, and that thing is Lady in the Water. I went to this expecting to be enthralled and intrigued for nearly all of its running length. Sure I knew there was a good chance that I would be grossly disappointed in the last five minutes, but even then I expected the bulk of the movie to make the disappointment worth it. Instead I got a ham-handed sledgehammer of an allegory filled with sub-par (for M. Night) cinematography, technical goofs (the boom mike operator should be fired), Ed Wood level dialog, a hackneyed inane story (Narfs? Scrunts? Dr. Seuss M. Night ain't) that seems to think it is treading new ground, and hollow characters. No mystery, no twists of any interest, none of that M. Night charm.

The only really good performance was by the Lady herself. The rest seem to phone in their performances. Even M. Night himself. (Did anyone else find the dialog between he and his sister more creepy than humorous? Maybe it was because I expected him to fly into a violent rage at any moment, shouting "You dare mock me!?")

I cannot fathom that some of these reviewers actually saw the same movie I saw. This was a pretentious, high-handed, naked emperor of a movie that had no idea what it was trying to do. You will definitely want to wait to see this one on DVD, and then just to mstie it.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flashdance (1983)
1/10
This movie is surprisingly bad.
25 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I was a sophomore in college when this movie came out and I had never actually seen it until last night. I finally decided to watch it because I like good dancing and because the movie had such cultural impact. After seeing the movie I am completely baffled by how it had any effect other than putting people to sleep.

The story is pretty preposterous when you think about it. Does anyone actually buy the idea that that beer joint full of gnarly old steel-workers and teamsters could keep their clientèle with the high concept dances that those girls were doing? They would have all been over to Zanzibar faster than you can say "performance art". Can you imagine the reaction of the real life versions of that audience to that bizarre TV watching No theater dance thing that she did? Please.

It seems plausible to me that there could be a woman that worked in a steel yard and was also a dancer--after all both are physically demanding jobs. But I didn't buy for a second that THAT girl worked in a steel yard. And I didn't buy for a second that I was looking at a real steel yard. Steel work is dangerous. You don't keep your work area looking like a junk yard and not end up loosing a limb. I love some of the inane shots like when two welders are sitting in the big corrugated tubes welding. What the hell are they doing in there? Or when she is cutting six inches off of a rusty steel bar with a cutting torch. She was obviously board and just started cutting random things up.

But story holes like that can be overlooked if the movie is fun or at least stimulating in some way. Flashdance doesn't offer anything to balance it, however.

The dancing horrible. It is the spastic twitch-and-pose style that ruined American musicals until...well are we really over it yet? The sensuality that the movie tries for is ruined by Jennifer Beal's complete lack of personality. I mean I am a 42 year old male and when she was supposed to be eating lobster my only reaction was to think that she should get a lobster bib.

You can't really get behind Alex and her dreams because her character is so stupid and shallow. The dog had more going on than she did.

The love affair is flat. It comes across as nothing more than a boss with the hots for one of his workers. Zero passion.

Even the final scene where she dances for Orville Redenbacher and some other stiffs is unsatisfying because the panels reaction is so unbelievable. What serious dancers wouldn't roll their eyes at Alex's lame cheerleader routine? In short the movie had nothing but leg-warmers and large sweatshirts. Oh, yeah, there is a good chunk of nudity when Alex "rescues" her friend from being a useless erotic dancer (a laughable bit of hypocrisy). Other than that the movie is a waste of time. I wish that the MST3K crew were still in business. This would make good fodder for them.
30 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tripe
23 September 2004
I liked the first one and after seeing this stupid rip-off of it I was shocked to realize that it too had been directed by Wes Craven! What is the matter with that guy? Is he schizo?

The only reason to see this garbage is that it could possibly be the only film in history where a dog has a flashback. (Not including movies where the dog is the main character.) Craven was obviously stretching for ANY way to pad this sucker out with footage from the first one. While he was at it he might have padded it out with some of the GOOD footage from the first one.

The Hills Have Eyes wasn't perfect but it did build suspense and had some genuine horror. Part II fails on every level.

Wes, be ashamed, be very ashamed.
24 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What its about.
22 March 2004
Someone was asking what this movie is about. It is about mature relationships. It is about what it is like to be in love and live together.

It is about how a relationship is full of ups and downs and sometimes ups will get thrown out with the downs but if you do that you throw away something incredibly precious. It is a warning: If you are going to erase only erase the bad. It also hints about the way that when you love someone they start to fill your entire existence, past present and future. In the movie it is as an attempt to prevent her from being erased from his mind. Maybe that is why it happens in real life too? That's what its about.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Signs (2002)
Signs is excellent and engaging shaggy-dog story.
8 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
With everyone and their brother oo-ing and ah-ing over the genius of M. Night Shyamalan's Signs I have to wonder if any of them sat through the films conclusion. Much of the praise is deserved. The film is masterfully crafted and directed. M. Night certainly knows how to build suspense and take the suspense/horror genre to a new level. In fact I just love this movie up until the end. Unfortunately unlike Shyamalan's prior films this film does not get better the more you think about it, instead it unravels like a cheap sweater and you are left feeling like you have just witnessed the most expensive shaggy-dog story ever.

Spoiler warning! Read only after seeing the movie (which you should do. The first part is well worth your time and money.)

Here are the things you have to be able to accept to be able to get into the films ultimate message.

1. God is willing to kill a mother and wife of a man of God just so she will give a clue that will years later prompt her brother-in-law to use a baseball bat that is hanging on the wall right next to him to whack an alien about to kill her son. (I mean I thought they were not attacking the alien because he was holding their kid in a threatening pose but apparently it was only because they couldn't think of what to hit it with.)

2. An alien race could develop technology that enables them to cloak their ships from view and travel untold billions of miles but never invent a single WEAPON!

3. A predator race that is raiding earth for humans to eat starts off their raid by floating in full view over major cities for a few nights, apparently just to let earthlings get ready. I mean they can be practically invisible when they want to. They could have all the humans they want before we even knew about it.

4. Not only could an alien race whose skin burns on contact with water ever evolve but they can walk around in our water-laden atmosphere without a protective suit. They also have a taste for humans, which are over 70% water. Ok, so maybe they make the people into jerky before they eat them or maybe they weren't even going to eat them but obviously they had no suits because the water did burn the alien in the living room. So why would these intelligent beings walk around on Earth which is also over 70% water (on the surface at least) without a protective suit?

For a movie that engages your mind so well for most of its running time Signs sure leaves a lot of gaping holes. I think M. Night is a brilliant director and usually his stories are very well thought out. This time however he has let us down in the end.

Also, his acting is not that good. He should probably leave that to others and stick to very small cameos.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Resident Evil (2002)
8/10
Top-notch Saturday night drive-in fare.
20 March 2002
I have said many times that games of any kind do not make good movies but I now have to make one exception when I say that. Resident Evil is a great zombie shoot-em-up that doesn't rely entirely on visceral thrills. The plot has enough twists to keep things interesting and the characters are real enough that you care about them. On top of all that Milla Jovanovich is a treat to look at for a couple of hours and makes a convincing heroine.

It is true that there is nothing very original in the movie but what it steals it puts to good use. If I have a complaint it is that the movie uses the same schtick too many times. I'm talking about the trick of having some obvious source of danger that everyone thinks is about to happen NOT happen and instead some other unexpected nastiness happens. Good once, not 4 times.

As long as you don't put it in the Gladiator class and instead expect a thrilling Saturday night Drive in action movie this one is top of the line.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
And the audience got shafted.
26 April 2001
This movie is meant to shock and disgust. Fine. But I expected a laugh or two along the way. I didn't get a single one. The closest thing was the footage of the rocket powered wheel chair but by the time it shows up you are so numb from just staring blankly at the screen while Tom does his uh...thing that it has little effect. I'm usually a big fan of the absurd and comedy on the edge but this movie is so far from the edge that it couldn't even find the edge with long range radar.

Unfortunately it is even further away from comedy. Andy Kaufman was funny. This is just a gross out fest. What is funny about a running gag of a small child getting his face smashed complete with copious amounts of blood and teeth? What is funny about cutting open a deer and playing in its entrails? What's funny about watching Tom play with a horses penis? Fun for the horse maybe but what was the audience supposed to get out of it? The only reason to go to this movie is if you are curious about just how far Tom will go. That is settled by this movie. He has no limits just like he has no taste, no heart, and no comic timing.

I'm glad that many other fine talents have come from Canada. If all we had was Tom Green I would be all for closing the border.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed