There aren't too many "historic" medieval fantasy romps out there so this was a must watch. I had bought this on DVD like 15+ years ago (lol) and now I finally watched it. For once the "critics" were somewhat right. This is just no brain mediocre popcorn entertainment at best. I've should have know from Jerry Bruckheimer stamp from the get go but you just can't fail with story about king Arthur, right? Wrong.
For starters you can see the low budget everywhere from cinematography to casting and set. You just can't mix king Arthur and low budget. It doesn't work. Casting is just awful and wrong. Clive Owen is as wooden as it gets and I have no idea how they came up with this guy as a leading actor in this film. Guy was just bored whole way and didn't have any required charisma to be Arthur. Second miscast was Lancelot who was just a whiny skinny bit*** and didn't exactly look my fantasy of legendary Lancelot. Then there is that blonde "guy" who is clearly a transformer. Conchita Wurst. Hollywood never disappoints. Only good anctors were Stellan Skaatsgård and Mads Mikkelsen who had only small roles. Directing was crap, script was crap. So sad. I liked the middle part best, especially the frozen lake scene. I never thought one can depict king Arthur as a Roman centurion. The back story was just weird. And Briton being some kind of savage tribals and "Merlin" being facepaint goofball instead of great wizard. Just ridiculous. And the obligatory hero moment for the leading woman actor at the end. Turning into wonder woman with Avatar face paint. Sigh.
I really wanted a good rendition of Arthur with some epic fights and quality acting. I guess that was too much to ask. You could do that with low budget too if you concentrate on script and acting.
Thanks and sorry for incoherent review. Just typed straight from mobile.
For starters you can see the low budget everywhere from cinematography to casting and set. You just can't mix king Arthur and low budget. It doesn't work. Casting is just awful and wrong. Clive Owen is as wooden as it gets and I have no idea how they came up with this guy as a leading actor in this film. Guy was just bored whole way and didn't have any required charisma to be Arthur. Second miscast was Lancelot who was just a whiny skinny bit*** and didn't exactly look my fantasy of legendary Lancelot. Then there is that blonde "guy" who is clearly a transformer. Conchita Wurst. Hollywood never disappoints. Only good anctors were Stellan Skaatsgård and Mads Mikkelsen who had only small roles. Directing was crap, script was crap. So sad. I liked the middle part best, especially the frozen lake scene. I never thought one can depict king Arthur as a Roman centurion. The back story was just weird. And Briton being some kind of savage tribals and "Merlin" being facepaint goofball instead of great wizard. Just ridiculous. And the obligatory hero moment for the leading woman actor at the end. Turning into wonder woman with Avatar face paint. Sigh.
I really wanted a good rendition of Arthur with some epic fights and quality acting. I guess that was too much to ask. You could do that with low budget too if you concentrate on script and acting.
Thanks and sorry for incoherent review. Just typed straight from mobile.
Tell Your Friends