The Profane Exhibit (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Disappointment of the century...
Coventry18 April 2014
Each year I loyally attend as much screenings and international premieres at the Brussels Festival of Fantastic Films as possible. Each year there are pleasant surprises as well painful misfires, of course, and each year there is also one – and usually just one only – film that becomes my absolute must-see priority! For the 2014 edition, this simply couldn't have been any other film than "The Profane Exhibit". The seemingly dark and ultimately sinister anthology effort assembles no less than a dozen of the most eccentrically & controversially talented directors of the horror genre from the past, present and future. Just look at the names! And if the names don't immediately ring any bells, click on their names and browse through their repertoires. As a die-hard fan of extreme and worldwide horror, I appreciate the work of all directors involved, but I was particularly looking forward to the contributions of Ruggero Deodato, Sergio Stivaletti and Marian Dora. Deodato is the founding father of Italian cannibal movies, and thus a genuine horror deity. Stivaletti is the genius special effects wizard of practically all the greatest Italian directors, but he also directed two terrific movies himself already. And Marian Dora is mostly known for the extremely sick and grueling "Cannibal"; an uncompromising re-working of a true German crime case. The other names were more than fascinating as well, including Richard Stanley ("Hardware"), José Marins (the notorious "Coffin Joe" movies) and Nacho Vigalondo ("Time Crimes"). The only two that I personally don't admire very much are Uwe Boll and Ryan Nicholson, but considering their brute and unhinged filming styles they also definitely belong in this project. In short, "The Profane Exhibit" looks like every horror fanatic's dream come true, even more so than "The ABC's of Death" or "Masters of Horror".

But alas, alas… "The Profane Exhibit" unexpectedly turned out to be the biggest and saddest disappointment in many years, and to be quite honest, I still haven't fully recovered from how bad it actually is, even though it has been 3 days since my viewing now. It's fairly simple to see what went totally wrong here, in fact. The whole film, the entire project, is utterly soulless. None of the directors (except maybe for Uwe Boll) used even 10% of their skills and talents, and probably just considered their short stories as an annoying side activity. The different chapters, approximately ten minutes each, are gory and depraved for sure, but they completely lack content, atmosphere, coherence, suspense and even proper common sense. In case you're exclusively looking for brainless bloodshed and perversity, you might still enjoy "The Profane Exhibit", but if you expect a minimum of structure and/or quality story-telling, you will feel cheated. For what concerns the directors I looked forward to, I can be very brief and bitter. Ruggero Deodato's segment isn't worth mentioning, Marian Dora's tale was downright incomprehensible and Sergio Stivaletti's chapter was watchable but weak. With the exception of Nacho Vigalondo's contribution, which is mediocre at best, I can't even bother to mention the remaining short stories. As much as it hurts, I wish to prevent fellow genre fanatics from watching this embarrassing trash, or at least forewarn them not to expect too much.
57 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Years of waiting
BandSAboutMovies3 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This film started when producer Amanda L. Manuel approached director Michael Todd Schneider to direct her first short film, which is the chapter "Manna" in this movie. Manuel had other story concepts and brought on other directors, including a few who did not appear in the final movie like Richard Stanley (who supposedly was never part of this), Andrey Iskanov (whose segment was complete but needed new sound and some new footage which was too expensive to go to Russia for) and José Mojica Marins(who left the project).

After years of this movie getting press, it finally debuted in August of 2022. There were screenings of some parts of it and the reports were that the film was no good. Yet nine years later, here it finally is.

The film begins in a Paris nightclub that houses a secret society and The Room of Souls, a private gathering place for the world's richest and most evil people. Madame Sabatier allows each of them to tell a story and attempt to impress one another.

The first segment is "Mother May I," directed by Anthony DiBlasi, has Sister Sylvia abusing the girls in her halfway house for sins both real and imagianry.

Yoshihiro Nishimura (Meatball Machine, Kyûketsu Shôjo tai Shôjo Furanken) brings the next movement, which is entitled "The Hell-Chef" and is a quick cut artistic tale of two young Japanese women eviscerating and devouring a man. It's quick, to the point and well-made, even if there's no rhyme or reason, which is the point one figures.

The third chapter is "Basement," directed by Uwe Boll. This is based on the Josef Fritzel case, which was also made into a documentary, Monster: The Josef Fritzl Story. It's short and well-made, shockingly among the best of the entire film. That said, if you want to watch Clint Howard have sex with his character's daughter, well...this movie may just be for you.

It's followed by the part I was most excited about, "Bridge," directed by Ruggero Deodato. Sadly, it's only three minutes long and just when it seems like it has some steam, it quickly ends.

Marian Dora, which is a pseudonym for an anonymous German creative, contributes "Mors in Tabula," which is the same title as another Dora short. This one has a boy being operated on while his father helps the surgeon in a sequence that shows plenty of surgical nightmares over an Aryan rally soundtrack. There's no real story, just shocks, which is pretty much the Grand Guignol feel of this entire enterprise.

"Tophet Quorom" is directed by Sergio Stivaletti (Italian special effects master and the director of The Wax Mask). It's pretty wild and is has some incredible gore, like a jaw being ripped off, a practical werewolf transformation and infant sacrifice. Now, as you can see from that description, this tale of a woman looking for the missing twin baby she's just given birth to might not be for everyone -- again, a running theme.

Ryan Nicholson (Gutterballs, Hanger) seems like the perfect person to be part of this and his segment "Goodwife," in which a woman learns her husband is a killer and joins him in his depravity, might be the limit for some people. There's no humor in this, just shock upon shock, the kind of madness that seems like someone working out more than just a horror film if it wasn't so well shot. Apply liberally every trigger warning ever.

I loved Nacho Vigalondo's Timecrimes, so I was excited for his segment "Sins of the Fathers." A son has recreated the room he grew up in to place his elderly father into the same mindset he was in while the man abused him. It's an intriguing idea that could make up its own film.

"Manna," directed by Michael Todd Schneider goes from BDSM club to that most unimaginable -- and impossible of fetishes, vore. That means that someone gets off from being consumed and what follows is a man being treated like he's the Old Country Buffet for an entire room of latex clad women who break him down and make a meal of him.

"Amouche Bouche" is directed by Jeremy Kasten (The Attic Expeditions) and shows more human meat being prepared and eaten, which seems like how this movie should finish.

This is a movie made for extreme horror fans featuring some of their favorite directors. As such, people who think Hollywood horror is disgusting should probably stay home or keep this out of their streaming device. For those with a sicker bent -- and I say that lovingly but also you never get to play with my dog -- this is for you.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Moments of almost brilliance but way too many minutes of average viewing
AJ_Nel12 July 2023
The ten year wait is over, but how to review this extreme horror anthology? Let's start with the obvious. Extreme horror anthologies usually suck. Partly this is true of The Profane Exhibit, but then there are also moments (really just moments) of almost brilliance. For most of the directors, these little snippets (most are about ten minutes) do not present their best work or even their most extreme work. Overall it is better than I expected (yes I expected very little), but it's nothing special and falls way short of the 10 year hype. Two snippets stand out for watchable storylines and three for their unique viewer experience (yes there is an overlap). This film is probably only for a select audience. I'd say probably a 6/10 for an extreme anthology.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed