Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
My Comments/Review (Some Spoilers)
11 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I have always been able to lose myself in the film I am watching. I drove up the long Texas driveway with Elizabeth Taylor in Giant, flew over the desert with the English Patient, stood with Lawrence on the sand dune as he twirled in his new costume....but never have I felt such a part of a place as I did last night sitting in a theater while the ship and crew of the Surprise welcomed me into their world, thanks to the genius of Peter Weir and his crew.

It was like a magic door opening, and then, on the other side, standing in the small, fragile, impossibly crowded little ship along with Killick and Captain Howard and Nagle - with William Warley and Faster Doudle, with the midshipmen, the officers - sharing their discomfort and pride, their suffering and exhilaration - as they follow their Captain to the far ends of the earth.

The first thing you hear when the theater lights lower is the wind and the creaking of the wood, and the ropes chaffing one another.. It is silent as the camera carries you onto the deck of the ship just before the change of watch. Two officers watch the fog through spy glasses - and see something there. There is a call to arms, and you go below again where all you can see though the muted lamp light are silent rows and rows of gray drooping cocoon-like figures swaying back and forth. Then one after another the men crawl from those cocoons - their hammocks - and go up to the deck to begin their "Day." The camera pans past them, through midshipmen and marines getting ready for duty, till it stops at gnarled hands tightening a belt, pulling on a shirt -and there at last stands the captain - Jack Aubrey of the the HMS Surprise.

This is not a blockbuster film, despite the rousing bookend battles that enclose the plot. It is a thoughtful study of a ship of the British line, and of the men who live in it. Everyday ship happenings - the times of sadness and horror, the humor, the character of the men - captain and crew - are the true soul of Master and Commander. We grow to know all of them, even the lowliest powder monkey, and we become part of their lives.

Most memorable to me were Max Pirkis as Midshipman Blakeney - eight years old, an innocent, but full of courage and grit and intelligence. Someday you just know he will be a fine ship captain too; Lee Inglebey as Midshipman Hollum, a man who was not made for the sea; Robert Pugh as sailing master, Master Allen, gruff, with a laugh to fill a room, and more knowledge of sails and ships than anyone else on board - except for Jack Aubrey; Paul Bettany as Steven Maturin, friend, fellow musician, brilliant scientist and doctor. His face in the scene where he operates on himself, mirroring what his body was feeling, was acting of the finest.

Finally, the soul of the ship and the movie, Russell Crowe as Captain Jack Aubrey. A bluff man, a canny leader, caring yet tough, courageous, reckless at times, always loving the Surprise (there is one scene where he defends it from the charge of being old, talking as he rubs his hands over the wood of a shattered doorway, that tells it all). Once again Crowe turns what could have been a stock, seafaring character into a man of great depth and feeling. The anguish in his face during a violent storm, when he must choose between man and ship, brought tears to my eyes. At the end, his quiet Our Father takes those who have died in battle to their home in the sea. He makes you see how he - and you - will miss and remember all those who fell to defend their little part of England - off on the far side of the world.

*************************

In retrospect, I wish I had not seen all the trailers and shows about the movie. There are scenes that were very familiar already. One should come to this film, as my daughter did, unsuspecting of what will be seen. She loved it. And I did too, even if my enjoyment was partly that of seeing an old friend (the film) made whole at last.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hours (2002)
Caught in a well of loneliness
26 January 2003
I saw "The Hours" yesterday. There was one brief scene that captured, to me, the essence of the film. Meryl Streep's character is talking to her daughter, and she remembers an early morning years ago, when she was sitting outside at a beach home, and her lover came out behind her and touched her on the shoulder. She said it was a moment of pure happiness for her -- the beginning of many such moments in her life, she thought -- but it turned out the happiness was just that one brief moment in time - pure and joyous and gone.

The film is a slow, meditative one, very literary in dialogue, and the acting is of the highest caliber by all the cast, not just the three stars. But the overwhelming feeling I took away was that Streep was lucky to have had that one brief moment of joy. The lives and characters of the three principals were ones of deep unhappiness and disconnection from the rest of the world. They seemed to be trapped in some kind of well of loneliness. The movie left me wanting a happier redemption for the three than what we were given.

I suppose in Kidman's Virginia Woolf, it was death. In Moore's Laura Brown character, desertion of family, and in Streep's Clarissa Vaughan, the losing of the person she thought made up her whole world.

Sad, and finally not a film I would want to see again - Except maybe to watch the wonderful face of little Jack Rovello as Moore's young son.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Some Spoilers - Dark, Beautiful, Humorous, Sad, Unforgettable
25 September 1999
Warning: Spoilers
Sam Mendes was able, in this fine, dark film, to take a tired old theme - suburbia angst - and turn it into something entirely new.

In addition to the acting - which was so on target on everyone's part - Mendes' direction, the writing, the look, the colors, the sound track, the camera angles, all were superb.

Kevin Spacey's Lester, however, centered the film, and gave it, in my opinion, the wry life it so needed. Everyone else was so off kilter, so nuts, except maybe for the cheerleader queen, that we needed Lester's comments out of Spacey's twisting mouth, looking at Spacey's expressive eyes, to find the humor in a decent man trapped (most of it his own fault) in a desperate situation.

Annette Bening, who had a role full of hysteria, handled it so well, that you felt very sorry for her most of the time.

I was impressed with Chris Cooper in a very different part for him, and Allison Janney, who played his wife, could break your heart.

There were scenes of beauty, and one, in driving rain, full of tension, danger and poignancy.

All three kids were good too, but it is Spacey's film, and boy, does he run away with it.

I'd say go see it, but don't expect to feel good when you leave.

Murph
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Comments on the Film from a Colin Firth Fan
24 July 1999
Beautiful music fills the theater, and a view of a lovely castle, the light all brown and gold, then a children's room, curtains drawn for nap time, or "rest time, " a Gamma calls it. Fraser hates rest time. He pulls his bed over to the window, parts the curtains, climbs out the window and starts out on his housetop journey - the journey that brings his father, resplendent in tennis white and cream bounding up the stairs, long legs moving fast. And ends with Dad barking like a dog, and little son barking back until he is safely swept up into Edward's arms and hoisted high on the roof for all to see.

It is a wonderful beginning to a family saga. It manages to tell us almost everything about the kind of child Fraser is, and the kind of father he has -- Almost everything, but not all.

In the course of the film we see that Edward Pettigrew is many things, an inventor of hair brained gadgets, an exuberant dad to his children, a lover to his wife, a trial to his mother-in-law, a fool to his brother-in-law, a kind employer to the house staff. But most of all, he is a man with the heart of a child. There are times when the child Fraser is more mature than Edward the dad.

I never felt the film was fragmented, because the central theme, Edward's lust for Heloise, held the movie together, and gave it shape. And he DID lust for her, did something to her in the sphagnum moss storage room, something unwanted, and aggressive enough to take her choker from her neck, leave them both with moss clinging to their hair -- something to cause us to hear one wild scream from Heliose.

Edward's jealousy of Fraser's friendship with the beautiful Frenchwoman is a child's jealousy. Edward tries to push Fraser to the side; he vies with his son for Heloise's attention, and by his boorish, childlike actions, he opens himself to her public ridicule of him at table.

Colin Firth has one of his best roles here. He allows us to see a man with so many warring degrees of character - kindness and cruelty, foolishness and intelligence. And the man is funny too. There is a scene where he attempts to tell the facts of life to Fraser that is priceless. A perfect place for the stammer.

For the Firth fans of us, he is rugged of face and the liquid brown eyes have never been more expressive. There is one particular scene where you could drown in them! He is trim of body, walks the walk all over the heather, wears clothes to die for. There is one suit that he wore for hunting that I loved - dark brown with knickers, and with the most fetching brown slouch hat. And that Scottish accent! Divine!

Best of all, is a scene in pajamas, alone by the fire, the light playing on his face, his head back, a bit of suprasternal notch showing. Sighs were heard all up and down our row.

Yes, I liked it. Everyone was excellent in it. I particularly loved Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio's sweet expressive face, and her singing voice is lovely. Robert Burns never sounded more haunting or romantic. McDowell was hard edged, not a likeable man, but one that loved his mother very much -- and his young wife. You could especially see that when Edward taunts him in the climatic scene. Young Fraser is a natural, and I thought his discoveries in his grandfather's attic, and his obsession with "sins of the flesh," very real for a bright ten year old in 1920 who was never told any of the things he really wanted to know. The Louie Armstrong/jazz/cigar/brandy snifter scene shown in the trailer becomes much sweeter and sadder when you see the film. There is an extra ingredient that makes it so.

I wanted to be a guest in that house where smokes billows from the lawn, the master rides around in tiny inflatable boats, or tank like vehicles, where lovers waltz in their nightclothes in the rain. Where eccentricity is treated with forbearance -- until Eve enters the scene and changes the family forever.

*************
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Masterful!!!
26 December 1998
Since I first saw Tinker Tailor in 1980 on Public Television in the USA, I have wanted to see it again and again. It remains one of the best adaptations of LeCarre, and the best mystery filmed.

Recently I was able to order the PAL version from Black Star video in the UK, and have it converted. It was a lot of money but worth every penny -- A Christmas present to myself.

Guinness gives one of his greatest performances, and the rest of the cast, especially Beryl Reid, Ian Bannen and Ian Richardson, more than hold their own against him. As another viewer said, it is a terrible shame it is not available in the US. I hope that changes some day.

I have a web site for Alec Guinness that IMdb had kindly linked to their page on him, and I plan soon to add a review there of both Tinker Tailor and Smiley's People. Bravo to all concerned for both series.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed