Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
The better the art, the harder it is to find the right words to describe it.
21 December 2018
Updated review 4-9-19

I've now watched this movie 10 times since getting it on digital and then Blu-ray and can safely say this is a rare, near perfect movie. This is of course my opinion and I understand why this movie isn't for everyone. Let's break down a few of the reasons why for each of these points.

If we had a list of everything that can be done to make a near perfect movie, this movie checks every box. The visuals have been talked about endlessly. It won an Oscar for them. We know they're great.

The story is great, giving us a new Spider-Man with his own skills and personality that he brings to the table. The script is tight and the production is executed with laser precision.

The voice acting is nothing short of top notch. This is easily the second best thing about this movie right behind the glorious visuals.

Shamiek Moore has quickly grown on me over the ten times I've watched this movie. His range is as good as any veteran actor and he injects so much life into Miles Morales. He IS Miles Morales.

Chris Pine did not phone in the short amount of lines he had whatsoever. Just superb casting because he and Jake Johnson sound pretty similar. And oh boy, Jake Johnson.

I never understood why JJ had gotten so wildly popular over the last several years. With this movie I finally understand. I get it. It clicked. From the moment he pops up in this movie around the 20 minute mark till the end, Jake turns in one of the voice acting performances perhaps of all time. He succeeds in bringing a past his prime Peter Parker to life and runs the gamut of dramatic, sincere, intense, but above all FUNNY. Every single comedic line never fails to make me laugh out loud. Many of the gags pop into my head while I'm working or doing something else and I'll chuckle and repeat the line to myself.

I've always enjoyed Hailee Steinfeld and she shines in this movie along with all the supporting cast.

The greatest thing about this movie also happens to be its weakness. For me, the visuals are second to none. Another review title summed it up perfectly. "The most visually stunning movie I've ever seen". Absolutely agree. And while it takes a little time - usually 10-15 minutes - for your eyes to adjust to the frame rate, some people apparently can not adjust to this. I can imagine how poor that viewing experience would be, too bad really. Another thing is since they didn't use actual motion blur, but instead chose to animate blur-like artifacts and tricks to make it seem like blur, or having images doubled and overlapped for a ghosting effect, it confuses some people into thinking they're seeing the 2 images of the 3D version without the glasses. And lastly, the sheer intensity of some of the rapid action sequences combined with visual aesthetic pushed just beyond the breaking point and then dialed ever so slightly back by the direction team, it's just simply too much for some people. I get that.

As far as continuity/plot holes and things of that nature, I think the movie could actually stand to be about 15-20 minutes longer. There really aren't many issues though so maybe this is just me being greedy for more visuals.

Original review: Sure, we can dissect and critique and praise using any number of words we choose, but in the end to actually appreciate truly great art, it simply must be experienced in the medium in which it was created. For this movie, it was lovingly crafted in 3D, and so in my opinion can only be fully realized by the viewer in 3D.

What is a comic book movie, and what makes it great? From the original Superman where we first saw a comic book hero fly, to Burton's dark and stylized Batman, to the graphic novel style Sin City, live action ensemble X-MEN, Spider-Man, Iron-Man, The Dark Knight, the entire MCU....all of these are comic book movies, and depending on your personal definition probably range from good to great. And they're all live action with varying degrees of special effects, and some with animation. If you had to pick ones that 'feel the most like a comic book', you'd probably pick Sin City for the overall look, and the phase 3 MCU films for a combination of visuals and capturing the tone and spirit of the comic book story arcs.

But they aren't literally animated comics. The closest to that would probably be the animated movies, right? Like Mask of the Phantasm or any number of the Marvel animated movies. But again those are really 'just cartoons', and I don't mean that in a bad way. They're simply cartoon versions of comic books.

Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse is quite literally an animated comic book, and yet it is so much more at the same time. It's an explosion of comic book ink and paper, a dizzying palette of superbly rich colors, a jaw dropping display of digital artistry melded with living, breathing characters we care about, a story that is perfectly derived from the very medium in which it is being created and yet not for one single moment ever feels forced or hollow, a soundtrack fused with an endless exploration of a massive city, staggeringly sized scientific chambers, gigantic forests, and neon-electric-digital-dreamscapes of action set pieces that whir and click and come to life exactly as they do in the minds of children reading them on paper.

This movie is breathtakingly good in every aspect. Like-I'm-questioning-my-sanity-is-it-really-as-good-as-I-think-it-is!?!? Yes. Yes yes yes.

Remember the old Sega game Comix Zone? And how it was like "oh wow! It's a comic book come to life!"? This is like that, with modern technology, cranked up a thousand times.

But here's the most important part - *it was all done in the right way, by the right people, at the right time*. It feels like this project was greenlit and handed to the very people who created comic books themselves with a "here ya go, you have full creative control. Oh and by the way you have an unlimited budget! And resources! Have as much fun making a great movie as you possibly can!"

My first job was working in a movie theater. I took full advantage of being able to see free movies. I've built a decent surround sound system with all the creature comforts and have a growing library of movies. From the re-release of the original Star Wars trilogy, to each of the prequels and to the ongoing trilogy today, T-2, Titanic, the original X-Men, Avatar, The Dark Knight, Avengers, Avengers: Infinity War and so many more...I've gone to many, many big movie theater events for the experience. And I can safely say hands down that Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse in 3D is the best moviegoing experience I have ever had. It's that great.
467 out of 611 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Such a polarizing movie.
7 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
So many 1's and 10's, I'm not sure I've seen such a polarizing movie since Napoleon Dynamite.

I remember first hearing about this movie, mostly secondhand. All I knew was it was called Birdman and had Keaton. I couldn't figure out (or bother to search, too lazy...) if it was Birdman from the spider man comics ("uh isn't that vulture man?...") or from the Adult Swim cartoons or no wait, from the Marvel Universe! Oh well, as much as I loved Keaton I only like about half of the big budget comic book movies these days (Captain America, Dark Knight etc) and hate the other half (Thor, Guardians, Man of Steel). I figured I'd wait to see Keaton in a 'real' movie.

Then a friend asked if I had seen Birdman. I explained why I hadn't and they replied "no...it's not like that at all. Just see it if you get the chance".

So, I saw this movie without being fooled by the ad campaign for it AND without knowing it was a 'meta-artsy' piece. I loved it.

This movie is so well done on so many levels the negative reviews are simply baffling regardless of what got people to see it. Why are you tiring yourself trying to figure out where the edits are? Why are you dismissing it as trying too hard? Who ELSE would play a former superhero actor who walked away from untold millions in the form of yet another sequel?? How is this movie unfunny? "I think I'm hard". "No, you're just too serious with people sometimes-" "no I mean I'm hard. Let's do it. Let's really ****!" And "...tapping me on the balls with a tiny hammer..." And "he quit? I thought he got fired?" "With Mike it's usually both".

And how can a movie be too artsy? There's an art to action movies, ya know. Go to any video store and pick up any C or D-list cheesy action movie and then realize that those people are trying to make a great movie. That's their limit. No matter how hard they try their movies will always be garbage. Compare that to the likes of T2 or Avengers. So, forget the notion that this is just an artsy movie. It's just a movie.

For the "pointless lesbian scene" comment I've seen in reviews - go watch Mulholland drive. And pay attention next time you watch a movie, Watts clearly says "we share a vagina" in the beginning. AND it's a joke on the somewhat dying trope of "hey, let's have two hot chicks hook up in our movie". They tease with it and never revisit it or expand on it in any way. So yes, it's 'pointless', but the fact that you missed that it's slamming every other pointless lesbian scene invalidates your criticism.

As for the drums, I think it's delicious that A) the director was bold enough to challenge himself and the drummer to do this B) it's slamming Hollywood (see the 13 drummers used on the man of steel soundtrack) and C) that it won the award for best soundtrack while being up against Whiplash. Absolutely hilarious.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Way too much plot and character development
10 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
**review contains spoilers!**

Ugh, I can't believe I paid money to watch this. First of all, why do we need to spend 10 seconds on a scene where Max tells Furiosa his name? I don't want to learn *anyones* name! So, 1 star off for names. Just get to the action already!

Speaking of, this movie was probably 87% solid action. The other 13%? Who cares!? All crap! If I wanted to watch some stupid dramatic movie I'd pop in Ong Bak or Event Horizon or Terminator 2. Another star off for stupid drama.

Driving. Waaaay too much driving around and not enough exploding. I think there's probably a combined 2 minutes of driving where things aren't exploding. Uh, I paid for explosions. If I wanted to see driving I'd hop in my car and get on the freeway! No thank you, minus one star!

Dialogue. I like the grunting and gesturing. All that talking crap gave me a headache. Please, fire the screenwriters and spend more money on explosions and cgi next time. K Thx. Minus one star.

Plot. Stop setting up scenes so I can follow the action beats. Waste of time showing the exchange of gas for safe passage. Just blow stuff up! Gah, minus one star!

Character development. Nux (wasted time telling me his name, minus one star!) had far too much character development. Gawd I thought I was watching a freaking HBO mini biopic in the middle of this movie. Stop! I don't care about his transformation, just do it! Quit making my head hurt with all this, like, stuff! Minus one star.

Guitar guy. I liked him. Plus one star.

Basic story structure. All movies have a beginning middle and end. I was really excited because this movie had no definitive beginning or middle and it was super easy to follow the explosions so I figured it wouldn't have an ending. Boy was I wrong. The water didn't even explode when it fell on the people! What kind of lame crap is that? Pour gas on them! Minus one star.

Well this review is already longer than the entire script of dialogue and my head is throbbing so
13 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed