A Score to Settle (2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
131 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Mediocre storyline salvaged by a good performance from Cage...
paul_haakonsen8 May 2020
Right, well I had very little expectations to this 2019 movie from writer John Stuart Newman and director Shawn Ku. Why? Well, it is a Nicholas Cage movie, need I say more? I can't claim to be a fan of his in any way. Sure, he puts on the occasional good movie, but they are few and far apart.

Regardless, I had the chance to watch "A Score to Settle", so I sat down to watch it, as I tend to watch movies that I haven't already seen before.

And glad that I did, because this movie was definitely one of Nicholas Cage's better performances, and a movie where you actually get to see him having acting talents. And while the movie itself was sort of mediocre, Cage actually managed to lift it up and out of mediocrity with his impressive performance.

The storyline in "A Score to Settle" definitely had potential. Sure, it didn't offer much of anything new to the genre, but it was still enjoyable enough for what it turned out to be.

Aside from Nicholas Cage, the movie has some nice performances by the likes of Benjamin Bratt, Noah Le Gros and Karolina Wydra. I can't claim to be familiar with neither Noah Le Gros or Karolina Wydra, but they definitely performed well in this movie.

"A Score to Settle" is an adequate movie if you have nothing more pressing on your to-watch-list. While it wasn't outstanding, it was still good enough for a single viewing.

My rating of "A Score to Settle" would have been a very mediocre five out of ten, given the flatlining storyline, but Nicolas Cage's performance lifted the movie up a notch, who knew!?
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
mre
tski-5658611 August 2019
Nicolas Cage is still a great actor. just gotta find the right movie to act in.
66 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Nicholas Cage Paycheck Special but with a surprisingly better quality ending.
S_Soma2 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Nicholas Cage has explained his penchant for making borderline quality movies by declaring that he wants to be a "working" actor. Specifically he doesn't want to be warming the bench holding out for top quality pictures while time ticks uselessly by. So he makes a lot of movies that, if you weren't aware of the deliberate choice that Cage has made, might leave you wondering why an actor who is presumably still on the "A" list would make such iffy pictures. To Cage, and with apologies to Horton, a movie is a movie no matter how bad. Not only does he like the more regular paychecks, but he's noticed that when focused on working he tends to...um...stay out of...um...trouble.

A SCORE TO SETTLE is about an aging organized crime footsoldier, having spent 19 years in prison voluntarily taking the fall for a crime his boss committed, gets out of prison and determines to reconnect with the now-adult son he hardly knows and to take revenge against the professional associates that he feels did not hold up their end of the deal.

For the most part, A SCORE TO SETTLE falls neatly into the recent line of Cage's work. It certainly has a lot of the typical and predictable attributes we've come to expect of a certified Nicholas Cage Special: a cast mostly composed of medium- to low-grade actors in which Cage is usually the only headliner and it stands out pretty noticeably in terms of the overall acting quality one can expect; an apparently recipe-driven story formula where character and plot points could only be described as "cookie-cutter"; if not excellent then at least good-quality production values but with storylines that really don't stretch sites, situations or action; highly predictable.

About the first 4/5 of the movie will have you clearly thinking it's just another one of Cage's will-act-for-money "working actor" flicks. It may even sink low enough to get you thinking "why am I still watching this".

But as somewhat of a saving grace, the last 5th of the movie suddenly mixes in a small collection of reasonably good plot twists that does go a long way to saving the movie from the garbage bin. Some of these "twists" you have definitely seen before but they do create a context legitimizing the other twists and I would claim take the movie away from the completely formulaic path that you THOUGHT you were following through most of the rest of the picture. In the end, I was glad I watched the movie and it turned out to have a somewhat deeper message than the simple lizard-brain satisfaction of a good revenge flick. Call me stoopid for not seeing it coming, but I was surprised.

But be warned: you really have to hang on until the last portion of the picture in order to get any story rewards. I only held on because I literally had nothing else to do and wanted to see the entire picture in order to write a legitimate review. If I'd stopped in the middle I would've trashed it pretty thoroughly.

As a footnote to this review, Cage's character has the predictable, excessively dramatic I'm-dying-so-I-don't-have-much-time attribute. But, rather interestingly, what he's dying of is sporadic fatal insomnia which is a prion protein disease with multiple potential causes in each case. You don't hear a lot about prion-related diseases in everyday entertainment movies. It represents a rare and odd choice to fill the dramatic-fatal-disease attribute for a character. The typically unspecified cancer is the usual placeholder for that. I am very curious to know why the writer chose such an offbrand disease for the character and then also did not expound or elaborate upon it.
42 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disappointing
claudio_carvalho30 September 2019
"A Score to Settle" is another disappointing film with Nicolas Cage in the lead role. However, as a fan of this actor, I dare to say that he has a good performance. But the depressing story has a weak plot point and the direction and the screenplay are not in a good pace. Instead of a thriller or an action film, the viewer sees a boring and heavy drama with deceptive conclusion. Nicolas Cage needs to find better stories and screenplays. My vote is three.

Title (Brazil): Not Available
47 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The plot was nice but the director was bad.
cynicsick3 August 2019
People tend to jump on the hate train too quickly that they fail to see that this movie had great potential. If only they had a director that knows what he is doing, plus with the budget they had. This is not a bad movie BUT there were some pretty bad moments that pretty much ruined it. This is not an action film but is centered around the Nick's character. So dont expect guns-blazing-mindless-action. Its really not that bad.
28 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"A Score That Never Got Close To Being Settled...."
mike-859559 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Well let's see...

Out of the 5 or so people that he went back to kill... he only ended up killing 2 of them, one of whom was completely repentant.

Little to no action throughout the movie. The first 20min are rough IMO.

Take any Nic Cage action movie and no matter how B list it may be, or how cheesy some of the support acting is, it makes up for it with its fast pace, cool scenes, and action. This movie is not that. It is boring, head scratching at times, contains one very small "ooooohhh" moment, and ultimately leaves you wishing you had picked blind out of the walmart 1$ bin.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
So bad it's good territory
ernestsavesxmas20 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
There aren't any explosions or fire in the 2019 Nicolas Cage movie A Score to Settle. But the background of the movie poster is still covered in flames. I think I could probably leave it at that, and you would understand what 'kind' of movie this, but where's the fun in that?

The movie begins with a flashback scene to the 1980s where a bunch of thugs are torturing a tied up thug by trying (and failing) to hit baseballs at him. We know it is the 1980s because they are playing opera music on a boombox. It's an insane scene where a young Cage (played by a different actor) tries to teach his boss how to swing the baseball bat properly then goes outside to look for lost baseballs before returning to find said boss brutally beating and ultimately killing the tied up thug with the bat.

Cage is imprisoned for almost two decades for these above shenanigans. We later learn that he took the fall on purpose in exchange for two things: $450,000 cash and the promise that his thug pals look after his motherless son. Only one of those things actually happens. He's released early from prison because of insomnia, which, sure that checks out.

I'm going to spoil this movie right here and now because it's the only way I know how to do this. This movie is built upon a "twist." What makes the failure of this "twist" that much more condemnable is that it is so clearly aiming for "smart guy filmmaking" territory, and landing not among the borders, not in the periphery, but in a completely different stratosphere. It is a complete failure.

Cage meets his now young adult son Joey in the middle of the road in the middle of the night after being released from the prison because of insomnia. This felt odd! Like, he just shows up in the middle of the road in the middle of the night? They're both walking? The thing with these bad movies is that you are prone to suspend your disbelief when it comes to bad writing and dumbfounded plot mechanics all the time. It was very strange, but at no point was I thinking to myself "Oh, this is a Ghost Son; he's not really there." But, lo and behold, this is a Ghost Son! This is also, as it turns out, a baseball movie.

Cage returns to the hiding spot where the thugs have left the payoff cash and the murder weapon baseball bat for some reason. There's also one of Joey's old baseball cards in the suitcase. If you're wondering who the heck that baseball player on that card is supposed to be, I'm right there with you. There's not much information on a team called the Portland Gladiators let alone a player named Joe Kenneth (this film is set in Oregon, although that isn't important and never specifically comes up outside of this card), but I was able to discern that they were a minor league team who won a championship in their only year of existence... 1896! That is such a weird fake baseball card to make! In this reality, are the Portland Gladiators a real team, perhaps even a pro team? They must be if this card is worth a lot of money, right? Who cares! There is so much more garbage to get to.

We are then subjected to the first of many incredibly bad music choices with an atrocious singer-songwriter song set to some b-roll of the Northwestern landscape and some primo "I'm a free man" faces by Cage as he basks in the sun.

Father and son go to a super fancy resort hotel that we learn Cage's late wife took him to before he went to prison. You know, the kind of romantic place you want to revisit with your adult son whom you haven't seen in 19 years and who isn't actually there. Cage makes the first of many inexplicable "jokes" that do not land at all, but which I find endlessly funny because of that fact.

Then we get the first vague indication that his Son is perhaps a Ghost Son (a figment of Cage's imagination), as Cage is forced to order a ton of expensive food and dine on it alone.

We then get some more father-son bonding with some more baseball-themed memories. We learn Cage made and sold (!) baseball bats in prison. You know, that famous prison activity of making to-order wooden baseball bats for profit, ah yes.

Cage goes to see a gun salesman named Sleepy, but Sleepy is dead. However, Sleepy's kid (female) is there and she sells him a nice and good gun, fresh off the boat from Italy.

We're then introduced to Benjamin Bratt's character (people just call him Q now) and learn that Cage's character is named "Frankie Fingers."

The problem with this being a Fight Club type scenario is that there are far too many scenes where he and his son are together in public. For every "hint" we get that this might be Cage's warped reality, we get scenes like Ghost Son just getting fitted with a new suit at a store? How? And furthermore, the cause and resolution of this phenomena makes little to no sense. Is he hallucinating because of the fatal sporadic insomnia? Is he knowingly projecting because he can't psychologically deal with the loss? Who knows.

After spending a decent chunk of the 450K by Pretty Woman'ing his son, they share a painfully awkward conversation that takes place back at the hotel after their shopping spree. Ghost Son tells his dad that he should chat up the prostitute (Simone) who is getting her shoes on literally ten feet away from them. Remember: HE IS NOT REAL. HE IS NOT THERE. CAGE IS TALKING TO HIMSELF. Then we have back-to-back sex scenes that feel beyond forced.

Before meeting up with the hooker Simone, Cage had a run-in with her pimp. You know, the kind of pimp who hangs around outside super posh resorts way outside of town (the classic pimp spot). He'll return later no doubt.

We get more "jokes" that fails to make any contact whatsoever, and more excruciating dialogue. At this point, we're about halfway through this mess and it's easy to forget that it is, in fact, a revenge movie since there's been very little by way of, you know, getting revenge. So Cage tries to get some revenge on one of the thug underlings called Dragon and is casually very misogynistic in the process of failing to get that said revenge. After Dragon escapes, Cage has this really weird and tonally off encounter with Ghost Son where the latter refers to having sex as "making mercury," which super grossed me out for some reason and I am sorry but I will not be googling to see if that is an actual term people use for having sex.

Part of the reason why the Ghost Son "twist" doesn't work is that we know this kid is a junkie, he looks like a junkie; all his sudden disappearances and funny behavior are easily explained by that.

Anyway, Cage tracks down another thug and this guy just immediately gives himself up and is shot in the head while Cage eats a Slim Jim.

Then Cage sings the Judy Garland era standard "I'm Always Chasing Rainbows" as he has a confrontational sing-song chat with Benjamin Bratt at the bar. An increasingly delirious Cage commandeers a bellboy and gets him to teach him how to use a smartphone. Cage gets the bellboy to look up every nursing home in the state so that Cage can hunt down the elderly thug boss and beat him to death with the bloody baseball bat from before.

But the pimp from before shows up to compare sex workers to "feral cats" and to briefly thwart Cage's masterplan, but Cage is armed and ready with some combat moves and some "egg" puns.

Then we get The Big Reveal™ of the "twist." It just happens. There's no real inciting incident, no setup. He just visits his wife's grave, glances over and sees the grave of his son and acts like that was his reality the entire time?!? WHAT!

I was, of course, anticipating a stupid twist. But the rub of this that makes no sense is such: if Cage actually believed his son was alive AND the thugs came through with the $450,000, why was he even interested in getting revenge in the first place? We're also immediately alerted to the fact that Q (Bratt's character) is actually the bad guy and the head thug Max in the nursing home has actually been a vegetable for almost as long as Cage was locked away in jail. No need to beat a helpless coma victim with a 20-year-old bloodstained baseball bat! It was actually Q's fault his son is dead. That's good I guess.

Before he stopped by the nursing home, Cage returned Simone's scarf which flew off her head earlier in the movie, which was very thoughtful of him. Simone's son is named Joey, because OF COURSE HE IS!

He shoots Dragon in the groin before killing him and then goes to the church to confront Q on Q's daughter's wedding day, and Cage has his full-on Cageian freak-out moment that was brewing the entire time, and was worth the wait honestly.

And that's basically it. Total unearned B.S. all the way around, anyway you look at it. There are some awkward flashbacks to the thugs actually executing Joey, and Cage is watching it happen somehow in his memory? Q's daughter--a character we've just met for the first time--is the one who shoots Cage for some reason but the bullet is basically ineffective? No worries, Cage staggers out of the church and there are a bunch of cops waiting outside the church to unload a ton of bullets in slow-motion into our anti-hero's body. Ghost Son returns one more time (this time in Official Ghost Attire) to say what is on everyone's mind watching the film at home, that "this kinda sucks..."

Ghost Son asks his dad what he's gonna do now and Cage says he's gonna ask God to forgive him and then Ghost Son just laughs at that??? You can't make this stuff up.

In many ways, this is a painfully terrible film. So why am I giving it a 7? Because I found it to be truly, legitimately "so bad it's good." Part of the reason I started watching and rewatching the Cage filmography was to uncover a few hidden gems among the late 2010s Cage collection, and I can proudly say that I found one here.
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Typical 2000's Nic Cage Film
callumfaulkner2 August 2019
Film tries to be deep and clever with a "plot twist" that anyone with eyes sees coming from a mile away. Cliches of course abound, so expect to see all the generic quotes and tropes you've seen/ heard before. The only twist being that this film blurs the genres of films it steals it's quotes from.

All of this said is it a terrible film? No. It's ok. Just about. Watchable if you're not really paying attention.

Also, whatever you do, don't question the timelines, e.g. how a young adult can go to jail for 19 years but come out an old man.

Anyway, the terrible cliches, inconsistencies in timelines (forcibly injected so the characters fit the proper cliches), and a pretty average script let this film down.

5/10

CF
32 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Would be a great film... if played at 1.5x speed
Top_Dawg_Critic5 August 2019
For starters, all the 1's are just bone-head amateur reviews. This film - all things considered, is a solid 7/10, and here's why:

It's clearly a low budget B-grade film. You have a novice director (only his 2nd full length feature film, other 4 are shorts and TV films), Shawn Ku, who did a fairly decent job (remember, for a novice filmmaker) with the camera, but needed work on directing his cast (except Cage, who was awesome on his own). Then you have a great (conceptual) story, that was written by a totally green newbie writer, John Stuart Newman, in his 2nd full length feature film. Yes there were some plot issues, and yes the slow pacing was atrocious that the 103 min length felt ridiculously long. But nevertheless, Nicolas Cage kept this film afloat, with some help from Benjamin Bratt (who certainly needed better direction in the beginning).

If this film was properly edited and the pacing sped up 1.5x, it would have been an entirely different (much better) viewing experience. The score was decent and the cinematography on point. It's a shame the producers didn't decide to edit this better, because Cage deserved better for his performance. Nevertheless, rating this film based on its own production merits and value, it's a solid 7/10 from me. I still enjoyed it, but wanted more.
75 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adequately entertaining
Gordon-115 May 2020
The story is quite good, though I would have liked it more if there was no twist in the middle. The pace could be a little faster, but it is an adequately entertaining film.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Does Cage make any good movies anymore?
legalizecures22 September 2019
DON'T WATCH! Idk how anyone can say this movie is any good. A pointless complete waste of time like the past several movies of his this year adnd last year. Hollywood doesn't seem to know to make good movies or is this part of some kind of conspiracy to make people insane?! It don't make sense!
17 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Worthy
sissy30063 January 2020
I don't care what anyone says, I am a big Nicolas Cage fan. I liked the movie. I think it's worth the watch. He still got the touch. Good for him
26 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Far better than expected. Cage on top form.
Jester2223 August 2019
I expected a phoned in performance from Cafe but he really gave a great performance. A good story that kept my attention. Cage had some great dialogue in this and I think in anyone else hands it wouldn't have worked. It may have been a straight to blu ray movie but so much better than most of his recent low budget efforts. Great character and script. I liked the RoboCop reference in the dialogue. The 'Dragon' character was poor acting though and his scenes were so over acted it made Cage seem reserved ha ha.

A surprising enjoyable film.
47 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Utterly brain-numbing
superstar-122 August 2019
This is right up there with the rest of the late career choices of Nicholas Cage. The first hour is pointless wallpaper. When the action eventually does kick in, it is as predictable as sunrise. Cage takes the money for all these turkeys he makes. Time for me to pass on his future efforts if this is all we can expect from a once fine actor. Don't waste your time on this one
29 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nicolas cage is brilliant ... but that's it
thekhalednouh13 October 2019
Honestly Nicolas cage was the only good thing in the movie .... Mohamed ( jimmy ) was the worst part in the movie no acting no nothing
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Oh god no another cage movie lol
adampadum6 August 2019
Please please cage save some dignity and retire from cheese movies.wait for a decent role at least.dam cheese lover
19 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible
thebogofeternalstench2 August 2019
Awful movie that is so boring and contrived. Also the dialogue is dubbed over.

Avoid.
23 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ignore bad reviews
MikeWindgren12 November 2019
This is a good movie with a surprise in it. If you like Cage just see it.
29 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
powerless
ops-525352 August 2019
It seems to me that the old stars strives to keep up with the new ones, and nicholas cage, in my opinion downspiraling lately, doesnt deliver in here either. its the story about a jailbird thats full of revenge, that gets his wings back and becomes a free bird , searcing for the crooks that made him go to prison years ago. its also a story about father and son, and the harshness and hardships that caracterizes a relationship that has been absent due to a life in prison. he wants to try by bearing and sharing what he has, but he is hard to feel sympathy for.

the acting are plain and simple, so are the story also, told through flashbacks on the main carachter.the filmography are not overwhelmingly made, and the editor are at times on overdrive with fast shifting camera angles etc.

what i miss from mr cage is the smile, i think a good comedy like family man could wake up his fans, allthough he is not totally carried away by this flick. the grumpy old man thinks this is a filler for the title collector and no more than that.just a recommend
17 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some Twists and Turns, Kept My Attention - Surprise Ending
srobertson-7510327 February 2020
I won't reveal anything, but the movie did keep my attention (and I tend to be a little restless). A few things didn't make sense until the end...so hang in there and watch the whole thing before you pass judgement. It's a bit of a dark gritty movie - so be prepared for some shootem' up gory stuff. But if that doesn't bother you, it's fine. I liked Nicolas Cage - he's very versatile and believable.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shamelessly bad
Leofwine_draca4 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A SCORE TO SETTLE is a truly lamentable effort from Nicolas Cage, who now seems to be going after Andy Lau for the title of world's most prolific actor. The difference is that when Lau was making 6/7 films a year in late '80s Hong Kong, they were all good films, whereas Cage's B-movies are generally rushed and amateurish. This film's a case in point.

Cage plays an old lag, looking tired and bloated after a long prison sentence. He comes out to bond with his druggie kid, and argues with some old gang members and former colleagues. Occasionally he has sex with a prostitute and gets into a fight with a pimp, but that's about all the drama you'll get. The direction is poor indeed, the performances ho-hum, the major twist at the climax shamelessly borrowed from the excellent DEAD MAN'S SHOES. Go watch that instead.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What a surprise
dwcooley7 August 2019
Decided to watch this because I'm a fan of Nicholas Cage. Glad I did, had a good surprise in the story and even though I was expecting it to be cheesy acting it wasn't. Really good performances by the cast.
31 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not great, not terrible.
far-tkt4 August 2019
Plot was so obvious yet I enjoyed it a little bit. Could have been better with a more enthusiast director and script.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Average but not horrible
lukesharp-388852 May 2020
Quite a mediocre watch that will still entertain if you have nothing better to do or are a cage fan
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Would have been a better movie without the action aspect
mga-650882 August 2019
I expected a direct to DVD movie and I got a very good one. Cage puts a lot of effort giving a very good performance which made the movie by far better without any memorable supporting roles and bad dialogue and a flat effortless cinematography I'd prefer watching it black and white but I can feel the director hard work and care about small details which I didn't expect from a B-movie. the movie would been far better without any action
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed