Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
A nice idea, but...
9 June 2010
GITS is one of my favourite films, and one of the first DVD's I bought when the format was new on the scene. After watching Innocence (which looked great), I was quite ready to see something totally awesome in this update. I was wrong.

As another comment said, they should have re-done the whole film, instead of a bit here and there. I couldn't enjoy the movie when it kept switching from CGI to cel-shaded animation. Also, considering this was made FOUR years after Innocence, the CGI is awful. Most of the time Motoko looks like a plastic doll. Not cool.

The music and sound effects were re-done, sometimes better, most times not. In the original GITS if somebody was getting beaten up, you would hear them scream. In 2.0, a guy gets his ankle broken and doesn't even let out a whisper. Stupid. The main theme song (the choral piece) was re-recorded and it too lost a lot of impact.

Don't bother with this. Just watch the original.
59 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A great psychological thriller!
30 May 2010
While I like Scorsese's films, I've never been a huge fan. This, however, is something quite different.

As someone fascinated by the way our minds can play tricks on us, I was hooked after the first few scenes. A lot of questions are raised at the beginning, and if you like a story with a bit of mystery, this is for you. Its a film where small clues are given, and (If you're smart enough) you might figure out whats going on way before it finishes. Even if that is the case, it is still a very entertaining movie right to the end. It reminded me of Fight Club and Memento, so if you like them, you'll probably like this.

Its an exploration into the darker side of the human psyche. If you have no interest in, or experience of, mental illness or psychology then you might not like it. If you don't like weirdness in films then don't bother. You probably wouldn't get it.

I'll definitely be watching it again. 10/10
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
my favourite ghibli film so far
21 October 2006
after seeing spirited away, howl's moving castle, and princess mononoke, i didn't expect this film to be any better, as all of the above were fantastic. i was very pleasantly surprised! sure the animation isn't as refined as the other films because it was made so many years before, however the story is just absolutely incredible. it's so enthralling in the way it is told, that while it may seem like so many other films i've seen (anime or live action, American or Japanese), nausicaa kept me firmly glued to the edge of my seat.

the characters fit in with the story so well, the pace and timing of the film are perfect, and it conveys it's message in a wonderful way.

if you like anime in the slightest, buy this movie. you won't be disappointed!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
right up there with naked gun & airplane
17 October 2006
first of all, ignore the fact that this film has "national lampoons" name on it. loaded weapon 1 is far better than all of the awful lampoons films.

this is a spoof, through and through. the jokes are some of the most stupid i've ever seen, the acting seems to be quite deliberately bad (we all know that most of the principal players in this movie can act better), and even some big goofs and mistakes seem to have been left in. if you see these things and you think it's a bad movie because of them, you're missing the point. the film is intentionally bad, in the same way starship troopers was intentionally cheesy.

so if you're in the mood for something that you don't have to take seriously (at all), this movie is just the thing. watch it once for all the obvious jokes, and then again to find all the jokes in the background (and there's loads of them).

my favourite spoof of all time. 10/10
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
If only there hadn't been so much hype...
17 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
BE WARNED - BIG SPOILERS HERE!

this is one of my favourite films, i saw it in the cinema here in the UK when it first came out, after feeling intrigued by the trailer. at no point did i think it was real (i heard that for a while after the film came out, the actors decided to go into hiding because so many stupid people in America took the bait and believed it was real. oh dear.), however i was able to really put myself in their shoes, probably because it was shot in such an amateurish way. never before had i seen a film that did not show you what was supposed to be scary, and it is better for that.

so many people have said they thought it was rubbish because they were waiting for some big payoff or for something showy to happen. admittedly, the hype surrounding the film did give the impression of something more spectacular, which did nobody any favours. luckily for me i never read reviews of horror films for precisely that reason, just seeing the trailer was enough for me.

blair witch's dialogue is fine by me even with all the f-words. young people that swear will swear a lot when they're scared, and if you look into the making of this film you find out that there was no script, most of the dialogue was improvised. the bad language was not excessive because the directors had no control over it. they had only certain lines and events pre-planned and so the rest was made up. the young actors did a good job with this too.

as for people stating the characters were idiots for not climbing trees to look for civilisation, surely if they did they would only see the tops of more trees? they were in the forest! also someone said they should have just followed the river downstream and they would have found some way out. IF YOU HAD PAID ANY ATTENTION you would have seen they did that, but with the curse or magic of the witch they ended up in the same place they were before. to quote "that's the tree we crossed, it's the same one" and "we walked south all day, i don't know how we ended up back here" or something to that effect. surely the idiots in films are the ones who know there's someone in the house trying to kill them, so they run upstairs instead of out of the back door or through a window.

the ending was something really special, to find a house in the middle of nowhere like that would be creepy enough, but to hear your friend's cries coming from it is far worse. the things you see inside the house, and the final moments make all the stuff said at the beginning of the film make sense.

i think the guys that did this have made a superb student film, that was exploited far too much, and it was made out to be something it's not. so for anyone who hated it, please take this advice - don't believe the hype about ANY film, ever. try downloading a trailer first and if it appeals to you then go see it. you have a brain, don't let the idiots in the media ruin your cinema experience again, go and make your own decisions about these things. don't forget, the critics thought titanic was awful when they first saw it, but as soon as the public started saying otherwise they changed their tune.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jacob's Ladder (I) (1990)
9/10
to anyone who gave this film a negative rating
15 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
after ploughing through twenty pages of positive reviews for this, i eventually found what i was looking for, the negative ones. upon reading them, it seems that the people who gave this film a bad rating have no ability to interpret the films meaning. they probably wanted to see another scream or i know what you did last summer because everything is explained for them there.

as for people saying the ending was rushed or poorly structured or badly directed, you have to remember that the ending was written like that for a reason. adrian lyne did his very best with it and i think he did a good job. just because you don't understand why a film would have such a finish doesn't mean it's bad, it just means you don't get it. try reading some fiction, that should help develop a bit of imagination in you people.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed