This is an intriguing movie. It's not big on dialogue that needs to be followed and all the plots are more subtle than expressed.
It's intended to be thought-provoking and in this respect it succeeds.
Whoever the cynical "genius" was that determined that the movie title in English should be "The ways of Man", rather than the correctly translated "All the ways of God" should be booted firmly and repeatedly in the posterior until they realise that their decision has left a majority of English-speaking viewers utterly bemused and totally nonplussed as to what was the point of the movie.
As far as plot goes, the "ways of man" is something we ALREADY knew about before the movie started. It was the ways of man, i.e. Judas' betrayal of Jesus, that led to the point of the movie being made (as gets explained in the biblical quote in roughly the first five seconds of the film). This film is to show all the ways of GOD, not man. In other words, the English title totally misses the point.
This is an interesting reflection on guilt and how it can make us behave, and on any possibility of forgiveness.
As is stated right up front in the film, this is a modern interpretation of the story of Judas Iscariot after he betrays Jesus in the St Matthew Gospel. This is not, however, an overtly religious movie.
In theatrical terminology, you need to expect that this is a going to be a tragedy - depending on how you examine tragedy.
This is an appropriate point to reiterate that the film is correctly titled "All the ways of God". Knowing that will help you understand the point of the movie.
If you like to watch artistic, thought-provoking movies where the meaning is subtle, the action is dead slow and mostly non-existent, with neglible dialogue, and with religious undertones (not overtones) then you may benefit from watching this movie.
I enjoyed the experience of allowing these concepts to be portrayed before me to provoke within me ideas and curiosity, but this is not a movie for mainstream viewers imo.
It is more of interest to those whose minds tend towards philosophy and who have at least some appreciation of Christian doctrine.
FWIW, given the microsecond or so of male nudity during a brief underwater swimming scene, the warnings about nudity are rather overstated, depending on how prudish you are. Also any suggestion that this may be relevant to LGBTQ viewers is largely unwarranted or no more than hinted at as a faint possibility.
This movie is more a reflection, ideas, sadness, hope, guilt, loss than a traditional movie, and as such you should determine whether it sounds like something you wish to watch, or would prefer to steer a wide berth.
Basically, if you like, very slow, thought-provoking, action-free art films then this might intrigue you, but if you only enjoy mainstream cinema then walk away, avoid.