Reviews

34 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The disaster era at its finest
1 September 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS AHEAD

Producer Irwin Allen hit a home run in his first at-bat in the disaster genre with "The Poseidon Adventure," a terrific suspense classic that actually looks as good today as it did upon its release in 1972.

The plot is simple: a tidal wave hits a huge luxury liner in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea. When the ship capsizes, a small group of survivors must climb their way UP to the bottom of the ship in the hopes that rescuers can cut through the hull and rescue them. Since the entire crew of the ship has apparently been killed, an outcast minister named Rev. Scott (Gene Hackman), who is borderline psychotic and holds some incredibly unconventional views about God and his influence on mankind, assumes leadership of the group. Scott's chief rival is a gruff and bitter cop named Rogo (Ernest Borgnine), who is travelling with his nasty, foul-mouthed ex-hooker wife Linda (Stella Stevens). Other survivors include an elderly Jewish couple (Jack Albertson and Shelley Winters), a teenage girl and her young brother (Pamela Sue Martin and Eric Shea), a middle-age bachelor (Red Buttons), a pop singer (Carol Lynley), and a crewman (Roddy MacDowell). Of course, the suspense all revolves around who will live and who will die.

While the characters for the most part are stereotypes, what makes "The Poseidon Adventure" stand apart from other films of its type is the strong plot and the utter unconventionality of its lead character. Gene Hackman, coming off his Oscar win for "The French Connection," is absolutely sensational as Rev. Scott, a minister who doesn't believe in prayer and actually sees it as a sign of weakness. He believes that God has put man on Earth to fend for himself and has given him a brain to figure things out for himself. I honestly have never seen quite a character on film before or since, and the religious subtext actually gives the film additional meaning beyond the standard thrills and chills. He may be psychotic, but the man makes sense, at least in this predicament.

Most of the rest of the cast is also quite good, with Borgnine making an excellent sparring partner for Hackman, and Stevens having her finest on-screen hour as the hilariously unpleasant Linda. I also liked the burgeoning relationship between Buttons and Lynley, who are quite touching in their loneliness. And then there's audience favorite Shelley Winters as Belle, a nosy (and obese) Jewish grandmother. Winters managed to get an Oscar nomination for this role, but let's face it: she's just a teeny-bit terrible in this one-note role. And the kids are ridiculously out-of-place here: why would parents put their kids on a luxury liner instead of flying them to Greece? Its obvious they are around solely for audience sympathy. It doesn't help that young Eric Shea is so obnoxious as the young brother you may very well find yourself wishing he had drowned with the rest of the passengers.

Then there's Leslie Neilsen as the ship's captain. At the time a serious actor, it's impossible now to keep a straight face watching this master clown in this serious role. You keep expecting him to break into slapstick mode, even though you know he's playing it straight. Regardless, he's believably authoritative in the role. But you'll still laugh.

If I have one negative thing to say about "The Poseidon Adventure," it's that the establishing scenes, in which the characters are introduced, are pretty bad, laughable even. But once the ship capsizes, the film turns into topnotch entertainment, with fabulous Oscar-winning special effects that still are convincing today.

Irwin Allen followed this one up with the even better disaster epic "The Towering Inferno." Together, they make a terrific, if day-long, double feature. Forget "Titanic." "The Poseidon Adventure" remains the top of the maritime class. ***1/2 (out of *****)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good cast in so-so comedy
31 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
POSSIBLE SPOILERS AHEAD

Kurt Russell's final Disney film (not including his vocal work in "Fox and the Hound") was also the last of the studio's formula college comedies, and the last film appearance of the late, great Joe Flynn, who died before the film's release.

Once again Russell plays amiable science major Dexter Reilly, and once again Reilly stumbles on an incredible scientific breakthrough, this time a potion that induces superstrength. And once again Medfield College's Dean Higgins (Flynn) sees the discovery as a way out of the college's financial problems while villainous A.J. Arno (Cesar Romero) gets out of jail just in time to try to steal it. Add Eve Arden and Phil Silvers (very funny as the villain) as rival cereal makers eager to use the potion to increase their cereal sales and you have a top cast doing it's best to enliven a so-so comedy.

I must say I thought the previous film in the series "Now You See Him, Now You Don't" to be an absolute riot, so this film is a bit of a letdown. After a wonderful first half-hour, Russell and Flynn all but disappear from the film and Arno and henchman Cookie (Disney regular Richard Bakalyan) take over when they are hired by Silvers to steal the formula, which Higgins has sold to Arden. This leads to a series of disastrous theft attempts and a midsection that moves like molasses, and includes an offensive scene involving the racial stereotyping of a Chinese acupuncturalist.

Fortunately, the film recovers for a wonderful, and absolutely hilarious, finale involving a weight-lifting competition and an engaging chase scene involving Dean Higgins' supercharged vintage car, which has been "fed" the formula. That the beginning and end of the film are the best parts of the film, and that they both feature Russell and Flynn, is no coincidence, since they work so good together whenever they aren't on screen the film comes to a complete stop.

So, basically, you have a funny beginning, a hilarious ending, and funny performances by Flynn and Silvers, two authentic comedy legends. I also love the film's bouncy and catchy theme music, by the underrated Robert F. Brunner, who scored many of Disney's comedies of the time. So count this one as a mediocre, inoffensive Disney effort. You can do far worse. ** (out of *****)
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superdad (1973)
Rock bottom Disney dud
31 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
In 1974, Disney studios tried for a hip generation gap comedy with the film "Superdad." Unfortunately, the film is anything but "hip," even for the early 1970's. In fact, it is, was, and always will be hopelessly dated, even for the era.

POSSIBLE SPOILERS AHEAD

This rock-bottom dud stars Bob Crane as Charlie, happily married father of Wendy (Kathleen Cody). Wendy is a lovely teenager who is involved with a laid-back surfer named Bart (Kurt Russell) and hangs out with an aimless lot of beach bunnies right out of a '60's beach party movie. His wife Sue (Barbara Rush) is an amiable sort who likes her daughter's friends, but Charlie wants Wendy to dump them all and go to college, not to get an education but to find a rich husband, preferably a doctor or lawyer.

One day while watching a relationship-oriented talk show (definitely NOT in the Jerry Springer mode) he takes a psychologist's advice and decides to join his daughter's gang at the beach, which leads to typical Disney slapstick of the era. In short, the day is a disaster and he's even more determined to separate Wendy from her friends. This leads to an ill-conceived plan to ship her off to a private college on a bogus "scholarship." When Wendy learns of the plan, and that Bart figured it out and said nothing, she disowns them both. Charlie and Bart spend the rest of the film trying to win her back.

All this may sound well-and-good in print, but on film it's absolutely dreadful. The film plays like a relic from the '60's, especially when Wendy becomes involved with a ridiculous, stereotyped hippie loser named "Clutch." To have this beautiful, level-headed and intelligent young woman become involved with such a loathsome, idiotic loser throws credibility to the wind. Also, Wendy's gang is way too nice and squeaky clean, and Bart is polite, clean-cut and respectful, so Charlie's distaste for them makes Charlie look like an idiot, which isn't the point.

The film is also episodic, badly paced, and wastes a good performance by the great Joe Flynn, who is hilarious (once again) as Charlie's boss. Flynn, who died less than a year after this film was released, deserved better. And Russell, who has matured into one of our finest and most reliable actors, scores with a forceful and professional performance. But don't get me started about the incredible waste of the lovely Rush, who is given absolutely nothing to do but be incredibly supportive of her idiot husband. As for the gang, only Bruno Kirby and Ed Begley, Jr. went on to careers of any note. The rest, well, are better left forgotten.

In short, bad writing, choppy direction and incredibly dated situations leads to a film that should have been called "Superdud."

* (out of *****)
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Camp (2003)
Tons of fun...
16 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I can't believe the negative comments being written about Todd Graff's "Camp," an obviously affectionate tribute to his youth spent working as a counselor at a special camp for teenage Broadway and show-business wannabes in upstate New York. Yes, it's a little ragged around the edges, with characters that appear and disappear without warning, and some of the performances are uneven, but so what? I wish more Hollywood films were even half as entertaining and written and directed with even half the passion that Graff (an actor best known as "Hippy" in "The Abyss") brings to his directorial debut. IMHO, "Camp" is tons of fun, especially in the vibrant musical numbers sprinkled throughout the film.

SPOILERS AHEAD

Evidently, the only campers who frequent Camp Ovation each summer are straight girls and gay boys, the vast majority of whom are school outcasts. Their crimes? Aside their sexual orientation, they are guilty of the felony of preferring Stephen Sondheim to Britney Spears, and it is at Camp Ovation that they all come together to bond and perform in the only environment that they all fit into. And, of course, in a film like "Camp," an outsider has to be brought in to shake things up and in this case it's Vlad, or as one impressed counselor enthuses: "A boy. A real, honest-to-goodness straight boy!" That he is, and a bonafide "hottie" at that, who proceeds to melt the hearts of just about every camper around, but none more so than roommate Michael, a teenage drag queen who shows up at camp just after being beat up for trying to attend his junior prom in drag. Michael's infatuation with Vlad in turn threatens his relationship with best friend Ellen (a "plain Jane" who is humiliated at the start of the film when she can't even get her own brother to take her to the prom), when Vlad and Ellen start going out. Also shaking things up is the camp's new musical director Bert Hanley, a washed-up, alcoholic Broadway composer who had one hit about ten years ago, then disappeared from sight.

Other campers include Michael's other best friend Dee; Jenna, an overweight girl whose father has had her mouth wired shut; and most hilariously, Jill and Fritzy, a sort of "All About Eve" match (Jill's the diva, Fritzy the ingenue who is so fixated on Jill she has taken to washing her friend's underwear in the sink.) whose falling out leads to the biggest laughs in the film.

That's about all there is to the plot and the audience is left to see if their questions will be answered: Is Vlad really as straight as he seems? Is he toying with Michael emotionally, or does he really like this guy as a friend? What are his motivations with Ellen, who is clearly out of her league romantically? Will Jenna finally confront her father about her weight? Will Bert Hanley stop drinking long enough to find that he still has something to contribute to society? Will Jill and Fritzy end up killing each other? What do you think?

Some people have commented on the ragged nature of the film and the uneven performances, but I believe low budget first films like "Camp" should catch a bit of a break when it comes to these issues, especially when they are as entertaining as this one is. I think both Daniel Letterle and Robin de Jesus are real finds as Vlad and Michael, and their relationship in this film is as complex and well-handled as any such relationship I have seen on film in quite a while. Why would an All-American boy like Vlad even want to hang out with Michael, even if they are roommates, unless he's "the world's biggest closet case?" Especially since he has to know Michael has fallen hard for him? And why is Vlad so nice to Ellen (a nice bit of work by Joanna Chilcoat)? I admit I found Vlad too good to be true at first, but everything is explained and revealed in the last scene, which may very well end up being my favorite film sequence of the year. Honestly, if I have one criticism of these three central performances, it's that Letterle relies on his killer smile a bit too much, the same criticism that has been leveled at Tom Cruise at times.

As for the rest of the performances, there are three obvious standouts: Alanna Allen is hilarious as the diva Jill, especially in one inspired scene where she tries to fight her way through a number even though she is so sick she has to throw up after every line; Tiffany Taylor literally brings down the house during Jenna's big number, in which she sings with such passion and power about accepting her as she is even her father gets the message; and especially Don Dixon as Bert Hanley. I've read many negative comments on his transformation in the film but I think it works fine, especially since he's still drinking at the end of the film. He's better because he's regained his professional confidence, but he's still a drunk. Dixon nails this role, and is especially good in an inspired scene where he verbally berates, insults and tries to discourage Vlad, Michael and Ellen's musical aspirations.

As for Graff, like I said his film is ragged around the edges and some of the minor characters should have been better developed or dropped entirely (the athletic director, for instance, who is used in two short--albeit very funny scenes--then disappears for good), and the musical numbers could have been better incorporated into the flow of the main story (most revolve around minor and supporting characters and not the three leads). Although Vlad has a couple of solos with his guitar that show he might make a decent folk-pop singer, Michael and Ellen never do really have a chance to show off their skills, so I have no idea how talented they are. But Graff does show a flair for directing vibrant musical numbers and they do stand well on their own, expecially Jenna's solo and the finale, inwhich we see Michael in drag for the first time since the film's opening and finally see why he is the way he is; with his acne covered in makeup and flamboyant hair and dress, he literally comes alive with an exuberance and happiness that is positively infectious.

In short, "Camp" is an entertaining winner, and the first movie musical in years that deserves positive comparison to Alan Parker's great 1980 film "Fame." When "Camp" is released to video, you can bet that will be the double feature at my home theater that evening. ***1/2 (out of *****)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
So bad they advertised it as a comedy!
1 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
"The Concorde--Airport '79" is truly one of the worst films ever made. It is tacky, imbecilic, and inept, with some of the most inane plotting ever committed to celluloid. It comes complete with what is probably the worst script ever by an Academy Award Winner (Eric Roth of "Forrest Gump" fame). It is so dumb it is laughable. It is stupid. In fact, it is so bad they advertised it as a comedy!

The plot is inane: wealthy weapons manufacturer (Robert Wagner) is confronted by television anchorwoman/girlfriend (Susan Blakely), who tells him she has evidence that he is selling secrets to the Russians and is going to expose him. Does he kill her then? No. Since she has been assigned to cover the inaugural flight of the Concorde (Washington, D. C. to Paris to Moscow), he decides to shoot down the plane with the anchorwoman in it. So when the plane takes off with the usual "Hollywood Squares" cast of television has-beens as passengers, and the two most unlikely pilots in the business (Alain Delon as Capt. Marquand and George Kennedy as Capt. Joe Patroni--that's right, airline mechanic turned executive turned Concorde pilot), he tries to shoot it down with a wayward missile, which he could conveniently blame on equipment failure. After the pilots elude the missile by flipping the plane over a half-dozen times and firing a flare out the window while flying at mach 2 (!!), they survey the damage and decide to fly on to Paris, since noone is hurt and structural damage evidently not a concern. Then they get to Paris, where they are attacked by a couple of fighter jets, which they manage to elude. They then crash land (in one of the most cheesy uses of obvious miniatures I have ever seen in a supposedly big-budget film--even the trees are obviously plastic) and disembark. That's the end, right? Wrong. The movie is only half over, so after an overnight layover, in which the cast couples as if the Concorde is Noah's Ark, everyone reboards the plane to go on to Moscow, even though they know someone is trying to bring it down.

Anyway, let's just say the second leg of the trip ends even worse, with the plane crashing into a snowdrift without a single passenger or crew fatality. So what does our wealthy weapons manufacturer do? He shoots himself in the head. Fade to Black.

Where do I start? Obviously this is absolutely ridiculous from start to finish. And then there are the actors: soft-core porn star Sylvia Kristel as a stewardess, Jimmie "J. J." Walker a saxophonist, Mercedes McCambridge looking ridiculous as a Russian gym coach, Andre Marcovicci as a gymnast who appears to be six feet tall, John Davidson as a TV reporter, Bibi Andersson a prostitute, Eddie Albert the idiot Concorde owner and Sybil Danning his trophy wife, David Warner the flight engineer, etc. Etc. There's even a cameo by Charo (yes, Charo) as a passenger who tries to smuggle a chihuahua onto the plane by pretending to be blind and saying it's her "seeing eye Chihuahua." And, sadly, we're treated to the sight of the great African-American actress Cicely Tyson, reduced to picking up a paycheck as the mother of a heart-transplant recipient who's accompanying the heart to Paris where her son waits. (In the late '70's, the two most highly regarded TV performances of the decade were Sally Field in "Sybil" and Cicely Tyson in "The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman." Field was rewarded for her performance with a film career that was capped by two Oscars. Tyson disappeared after appearing in this travesty. How sad.)

Yep, the stupidity runs rampant: Kennedy and Andersson make love by a fire. Kennedy tells stewardess Kristel: "They don't call it the cockpit for nothing, honey," a line that would get you fired in a second nowadays. Albert says upon disembarking in Paris: "Nobody is keeping us from going on the Moscow!" Martha Raye adds unfunny comic relief as an old lady with weak bowels. When she's nervous, she runs to the bathroom. She spends the entire film in the bahtroom. (Ho! Ho!) And no one even mentions lawsuit once, even after the plane turns upside down. And the cast? Dreadful. All the way down the line. Paychecks, paychecks, paychecks. That's all anyone was after on this one.

Incidentally, the "director" of this mess was yet another television hack, David Lowell Rich, who may as well be named Ed Wood. But he's the least of the problems. No, the problem is a studio that insisted on dumping cheapjack product like this on an undemanding public instead of taking the time to hire truly talented visionaries who could come up with a decent premise, or better yet, not make the darned film in the first place. The only good thing about "The Concorde--Airport '79"? Released at the same time as "Beyond the Poseidon Adventure" and the year before "When Time Ran Out...," it delivered strike two in the at bat that mercifully ended the disaster craze of the '70's. And not a moment too soon. No stars (out of *****)
73 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Airport '77 (1977)
It's not that bad....
1 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS***

"Airport '77" has the reputation of being a bad movie, but it's not THAT bad. In fact, compared to the other "Airport" sequels, it qualifies as high art, simply because director Jerry Jameson and his all-star cast (Jack Lemmon, Brenda Vaccaro, Lee Grant, Darren McGavin, Christopher Lee, Olivia DeHavilland, Joseph Cotten, etc.) actually take the whole thing seriously and seem to be trying to do good work, instead of phoning in inept cameos and working harder at cashing paychecks than giving decent performances.

The plot is definitely the film's weakest component: luxury jumbojet full of jetsetters (and two children for sympathy's sake) and priceless artwork is hijacked by a gang of art thieves (and a crooked copilot) and driven into the Bermuda Triangle after the pilot and passengers are knocked out with nerve gas. The plan is to land on an island and make off with the art while the passengers sleep. Unfortunately the co-pilot runs the plane into a radio transmitter and they crash into the water. Luckily for the passengers who survive the impact, the plane is evidently built like a tank and pressurized like a submarine, since it doesn't break up and sinks to the bottom of the ocean. It's up to the passengers to figure out a way to save themselves, since they're 200 miles off course and no one knows where they are.

Now, obviously, this premise doesn't hold water (pardon the pun). The plane would break up either on impact or while sinking, due to the incredible pressure of the outside water. That's a given. But suspend disbelief and you have a pretty nifty premise. And unlike "Airport 1975," the set-up to the accident is well-done and sustains interest and the aftermath actually is well-paced and the rescue scenes exciting and believable. There is no "filler" here--no silly comic relief, no characters that don't fit into the plot in one way or the other--unlike the previous sequel's "Hollywood Squares" cast of worthless caracitures. That's not to say that stereotypes don't abound (Grant is particularly annoying as a one-dimensional, nearly psychotic rich bitch who actually at one point says: "What's going to happen to me?"), but they're less annoying than usual, and are inhabited by some good character actors-- Lee in a rare "saintly" role, Kathleen Quinlan, Robert Hooks, Robert Foxworth (quite good as the villain), DeHavilland as a rich matron and Cotten as her one-time beau. We also get a cameo by James Stewart as the millionaire who arranges the trip.

The best part of the film, however, is Jack Lemmon's presence as the dedicated pilot. I checked his filmography and I believe this is his sole film appearance in an entirely heroic role. For those who don't understand why such a great actor would take a role in an "Airport" sequel, that says it all. At the time he seemed to be playing one tortured loser or everyman on the edge of a nervous breakdown after another. Playing a strong hero must have been a real treat and he is obviously enjoying himself here. It's amazing how by simply putting on a fake mustache and carrying himself with authority, Lemmon can pull off such an atypical role and make us remember how bad Charlton Heston really was in "Airport 1975." Unfortunately, we also get a gratuitous, unnecessary cameo by George Kennedy as Joe Patroni, who went from airline troubleshooter in the original, to airline vice-president in the second film, to some kind of airline liaison to Jimmy Stewart here. But at least he's not as ridiculous here as in "The Concorde--Airport '79." Enough said.

As far as the direction, another TV hack (Jerry Jameson) worked on this one, and he at least delivers a competently edited and photographed piece of work. The visual imagery is sharp and the special effects are actually very good. (Even the miniature work looks impressive, which wasn't always the case back then--see the aforementioned "Airport '79.") And, as I said before, it helps immeasurably that Jameson and the writers didn't feel the need to add a lot of cornball humor and other emotional hooey to a film that needed to be directed with a straight face in order to work at all.

Okay, so "Airport '77" has a ridiculous premise and a reputation as a bad movie. But watch this after "The Swarm" or "When Time Ran Out..." and you may find that it's a pretty competent piece of work, and rather entertaining to boot. You may not even hate yourself for liking it. I don't. *** (out of *****)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Underrated 1970's comedy classic
21 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS!! Any list of the top ten films from 1976 should include "The Bad News Bears," but most probably don't, since this film was, and remains, an underrated classic. I can't say enough about how much I love and appreciate this film, and it remains fresh and vital nearly 27 years later.

Walter Matthau is Morris Buttermaker, a washed-up minor league pitcher turned alcoholic San Fernando Valley pool cleaner. He's hired by a client, Councilman Whitewood (Ben Piazza) to coach a pathetic baseball team called the Bears, made up of pre-teen Little League rejects. This doesn't sit well with Roy Turner (Vic Morrow), unofficial head of the League and hard-case coach of the best team, the Yankees. He's p.o.'d because Whitewood sued to have the boys accepted into the league instead of letting them play in less competitive leagues in the Valley. His contempt is shared by his assistant Cleveland (Joyce Van Patten), an undecidedly nasty piece of work. Buttermaker, however, couldn't care less since he only agreed to coach after Whitewood agreed to pay him, since noone else would do it. And it's no wonder: this is the most pathetic group of losers you'd ever imagine--all of them the type of kids that would be picked last in any P.E. class. (I say this affectionately since I was the type myself.) There's fat Engelberg, the emotionally unstable catcher; Ogilvie (Alfred Lutter), the brain and expert on baseball stats; Whitewood's amiable son Toby; the token African-American Ahmad Abdul-Raheem (Erin Blunt), a Hank Aaron wannabe; Jewish pitcher Rudy Stein, who couldn't hit water if he fell out of a boat; the Mexican Aguilar brothers, who don't speak English; Regi Tower, an average kid with a typically overbearing Little League father; curly-topped Jimmy Feldman; and most famously Tanner Boyle (the terrific Chris Barnes), a foul-mouthed, hot-tempered and fist-happy runt and his nemesis Timmy Lupus, a shy, quiet back-of-the-class type who Tanner berates in the film's most famous line of dialog as a "booger-eating moron."

The plot proceeds according to form: the teams stinks, they fight, they lose their first game in embarassing fashion, all the while Buttermaker drinks himself into a stupor and barely notices. But after seeing the kids humiliated--and being insulted himself one-to-many times by the apallingly arrogant Turner--he decides to get serious and pulls a couple of secret weapons out of his hat: his former girlfriend's eleven-year-old spitball-throwing daughter (Tatum O'Neill) and the town juvenile delinquent Kelly Leak (Jackie Earle Haley), a chain-smoking, skirt-chasing, motorcycle-riding hellion who is a seriously talented ballplayer no one else wants because of his attitude. And to everyone's amazement, they manage to turn the whole league upside down.

There are many things to like about this film but I'll start first and foremost with the script, which was written by Burt Lancaster's son Bill Lancaster. This script should be taught in every screenwriting class on how to write for the screen. There is not a single wasted line of dialog, wasted scene or wasted moment in the entire film. Every line of dialog advances either the plot or character development, every scene is necessary and runs exactly the right length. And it is absolutely astonishing that in merely 102 minutes, the film deals with 18 major characters (13 team members, Buttermaker, Turner, Cleveland, Whitewood and Turner's little jerk of a son Joey) and gives every one of them a moment to shine and a distinct personality while not straying from it's central theme of the importance of teamwork and perserverance. And the entire film takes place on or around the ballfield, the exceptions being when Buttermaker visits Amanda and takes the team along on some pool-cleaning jobs. And the film is refreshingly unsentimental. When the story starts the kids dislike Matthau and he dislikes them. At the end, they still aren't wild about each other, but they have developed mutual respect. Buttermaker's relationship with Amanda is also something to behold--he refuses to admit how much he cares about the kid even when she practically begs him to. In one particularly memorable scene he actually throws a beer at her; I'd have to say anyone who doesn't think Tatum O'Neal can act should watch this scene and they'll know she's capable of better than she's given over the years.

Michael Ritchie's direction is also something special and probably as responsible for the tight construction of the film as Lancaster's script. Not once does he let the action get out of control and he coaxes good performances out of all the kids, especially Haley, Lutter and Barnes. Matthau is terrific, but then Matthau is always terrific. Morrow is also perfect as Turner, especially in an astonishing scene when he confronts his son about an "inside pitch." And the ending is perfect, and ironically similar to that of 1976's other crowd-pleasing sports movie, Best Picture Oscar-winner "Rocky."

In 1976 the main source of appeal of the film was the four-letter words spouted by the kids, which was something we hadn't seen before in an era of squeaky-clean Disney family films. And while some of the lines are hilarious, they are also the weak part of the film. It's believable that kids would talk this way, especially around someone like Buttermaker, but not during a Little League game, especially the championship game where they threaten each other with bats, kick each other in the groin, give each other the finger, etc. It's just not believable. Also, as another poster wrote earlier, "ringers" aren't allowed so Amanda probably would be ineligible to play. But these are minor quibbles. "The Bad News Bears" is a winner, and in spite of the "family film" reputation it has because of it's bowdlerized TV version, it is actually for teens and up. In other words, it earns its PG rating.

I have one rant: Once again, Paramount video has let DVD viewers down. The current DVD consists of absolutely no extras of any kind. No documentaries, no commentaries, no trailers, no nothing. I realize Ritchie, Lancaster, Matthau, Morrow and Piazza are no longer living and therefore a commentary track might not have been as informative as we would have liked, but producer Jaffe, Joyce "Cleveland" Van Patten, O'Neal, Haley, Cruz and the rest of the kids are still alive, so a commentary track would still have been possible. Also, a "where are they now" documentary on the kids and their experiences making the film would be informative and fun. So, how about it, Paramount? Why don't you stop being the bargain basement, stingy DVD outfit that you are and start taking your job as film restorers and historians seriously and give classics like this the DVD treatment it deserves. (See Disney's Vault Classics for instruction on how it should be done.) Thanks for nothing. ****1/2 (out of *****)
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Airport 1975 (1974)
Cheesy, silly, unnecessary sequel
21 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER!!! "Help us! Oh, my God, help us!" Stewardess Nancy Pryor screams into the radio at one point in "Airport 1975." She may as well have been speaking for the audience that was suckered into seeing this cheesy, silly and unnecessary sequel to the excellent 1970 suspense classic "Airport," one of those rare sequels that is so bad it actually dimishes the original in stature.

The film opens with Nancy (Karen Black) meeting her pilot boyfriend Al Murdock (Charlton Heston) at Washington D.C.'s Dulles International Airport. Both are headed back to L.A., Al on an earlier flight, but Nancy has something "important" to talk to him about and wants him to wait and fly back with her. He has an important meeting and can't. She gets p*ssed (PMS maybe?) and blows him off. They part, and you know nothing good will come of it. It's not long before Nancy is working her flight, "the red-eye special," a non-stop cross country overnighter. The flight crew is composed of Capt. Stacy (Efrem Zimbalist, Jr.), the co-pilot (Roy Thinnes) and Flight Engineer (Erik Estrada). Since this is typical Hollywood filmmaking, the stereotypes run rampant: the captain is a good, stable family man, the other two lecherous, rude, chauvanistic dopes, while the stewardesses are beautiful, young midwestern refugees like cute young Bette (Christopher Norris). And then there are the passengers: a bunch of drunken Conventioneers (Jerry Stiller, Norman Fell, et al), a couple of professional football players, two nuns (Martha Scott, Helen Reddy--Helen Reddy???!!!), the wife of the "vice president of operations" Mrs. Patroni (Susan Clark), an old drunken matron (Myrna Loy), a pathetic wannabe actor (Sid Caesar) and a famous movie star (Gloria Swanson) and her assistant (Augusta Summerland). And then there's the last to board--a dying kidney patient being flown to California for a kidney transplant (Linda Blair) and her mother (Nancy Olson). More about THAT later.

About the same time the plane takes off, small pilot Scott Freeman (Dana Andrews) is about to leave Boise, Idaho, evidently to fly south for the winter. (Actually, I'm being a smart*ss. He's going home from a business meeting.) He decides to make the trip even though the weather is terrible, which has no bearing whatsoever on what happens next. Anyway, after wasting a half-hour or so of screen time on silly banter between the passengers and crew and a famously parodied scene (see "Airplane") involving Reddy's "singing" nun and Blair, the pilots inform the passengers they have to land in Salt Lake City since "the entire West Coast" is socked in with fog (more about this later also). Ditto Scott Freeman. Unfortunately for everyone involved, Freeman has a heart attack and plows into the 747, blowing a hole in the cockpit, killing Thinnes and Estrada, blinding Zimbalist and leaving Nancy to fly the plane, which brings us back to where we began, with the classic: "Help us! Oh, my God, help us!" I won't give away any more of the plot, although it's predictable what's going to happen, since there are no pilots on the plane and the film's hero (Heston) is on the ground. Oh, and did I mention George Kennedy returns as the original picture's most popular character Joe Patroni? He's been promoted from airline troubleshooter to the aforementioned "vice president of operations" and his wife and son are also on board, so he becomes Heston's sidekick in the rescue attempt.

So what's wrong with this film? Oh, let me count the ways. The script, for one, is horrible. Don Ingalls, a former airline pilot is responsible for this lumbering and boring pile of cliched characters and hackneyed dialog. The direction by '70's hack Jack Smight is singularly uninspired and wooden, failing to coax a single winning performance out of what is a pretty impressive cast. The attempts at humor are preposterous: are we to believe an out-of-work actor could afford to fly cross-country simply because of his pathetic bit part in the on-flight movie? And that it's funny to watch Myrna Loy order a boilermaker? The only thing funny here is some of the dialog, and that's unintentional: Bette to Nancy: "This sure beats Ogallala, Kansas!" (Well, Bette, I hate to tell you this but Ogallala is in NEBRASKA, dimwit!) And then there's the whole subplot involving the kidney patient, which is absolutely ridiculous. No doctor would ever okay a girl in that poor of health to fly cross country to get a kidney transplant. They'd fly the kidney to her on a special flight! It would be quicker in the long run! I'm sorry I'm shouting, but I hate when my intelligence is insulted in a movie. And speaking of insulting, being from California, I have to say never, in my 40 years of life, never have I seen the entire West Coast socked in by fog. It is impossible. They could have flown into Ontario or any of a number of inland airports in the region.

Anyway, suspense is minimal since you know how this one will end, although in real life not three years later a similar mid-air collision resulted in nearly 150 deaths and the obliteration of a North Park neighborhood in San Diego, which amplifies how preposterous the entire enterprise is. As for the acting, it is lazy and uninspired with one exception: Karen Black actually tries to give a semblance of a performance and is plucky and believable throughout. Kennedy also at least tries to liven up some deadly dialog, but Heston (the once great actor reduced lately to national joke as the one-note arch-Conservative NRA President), is stiff and actually looks at times like he'd like to put a bag over his head so noone will recognize it is him in this giant pile of silliness. Noone else registers much more than a blip on the interest scale, although you'll never forget Reddy in a full habit kissing her rosary, counting her beads and belting out inspirational folk tunes while strumming a guitar in one of the all-time great camp performances. And as for Gloria Swanson, she evidently smelled the stench that was the script early on and wrote all her own dialog, which is why she spends the entire film talking about the benefits of health food and not eating "poison" foods--her favorite talk-show subject at the time. Worst of all, though, is watching the great comedian Sid Caesar and the great actress Myrna Loy reduced to picking up paychecks as pathetic, sleazy caricatures who matter not one iota to the film or the plot. They could have blown out of the cockpit hole along with Thinnes and Estrada and no one would have noticed. Is that any way to treat two legends?

Finally, a couple of interesting notes: look closely behind Karen Black when she addresses the passengers near the end of the film and you'll see a very young (and slim) Sharon Gless, looking beautiful and grinning from ear-to-ear. But look quick, because that's her entire role, even though she's listed in the beginning credits. Also, the beautiful young woman who plays Swanson's assitant is credited as "Augusta Summerland," aka "Linda Harrison," aka "Nova" in the original "Planet of the Apes." Just in case you're interested. *1/2 (out of *****)
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absolutely hilarious subversive comedy spoof
22 June 2003
"Wet Hot American Summer" is one of those films that the distributor obviously didn't know what to do with, so it was dumped in theaters without fanfare, performed trifling business and then just as quickly ended up on home video. Therefore, I never even gave a thought to renting it, since the cast is made up of a group of talented, yet secondary comedy actors who, with the exception of Janeane Garofalo and David Hyde Pierce, have never even registered a blip on my comedy radar. Then, during a bout of insomnia, I turned on pay cable and caught the last half and found myself laughing hysterically throughout, enough so that I bought it the next day and watched it all the way through and laughed more than I have ever laughed while watching a comedy feature, with the possible exception of "Blazing Saddles."

A rather subversive spoof of 1970's camp comedies like "Meatballs" and "Little Darlings," as well as early '80's gross-out farces like "Gorp" and "H.O.T.S," "Wet Hot American Summer" notches up the sexual innuendo, spits good taste into the wind, worries about offending nobody and ends up absolutely hilarious, and ten times better than any of the movies it is sending up. It is the last day of summer camp at Camp Firewood, circa 1981. In the first scene, we pan a row of bunks in which couples are paired up, dry humping each other under the covers. Counselors, you suppose? Try pre-teen campers, at least that's what we find out when one boy throws off the covers and yells, "We got to get back to our cabins!" As dozens of young boys run back to their cabins, the camp director (Garofalo) watches from the porch of her cabin and says rather unenthusiastically, "You're not supposed to be out of your bunks," but she might as well be chastising them for not eating all of their vegetables. The humor is all uphill (or downhill, whichever you prefer) from there as we meet the rest of the campers and counselors, all of whom are so oversexed that you wonder if they have anything else whatsoever on their minds. And that's to say nothing of Garofalo, who when she isn't ignoring campers she's putting the moves on the scientist next door (David Hyde Pierce) or officiating at gay weddings.

My favorite bits? How about the insane camp cook, a Vietnam War veteran who is so nuts he is given to making love to a refrigerator in front of the entire camp? (Don't ask.) Or the incredibly oversexed counselor who reveals himself to be a virgin to an incredulous friend, then proceeds to wreck the camp van (He crashes into a tree for no reason whatsoever.) while racing back to camp to jump a female counselor's bones. And how about the incredibly oversexed (get the trend?) lifeguard (Paul Rudd) who is so busy making out with a nymphet counselor that he ignores a drowning boy's cries for help until it's too late? (Don't even get me started about what he does with the body.) Or a ridiculous motorcycle chase where the driver is too stupid to know to drive around a bale of hay laying in the middle of the road? Or the two incredibly oversexed counselor nerds who are so intent on getting their supposedly virginal friend laid that they don't even catch his oh-so-obvious homoerotic signals? And then there's a hilarious scene with SNL's Molly Shannon as a severely depressed counselor whose husband has dumped her. What's a girl to do? She finds solace and romance in the arms of a wise-beyond-his-years 12-year-old, of course. (Shannon to Garofalo: "Be sure and come to our wedding next week!" to which Garofalo conveys her delight.) Like I said, good taste is not a priority here. But my absolute favorite bit has to be the counselors' trip to town, which goes so out of hand Garofalo literally mugs a little old lady for drug money.

I could go on-and-on but won't. Let's just say Garofalo and Pierce are as funny as always, the supporting cast (including co-writer Michael Showalter as the requisite nerdy virgin counselor in love with the unattainable camp babe) is terrific, the direction by David Wain inspired though visually ragged at times (but then so were it's predecessors) and the script by Wain and Showalter shameful, irresponsible, politically incorrect, disgusting and absolutely hilarious from start to finish. Too bad "Meatballs" and the rest of its ilk were not even remotely as successful as "Wet Hot American Summer."

As a bonus, the DVD has a terrific deleted scenes section with director/cowriter commentary in which Wain and Showalter actually explain why certain scenes were left out (besides the obvious NC-17 rating it would have garnered were they included) and an alternative soundtrack (which I have yet to sample) that promises "extra farts and more!" "Wet Hot American Summer" is a deserved candidate for future cult film status. ***1/2 (out of *****)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Making Love (1982)
So-so treatment of taboo subject
8 March 2003
In the much superior 1990 film "Longtime Companion," a gay actor is discussing whether or not to accept a gay part in a soap opera with his partner. He's afraid it will effectively end his career. As he says, a friend of his hasn't worked since he made "that movie." His lover replies, "Well, it was a lousy movie."

Although I have no way of knowing, I've always thought that dialog referred to Arthur Hiller's 1982 ground-breaker "Making Love," about a closeted (and married) doctor who leaves his wife after coming to grips with being gay. Because, in spite of its good intentions, its fine cast, and its impeccable production values, it simply doesn't add up to much in the end. "Making Love" is most notable for being one of the only studio films until then (and actually, to date) to deal head-on with the issue of homosexuality (the other being "The Boys in the Band," a much superior film that is now despised by many for its many gay stereotypes). Unfortunately, the good intentions of everyone involved have resulted in a film that is just to bland to be totally effective.

To be fair, it's been quite a while since I have seen it, since video copies are exceedingly hard to find and the DVD is non-existent. I first caught it on cable a year-or-so after its release and while I admired its glossy look and the absolute conviction of the cast in telling a story they obviously felt needed to be told, I found the film simply too eager to please everyone--gay and straight--who might see it, since there are no real villains and none of the characters have much of an edge to them. As the married doctor Zack, Michael Ontkean finds himself increasingly noticing the attractive men around him while his clueless wife Claire (Kate Jackson) seems to think she has the perfect marriage. Enter Bart (Harry Hamlin, pre-"L.A. Law), a gay writer whom Zack falls for. The two men end up in a torrid affair, and I can just imagine the reaction of preview audiences when Ontkean and Hamlin first kiss, then are shown in various lovemaking scenes. (In fact, when the trailer for this appeared before a showing of "Taps," which I attended in Oceanside, CA with a large audience of off-duty Marines, there was a near riot in the auditorium when Hamlin simply asks Ontkean to spend the night.) In retrospect, these scenes may seem tame now (compare them to any episode of "Queer as Folk") but considering eleven years later Jonathan Demme wouldn't even show Tom Hanks and Antonio Banderas kiss in the ridiculously overpraised "Philadelphia" they were phenomenally brave for the time.

The problem with "Making Love" is that it is absolutely predictable from start to finish. You know what's going to happen before it does. The one truly memorable scene in the film is when Ontkean finally has the "fireside chat" with Jackson. Her response is honest, perceptive and powerful. In fact, Kate Jackson is absolutely the best thing in this film. After seeing her here, it isn't so hard to believe that she was the initial choice to play Joanna in "Kramer vs. Kramer." And Ontkean and Hamlin deserve huge credit for taking a tremendous risk by appearing in this film at a time where actors were automatically assumed to be gay simply by playing gay. Nowadays it seems young straight actors are dying to play gay just to prove their acting chops, but at the time it was considered career suicide. Unfortunately, neither of their characters are particularly interesting. We know nothing of Zack's past and whether he's ever struggled with his sexuality. And Bart is an absolute enigma. He's either selfish and self-centered or absolutely incapable of commitment. Making him more like Brian Kinney in "Queer" would have added considerable interest to the film. But like I said, the filmmakers were simply too eager to please. And surely Claire has had some inkling of her husband's "secret." Or does he just simply "become" gay. I don't believe so, but according to the film you would think he had.

Another problem here is writer Barry Sandler's and director Hiller's annoying use of the characters talking directly to the screen ala Bob Fosse's "Lenny." While this device working fine in the previous film, here Sandler just doesn't provide the insight or perceptive dialog to justify the conceit. Actually, Sandler's entire script is the problem, as it never rises above the level of standard soap opera. A typical problem is a scene in which Jackson confronts one of Ontkean's one night stands after finding his name on a piece of paper. The man doesn't remember anything about meeting Zack. Furthermore, several scenes in bars (to say nothing of the character of Bart) reinforce the stereotype that gay men simply are promiscuous sexual predators incapable of long-term commitment. Nine years earlier the TV movie "That Certain Summer" was more perceptive and forward thinking than "Making Love." And may I say that "Making Love" is an absolutely terrible title for this film, since it reinforces the stereotype that being gay is simply about having sex and nothing more. And knowing now that the AIDS epidemic was in its early stages in 1982 throws a terrible pall over the entire film.

So, as much as I'd like to praise this film, I just can't. I admire the tenacity and courage of everyone involved, but good intentions don't ensure a good film. Much better is Robert Towne's 1981 film "Personal Best," about a pair of female runners who fall in love while training for the aborted 1980 Olympics in Montreal. It has the insight and unpredictability that "Making Love" lacks. Maybe one of these days the studios will try again. And maybe this time they'll get it right. ** (out of *****)
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Shootist (1976)
One of the all-time great swan songs
8 March 2003
"The Shootist" was John Wayne's swan song as a film legend and, to put it mildly, he hit a home run. It is a terrific end to a legendary career.

After a brief prologue made up of film clips of Wayne in his career prime, we meet his cinematic alter ego, John Bernard Books, an aging gunfighter who rides into Carson City, Nevada in the early 1900's looking for Doc Hostetler (James Stewart), the old sawbones who once saved his life and apparently the only man he trusts. It seems the old guy has prostate cancer and only a few weeks to live, and as Hostetler tells him, it will not be a pleasant death. Books, with no where else to go, checks into Bond Rogers' (Lauren Bacall) boarding house to live out his final days in peace under the alias "William Hickok." When Bond's delinquent son Gillom (Ron Howard, in a nice change-of-pace performance and his last major film appearance before becoming a director) informs her of his true identity, she tries to throw him out but relents when she finds out his condition and agrees to help him die in peace.

Unfortunately, things don't go as planned as everyone from the town mortician (John Carradine) to an old girlfriend (Sheree North) to a newspaper editor (Richard Lenz) try to take advantage of his situation and turn a fast buck. And then there are several lowlifes (Richard Boone, Hugh O'Brien, Bill McKinney, etc.) who want to seal their reputations by taking him out. Since it's obvious that no one will leave him alone in his final days, and since he grows fond (to put it mildly) of both Bond and Gillom and wishes them no harm, Books decides to go out in style and on his own terms, and to take a few scumbags along with him.

"The Shootist" is one of those rare films that seems to have gotten better with age. It wasn't particularly successful with critics or audiences at the time, as they were apparently put off by its leisurely pace and relative lack of action. Typical of the reaction was a TV guide critic (who shall remain nameless), who once derided it and its stars as coming across as "relics of the old West." (Wasn't that the point?) However, it is now pretty much considered a classic, and rightfully so, especially when viewed next to some of the lesser films of Wayne's 1970's period ("Cahill," "Rooster Cogburn," "The Cowboys"). In fact, it is now hard to believe that Wayne was not nominated for an Oscar here, as Books is clearly one of the best performances of his career and definitely eclipses his extravagantly praised, Oscar-winning mugging in "True Grit." Indeed, "The Shootist" deserves to stand alongside Clint Eastwood's "The Outlaw Josey Wales" and Oscar-winning "Unforgiven" as the last three great Westerns in cinema history. Everything about it is immaculate--the sets, the costumes, the supporting cast (including Harry Morgan in a terrific cameo as an unsympathetic sheriff who tells Books, "What I put on your grave won't pass for roses."), the script, and the chemistry between Wayne and Bacall, teaming up for the first time since "Blood Alley." And everything is held together by old pro director Donald Siegel who, aside from the late Hal Ashby, may very well be the most underappreciated director in cinema history.

But "The Shootist" is John Wayne's film all the way. He is simply sensational, and BRAVE, since he apparently knew at the time his cancer was back and that this would probably be his last film. It's not every film legend who gets to end his/her career on a high note, but Wayne did just that. I just hope he knew it before his death barely three years later. ****1/2 (out of *****)
105 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brannigan (1975)
Fine late-career vehicle for an aging acting legend
15 February 2003
A year after looking silly starring in the Dirty Harry clone "McQ," John Wayne gave the modern-day cop thriller another try to much better effect in "Brannigan," a fine vehicle for the aging legend.

Wayne plays Lt. James Brannigan, a Chicago police detective hot on the trail of mobster Ben Larkin. When Larkin is located in London, England, Wayne is dispatched to pick him up and extradite him home to face criminal charges (extortion, prostitution, bribery, murder). Upon arrival in London, he meets his pretty young escort Jenny (she's on loan from vice squad.), who takes him to meet Scotland Yard chief Sir Charles Swann ("Gandhi" director Richard Attenborough, in a terrific performance). In the meantime, Larkin, who is under surveillance, is kidnapped, thwarting Brannigan's plans for a quick extradition and embarassing Swann, who has just berated Brannigan for losing Larkin in the first place and assuring him: "It can't happen here." To Swann's obvious displeasure, Brannigan decides to stick around and help Scotland Yard find Larkin, even though he and Swann have a prickly relationship at best and disapprove of each other's police methods--i.e. Brannigan is a conservative who carries a gun and believes in the use of force and Swann a liberal who doesn't believe in either. Brannigan also spends a great deal of the film dodging a hit man whom Larkin hired prior to his kidnapping.

What follows is an amusing, and low-key, caper that is culminated by a well-choreographed chase through the streets of London, a hilarious bar brawl, and several attacks by the hit man, including one in which Jenny is almost killed. Wayne is in fine form here, well-served by the change of locales and by his character who, unlike McQ, is closer to his own age and not as much of a Dirty Harry-clone. The film is also marked by a much lighter tone than his previous outing, and unlike his uncomfortable pairing with "McQ"'s Eddie Albert, he and Attenborough make a memorable team and have several terrific scenes together. A warning, however--compaired with today's myriad of over-the-top action films like "XXX" and every "Lethal Weapon" wannabe of the past fifteen years, "Brannigan" is pretty subdued and the action scenes will seem tame to today's thrill-seeking action audience. Unlike today's action dreck, the name-of-the-game in "Brannigan" is characterization and plot, as it was with most genre films of the '70's.

Also unlike today's action films, "Brannigan" has a memorable supporting cast, all of whom play characters who actually resemble real people. As I said earlier, Attenborough is terrific as Wayne's sparring partner, and Judy Geeson is a worthy partner for Wayne, although as was also standard for the era, she's mostly around to scream "Jim!" every time Brannigan is in danger and to be protected by her new friend. John Vernon (the dean in "Animal House") is a fine villain as Larkin, and Mel Ferrer scores points as Larkin's sleazy (and crooked) lawyer, who obviously knows more than he lets on. Daniel Pilon adds menace as the mostly silent hit man Gorman. And look fast for Lesley-Anne Down as a hoodlum's girlfriend.

John Wayne only made two more films after "Brannigan"--"Rooster Cogburn" and "The Shootist." And while "Brannigan" will probably be regarded as one of the lesser efforts of his legendary career, it was, and remains, an amusing and entertaining two hours, and a rare chance to see Wayne in a contemporary setting. It's a worthy effort. *** (out of *****)
44 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of Bronson's better '80's efforts
10 February 2003
About the time "10 to Midnight" was released, I read an interview with Charles Bronson in which he was asked why he continued to make one "Death Wish" clone after the other with bad hack directors instead of taking over his career and taking chances like his contemporaries Sean Connery and Clint Eastwood. I remember he wasn't too happy with the question, but it was, and remains, a legitimate one, for while Connery and Eastwood would cap their careers with Oscars Bronson would limp toward the end of his with one bomb after the other. So bad were his '80's films in fact, this one is one of the best, even though it still is a pretty mediocre, and at times terrible, film.

The difference between "10 to Midnight" and say, "Kinjite," is that Bronson actually has a pretty good supporting cast to work with, including Lisa Eilbacher, Andrew Stevens, Geoffrey Lewis and Wilford Brimley. And his adversary, a kinky lady-killer (literally) played by Gene Davis, is a little more interesting than your standard-issue villain. Davis is Warren Stacey, a handsome young stud who is such a sociopathic sleaze that even his sexy looks and great body can't get him a date. So when he's rejected, what's a guy to do? It's simple, he strips naked, grabs some gloves and a knife, and kills the object of his affection, usually when she's also naked and in the middle of lovemaking. Obviously, "The French Connection" this one ain't. Enter Leo Kessler (Bronson) who surveys Stacey's carnage and comes up with the perceptive observation: "His knife must be his penis." Together with partner Andrew Stevens, he has no trouble fingering Stacey as the killer; unfortunately, the psycho is an expert at establishing airtight alibis. Also unfortunately for Kessler, he has a nubile, yet estranged, daughter (Lisa Eilbacher)--a nurse who not only was friends with victim one, but also shares an apartment with several potential (and beautiful) victims. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out where this one is going.

Yep, it's all as sleazy as it sounds, and surprisingly watchable. "10 to Midnight" also contains an astonishing amount of nudity (both male and female) for a mainstream film, and a sex scene near the beginning that is about one thrust away from tagging this with an X-rating. Fortunately, Bronson and the supporting cast keep it from veering too far off the deep end, with Eilbacher especially effective as a daughter who is every bit as tough and hard-headed as her father. I also liked Geoffrey Lewis' turn as a smart-as-a-whip defense attorney, and Brimley's presence as Bronson's superior adds a welcome touch of professionalism. And while Davis can't act, he does project enough menace to keep it interesting. Unfortunately, director J. Lee Thompson is less adept at handling his bit players, many of whom are so wooden as to be absolutely laughable. One actress in particular, playing the boss of the first victim, elicited howls of audience laughter when I first saw this with her absolutely terrible job of conveying shock and horror when hearing about the murder. In fact, Thompson's directing here is so routine and at times inept, it is almost impossible to believe that the same man was responsible for the authentic classic "The Guns of Navarone."

All-in-all, "10 to Midnight" has to classify as the ultimate good/bad film. Sleazy, predictable, offensive and laughable all could be used to describe it. But it's also strangely watchable, even entertaining at times. And the ending packs a real wallop. In other words, it's a real guilty pleasure. **1/2 (out of *****)
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
That Certain Summer (1972 TV Movie)
One of the all-time great TV movies
10 February 2003
Warning: Spoilers
"That Certain Summer" is one of the all-time great TV movies. Even though I haven't seen it in maybe 15 years, it is forever seared into my memory as few films I have seen before or since.

***SPOILER ALERT***

Hal Holbrook plays a divorcee with a young son and a male lover, played by Martin Sheen. Although they have been together for several years, his son has no idea of his homosexuality, because, let's face it, you just didn't acknowledge such things thirty years ago. When the son comes to visit, Sheen moves out to protect his beloved, even though he thinks the boy should be told. The visit goes well until the boy finds evidence of his father's secret life and Holbrook realizes it's time to come clean. The final scene between father and son is absolutely heartbreaking in the simplicity of its emotion and honesty. And the look of shame and disgust on the boy's face is absolutely shattering. As is true in the best movies, little is resolved by the end.

Holbrook and Sheen are excellent as is to be expected, and Hope Lange lends credible support as the supportive ex-wife who married him because she thought she could "change" him. Her scene with Sheen is honest and perceptive. But the real find here is Scott Jacoby as the son. I believe he won an Emmy for this role, and if I'm right, it was well-deserved. Unfortunately, like many of his contemporary child actors, he followed this up with several terrific performances (my favorites--"Bad Ronald" and "The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane")before disappearing in the early eighties. Thank goodness today's Hollywood is more willing to let it's more talented child actors age gracefully into adulthood.

Suffice it to say this is a perfect film and deserves to find a life on home video. And considering society's aversion to anything gay at the time, it was incredibly brave of everyone involved to participate. Watch for this one on the late show. ***** (out of *****)
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Chorus Line (1985)
A classic example of how to do everything wrong in a stage-to-film adaptation
2 February 2003
Richard Attenborough's totally ordinary and exasperating screen version of Michael Bennett's brilliant stage musical "A Chorus Line" is a classic example of how to do everything wrong in a stage-to-film adaptation.

First off, hire a director who has absolutely no idea how to stage a musical or judge musical talent. Allow him to hire a cast based on looks and youth as opposed to actual talent, update the setting from 1975 to 1985, then let him throw out the original production's ground-breaking choreography as being "dated" and hire the "Flashdance" choreographer to create '80's style dance routines that will look ridiculously dated 20 years later. And don't worry if the director doesn't even understand the meaning and purpose of the original show; after all, the show really isn't about aging dancers hoping for one more show so they can cling onto their dreams for a while longer. No, no, no. As he said at the time, the show is about "kids trying to break into show business." As a result, he doesn't have to even think about hiring the original cast as they are "now in their thirties and forties." (Note: all this is recounted in the book "On the Line" by Thommie Walsh and Baayork Lee.)

Then, to top it off, allow him to change the focus from the dancers themselves to a corny backstage love story between Zach the choreographer and Cassie, the fallen "star," who has come back to beg her old flame for a job. Finally, take the show's showstopper, the beautiful and unforgettable "What I did for Love" away from Diana, give it to Cassie, and turn it from an anthem about giving up your life for your dreams into a love song to a jerk. And make sure you cast a star like Michael Douglas as Zach and then cut to a reaction shot of him a dozen times during the dance numbers even if it is incredibly distracting. After all, people came to see him and not the dancing.

I could go on and on, but why bother? The truth is, with a couple of exceptions, nobody in this cast sings or dances convincingly on a Broadway level, and my bet is most wouldn't make it on the dinner theater circuit either. The exceptions? Vicki Frederick is a hoot as Sheila, the senior (and most cynical) of the dancers. Gregg Burge has a fun dance solo in the original tune "Surprise, Surprise," but then they ruin it by having him joined by the rest of the cast. And Alyson Reed is very good and convincing as Cassie, the star. But why, oh why did they replace Cassie's brilliant solo "The Music and the Mirrors" with the terrible original tune "Let Me Dance With You?" This and the bowdlerization of "What I Did For Love" alone sink the film. Not to mention that the show's other showstopper "Dance Ten Looks Three" is ruined by the terrible performance of Audrey Landers, who was obviously hired due to her gorgeous looks rather than her obvious lack of talent.

Any way, "A Chorus Line" is an major disappointment, especially now that Rob Marshall and company have shown us how to adapt a musical with his marvelous film version of "Chicago" which seems headed for a Best Picture Oscar. Ironically, both musicals debuted on Broadway the same year (1975) and while "A Chorus Line" was the bigger hit, because they got the film version of "Chicago" right and this one so wrong, "Chicago" seems destined to go down in history as the better production. Maybe if they'd waited for a more appropriate director with a real vision for this film, things would be different. Oh, the possibilities--- ** (out of *****)
18 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Carrie (1976)
A classic in every sense of the word.
6 November 2002
Twenty-six years after its theatrical release, Brian DePalma's adaptation of Stephen King's "Carrie" remains a classic in every sense of the word. Poetically filmed and sharply drawn as a character study, it introduced moviegoers everywhere to one of the finest actresses of our era (Sissy Spacek), gave a career-defining role to a fine actress (Piper Laurie) whose talent and name would probably be forgotten by now were it not for this film, was the first true exhibition of John Travolta's enormous screen charisma and jump-started the careers of an impressive line-up of unknown actors (Betty Buckley, P.J. Soles, William Katt, Nancy Allen and Amy Irving). And it managed to scare the hell out of audiences everywhere through sheer filmmaking technique and by showing only enough to make the audience think they see more than they actually see.

Is it even necessary to regurgitate the plot? We all know the basics: high school outcast is cruelly ridiculed by her peers, who don't know she has telekinetic powers--powers she is only beginning to understand. Her high school life is hell, and her homelife even worse. Her mother is a psychotic religious fanatic given to beating her over the head until she prays with her, refuses to let her socialize with anyone, locks her in the closet, goes bananas at just the thought of sex. Piper Laurie is absolutely sensational in this role--deliberately over-the-top in a chilling yet darkly funny performance which should have won an Oscar for supporting actress but lost out to Beatrice Straight's two-scene cameo crying and screaming jag in "Network." (Of course, as wicked as this performance is, it's amazing the staid Academy saw fit to nominate it in the first place.) After Miss Collins, the well-meaning gym teacher (future Broadway diva Betty Buckley), berates the class for torturing poor Carrie, and humiliates evil Chris Hargensen (Nancy Allen, gloriously naked in the memorable opening locker room sequence) in the process, she unwittingly sets in motion the tragic turn of events: Chris and boyfriend Billy (Travolta) plot revenge on Carrie, while Sue Snell (Amy Irving), feeling guilty for her part in the incident, talks her boyfriend Tommy (Katt) into taking Carrie to the prom, hoping she'll finally come out of her shell and fit in. We all know what happens next, let's just say it involves a bucket of pig's blood, water, electricity and fire.

What's amazing about this film is just how gory it isn't: I swear before I finally saw this film I was told that you saw heads severed, bodies explode and blood galore; however, except for the pig's blood, the gore here is pretty limited, although the final scene between Carrie and her mother has it's moments. And as I said before: it's all in DePalma's brilliant directing. Legend has it that the director deliberately began the film with graphic nudity in the initial locker room scene because he felt if he was that graphic in the first five minutes it would make the audience uneasy and they would spend the rest of the film not knowing how far he was going to go once the carnage began. Also, the last minute shock scene was added because at the time, there was limited time between screenings and the next audience would stand outside the auditorium door waiting for the next screening and when the previous audience would scream, the next audience would spend the next 105 or so minutes uneasily wondering what the screaming was about. It's all about anticipating what is coming and not necessarily about how gross everything on the screen is, a lesson schlock directors of today would be well-advised to learn.

I could go on-and-on about this film but suffice it to say "Carrie" is well-worthy of the designation "classic." It's funny, it's sad, it's scary and mostly tragic. And just to illustrate how cheap and sleazy it could have been in lesser hands, simply screen the awful sequel "The Rage--Carrie 2" and watch how Sue Snell's character is despicably trashed for a cheap thrill, or try to sit through the botched TV-movie remake which is as bad as this one is great and you'll see the difference is all in Brian DePalma--a director who has since had a spotty career but for one glorious moment put it all together to create a masterpiece. ***** (out of *****)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great premise, cheap, cheesy execution
22 October 2002
"Two-Minute Warning" is one of those films that has a great premise--91,000 people gathered at the L.A. Coliseum are terrorized by an anonymous sniper during a championship football game--that is undone by one of the stupidest, most incompetent scripts in the history of motion pictures. Add to that the fact that the filmmakers spared every expense possible in telling the story, and you have a cheap, cheesy film that has to rank as one of the most disappointing films of the 1970's.

How incompetent is it? How about this for a setup: on Super Bowl Sunday (or Championship X as its referred to in the film), a sniper guns down a bicyclist from a nearby hotel, then escapes to the Coliseum, where he hides out in the belltower for the game to start, and evidently to start shooting. How does he get in? He simply breaks open a couple of locks, feeds the guard dogs some hamburger and climbs the ladder into the tower. There is no security, no police, no media, nobody around except one maintenance man the morning of the biggest football game of the year. Now, I was 13 in 1976 and I can tell you security was a concern even then. There is simply no possible way anyone could enter a facility that easily on such an important day.

Then there's the flimsy cast of characters: Charlton Heston as the police chief, John Cassavetes the SWAT leader, Martin Balsam the coliseum manager, Beau Bridges a father of two bratty boys, Pamela Bellwood as his wife, Marilyn Hassett as a college coed, David Janssen a car salesman and Gena Rowlands his girlfriend, Jack Klugman a sleazy gambler, Walter Pidgeon a sleazy pickpocket, and David Groh as a doctor who hits on the coed. There is no need to describe the characters any more because that is all there is to any of their personalities. These stereotypical cardboard cutouts are so one-dimensional they resemble nothing more than ducks in a shooting gallery, which in effect is all they are anyway.

And how about the ridiculous plot? When the sniper is finally seen and the police called, the wheels really start to turn, with the main conflict between the straight-laced captain and the flaky SWAT leader. The SWAT leader wants to put sharpshooters in the light towers without 91,000 people (or the sniper) noticing. The captain's plan? Evacuate the coliseum without the sniper noticing. They finally agree to man the light towers but to wait until the two-minute warning until any action is taken. Why? Because the sniper obviously wants to wait to see who wins the game before opening fire!

Honestly, the movie goes downhill from there. I can suspend disbelief up to a point. But this is the type of flick where a man can be shot and left dangling behind a thousand people and no one notices for five minutes. Or that the nosy father can see the sniper (he's evidently the only one in the stadium with eyes) and go to alert the police, but tell his wife and kids to stay in their seats (in the line of fire) so he can find them later. Or that the maintenance man can be knocked off a forty-foot ladder in full view of the crowd and not be seen by anyone but the policemen. Or that-- Well, you get the idea.

Then there's the annoying fact that the filmmakers were obviously too cheap to pay the NFL for use of their football uniforms and the Super Bowl logo, so we have the dubiously named "Championship X" between Los Angeles and Baltimore, but not the Rams and the Colts, as they were known back then. (Since 1977's "Black Sunday," which was also set partially at the Super Bowl, actually used the name "Super Bowl" and real teams, I have to believe money and not the NFL were behind the decision not to use the name.) And instead of paying for a top-notch recording star to sing the National Anthem, here we get Merv Griffin(!) warbling the anthem in one of the most laughable scenes in modern movie history.

And let's not even discuss the acting; suffice it to say that a lot of talented actors are wasted in roles that they took obviously to pay the bills until something better came along. And the direction is just pitiful. Can I nominate Larry Peerce (whose filmography includes such classic stinkers as "A Separate Peace," "The Sporting Club," "Why Would I Lie," and "Wired," the John Belushi biopic that ruined the careers of everybody involved) as second worst director of all time, right behind Ed Wood? In two hours he establishes no mood, no style, no urgency and no suspense whatsoever. And the miserable script by Ed Hume deserves placement alongside Eric Roth's "The Concorde--Airport '79" as the single worst piece of film writing of all time.

Incidentally, when NBC bought broadcasting rights to "Two Minute Warning," it must have been sight unseen because by the time they cut the violence and profanity out, only about 80 of 115 minutes remained, so they reshot the film, adding an hour of new footage in which the sniper went from an anonymous threat to a decoy for a jewelry heist next door, which simply made things even more ludicrous. After it's initial three-hour showing, the film was cut back to two hours with most of the new footage left intact, but only about 30 original minutes left, mostly with Chuck Heston and Cassavetes as the only original cast members left with any screen time. However, all of the names were left in the opening credits, even though Hassett and Pidgeon were completely cut out of the film and the other supporting characters reduced to cameos. Which should serve as a further indicator of how bad this film really is.

So, consider yourself warned and proceed at your own risk. And let's depart with this classic exchange of dialog: Coed (to doctor): Are you a doctor? Doctor (surprised): Yes, I am. How did you know? Coed: Dirty shoes. Nice, clean hands. Only a doctor would have hands that clean. Or another: Coed: I hate football. Doctor: I do, too. Coed: Well, then why did you come? Doctor: To meet you! Coed giggles uncontrollably. Viewer runs screaming from room. * (out of *****)
13 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flashdance (1983)
Flashdunce
17 October 2002
I just watched "Flashdance" for the first time since it came out and my opinion has not mellowed over time. I dubbed it "Flashdunce" then and it remains "Flashdunce" now, a film so lame, inconsequential and annoyingly dumb that it actually made the comparably silly "Footloose" look like "Singing in the Rain" by comparison. Actually, I'm being too hard on "Footloose," since it actually had a plot, some interesting characters, and a point-of-view (to say nothing of a POINT), as opposed to the pointless and silly "Flashdance."

But then why should I be surprised? "Flashdance" was co-written by notorious flop-meister Joe Eszterhaus, who followed this up with the intelligent "Jagged Edge," then dropped such neutron bombs as "Basic Instinct," "Showgirls," and "An Allen Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn" on an unsuspecting public. At least "Flashdance"'s seemingly untalented director Adrian Lyne went on to redeem himself with the "Play Misty for Me" rip-off "Fatal Attraction," to say nothing of "Lolita" and the superior Richard Gere-Diane Lane starrer "Unfaithful." Here he directs the nonexistent story as a serious of brain-numbing music videos, in which the lead actress (Jennifer Beals, who followed this up with an incredibly forgettable film career) is replaced by an obvious double in the dance sequences and then the audience treated like a bunch of idiots when the filmmakers denied a double was used and refused to give her credit for her obvious hard work. I have long contended that the incredible success of films like "Flashdance," which were written in crayon and cynically slapped together without a thought as to whether the plot makes sense or not, have led to the increasingly abysmal state of Hollywood films which are terribly written and forcefed to a braindead audience of Pavlovian dogs who are trained to drool and devour garbage like this.

Okay the plot: Beals is Alex, who dreams of a career as a serious dancer. She's only 18, yet she works as a welder by day and an exotic dancer by night. And by exotic dancer, I mean one that doesn't remove her clothes and gets no more dirty than dousing herself with water and shaking her fully-dressed booty at the audience. She ends up romancing her wealthy boss, helping out her loser collection of friends whenever she can, and visiting a little-old-lady friend who acts as a defacto grandmother to her. Can you see where this is going? Will Alex get an audition to the prestigious Pittsburgh Conservatory of Dance? Will she fall in love with the boss? Will he help her get an audition? Will she get mad at her meddling boyfriend/boss, even though she meddles in everyone else's life? Will she see him with his sister and jealously break up with him without even asking who he's with? Will "Grandma" die? Will she pass her audition? Do we care?

Incidentally, not once does the film answer the most obvious question: just what the hell is a flashdance anyway? And why did audiences care so much about so little? Even at 94 minutes the film seems padded. As for nightmare double features, imagine this: this film was eventually paired with another megabomb from 1983, the Sylvester Stallone-directed "Saturday Night Fever" sequel "Staying Alive," which was rightfully considered the worst film of 1983 ("Flashdance" being runner-up). Pity poor Cynthia Rhodes, the beautiful and talented ingenue who is best known for co-starring in the infinitely better "Dirty Dancing." She appeared in both "Flashdance" and "Staying Alive." Now, that's what I call a bad year. (no stars)
15 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Innocuous, unpretentious and funny nonsense comedy
17 October 2002
Here it is, one of the most popular (and derided) films of Clint Eastwood's career, an innocuous, unpretentious and funny nonsense comedy which received scathing reviews upon its 1978 release but has remained incredibly popular for almost 25 years. In fact, "Every Which Way But Loose" is the only Eastwood film ever to receive a "BOMB" review from Leonard Maltin's influential movie guide, putting it below such career lows as "Firefox" and "The Rookie," but it's no where near that bad; in fact, it's actually fast-moving and entertaining.

The plot, what there is of it, is pretty non-existent: Clint is Philo Beddoe, a lunkheaded truck driver and bare-knuckle brawler of some local fame who lives with his best friend Orville (Geoffrey Lewis) and Orville's mother "Ma" (Ruth Gordon, in full ornery, foul-mouthed, gun-toting old lady mode) outside Los Angeles. Rounding out the family is Philo's beer-drinking pet orangatan Clyde, who acts like a human and was the obvious source of the film's runaway popularity. One night at a nightclub, Philo spots untalented country singer Lynne Halsey-Taylor (Eastwood's then paramour Sondra Locke) and falls head-over-heels in love, buying her expensive presents and giving her money even though she admits to having a boyfriend. (As I said, Philo is a lunkhead.) In the meantime, Philo gets into trouble with a group of middle-aged bikers named the Black Widows (all male!) and a couple of off-duty cops (James McEachin and Gregory Walcott) he beats up in a bar fight. When Lynne disappears, heading back home to Denver, Philo, Orville and Clyde take off in hot pursuit, in return being chased by the Widows and the two cops. This leads to a series of sporatically funny and amusing misadventures, including a stop at the Albuquerque zoo to find a mate for Clyde. Add Beverly D'Angelo to the mix as Echo, a produce worker who falls for Orville, and you have a top cast bringing this silliness to a full boil.

Actually, I'm probably giving this film more credit than it deserves. As I said, the plot is thin, the ending pretty unsatisfactory and the script, well, as in most of Eastwood's lesser films, is pretty weak. (Eastwood, always the writer's best friend, would have been better served in many of his films if he had demanded rewrites.) But Clyde is a riot and the film so good-natured undemanding viewers have been willing to go along with the goofiness for 24 years, so why overdo the criticism? I'd rather watch an unpretentious piece of goofiness like "Every Which Way But Loose" than a pretentious, critically-praised slog-fest like "Mulholland Drive" anyday. And it has one of the best country-music soundtracks ever, including the title song (a number-one hit for the late Eddie Rabbitt), Charlie Rich's "Behind Closed Doors" and Mel Tillis' "Send Me Down to Tucson." (Okay, we also get Locke singing "I Seek the Night," but you take the bad with the good.)

So, deride it if you wish, call it stupid, corny and insipid. It's all of those. It's also pretty damned fun. **1/2
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the better Disney films of the '70's
21 August 2002
The '70's was a decade when Disney studios was woefully out of touch with the changing tastes of the average filmgoer and continued to make silly, fluffy "family" films that thrilled kids and put their parents to sleep. Every once in a while, however, they managed to present a decent, competent family film that everyone could enjoy. One of their most successful movies of the time was "Escape to Witch Mountain," which told the story of two children--brother and sister Tony and Tia Malone (Ike Eisenmann and Kim Richards)--with amazing powers of telepathy and levitation. We first meet them as they are being placed in an orphanage after the deaths of their foster parents. When on a school outing, they use their powers to save a stranger from certain death and are seen by Deranian (Donald Pleasance), assistant to evil billionaire Aristotle Bolt (Ray Milland). Bolt, who is looking for ways to increase his fortune and sees the pair ripe for exploitation, convinces the orphanage that he is their grandfather and takes them home to live with him. All is well until the pair discovers his plan and runs away, stowing away in a Winnebago driven by crusty widower Jason O'Day (Eddie Albert, who looks much more at ease here than he did sparring with John Wayne in "McQ."). O'Day, of course, is annoyed upon finding them, but warms to the pair and ultimately agrees to help them find their way "home" if they can ever decypher the meaning of Tia's recurring "nightmares" which are obvious clues to their mysterious past. This leads to the chase between them and Bolt that consumes the rest of the film.

I know, some people will find this film extremely cloying and manipulative, but there is something to be said about non-pretentious, straightforward storytelling like this. The special effects at times look great (remember, there was no digital technology at this time) and other times pretty cheesy--the climax with the Winnebago for instance--and the ending is probably a little too predictable, but the film is earnestly acted (especially by Albert, who seems to be having a wonderful time) and ultimately quite touching. I especially like Albert's last scene with the kids, which is played with refreshing restraint for a Disney film.

I would place this in the top five of '70's Disney films (of which there were very few gems) along with "Candleshoe," "North Avenue Irregulars," "Freaky Friday" and "The Rescuers." It's one of the few that deserves Disney's DVD special "vault classics" designation. *** (out of *****)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ann-Margret in a plunging neckline--need I say more?
21 August 2002
"The Outside Man" is one of those films that I would classify as a "guilty pleasure." I first saw it as a child of eleven on the second half of a double bill with "Little Big Man" at a retro drive-in in 1974. This is exactly the type of film my parents would have walked out on in fifteen minutes, since my Dad is a strict law-and-order type and likes films where there are good guys and bad guys and the good guys win. Lucky for me, this film played FIRST, so they were stuck sitting through it. I, for one, loved it because it was fast-paced and action-packed (and very violent) and couldn't have cared less that everyone in it was a crook. (I still don't.) It's one of my favorite films of the '70's and remains one I watch again and again.

"The Outside Man"'s plot is simple: A French hit man (Jean-Louis Trantignant) travels to Los Angeles to kill a mobster. Upon completion of his assignment, he returns to his hotel to find he has been checked out and that his belongings (wallet and passport included) are gone. Upon leaving the hotel, he is ambushed by an American assassin (played with icy menace by Roy Scheider, a million miles from his "Jaws" sheriff), who has obviously been hired to kill him. After an exciting chase through the streets of L.A., and a brief respite in the apartment of a dippy widow and her smart-aleck son ("The Mary Tyler Moore Show"'s Georgia Engel and a very young Jackie Earle Haley), he contacts his boss and is told to find the boss's ex-moll Nancy Robson (Ann-Margret). He meets her in a topless bar and she agrees to help him get the hell out of Dodge. This sets up a series of chases and shootouts as she tries to help him leave town while he dodges Scheider's bullets.

Sure, this film is at times as trashy as it sounds. But it's also highly entertaining and has a top cast which also includes Angie Dickinson in the small role of the gangster's widow. In spite of the fact that he's playing a cold-blooded killer, Trantignant actually elicits a certain amount of audience sympathy and the mostly silent Scheider (who probably has five lines of dialog, total) is a hair-raising villain. Dickinson is appropriately shady and Engel at times very funny (and touching) as the victimized housewife. And then there's the eye-popping Ann-Margret, who I believe filmed this before her near-fatal Vegas accident: Her plunging neckline, blond wig and mini-dresses alone are worth the price of rental. Add at least two exciting extended chase sequences and a uniquely filmed shootout in a mortuary (where the mobster has been embalmed in a sitting position, cigar in hand) and you have a highly entertaining melodrama in which everyone eventually gets their comeuppance.

All-in-all, "The Outside Man" is a highly entertaining film lark from an era where films were actually distinguishable from each other, and didn't all look like yesterday's recycled trash. *** (out of *****)
42 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
They don't make 'em like this no more...
21 August 2002
If I were asked what my favorite film of all time was, I would probably say either "The Last Picture Show" or "Ordinary People," two films that I feel are legitimate masterpieces. But if I were asked what my favorite film of all time REALLY was, I'd have to say "Yours, Mine and Ours," which was one of the first movies my parents ever took me to (along with a re-release of "Swiss Family Robinson" and Steve McQueen's "Bullitt") as a five-year-old. I've loved it my entire life, and I have to admit my affection for it hasn't dimmed with age. Although I realize it's not one of the great masterpieces of all time, and I would never rate it as high as say, "Show" or "People" or "Casablanca" or "Schindler's List" for that matter, I still love this film all the same.

I must admit that I am also a lifelong fan of "I Love Lucy," so the fact that "Yours, Mine and Ours" stars Lucille Ball certainly has something to do with my fondness for this film. And growing up in the '70's when co-star Henry Fonda was relegated to cameo roles in awful films like "The Swarm" and "Rollercoaster," if it hadn't have been for his charismatic and likeable performance here, I would never have known he was the great actor that he was. Add the pleasure of Lucille's longtime friend Van Johnson in the prime supporting role of Darryl, Fonda's best friend, and an extremely young Tim Matheson as Fonda's oldest son, and you have the foundation of an excellent cast in a lovely romantic comedy about the ultimate blended family (think "The Brady Bunch" with brains, and much, much larger to boot).

Very loosely based on a true story, Ball is Helen North, a recent widow with eight unruly children who moves to San Francisco for a fresh start. While working at the infirmary at an (unnamed) Naval base, she meets Naval Officer Frank Beardsley (Fonda, of course), who is a recent widower himself (with 10 children !) and has brought one of his daughters (Suzanne Cupito, aka '70's starlet Morgan Brittany) in for treatment. Helen and Frank are immediately smitten with each other and go out on a date, but immediately break it off when they realize how many children their combined family would contain. Darryl realizes that eighteen children aside, these two were made for each other and proceeds to plot to get them together. They do eventually marry and this sets up many amusing scenes of this huge family trying to blend in together.

The nice thing about this film is that for once Lucille Ball is allowed to play a character completely different from Lucy Ricardo or Lucy Carmichael (from "The Lucy Show"). She is intelligent, touching, funny and very, very human here. In only one scene does she do any kind of "Lucy" shtick, and that is during a wonderfully played drunk scene. Even then she doesn't resemble her daffy TV persona as much as, well a woman who's had too much to drink. And the chemistry between Ball and Fonda is so believable, as a child I found it hard to believe they were not really married in real life! Honest! Johnson gives wonderful support and Tom Bosley has a few amusing scenes as the family's exasperated doctor. I also loved the character of Madeline Love, who Darryl sets Frank up with on a disastrous date that ends with her riding home between Frank and Helen (who's been dumped by her Darryl-arranged date). Their discussion of their respective families ends with the hilarious exchange: Frank: "I'm glad I have ten children!" Helen: "I'm glad I have my eight!" Madeline: "And I'm glad I'm careful!"

All in all, this is an extremely enjoyable romantic comedy that grandkids can watch with their grandparents where everyone will be entertained and nobody will be embarassed. An added treat: laughing at the '60's styles and hairdoes, which look worse and worse with each passing decade. They just don't make them like this anymore. ***1/2 (out of *****)
41 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A smart career move for Clint
21 August 2002
Clint Eastwood has always been one of the most career-savvy superstars of all time. Looking over his filmography, since his career breakthrough it is obvious he has never done a film strictly for the money and has solid reasons behind every film he has made. Even his worst films have a purpose: "The Rookie," for instance, which most people would agree is a career low, was obviously made to satisfy the brass at Warner Bros. by delivering a modern-day Dirty Harry clone so he would be left alone to work on his Academy Award-winning classic "Unforgiven," which came out two years later. So it is with "Coogan's Bluff," which most viewers would probably dismiss as second-rate Eastwood, but in reality served as a savvy bridge from Westerns (the type of genre he was primarily known for at the time) into more modern day roles.

As directed by his mentor Don Siegel, "Coogan's Bluff" actually opens in the Arizona desert, which strongly resembles the background of his spaghetti westerns. Indeed, the first character we see is a loincloth-attired man, who appears to be Indian, so the audience is tricked into thinking they're watching a western. Then, we see a jeep driving down a dirt road, with a stetson-wearing Clint at the wheel. He is Dept. Sheriff Coogan, and there we see our first view of Clint as a modern lawman. It isn't long before he's in New York City, chasing down an escaped extradited criminal (Don Stroud), romancing a beautiful parole officer (Susan Clark) and butting heads with a strong-willed police captain (Lee J.Cobb, a terrific, yet sadly forgotten character actor of the day). Therefore, in a matter of fifteen minutes, Siegel cleverly introduces Eastwood as a contemporary figure, a transition that will be complete when he returns to modern times three years later in his most famous role, "Dirty Harry" Callahan.

But "Coogan's Bluff" is an enjoyable film on its own terms. Eastwood at times is very funny here--his retort to an unethical cab driver is priceless--and the film moves along at a brisk pace. Just don't expect action galore or a high body count. Clint doesn't kill anybody here; there's no broad conspiracy or mystery to solve; his job is simply to find the prisoner and take him home. In fact, the film is at its best when its dealing with Coogan as a fish-out-of-water, dealing with various New York thieves, crooks, drug dealers, hippies, and the aforementioned cab driver. There is, however, a well-choreographed fight scene in a bar and an exciting motorcycle chase for a climax, but that's as much action as there is. It's also pretty short for an Eastwood film: where most of his films run over two hours, this one clocks in at a brisk 94 minutes, next to "Joe Kidd" and "The Dead Pool," one of his shortest adventures.

So there you have it, a "minor" effort that served a "major" purpose in what has become an important Hollywood career. *** (out of *****)
66 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An impressive '70's disaster spectacle
20 August 2002
Here it is, the one, the only, the best of the '70's disaster movies, a first-class movie spectacle that still looks great after all these years. Conceived by producer-co-director Irwin Allen as a followup to his box-office smash "The Poseidon Adventure," no expense was spared to sign an authentic all-star cast, put them in the world's largest roman candle and let the audience sweat out the obvious question: who will live and who will die? It was a successful formula, at least in this incarnation, and the resulting spectacle makes the tacky imitations that were released around it (the "Airport" sequels, "The Hindenburg," "Earthquake," and Allen's own woeful later attempts at recapturing the magic) look positively abysmal in comparison.

One of the only films of the genre to have a truly "all-star" cast instead of merely a ragtag assortment of television and silver-screen has-beens, "The Towering Inferno" boasts an impressive lineup: co-leads Steve McQueen and Paul Newman, top female star Faye Dunaway, silver screen legends William Holden, Jennifer Jones and Fred Astaire, top television stars Robert Wagner, Robert Vaughn and Richard Chamberlain, and gridiron great (long before he became a national disgrace) O.J. Simpson. Only forgotten starlet Susan Blakely seems out-of-place among this talent. Also impressive is the fact that Allen's special effects team, working long before the advent of digital technology, was able to craft special effects that still look impressive nearly 30 years later. Indeed, the sequence in the glass elevator, the climactic, last-ditch effort to douse the fire and save lives, and Paul Newman's and Jennifer Jones' journey up the building to safety in the middle of the film remain believable and impressive action spectacles.

For those who don't know, the plot revolves around the dedication ceremony of the world's tallest building, which has (illogically) been built in San Francisco, along with Los Angeles the earthquake capital of the United States and therefore within the jurisdiction of California's moratorium on skyscrapers above 75 stories. But ignoring this plot hole, the film proceeds in placing the above cast in the Promenade Room on the 135th floor for a all-out gala celebration. When a fire breaks out on the 80th (or so) floor due to faulty wiring, architect Paul Newman tries to persuade builder William Holden to move the party downstairs, but he refuses, saying they're perfectly safe in such a well-constructed building. By the time fire chief Steve McQueen orders the party downstairs, it's too late--the fire is out of control and it becomes apparent that not everyone will make it out alive.

As much as I like this film, I must say flaws are prevalent. The most glaring is in Richard Chamberlain's hissable villain character. He is so over-the-top all he needs is a handlebar mustache to twirl ala Snidely Whiplash. And it's unbelievable that such a dispicable man could not only wed the boss's daughter (Blakely), but that Holden wouldn't have seen through this charletain's act and kicked him to the curb long before. (He's the building's cost-cutting electrician who's faulty wiring causes the fire.) Also, the film goes over-the-top to kill off some of the cast in rather gruesome means. (One particular legend and audience favorite's death is so horrible, in fact, that the audience I saw it with groaned with disgust when it happened.) And considering the events of 9/11/01, watching beloved actors falling 135 stories to their deaths will no-doubt be extremely disturbing to some.

To wrap this up, "The Towering Inferno" is an authentic action classic. Unfortunately, it had the misfortune of being nominated Best Picture alongside such masterpieces as "Godfather 2," "Chinatown," "The Conversation," and "Lenny," and over authentic classics like "Young Frankenstein," "Blazing Saddles," "Murder on the Orient Express," and "Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore" in one of the all-time great movie years 1974. So it's been maligned by critics ever since for something that wasn't even its fault. But viewing it for what it is--an action spectacle, nothing more, nothing less--it's a topnotch effort, a two-and-three-quarter hour thriller that thrills and never bores. And that's all an audience can wish for. ***1/2 (out of *****)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
McQ (1974)
Clint Eastwood he ain't
20 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
John Wayne was my boyhood hero, so as an eleven-year-old I absolutely loved this modern-day cops-and-robbers saga upon it's release in 1974. As an adult, however, I must say 60+-year-old Duke looks ridiculous as a Green Hornet-driving police lieutenant, shooting it out with the bad guys and railing against "lousy, damn junk (cocaine)!" in the hip lingo of the day. No-less silly is another senior citizen, Eddie Albert as Capt. Kosterman, who struts around in tacky plaid suits and goes one-on -one with renegade Wayne, who is too much of a maverick for the squishy liberal superiors who refuse to let him play Dirty Harry on the streets of Seattle.

Actually, "McQ"'s plot isn't bad--Wayne's Lon McQ awakens one morning to find that his partner has been shot in an apparent ambush. Not knowing that the partner was involved in dirty doings including murder (which the audience knows due to an extended main credit sequence, so this is not a spoiler), McQ decides to investigate over the objections of Kosterman, who pins the shooting on militants. McQ believes local drug kingpin Manny Santiago (Al Lettieri, a fine character actor specializing in villains who sadly died a year later of a heart attack) is behind the attack and immediately starts harassing him. After a particularly nasty confrontation with Santiago's henchmen, McQ is suspended, and he promptly resigns from the force. ("Too much politics," he says.) He then signs up as a private investigator with his P.I. friend "Pinky" Farrow (David Huddleston) and proceeds to investigate the shooting (which becomes a murder investigation when the partner dies) using himself as client. Also becoming involved in the investigation is the partner's wife (Diana Muldaur, hissable Rosalyn Shays in "L.A. Law") and pathetic cocktail waitress/junky Myra (the late, great Colleen Dewhurst, in a two-scene performance that might have netted an Oscar nomination in a better film, she's that good). Add Clu Gulager to the mix as a supportive public servant and you have a solid supporting cast to support the miscast Duke.

Although "McQ" is not highly thought of and Duke looks ridiculous here, the film has some terrific action pieces and a solid plot. Yes, you'll probably solve the mystery long before McQ, and will probably cringe at some of the '70's lingo and obvious racial stereotypes (Roger E. Mosley's pimp Rosey is particularly offensive, although they make up for it by casting a black man (Jim Watkins) in the important role of fellow police detective), but really the only thing wrong here is Wayne's and Albert's miscasting in the leads. The film was obviously written for Clint Eastwood, and if he had made it, it would have worked as a solid effort. As it is now, see it for Dewhurst's performance and the finale, a terrific car chase on the beach followed by a tense shootout. Otherwise, this one's for Wayne fans only. **1/2 (out of *****)
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed