Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Stargate Universe (2009–2011)
1/10
Not Good
19 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Stargate Universe promised Sci-Fi fans a mature and thoughtful series in the Stargate Franchise. Stargate Universe delivered a soap opera populated with characters that I would sooner see dead than make it home.

The characters in Stargate SG-1 and Atlantis were interesting because they did heroic and interesting things. The characters on SGU were not interesting because they engaged in passive aggressive actions when they were not moping like spoiled emotional teenagers.

Because the characters in SG-1 and Atlantis were wholesome, intelligent, and heroic persons, I wanted them to succeed in whatever challenges that had to face in each episode. Because the characters in SGU were ignoble, unintelligent, and cowardly persons, I wanted them to die in the black of space.

SG-1 and Atlantis were Sci-Fi shows that took a loose approach to the principles of real world science. This was acceptable given the needs of dramatic television. However, Brad Wright and Robert C. Cooper promised that SGU would be much more realistic. Therefore, it was only fair that the standards for scientific verisimilitude be higher for SGU.

This increased verisimilitude was not present. The pilot episode had a main character solving an unsolved mathematical problem via playing and beating a computer game that was distributed by the USAF. Unfortunately, in order to incorporate a mathematical puzzle into a computer game or program, one must solve the puzzle before writing the computer program. This basic principle of computer science, known to all programmers, was apparently not known by the writers and producers of SGU.

The pilot episode also went on to show the characters scrubbing carbon dioxide from the space ship with calcium carbonate that had not been baked off to remove carbon dioxide. This indicated that the writers and producers were ignorant of high school chemistry.

Brad Wright and Robert C. Cooper needed to spend some more time developing this television program before casting the actors and writing the scripts.
102 out of 181 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Showgirls (1995)
1/10
terrible
27 January 2001
This movie was every bit as bad as the critics rated it. I found the "straight" dialogue scenes so silly and laughable, I had to fast forward the tape past them. The first scene turned me off to the entire movie; who accepts a ten dollar bill from a stranger to gamble and leaves all of their personal belongings with him.

I remember Kyle MacLachlan's role as Paul Atreides in Dune. How much money did they have to place in front of him to get him to accept this crap?

The sexual scenes were boring and appear to have been designed to be anti-erotic. I could have gotten a bigger rise out of a visit to the local "gentlemen's club". "Sucked" doesn't quite describe how bad this movie was.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad...
31 August 1999
I really liked Eric Idle's performance in this movie.

Some of the satirical scenes involving Hollywood players are positively classic. Overall, the movie is good for cable or rental but not quite worth going to a theater.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed