Reviews

41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Hoosiers (1986)
10/10
Best movie ever about Indiana's favorite pastime
24 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Viewers who were not born in Indiana, or have never lived there, will find a few things about "Hoosiers" a little puzzling. But, that's often the case when a story takes one into unfamiliar territory -- even in one's own country.

Yes, we Hoosiers are more attached to our farms and corn fields, our small towns, our narrow back roads. But the pastime everyone here -- well, ALMOST everyone -- is fascinated with, is BASKETBALL.

And the movie "Hoosiers", based on a small town's winning the state championship in 1954 (yes, it really happened) portrays our state love affair with basketball better than any other I've ever seen. The game was invented in Massachusetts -- but it grew up in Indiana. The fit was better here.

And, to wind up this short review with a big surprise, today I got to meet and shake the hand of the man who, as a starting guard for the Milan Indians, scored the field goal that snatched a victory for them from the Muncie Central team to win the 1954 state championship. I was only 9 years old when he made that shot, but I finally got to shake the hand of Bobby Plump, the hand that made that shot, 68 years later!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
'No yodelin' ? NONSENSE!
8 November 2022
One reviewer on here said he "couldn't find a single yodel" in "Yodelin' Kid from Pine Ridge". He must have gone to the popcorn stand, or the restroom, just as the movie started, as Gene yodels the first few bars of the theme song over the credits of the movie. Yes, he did yodel, in a number of his early recordings. And yes, so did Roy Rogers. But my opinion is that Gene's yodeling was superior to Rogers'.

Gene Autry started making records in the late 1920s, and many of his early records were his versions of records made earlier by Jimmy Rodgers, who was famous for his yodeling. That's where Gene learned how to yodel.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
These Babes were the best!
4 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Stan and Ollie were the best comedy team in movie history, in my humble opinion. The Marx Brothers usually got that title from the professional film critics -- with Charlie Chaplin as the "best single comic" -- but I think that was a mistake based on opinions which were shared around like doughnuts.

And of all the numerous feature-length movies Laurel and Hardy starred in from the middle to the last part of their careers, I vote for "Babes in Toyland" as the best. It has a wonderful musical background, for one thing. Especially the song early on, titled "Never Mind, Bo Peep," which I think has the most beautiful melody to its verse as any song I've ever heard. "The boys" are at their best in this fairy tale, and all the other actors play their parts well, without a trace of "snicker" or "wink, nudge" about being characters in a story which couldn't have happened in real life.

The wind-ups in the cave, with the Wooden Soldiers about to chase the villain and his bunch out of Toyland, couldn't have been better, or more typical of a Stan and Ollie finish. I first saw this movie on TV when I was 8 years old, and I've loved it from that day to this.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The brothers were Grimm; their fairy tales were not
13 August 2022
I saw this the first time not long after it was first released. I guess because I was so young at the time, some things about this movie appear to have gone right in one ear and out the other.

But I watched it again just the other day, and it came to me in ways that few, if any, other films have. About the superior acting in the movie; the old fairy tales brought back to life 70 years after I first read them, when I was in second grade. And, especially, the style of photography used throughout.

There are very few of what most would call "close-ups" in the movie, from beginning to end. When I was watching it recently, at first I thought, "Why on earth did the director shoot the film in that manner?" But then I began to notice how the "more of a distance" shooting showed us the beautiful German architecture of the 19th Century; the equally beautiful rivers, forests and mountains, and the majestic and, yes, also beautiful, interiors of many of the German palaces, homes, etc. It took one back 200 years, to when Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm were actually collecting, or in some cases, creating, their magnificent fairy tales.

The acting, and the music, were equally magnificent. This is a movie that I think almost anyone would enjoy, immensely.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Lovely Barbara plants a big one!
6 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This early Gene Autry Western is much better than most of the other reviewers are willing to admit. Gene's acting is mostly serious in this tale of the murder of an old miner who had discovered gold in his hidden mine, and of Autry's and Smiley Burnett's efforts to find and arrest the killer. This contrasts greatly with Gene's casual, semi-comic performance in the movie filmed just before this one, "Melody Trail." But then, Gene Autry's movies were not all alike -- despite what some of these reviewers would like you to think.

Some have criticized the early scene where Champ, Autry's magnificent horse, supposedly stumbles and falls, sending his master tumbling a short way down an incline (but with no injury to the rider). But they seem not to realize that some horses can be taught to deliberately "take a spill" like that as part of a scene. Note that Champ scrambles up again quickly, apparently also not injured.

And the last scene of the film, after Gene and Frog have frustrated the bad guys, and seen to it that that the elderly miner's mine has been registered to his young, beautiful granddaughter, who has been gradually falling in love with Gene, shows how a rumor about Autry's movies became a "fact" to so many of his fans.

"Gene never kissed the girl in his movies; he always kissed his horse." Well, actress Barbara Pepper sits close to Gene as he sings, "Ain't no woman gonna marry me, as long as I have my horse ..." And just as he starts to say "horse," to end the song, Pepper jumps up into his face and plants a big French kiss on his lips! Then the camera switches to Frog, who looks a little embarrassed at having witnessed it, then puts his arm around Champ's neck, and kisses "the world's wonder horse." This was the first of several of Gene's early movies where he DID kiss the girl -- or she kissed him -- just before the final fade-out.

But Gene NEVER kissed Champ. Not on camera, anyway. A very entertaining Western. Give it a look!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trader Horn (1931)
10/10
Classic jungle film, but painful or disgusting to some
21 March 2021
"Trader Horn" is one of the most unique movies ever crafted in the early days of sound film. And it shows many things -- especially the native Africans -- in a way that deeply offends the "politically correct" people of our era. But that doesn't mean that those "offensive" qualities aren't true.

Aloysius Horn -- a "Trader" in darkest Africa -- is a White American who is on one of his trips into the jungle to trade with the natives. Accompanying him is his young Hispanic friend, Peru, who is just beginning to learn how to do such trading, and Horn's loyal gun bearer, the African he calls "Ranchero."

Harry Carey Sr., a veteran Hollywood actor, mostly as a cowboy, enacts Horn in an inimitable way, as if he has simply "moved into" the part. Horn appears to know everything there is to know about the African jungle, the natives who live there, and the multitude of wild animals, of which we get many fascinating views.

Duncan Renaldo, who many years later played the Cisco Kid on TV, was only about 25 when he enacted Peru, and his amateurishness shows. But, he is believable in the role. And I doubt that there were very many women who watched the movie who did not find him VERY handsome! In fact, in the first few moments that Horn's group enters the first African village they come to, and Peru is looking around, fascinated by everything, several teenaged girls or young women, wearing skirts but bare from the waist up, begin smiling at him, giggling, and what we would call "flirting." And Peru appears to eat it up very willingly.

Of course the film takes a sharp turn when the "White goddess", brought out to face the Horn group, and played by the beautiful blonde Edwina Booth, meets the first White people she has seen since she was "adopted" by the African tribe when just a baby. Her arrival later leads to a romantic triangle that culminates in a conclusion that many may not have seen coming.

As I said earlier, Carey plays a masterful role as Horn, and always seems to be able to figure out a way to get them out of awkward and/or dangerous situations. Even his native Bronx, New York City, accent seems to fit his character perfectly. Booth comes across as genuinely ignorant about her own native race, but gradually "adopts." And one could say that Peru does, also.

People who see "White racism" everywhere, probably will be deeply offended at the portrayal of the Africans, primitive, brutal, murderous, with no redeeming qualities. But remember, folks, when this movie was made, IN Africa, in 1930, most of them were still that way.

This is not a film that everyone will love. But I recommend that you watch it, if you think it won't offend you TOO much, and then draw your own conclusions.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A wonderful "Southern" classic
6 March 2021
I was just a child the first time I saw "Song of the South," and I still can remember the delight I felt on that day. Uncle Remus, the young children he fascinated with his tales of Br'er Fox, Br'er Rabbit, Br'er Bear, the loving but not-so-sharp parents of the young boy who did not want his daddy to go back to the city without him -- it was all like a wonderful fairy tale.

The talk about "racism" allegedly anywhere in this film is simply nonsense. There are no racist words uttered in the film, no nasty or violent acts committed by any of the black people -- only by the two poor White boys who try to beat up the starring boy -- and are stopped by Uncle Remus.

And a special thrill for me, that I only learned in the last few years, is that James Baskett, who did a phenomenal job playing Uncle Remus, is one of my fellow Hoosiers, having been born and raised in Indianapolis.

Watch this movie. It will make your day.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Deeper than most B-Westerns
23 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This 1941 Gene Autry Western deals with a more detailed and complicated plot than most, and the climactic scene may disturb you, and even make you cry. There are moments in the film that reveal the genuine emotion of a young girl over her dad's being in mortal danger that you seldom see in movies of this genre.

Having said that, I'll add that in my opinion it's one of the best Westerns that Gene ever starred in, just a year or so prior to his leaving Hollywood to enlist in the U.S. Army Air Corps in World War II.

Gene and Frog (Smiley Burnette) are watching the parade through their Western town of the performers from a showboat that has landed in town, when two evil men rob the local bank, taking $140,000, which includes money Gene had encouraged some of his fellow ranchers to invest there instead of wasting it on things they didn't really need.

The two thieves not only rob the bank, but they also kill the owner. And the down-on-his-luck father of a young, talented singer from the showboat cast, played by Mary Lee, foolishly has gone in with them, feeling that he needs money so bad that he has to.

The thieves escape (Mary's father doesn't go with them), despite Gene's chasing them unsuccessfully on Champ. Gene and Frog then talk the owner of the showboat into hiring them as entertainers in the cast, so they can keep an eye on the foolish father and his daughter.

Of course the young girl singer is loving and protective of her father, even after he flees with the loot that the thieves have left in his hands. She is hostile to Autry for being suspicious of her father, until one evening she accidentally falls overboard from the boat, and Gene has to dive in and rescue her. It's obviously him (and her) in the water, too, despite the fondness of some who review his movies on here of implying that Gene had stuntmen to fake being him for anything more difficult than walking across the room.

Anyway, the climax of the movie includes some very hard riding, a big gunfight, Gene fighting it out with the two bank robbers (and doing his own stunts there, too), and finally the crooks shooting and killing poor Mary's father. Mary's weeping and screaming as Gene tries to comfort her sounds very genuine. Mary Lee was a fine actress.

As I said before, I enjoyed this movie tremendously. There was a lot of great music included in it, too. I highly recommend it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A well-titled Western
21 February 2021
By this time in 1936, Gene Autry was being known in all the theaters as the "singing cowboy." So this was the perfect title for the movie.

We get to hear Gene sing a number of songs in this one, as he and his musical buddies try to raise money for a much-needed operation on the little girl whose father was Gene's partner but who was murdered by a bad guy (Lon Chaney Jr.) trying to take over the ranch. The barn where the killing took place was then set on fire, and the little girl rushed into the barn to try to save her kittens, but was badly injured. Gene and the other guys are shown rushing into the barn to try to save the livestock, with Autry rescuing both the child and her pets. This was only one of several instances in Autry movies where Gene rushes into a burning barn to save animals/people, and in every one, the singing cowboy appears to have done the stunt himself. Same with his rescuing people from drowning in several other of his movies; in every scene like that, it's easy to tell that, yes, it really is Gene, swimming through the water and dragging the person to safety.

Anyway, Gene and his musical buddies gain quick popularity, partly through the use of television, which was absolutely in its infancy in 1936. It wasn't officially recognized by the federal government until 1939. After some plot twists and turns common to B-Westerns, and some riding and fighting, Gene's guys come up with the money, the little girl gets her much-needed surgery, and the ending is happy.

And one more thing about Autry's movies in general: This one, and a number of others, show how sincerely Gene liked children, and was always comfortable working with them. This isn't the best movie he ever made, but it's well worth watching.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of Gene's best ever
18 February 2021
This was one of the very best of Gene Autry's early Westerns, filmed just after he and Republic Pictures owner Herbert Yates reached a compromise agreement on a salary dispute that had led Gene to go on strike for a few months. The title song, "Gold Mine in the Sky," is one of the most beautiful Western songs I've ever been privileged to hear, and the scene early in the movie when Autry sings the song to his boss who has been fatally injured in a horse-racing accident brought tears to my eyes.

An earlier reviewer, froberts73, also said he liked the movie but that he wouldn't give it a "10" rating for fear he would be teased and laughed at for rating a Gene Autry movie that high. Well, sir, Gene Autry was the most popular Western star at the box office for six years, 1937 through 1942 when he enlisted in the military during World War II, and I don't know why you, and many other reviewers, delight in referring to his movies as "oaters" and other disparaging names, and often describe a particular Autry film as "not up to his usual standard."

This film does feature the boss's ranch being inherited by his spoiled Eastern heiress daughter, and depicts the situations that became common in a number of Gene's later movies where he had to deal with such women (always beautiful, of course). But this film has different situations, humorous dialogue here and there, some very fine music, and several great action scenes.

So, Mr. froberts73, I'll give "Gold Mine in the Sky" a very solid "10" rating, and if people want to laugh, let them. It reminds me of a story about Gene when he was well into his successful career, and was leaving a dining room-saloon with a friend one evening when a drunk came up to him and said, "Aren't you Gene Autry?" The singing cowboy answered, "Yes, sir, I sure am." The drunk then said, "Well, Autry, you can't sing, you can't act, and you can't ride!" Gene just smiled, put his hand on the man's shoulder in a friendly fashion, and replied, "That's right, mister! I can't sing, I can't act, and I can't ride! And I've got $3 million to prove it!"

Gene always cried all the way to the bank.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Harvey (1950)
10/10
Elwood and Harvey -- the real thing
10 July 2020
Nearly all the people in this movie view Elwood P. Dowd as -- somehow -- crazy and needing to be locked up in a mental institution, as soon aspossible. But as you watch the movie, and absorb James Stewart's masterful job of showing us Dowd as he really is -- calm, kind, not inclined to criticize others or lose his temper -- I think you'll find, as I did, that Elwood is actually the only fully sane person in the story.

Does Elwood actually have a six-three friend who is a white rabbit, and invisible to everyone but him? I don't know; do you? Many people will insist that anything you can't see, touch, or spit on, just doesn't exist. Well, I'm not one of those. By the time the movie ended, I was convinced that Elwood and Harvey the rabbit, actually WERE best friends.

And I'll add this: I don't think there was another actor in Hollywood then -- probably not now, either -- who could have played Elwood P. Dowd as effectively and convincingly, as Jimmy Stewart. I see him as the greatest actor, in many ways, in Hollywood history.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Metropolis (1927)
10/10
A German masterpiece, with only one other being similar
21 April 2020
Everyone in the world should see this film at least once in their life. It is like no other that I have ever seen.

Well, I'll amend that statement in a few moments here. But anyway, this German masterpiece from 1927 directed by Fritz Lang tells a story of a Marxist-like city where a minority of wealthy, independent people have a complete whip hand over thousands of poor, starving working-class people who slave for them under the earth. Footage of these oppressed people early in the film could move you to tears, it is so real and believable.

But the apple cart is upset for the rich Marxist rulers by several events involving the son of one of those rulers and a sweet, innocent girl he falls in love with. As the movie goes on, more and more on-screen action -- and violence -- erupts with the final few scenes being awe-inspiring by the thousands of people involved, the unbelievably skilled special effects, and other things.

As I said above, anyone who hasn't seen this film, should do so. And to amend one thing I said in the first paragraph, I've seen only one movie in my life that this film reminds me of in a number of ways. And that was "The Phantom Empire," a 12-part serial released in 1935, with singing cowboy Gene Autry in his first starring role. If you get to see both of these classic films, maybe you'll agree with me.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Early Duke; not a bad Western
27 February 2020
This is one of John Wayne's very early B-Westerns (1935), before he became a big "A-movie" star. The plot, which involves the Duke's father being murdered, and Wayne wounded, by robbers, is fairly standard by B-Western standards, but entertaining enough. The old black-and-white film was colorized in recent times, and the colorization was well done.

The Duke has not yet adopted his Harry Carey-taught style of talking, with occasional pauses in the middle of sentences, so he sounds a little different than the later John Wayne. The fight scenes are not done as well as they were in, let's say, Gene Autry's first starring film, "Tumbling Tumbleweeds," released about three months later.

But the colorizers did study the script and insert ironic "plays on words" in a couple of scenes. When Wayne is told by a cowboy he's having problems with that there's "no need for lavender cowboys" or words to that effect, he's wearing a purple shirt. Later, when the same cowboy asks the Duke if he wants to continue a fight they were having, and Wayne says, "No," the other guy says, "Why? You yellow?" Yes, you guessed it, dear readers --in that scene, the Duke is wearing a yellow shirt.

And in an early scene where Wayne's opponent has whipped another cowboy, and begins firing his six-shooter at the man's feet to make him "dance," I thought of a scene in "Tumbling Tumbleweeds" where one of Autry's buddies gets the drop on three bad guys and tells them to "dance." One says, "Aww, we can't dance!" And the guy with the gun replies, "Anyone can dance if they're properly persuaded!" The bad guys begin cutting a rug immediately.

I wondered, "Did the director of the Autry movie pick up and use those two situations?" Because at one point in the Autry movie, a "bad guy" tells a singing cowboy Gene, "We don't need no lavender cowboys!"

Overall, "The Dawn Rider" is a good B-Western -- but "Tumbling Tumbleweeds" has better acting, and some great songs.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Midwestern drama in Ike's era
21 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This late-'50s drama starring Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin and Shirley MacLaine was filmed in my home town of Madison in southern Indiana, and gives one a very interesting look at the clothing styles, prevailing moral standards, and other social parameters of the late Eisenhower era. All of these may look a little odd to younger people who happen to watch this movie today, but that is true of many movies filmed many years before one's own era.

Sinatra does a creditable job playing former GI and supposedly failed writer Dave Hirsh who has returned to his home town of Parkman. MacLaine, who is in love with him, follows him there on the Greyhound bus, and his brother, a successful local merchant, welcomes him home -- sort of. The brothers are obviously not close, and clash in various ways throughout the film.

Hirsh's pursuit of a lovely college professor, played by Martha Hyer, does not work out, and he finally winds up marrying MacLaine. But later the same evening, a jealous suitor who has followed her there from Chicago, shoots them both, killing MacLaine. Her burial in a cemetery beside the Ohio River is the final scene in the movie.

Sinatra's performance is reasonably good, although he often seems bored and annoyed by the plot. Martin does a much better job as his professional gambler friend, and MacLaine's performance is outstanding.

The movie gives one a glimpse of what my hometown looked like in 1958 -- the photography is excellent. A good "period picture."

My only major criticism of "Some Came Running" is this: The interactions between Sinatra and MacLaine in the movie are convincing, and show how much she loves him. Then, he finally marries her, and it's the happiest day of her life -- until she is shot and killed as the two walk through a night-time street carnival. When MacLaine hits the sidewalk, that's it -- she's dead. Sinatra, wounded, holds her in his arms, staring with stunned unbelief at her composed features. It would have been such an excellent place for her to speak some memorable last words to her new husband. But the director just let that chance pass.

In my opinion, he made a big error there.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Night and Day (1946)
7/10
Good music, poor casting
7 December 2019
It was only in recent years that I discovered this alleged biography of the great Hoosier composer Cole Porter. Since I'm a native Hoosier, too, it grabbed my attention for that reason.

You get to hear some excellent renditions of some of Porter's most popular songs, like the title song; "Begin the Beguine"; "I Get A Kick Out of You"; "Just One of Those Things"; "Blow, Gabriel, Blow"; and others. "Just One of Those Things" is my favorite, as it departs from the usual "Oh, I'll Love You Until I Die" tone of so many songs of those days, and acknowledges the existence of "one-night stands." The real world, you might call it.

But, having said all that, I'll add that I didn't think the casting was done all that well (Cary Grant to play Cole Porter? Why? Because they were both secretly gay?) Seemed a bad choice to me.

And here's another thing that the average person might not have noticed. I've lived in Indiana all my life, as Porter did, but I can't always identify a fellow Hoosier just by his accent. Although I can tell when someone is NOT a Hoosier, when they try to pronounce "Terre Haute", one of our major cities.

Anyway, fairly late in the film, we see Porter visiting his ill grandfather, who was once considered the wealthiest man in Indiana, and was a native Hoosier, like Cole. Suddenly I noticed something: Both Grant, and the older actor playing his grandfather, were speaking with British accents! I never heard a native Hoosier talk like THAT!

Too bad the director, or someone else in charge, didn't notice that.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I beg to disagree about this movie!
4 October 2019
So every one of the rest of you reviewers think "Ride, Ranger, Ride" is a third-rate "oater," is "routine and dated," "cartoonish," you can't recall any of the music two hours later, etc.? Well, maybe, just maybe, we didn't watch the same movie.

The title song of the movie is one that has echoed in my head ever since I saw the film the first time, when I was about 10 or 11. I've never had any trouble remembering it. In fact, it was considered so good that it was used again in the last Autry film of 1936, "The Big Show."

The big, if a little brief, fist fight that Max Terhune and the other Rangers deliberately start in a saloon to try to get thrown out of the cavalry is one of the most realistic I've ever seen in an old Western. It ends with a close-up of Terhune and Smiley Burnette, but most of it is viewed in a room-wide shot, which would make it more difficult to have the fisticuffs look genuine. But they did!

Yes, Terhune does say, once, "The only good Indian is a dead Indian," or words to that effect. I don't remember Autry ever saying it. But remember this movie was made in 1936, long before the era of "political correctness." Even in the movies, people were more apt to say just what they thought in those days.

And yes, the horse race involving Gene and his rival for the affections of leading lady Kay Hughes, was a fine one. Gene Autry was a very accomplished rider -- which few of the reviewers are willing to acknowledge.

The final and unique plus for this Autry film, for ME, at least, was that Monte Blue, playing a fake Indian chief, and Max Terhune, were both native Hoosiers! Can't beat those actors from Indiana! And Max Terhune was a very talented ventriloquist and card shark, too.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Civil War story in Indiana? Well ...
9 March 2019
There is no actual Raintree County in Indiana -- but then, Ross Lockridge wrote a novel, not a history book. As a native Hoosier, I noticed that a lot of the countryside scenes DO look a lot like southern Indiana. But I noticed that among the credits at the start of the movie were grateful thanks to the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, and the people of Tennessee and Kentucky. Excuse me? Is it possible that this Hollywood filming crew never set foot in the Hoosier state?

As to the acting, well, Elizabeth Taylor does do a masterful -- mistressful? -- job of playing the dark-haired beauty from the South who meets and falls in love with Montgomery Clift in his small Indiana town. She handles the various twists and turns of the plot and her character well, and well deserved her Academy Award nomination.

Then there's Montgomery Clift. He looks convincingly Civil War in costume and well-coiffed black hair. But ... somehow or other, his facial expressions, his delivery of his lines, the whole way his character comes across, reminded me of a young actor, unsure of himself, in his first stage play. I don't claim to be any expert on his films in general, but as Johnny Shaughnessy I think he falls somewhat short.

And here's one more thing: At several points in the film, the "Hoosiers" have occasion to mention the state capitol, Indianapolis. And they pronounce it, accenting each letter, especially the "O" near the end. Sorry, folks, that isn't how we Hoosiers pronounce the name of our "Naptown." Try this: "Indanap'lis." It reminded me of another movie from the same era, "Some Came Running," also set in Indiana. When some actor had occasion to mention the city Terre Haute, he said "Terry Hout". And I said, "WHAT?"

To sum up, a good, entertaining Civil War movie -- but with some weaknesses that I think could have been avoided.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Pretty good Autry -- as "Tex"
7 February 2019
This is, I think, the only Gene Autry movie where he didn't use his real first name. He is "Tex Autry" in this one. Don't know whose idea that was, but it was never done again. The Singing Cowboy and his group spend a good part of the film fighting a fierce Indian tribe near a U.S. Cavalry fort, singing, and, for Tex, romancing a lovely leading lady, Ann Rutherford. She has come from back east, where the movie begins at a New York theater where we see part of a minstrel show. Some may find this distasteful in this politically correct age, but it didn't bother me a bit, as at the age of 9 I was privileged to see the last live minstrel show ever put on in my hometown. Anyway, there's a lot of good action in the film, and Gene Autry is starting to show acting talent that his critics always claimed he never had. Worth a view!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Magic, melodious, funny masterpiece
26 August 2018
Prior to the first time I was privileged to watch "A Midsummer Night's Dream," I had seen a few filmed versions of William Shakespeare's plays, but never could get into them as I knew I should have. After all, this is the greatest author in the history of the English language -- right?

Then, I got to watch this masterpiece the first time, several years ago -- and suddenly, Shakespeare came all together for me! Great acting, by a mostly American cast, that made the dialogue for a Midwestern Yank like me easier to understand. A bunch of REALLY funny scenes -- especially of James Cagney as Bottom the Ass. Some wonderful music -- no, a LOT of wonderful music. The actors really "got into" their parts -- especially Olivia DeHavilland, just 19 years old at the time (and still living at age 102, by the way). And of course, Victor Jory as the fairy prince -- evil, but fascinating.

An air of a magical world that was SOOO believable! I think it's just as well that the movie was filmed in black and white, as it would seem a little too "real life" in color.

Anyway, if you were like me, finding Shakespeare hard to understand and enjoy, you need to watch this movie. It is one of a kind!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Was this based on an earlier, fairy-tale film?
20 May 2018
Bud Abbott and Lou Costello got a lot of good publicity as a comedy team in their time. But, in my opinion, Abbott was not funny -- strictly a straight man -- and Costello wasn't as funny as many people thought he was. This movie is typical of those facts. There is no particular connection or empathy between Bud and Lou, and Abbott is seldom on screen for the allegedly funny scenes. And Costello's tortured facial expressions at moments of "stress" are often unpleasant, not funny, to look at. With the "Middle Ages" costumes and atmosphere, and the totally forgettable singing and dancing, this movie appears to be an attempt to mimic the 1934 Laurel and Hardy feature, "Babes in Toyland." If so, it is a very failed attempt. Stan and Ollie fit together without a seam showing. Bud and Lou did not.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hoosier horseless carriage saga
4 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was based on a book by Bellamy Partridge, who doesn't seem to have been given any credit AMONG the credits. Anyway, my mother had a copy of the book, which I read as soon as I learned to read, about 1951-52, when I started school. I became fascinated by antique automobiles. So when "Excuse My Dust" came to our home town, of course my parents took me to see it.

And I loved it! Red Skelton as Joe Belden (a takeoff from "Bellamy,") is trying to get his horseless carriage to run properly in his small Indiana town. As Skelton was born and raised in Vincennes, Indiana, and I'm a born Hoosier, too, it's no wonder it grabbed me as it did. Old-time cars, one-cylinder, steered with a tiller-like lever (no steering wheels yet), with a top speed of maybe 12 miles per hour!

Belden and his girlfriend (Sally Forrest), and Macdonald Carey as the "bad guy," sort of, who wants to steal her away, spar back and forth throughout the movie, which includes some pretty good music and dancing. At the climax, Belden, Carey, and several other owners of these horseless carriages participate in a slam-bang race for a first prize that must have seemed like a fortune in 1895 America.

Red is a little more restrained than usual for him in his comedies, but then again, this one isn't a Three Stooges. Milder, more musical. More -- Hoosier. Well worth watching!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Guns and Guitars, and great Western action
9 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This was one of Gene Autry's earliest movies, less than one year into his series that he filmed, almost without pause, between 1935 and his entry into the U.S. Army Air Corps in 1942. But his riding, and his acting, already are looking more natural, and he's looking more comfortable doing them.

His best acting probably comes when one of the bad guys, Tom London, emerges from the saloon through a window he and henchman Charlie King have shot out, to confront Gene over the fact that London's warned him to be "out of town by 5 o'clock," and Autry has failed to comply. Gene is presiding at that moment over the sales of Dr. Parker's (Earle Hodgins) "magic tonic" at the medicine show that Parker operates. Instead of running scared of London, or trying to "out-draw" him, Gene begins an advertising spiel for the tonic -- available for one dollar a bottle. Speaking directly to London, Autry finally tosses him a bottle of the stuff. "One dollar, please." London glares at Gene, and his hand moves slowly -- toward his gun? Gene's right hand slowly makes the same move. But finally London reaches into his pants pocket instead, pulls out a silver dollar, and tosses it to Gene, who catches it effortlessly (don't forget, Autry once got a chance to sign with a minor league baseball team, but decided to turn it down), gives London a grin and a nod, and the tense moment passes.

London and King's boss is a local big shot who expects to "make $100,000" using illegal ways to move a big cattle herd. J.P. McGowan plays that "biggest bad guy," and his sons Dorrel and Stuart McGowan wrote the screenplay. The McGowan brothers wrote some of the best of Autry's early screenplays.

All ends well -- as usual -- with the bad guys in jail, and Gene and the leading lady, Dorothy Dix, driving the medicine show wagon off into the sunset. And if you want to see a funny ending, watch Smiley Burnette take a big swig of Dr. Parker's Painless Panacea -- and then see what happens within seconds. All in all, an excellent Autry B-Western of the early sound era.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great, but not perfect, classic
28 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I'd not watched "White Christmas" for a long time, and my (faulty) memory had it not quite rising to the level of "Holiday Inn," the other Bing Crosby Christmas musical from 12 years before. Happily, when I saw "White Christmas" yesterday at my local theater, it proved to be far superior to what I had recalled.

Capt. Bob Wallace (Bing Crosby) and Private First Class Phil Davis (Danny Kaye), both serving in the U.S. Army in World War II, starring in a musical comedy show for the troops in their outfit, lead a big good-bye show for Gen. Waverly (Dean Jagger), their commander, who is returning to the states. After the war is over, Wallace and Davis form their own singing-dancing duo and begin scoring well in live theater in the New York City area.

They meet two other musical and dance performers, Betty (Rosemary Clooney) and Judy (Vera-Ellen) Haynes, who are sisters, and, naturally, a double romance begins to brew. The four wind up at a "holiday inn," so to speak, in Vermont, and discover that the owner is none other than (retired) Gen. Waverly, whose bankroll is rapidly "getting small" because of no snow (in Vermont?!) and few customers.

After several songs, both on stage and well-placed within scenes, Wallace gets in touch with a TV producer back in New York City, who agrees to set up a live TV show from the inn, which will be designed as a big tribute to Waverly (who must be kept "in the dark" until the trap is sprung).

After some additional plot twists in which Betty gets mad at Bob because she thinks (incorrectly) that the show is going to be designed to poke fun at Waverly; and Judy tries to lure Phil into announcing a phony engagement between the two to try to get Betty and Bob back together; the movie finally climaxes with a giant Christmas show in the big dining hall at the inn, with many, many of Waverly's former subordinates from his Army career there with their wives; and the two show business couples finally falling into each other's arms. Good flick; good characterizations, although not terribly deep.

Now: A few minor quibbles that kept me from giving it 10 votes:

The opening scenes near the "battlefield" in France wouldn't have fooled a 5-year-old; the sets were very obviously in a Hollywood studio.

Crosby's and Kaye's characters' names -- Bob Wallace and Phil Davis -- come on, guys! How Whitebread can you get? They needed a little more pizazz than that.

Clooney's "lady in a snit, if you don't know why, I'm not gonna tell you" attitude when she thinks she has uncovered an unpleasant angle to the show being planned by Crosby. Why didn't she just tell him? Oh, I know why: It would have untangled the plot twists too soon.

All in all, though, an excellent classic movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Gene helps the Mounties, makes a unique friend
24 November 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Gene Autry and Pat Buttram pursue some bank robbers, who are French Canadian, from Montana up into the Canadian Rockies. They wind up meeting a French Canadian family named Duval, the father of which is in league with chief bad guy Pierre LaBlond. His daughter, Marie, is kind and law-abiding, while his teen-age son, Jack, hates Mounties and has a big white dog who is hostile to strangers.

Gene befriends the dog after extracting a large thorn from the animal's paw. When Gene sings a song while sitting at the Duval kitchen table, the dog rears up and puts its front paws on the table, the better to hear. Gene can now do no wrong, in the dog's eyes.

Later, when Autry has tracked the LaBlond gang to their hideout in the woods, and has defeated LaBlond in a knock-down, drag-out fight (doesn't appear that doubles were used, either), LaBlond's henchmen seize Gene, and LaBlond knocks him out. They leave him lying on the ground, roped and woozy, while they move away to plan their next robbery.

The big dog has followed Gene to the scene, and he sneaks over to his new friend, licks him affectionately, and goes and fetches his steed Champion as directed by Gene. Rider, horse and dog all manage to escape the outlaws.

In the climax of the movie, as a village burns to the ground, both LaBlond and the senior Duval, who has turned on him in disgust, die a horrible mutual death (not caused by Gene or Pat).

The movie is unique to my eyes because of the obvious excellent chemistry between Autry and the big canine. An excellent film, with plenty of action.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oliver! (1968)
10/10
Magnificent! Charles Dickens would be proud
21 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
British film studios have not been known for turning out large numbers of first-rate musicals. But "Oliver" is a HUGE exception.

The 1968 version of Charles Dickens' "Oliver Twist," based generally although not slavishly on his original story, absolutely sparkles with great music, very fine acting, and some lessons about life, and people, that many of us may not notice the first or second time we see the film. Which is a good reason to watch it several times -- as I have, over the years.

Oliver Twist is a little boy in a British orphanage, where the unfortunate youths are forced to perform hard manual labor all day, and are fed almost solely on thin gruel by the miserly managers of the place. Emboldened by his mates to tell the head whip-cracker, "Please, sir, I want some more!", poor Oliver is expelled from the orphanage and sold ("Payment upon liking," says his new "owner," a skinflint undertaker) as a virtual slave.

Events enable Oliver to escape the undertaker's cellar, where he has been cast down for "misbehavior," and he winds up in London, where a vagrant boy about his age, The Artful Dodger, introduces him to the "orphanage," so to speak, run by a criminal named Fagin, who teaches "his" boys to pickpocket, and fences goods stolen by a burglar named Bill Sikes.

It is worth noting that, while Fagin exercises strict control over the young boys living with him, he appears to feed them better, and to treat them with more respect, than the establishment orphanage bosses.

Oscar becomes the favorite boy of Sikes' beautiful live-in girlfriend, Nancy, and that eventually leads him into trouble. Sikes' first appearance in the film comes at a crowded pub, late at night, after he has pulled a very profitable burglary. Preceded by his large, ominous-looking shadow as he walks in, he is a tall, unsmiling thug -- someone who "you wouldn't want to mess with," as we would say in the U. S.

Sikes is good at bullying and intimidating elderly men (Fagin), women (Nancy) and boys (Fagin's wards at his evil orphanage). But in the disturbing climactic scene, as he attempts to escape the London bobbies and outraged citizens after killing Nancy, while holding Oliver as hostage, a policeman's gun proves to him that all bullies and thugs, eventually come to a bad end.

The music, and the dancing, in "Oliver," are absolutely superb. One extended music and dancing scene, which takes place in a circular plaza in an upper-class neighborhood, was so good that it caused me goosebumps.

Ron Moody as Fagin; Shani Wallis, as Nancy; Oliver Reed, as Bill Sikes; Mark Lester, as Oliver; and Jack Wild as The Artful Dodger, play their parts to absolute perfection. This film won five Academy Awards, and in my opinion, should have received more. If you're a Dickens fan, and you want to see a really great musical with a different accent than the usual Hollywood kind, go see "Oliver."
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed