Plurality (2012) Poster

(2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A timely warning - Please produce a full length feature!
vipcorp-954-7085274 April 2014
Plurality is a very well done short, film. It presents an important message about the dangers of sacrificing freedom for security. This is a warning for all of us and it shows just how close we are to the point of no return, right here, right now, today.

The central idea is not new, but sadly, no one seems to be paying attention and I have not seen much, if anything, in film that hits the nail right on the head in this manner. The closest things out there exaggerate with hypothetical, fanciful future technology which makes the clear and present danger we are facing less real. Plurality, is different. Although the film does appear to include a far-fetched technology which is revealed near the end, it is only used as a plot device for the characters to deliver the message about the very real danger of what is taking place right now, all around us, with our current technology.

Plurality does not have great acting or dialog. Its futuristic "floating computer screen" special effects are well done but seem a bit overused - likely to show some flash within the short running time. This is not a polished work by any means, and it is not some "brilliant masterpiece," but for its budget and scope, it succeeds as an entertaining and thought provoking teaser film. By the end of this short, you will want to see more.

It would be nice to see this made into a fully developed feature film, but please do not let it near Hollywood - they would turn it into some kind of anti-corporate bastardization of what it is intended to be.

We need more people making films that encourage people to step back and think about the horrifying future we seem all too eager to embrace at the expense of our freedom. Freedom comes with a price consisting of responsibility, insecurity, inconvenience and even hardship and bloodshed. Some of us understand that and value freedom all the more for it. Unfortunately, most do not.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Black mirror episode
TheLegio7 July 2020
It´s cool how this short seems more expensive that it really is. The productions levels are pretty cool for a 15min film. The whole idea and filming style seems to be a plot about a Black mirror episode. It´s online on youtube and only 15min long. You can´t loose anything by watching it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty decent
Horst_In_Translation2 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Plurality" is an American English-language short film by Asian-American filmmaker Dennis A. Liu, his more known effort by two career works only. The more known name here is certainly writer Ryan Condal and if you look at his body of work you will find some pretty prestigious blockbuster projects, especially the stuff he did with Dwayne Johnson. But now lets take a loo at these 14 minutes here. I may say that I am possibly a bit biased as Sci-Fi never did too much for me, but I was positively surprised by the outcome here. It is a fast interesting futuristic little movie with a fairly decent plot at the core of it all. And the title is quite fitting too. You will know what I mean when you watch it. And I think you should. Acting's fine, script is decent too and I think Liu should return to making films as this one from five years ago is a success overall. I can see why it managed to get somewhat popular on Youtube, even if it is not one that stacked millions and millions of views. Go check it out. I'd maybe even watch a full feature based on this one and this means quite something in my very case. 90%, maybe more, of Sci-Fi short films are inferior.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bit weak when it comes to the dialogue, but when it is moving it is very effective (minor suggestive spoilers)
bob the moo30 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
New York of the future has driven crime to an all-time low due to the introduction of a DNA-based network where any transaction, any interaction and any surface will log and track the DNA of that individual to start their car, enter their home, grant access to their workplace, buy a Coke, anything. However, something strange is happening – duplicates (or pluralities) of some people are start to show up in NYC. Under the guidance of the surveillance network of Director Pollard, Agent Jacob Foucault is out to hunt down the most recent example – journalist Anna Winston.

As many a Hollywood blockbuster can testify, you can get away with a lot if you hit the ground running and don't let up – many a thriller is full of plot holes and nonsense but the viewer never really has time to sit and question them because the film is carrying them along at a great pace and not giving them time. Plurality is at its best when it plays this card and for the first half of the film it does it extremely well. The world of the DNA grid is introduced with great effects and pace, so much so you never really stop to think that actually, while our DNA is unique for individuals, it isn't something that is impossible to get and actually we shed it everywhere we go. This is a flaw in the logic but it doesn't matter because we are in this world so therefore it must work and we are moving fast. Although we have no idea what it means, suddenly we have a plurality and supercool agent Foucault is off and literally running in a chase sequence that is not quite Bourne levels but still works as such.

It is when this is over that the film starts to wobble; the interview sequence requires a lot of dialogue and now suddenly the lack of a working bigger picture is a weakness and the lack of understanding of the "plurality" effect is also an issue. It is a shame because this section points to a bigger story to tell and I guess the hope is that someone with money would feel this way too and help make it happen, but the aims and methods of the time-travellers is not really introduced well. That said the film ends on another high – the new plurality and you know by the way it ends that the very next scene will be thrilling just like the opening ones. The delivery may ape Hollywood thrillers but it is effective and well done – it is a little limited perhaps but mostly when it is moving it is really good. In the performances it is the same – Nissani is great in the lead role, strong presence, cool delivery, but his dialogue not also so and his narration doesn't always work. Strelitz is more or less the same, best when moving, not so much when talking. Di Domenico's big gruff American director is a caricature but his delivery of his lines is part of the "thriller" delivery that works well.

Plurality is a mixed bag; it has weaknesses in the plot and particularly in the dialogue, but yet when it is moving it is working above its level with good effects and motion which is engaging and thrilling. The second half is weaker for sure but it ends on a promise and if this was a start of a Minority Report thriller with Nissani's Foucault in the lead, I'd be watching it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A few good ideas, but it could have used more
I_Ailurophile3 June 2021
It's clever, naming an all-seeing, all-knowing security apparatus after Jeremy Bentham. It's similarly cheeky to name an agent, beholden to that apparatus, Foucault.

That's about the most clever that 'Plurality' gets.

From start to finish these 13 minutes have the feel of an over-produced, high-end commercial for, I don't know, credit cards, or LED TVs. You know the kind: The ones of length, action-filled dynamic style, and apparent budget that make it appear to be a film trailer, when ultimately it's just an advertisement. That notion is boosted by the voiceover from Jeffrey Nissani, in his role as Inspector Foucault, whose timbre and diction lends credence to an immediate impression that 'Plurality' is actually a commercial for a product. It's boosted by shots from the camera that suggest the short is actually an advertisement for a security product that doesn't exist. I'm unsure if the performance of the actors here, ever furthering that ham-fisted impression, is more a result of their acting or Dennis Liu's direction. I'm left to wonder, though, where I can find the credits for certain lofty advertising spots, and if I'll see some familiar names among them.

That's not to say that this is necessarily bad. It takes in a slightly different direction the ubiquitous sci-fi trope of the abolition of privacy, and therefore freedom, in the name of security. It uncomfortably centers the antagonists, and in the end gives us more questions than answers. Keep the audience guessing - I like it. I also like Samantha Strelitz, appearing here in the part of Alana Winston, and injecting more personality into her role than the rest of the cast combined.

'Plurality' is entertaining enough. But the flaws of its production weigh it down heavily, and it only just manages to remain engaging enough for us to watch to the end.

Worth 13 minutes of your time? You could do worse.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Well Done Because of the Response
Hitchcoc11 June 2019
This is finally one of those us versus the evil overlords of the government that gives hope to us. The story involves two attractive young blonde women who have been seen as a danger to society. They are run down by the authorities, but there is a fly in the ointment which will make it interesting for the smug jerks that have been given power. Very nice.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant and interesting
omarespinels4 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
From the director of Super friends(2019), Welcome to BIONA. Hope you Survive the Experience(2018), Denis A. Liu, we saw an interesting Sci Fi short: Plurality (2012), this short as some of the recent films pictures a close future some might even call dystopian. In this future the city of New York is controlled by a new security system that tracks the people everywhere: from the streets to the public transport even the stores, they are tracked down by their fingerprints. Which are used from paying items to open doors, as well as tracking down criminals and fugitives, but something weird happens as people start showing at two places at the same time. In this work we can see the influences of other Sci Fi films on the director's style but also the interest on fictional and action elements that are going to be present in later works, with a great focus on city landscapes and use of the grey and blue colors to make the audience feel in the future an interesting film winner of the Gold Coast international film festival of 2013.

Detailed Summary: New York is under permanent inspection by the government. The master software has detected a plurality through the sensor grid: Two blonde women with the same DNA. The government employees have started a persecution following the DNA alerts that the system has capture from the woman's interaction with every object in NYC. Both have been captured and interrogated to identify which Alana is in the current time and which one is the plurality.

The inspector, Jacob Foucault, has detected differences on the woman's answers. One of them have specific time references than the other one. That allows to the government inspectors identify that the woman that have vague idea of the time references is the actually plurality. To keep the order of the world every plurality should be eliminated.

· Scenario

There are some air landscapes of NY Island while the voice in off sets up the context. Several scenes of skyscrapers and streets.

The pursuit takes place mostly in outdoors. We can see places like the subway stairs, the street and a public park that give variety to the scenarios.

· Directing

The plot seems to have some influences of sci-fi movies such as blade runner and total recall.

The action develops progressive and coherently. As the movie goes on, the background is being explained to the watcher as a tactical way to take the most of every minute.

· Acting

The dramatical weight on this film relies on characters of Inspector Jacob Foucault (Jefrey Nissani) and Alana Winston (Samantha Strelitz).

Jacob's smoke habit is used to emphasize his role as a conspicuous inspector in the story.

Samantha plays the role of two Alanas, with some slight differences, she gives lots of drama to the sequence.

The full team of investigation take it seriously, when it comes to follow Alana along the city, given cameras and DNA detection devices-

· Musical elements

The music appropriately supports the enigma and drama being developed.

Music is dramatical during action and tensely calmed during the questionaries.

· Visual elements

The whole sequence develops in dark places.

In the pursuit, there is a camera to the level of the floor, following Alana's steps. This gives a sense of urgency, speed.

There are simple yet powerful elements to simulate hi-tech gadgets, such as the images on the widescreen of the investigation team.

Clothes are ordinary, using neutral colors, rather than designing full outfits for every actor.

The film is an interesting trip to a dystopian future of the New York city including exciting elements as time differences, detectives, persecutions and action sequences that can make the viewers get really excited and interested on the short's plot and will be eager to know more about this world and its rules.

This movie affords in a new, unexpected way, the dominant futuristic technology over world population, with a brilliant ending.

This short shows the early expectations and interests of the director on the Sci-Fi genre, exceeding expectations and making the audience interested on the director's work, with a futuristic and mystery aura, this 13 minutes only film its worth every second and a good recommendation in case you have some spare time!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed