Reviews

17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Hun Jan, Oliver Stone and John Irving, a quick comparison
18 December 2022
"The enemy is war itself" says one officer near the end. "Soldiers deserve to die" says another.

Such opinions are shared on both sides of the infamous border arbitrarily drawn around the 38th parallel in 1945 by the victors of WWII, the USA and the Soviet Union. The useless war didn't change a thing. Worse, a peace treaty has yet to be ratified and the border has since become a wall.

On a similar theme, soldiers fighting for a hill, Front Line is closer to Platoon than to Hamburger Hill. Director Hun Jang has a word to say about the reality of war that is radically opposed to John Irving's faith in patriotism and glorification of official virtues, whose contradictory passions for pseudo-realism and war porn are second to none.

Indeed, there is blood here as well, there is mud, and all the flying limbs that you can dream of. Yet the comparison stops here. There is not a hint of a glorified vision of war in Hun Jang's opus because there is no glory at war : true heroes don't kill. Survivors do, at the risk of becoming desensitized.

I like to think of John Irving as the Russ Meyer of war flicks. A deranged paintball gamer's dream of hell, with plenty of eye candy. A mud bath mixed with blood. Orgasmic for some, otherwise forgettable.

Oliver Stone is the moralist, always weighing the good and bad, essentially focusing on the small picture. Polarizing, in effect, annoying for quite a few, and this will come as no surprise.

Hung Jang is the humanist, a master propaganda shredder. The big picture guy. A rarity.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
When Trumpets Fade (1998 TV Movie)
7/10
War porn - you can feel the mud
15 December 2022
Director John Irving is known for his love of thin storylines, and this movie is no exception.

However this time he does dig a little deeper into human psychology, doing a competent job of portraying a dutiful coward, a soldier willing to be sent home. Cowardice or reasonable thought ? The end is dealt with in typical Irving fashion. We're left with an upending question on redemption.

Filming is your typical Irving fare, you get a generous dose of his peculiar love for pseudo-documentary realism. A deranged paintball gamer's dream of hell, with live ammo, exhilarating explosions, limbs flying, discarded ammo cases, burning vehicles and broken trees. You can feel the mud.

The duel between an artillery gun and a flame thrower is worth the watch. "War porn" at its best.

In was in the mood for that kind of movie today. Irving is a sure bet in this category. Hence my generous rating.

=== Ratings should be subdivided into categories. "When Trumpets Fade" would surely get a 1 star rating in the category "Best Movies of all Times", yet, John Irving being the Russ Meyer of war flicks, I would give it a 10 in a "War Porn Movies" category.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Now we know why and how America lost the Vietnam war
15 December 2022
I get it why many viewers love this movie :

Lots of fights, no questions asked, a straightforward storyline - an heroic platoon goes up the hill under heavy enemy and friendly fire. Now put that brain of yours on pause, grab some popcorn and enjoy.

It reminded me of Liberace's version of Mozart. Forget what Vietnam truly was, cut to the chase, show what sells best - noisy and bloody heroic war scenes -, pretend it is the real deal. To his credit, director John Irvin did not skip all the foreplay, you learn how to brush your teeth, drink beer and deal with prostitutes while waiting for the front line.

Every soldier is just an average Joe, played by average actors, which might make it easier for the average viewer to relate to. Don't look for the smart guy, there is none - which is not per se a bad thing. However, none has depth of character, none actually seems to be able to think beyond chit-chat. As a result I could not care less when they died, I could not remember a single nickname after the movie had ended. Not even a face.

Soldiers sound how your friends would, in a movie - small talk, no thoughts, tons of clichés, only the beers and the fun are missing in action, and barbecue is lit with napalm. At least your friends are not pro actors.

Alas, the scenes with lengthy close-ups on soldiers expressing their emotions, angry, dazed, dying, crying, whatever, made me cringe. Such cartoonesque mimics !! Acting is so,so... you got it. B movie paradise, except it is not funny. Filming and editing are lazy as well, and the music is cheap and intrusive when it shouldn't.

Back to the story : despite the absurd blood bath, they all seem ready to go up again and again, day in day out, brave as they are under heavy fire, no questions asked, and there is apparently no chain of command on the ground, with plenty of privates strolling around and alone during battle. Looking angry, dazed, dying, crying, you got it. The script is rather tenuous, indeed.

All in all it has the flavor of a patriotic popcorn myth : every soldier is friendly and looks fit, nobody is on drugs, bravery and sacrifice are beyond doubt, thinking is irrelevant. The other side is just a bunch of evil aliens bent on shooting american boys for some ungodly reason. The tribute in the credits is for America's lost sons only, making the hypothesis of a denunciation of the horrors of war irrelevant.

If this movie truly depicts reality, then we now know why and how America lost the war, and deserved it. At least that movie was shot on a relatively low budget and no people were harmed in the process.

Funny, how Platoon, the movie - which tells a similar story, albeit with some degree of intelligence, debatable topics about humanity, better acting and presenting Vietnamese as a people -, gets heavy flack from reviewers who loved Hamburger Hill. Would they have enlisted voluntarily ? Shouldn't a war movie denounce war ? Or just be patriotic entertainment ?
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Alternate (2021)
8/10
Pretty good
4 December 2022
Low budget ? Sure.

Engaging storyline ? Indeed.

Decent acting? Yep.

Additionally, the film boasts some truly impressive camerawork.

Being its first feature movie, director Alrik Bursell has crafted a streamlined sci-fi romp that never boxes above its weight while telling a relatable premise. At about 85 minutes to the credit run, The Alternate wastes little time either pondering or explaining the scientific "hows" of its story. It's all made up, it doesn't matter, and you won't care. Solid and convincing, it keeps the audience invested in the outcome of it all.

What else can you wish for ?
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Call (2020)
10/10
The ending scene explained from a corean perspective
14 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Intriguing, how so many reviewers hated the scene included in the credits, to the point where they advise you not to watch it.

I was curious, I got it.

Is it because it left them in a state of denial, robbed of their hopes for a happy ending in the very last seconds ? Most probably.

A CLEVER TRICK FROM THE DIRECTOR

The last scene is the ugly true ending. Not the fictitious alternate one we hoped for out of empathy for the "good" girl, shown first. The "evil" girl wins, and as humans we are conditioned not to like that. Especially in the West.

But so be it. In corean culture (see below for details) only shamans have the power to defeat a demon. The "good" girl plays with fire despite being warned by the shaman, and looses.

Such a great unhappy ending, a rarity in movies, suits the script perfectly. Dark, murderous and hopeless. I believe it actually makes all the difference and saves the movie, which would otherwise end on a cheesy, happy note in typical Hollywood fashion.

Of course the whole movie falls apart when you start looking for logical inconsistencies. Who cares ? There are always plenty in a script based on some time quirks.

AS FAR AS THE LAST SCENE IS CONCERNED, EVERYTHING FITS

It starts from the point when the "good" girl is trapped by the "evil" girl in the present. All she has to do is to check the police report the "good" girl robbed at the police station. And act accordingly to change the past, and therefore the present, warning herself. Logical : had she been dead, she would not have been able to meet the "good" girl in the present.

DEMONS AND SHAMANISM IN COREAN CULTURE

We have to take the corean culture into account. Shamanism has been at the heart of corean culture since prehistoric times. It is not a minor detail in the movie.

When the movie starts we soon learn that the mother-in-law of the "evil" girl is a shaman (Mudang) who knows her daughter-in-law is possessed by a demon that has to be killed to prevent deaths. She tries everything to save her, but it does not work, so she reluctantly decides to kill her. It fails and we know why.

In the end we can assume she was right.

In the traditional corean culture, shamans are supposed to terminate a demon when they spot one. It is their duty.

Around 1890, protestant missionnaries started a ruthless repression that lasted for a century. In the 70s and 80s the repression reached new heights, in South-Corea, notably during the autoritarian rule of Park Chung-hee, a devout Boudhist, with full backing from the protestant churches and fundamental evangelists. Thousands of shamans were jailed, tortured and killed.

Regardless, shamanism has remained present in popular culture and its practice is rising again. Nowadays, around 20% of the South Corean population regularly contract shamans for advice and cleansing, up from 5% in the seventies. Shamanism is now recognized as the natural corean religion.

Who else but a demon would be able to make a phone call in the future to save itself ?

There is another clear reference to shamanism and demons in the movie, through the "evil" girl's favorite pop star, Seo Taiji. He has been accused of being a shaman who had sealed a deal with the devil, a rumour which turned into a nationwide scandal in the '90s. In Corea such an accusation was then considered a very serious matter by a large majority.

Yes the movie is 100% coherent, as far as corean culture is concerned. Only a shaman is able to terminate a demon. An innocent girl has no such power.

In this movie, evil wins. Because we lost our shamans. It is a warning but there is hope, eventually, as they are on the rise again. (Not me saying this, but that's the spirit...) Enjoy.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cosmic Sin (2021)
10/10
Hilariously abysmal
7 March 2021
Giving a ten for Best Bad Reviews Of The Year. I had to watch it.

I suspect this movie was meant as a comedy. I laughed till the end in disbelief.

The script is non-descript, on a par with the dialogues. Insanely poor. Random editing spices it up. A special mention goes to Mega Boobs In Armor With Yellow Braids, but overall the promise falls flat.

My guess is that the little girl popping out of nowhere is actually the illegitimate child Bruce had with the Queen of the aliens, which he meets in a cave, where they both get high. Refusing to pay alimony he decides to nuke 'em all for good measure, in typical BW fashion.

I hope there will be a prequel.
6 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The resurrection of Nordic religion : One-eye is Odin's human avatar, some clues to understand the meaning of the movie
28 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
That's what this film is all about. Christianization is on its way and the nordic religion is in peril. It needs to be revived : One-eye's mission.

It is hard to understand the movie without some knowledge of nordic religion. Nobody quite gets it, the professional critics seem to be lost.

Some clues :

One-Eye is Odin, or his human avatar. Odin had one eye. He was, among other virtues from his curriculum, the god of slaves and gladiators (slaves, usually). One-eye is a slave, kept as a gladiator. He's been there for years, waiting, observing. He is Odin in disguise, guarantor of nordic traditions. The cunning warrior who always wins, using any situation to his advantage (here, using the rope tied to his neck).

He chooses to free himself after hearing two chiefs talking about the christians and their one god, while negotiating his sale : his owner at first hesitates "we need him", then agrees to sell One-eye for money that will help him deal with the christians. Obviously a big no-no for Odin : the many gods must prevail. Time for action ! Once free, One-eye ties an enemy against a rock and eviscerates him alive : a sacrifice straight from the cult of Odin.

One-eye has a bloody vision of a trip on a boat, then finds christians who just finished slaughtering some pagans and are planning to go to Jerusalem. He embarks on their boat and leads them to hell instead. The mist they encounter at sea is the mist separating the land of humans - the Midgardr - from the Niflheimer - the world of obscurity - were Odin sent Hel, the godess in charge of, you guessed it, Hell.

The vision of a red sea represents the blood of Ymir, whom Odin and his brothers killed to create earth from his body parts - and the oceans from his blood.

One of the christians wants to kill the kid (not One Eye, important detail) fearing he is the one sending them to hell. He is instantly killed by One-eye. Indeed, the kid has become One-eye's messenger, his messiah - he who hears and spreads the words of the deity. Choosen by Odin, in other words.

On what they believe to be unknown land, the christians loose their minds, those who reject their faith are swiftly killed by One-eye : they have earned their passage to Valhalla. The dead christians will instead remain in Niflheimer. One-eye's answer to one of the survivors is clear : they will die.

The indians are indeed a reference to the discovery of North America by the Norsemen. Here, however, they represent the dead warriors from Valhalla, the einherjar. One-eye has accomplished his mission, he drops his weapons and walks towards the indians - no need for a fight, as the einerjar are in essence already dead. His death is shown as a ritual, a sacrifice : violent death is needed to reach Valhalla - his return ticket, sort of.

There are actually two rituals during the sacrifice scene : we simultaneously see One-eye immersing himself in water, Odin's quintessential element : the water of knowledge (for which he gave one of his eyes).

The kid is spared for a good reason, he now has a mission to accomplish : to cross the ocean again and revive the nordic religion in the land of humans. At the end One-eye's face appears in the mist : Odin is watching.

As a matter of fact the movie was entirely shot in Scotland, where the Gaels-Galls tribes, descending from the Norsemen, perpetuated the cult of Odin and did not convert to christianism until the 13th century (all of Scandinavia had already been converted at the end of the 10th century).

We can assume the story of this movie is dated around the end of the 12th century, in Scotland. when nordic traditions in those tribes were starting to falter. A tartan is seen on the kid's shoulders, there were no tartans in Scandinavia (but they did provide the Scotts with the word kilt, which means wrap). The movie is actually very accurate as far as details are concerned.

One-eye/Odin's mission ultimately failed. Although one of his sons, Thor, is making a killing at the box office this very century :-)

Great movie
79 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a PC piece of nonsense
27 December 2020
Since accuracy does not seem to matter, notably as far as the casting is concerned, should we ask for a remake of Roots starring Brad Pitt as Kunta Kinte ? It would make PC sense, wouldn't it?
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beatrice (1987)
10/10
Probably the best time travel experience ever
10 February 2020
If you like stories filled with brave knights in shiny armor don't watch this movie. Entirely filmed on location, it will make you feel as if being teleported by mistake in an era you would never want to be a part of. You will witness a reality that you will hate and you will come back with the mud, the blood, the stench and the horror.

You will have been there and you won't forget. It won't make you happy. And the worst part : you will realize things haven't changed that much since.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The New World (2005)
10/10
Masterpiece NOT entertainment
3 September 2019
Says Rotten Tomatoes : "... The New World suffers from an unfocused narrative that will challenge viewers' attention spans over its " .

Some viewers, yes, but not all viewers.

Are people with a short attention span the ones we should always care about ? Is there such a thing as a norm regarding the narrative ?

The New World is art, not entertainment. An intelligent and delicate piece of art, which makes you think. Such a rarity in Hollywood.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Forgettable - Not a Danny Boyle movie, and it shows.
28 August 2019
The first movie was great, with awesome characters, great actors and a delightfully baroque plot. This one is a pizza movie with a cheesy script + some dumb kids and a stupid dad turned into a raging zombie + some dumb soldiers, lowest IQ ever + your typical hordes of zombies chomping on everything that moves. Yawn ...

There isn't a single smart character !

Fun here and there (mowing zombies with an helicopter) but shallow and predictable.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
High Life (2018)
10/10
Dealing with our truth
26 August 2019
I always read the one star reviews first. This movie has attracted some of the best samples. Quite a polarizing one ! Indeed if one is looking for a typical space flick, frustration must loom early on the horizon. High Life requires you to switch to brain waves that are hardly ever solicited in Hollywood. Some will find it boring and slow. For those who want, get ready for a mesmerizing and unsettling trip in your own deep space. It is an experience you will remember long after the end.

High Life does not make you feel good, it is a reminder of who we are at both macro and micro levels : we won't ever escape from our planet, nor from our inner selves. We are all prisoners. Birth is the entrance, death is the exit, our best hope is poetry.
226 out of 328 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Time Lapse (2014)
10/10
Like many I thought the concept was flawed. It works, actually.
26 August 2019
I was initially tricked into thinking there was a big logical flaw, despite being quite familiar with time paradoxes. I have noticed other reviewers fell into this trap. This is surely due to a lack of clarity and rythm at the beginning. I almost got bored and did not pay enough attention. Was it because I wasn't quite in the mood ? Who knows. It did not "catch" me.

But the movie works.

In the present the camera sends you a picture of the future. When the future becomes the present, you could say the camera is actually sending a picture in the past. Which was the present when you received it from the future. And so on ...

That's the time loop the movie is built upon. Nice ...

The script works, a bit rough on the edges maybe. It took me a while to get into. The beginning is somewhat clunky, lazy. A few scenes and dialogues are half baked, but it doesn't ruin the movie. Actors are ok. Interiors are depressing. Colors are just sad. The image is actually quite plain, lacking a signature, there's no magic for the eye. But it is effective as far as the narrative goes. The characters may not take great decisions, but that's how they are : not very smart. Great twists. Smart ending.

So, why a 10 ? Because of the lasting impression. Quite a paradox.

Not a masterpiece, but I have seen big budget movies fail on similar themes.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
British Humour Meets Russian Humour Meets FPS
25 August 2019
Lots of fun when you fancy all of the above + some recreational substances
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Battleship (2012)
1/10
Battlecheap
25 August 2019
Plot = none John Doe = dumb but smart ( ?! ) Navy = inferior but superior ( ?! ) Aliens = smart & superior but dumb & inferior ( ?! ) Rihanna = who cares Sci fi = less than zero, this is NOT sci fi, it's hollywood entertainment Pizza movie = ok, if there's nothing better on tv

(Disclaimer = I wasn't in the mood to watch a cheesy but expensive movie based on nothing but patriotic bravado, sexy/handsome brainwashed numbskulls and silly/ugly looking bearded aliens who happen to breath effortlessly on our planet)
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Death Proof (2007)
10/10
Oustanding
24 August 2019
Now this is a movie for movie buffs. I can understand why some folks hate it. Not your typical action packed scenario. Doesn't matter. It's just awesome. The ending is so good. The dialogues are fabulous. This is cinema.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Deserves a 10 in its category
24 August 2019
As a magnificent contender for the CHEESIEST MOVIE EVER, depending on your level of recreative subtance intake, it will make you laugh your a.. off - or not.

I don't think this film was ever meant to be taken seriously. It's actually funny to read the "pro" reviews : are they serious ? Relax guys !

Freely available on youtube, no copyrights claims ... almost 2M viewers. You're next !
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed