"Sherlock" A Scandal in Belgravia (TV Episode 2012) Poster

(TV Series)

(2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
90 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Not just a superb Sherlock episode, it's one of the best 'films' this year!
Quinoa198423 August 2012
Yes, it may be a slight bit premature, but I'll already call it based on my own arbitrary rules: A Scandal in Belgravia, despite being released on TV and now on DVD, is one of the best films I've seen this year. It is film length, we can agree on that, at 90 minutes it feels and is plotted out to be a feature film (albeit still in line with the continuity of the show due to it taking off the cliffhanger from the end of season 1, and a damn good one at that with Moriarty in the swimming pool). Within its own dimensions it works as a film, and writer Steven Moffat fleshes out the emotional stakes of the hero (or as much as can be with Sherlock Holmes) as he is up against a new and surprisingly dangerous adversary: "The Woman" Irene Adler.

How he comes upon Miss Adler is a mystery unto itself, except when we discover (though only later does the hero) what her connection is within the world of Sherlock. But not too much on that, that would spoil the fun. In this story, Sherlock, after getting out by chance/luck/huh from Moriarty's grasp, he takes on - or tries to take on - new cases, and all mostly for naught. While on a potential new case he is plucked out by secret service (and in just a sheet no less!) and is given the new case with shady intonations by his brother Mycroft at the palace: Miss Adler, a dominatrix (which Holmes needs a moment to process what that is), is behind some kind of secret with photographs, and Sherlock is only told so much. When he goes to see her, and following a very funny 'disguise' by having Watson hit him so he looks like he was just beaten up to be taken in for a moment, she appears "ready for battle" as she puts it to her assistant. How is this, you might ask?

Naked. Stark naked. When Holmes looks at her - another big laugh via Moffat's script - it's all question marks, which is unusual for Sherlock's super-incredible keen sense of seeing everything on a person like a computer. But the s*** gets deeper when a burglar comes about to get something from her safe, fight ensues, and then... well, all I'll say from here is that a certain ring-tone is put in Sherlock's phone of a female's 'pleasure' sound, and a game ensues over months between Sherlock and Irene. To put it bluntly about how good this episode is - if Sherlock is Batman (ala Moriarty's Joker or possible Riddler), then Irene Adler is Catwoman. She is an adversary, yet while she is a villain she can use her sexuality as a powerful tool against a man who may have intellectual prowess, but emotionally is not really all there.

Indeed this Batman/Catwoman dynamic is far different in this sort of case since Sherlock, or how Benedict Cumberbatch plays him and how Moffat writes him and Paul McGuigan (brilliantly) directs him, is with a big touch of asperger's. Or, rather, his genius comes with a sort of personal-emotional price with it. There are some twists along the way that Moffat lays out with the characters - some, frankly, will leave you slack-jawed in the best possible way - but it's really about this unlikely bond, this chess game that is played out in (not) dinner-time, and who wins will really be based on who loses control. We don't see much of Adler doing her 'dominatrix' thing (frankly, one scene where she is whipping a character is enough to get the point across, and it's very funny to see it), and really it's all on Lara Pulver's eyes, connecting (or trying to) with Cumberbatch, that gives the episode its edge and spark. Already the show is fantastic with its lead and Martin Freeman. With Pulver, it's another big notch on to the quality of the acting and electricity in the air, so to speak.

It's just sharp storytelling, some great twists and turns (some may or may not be surprises to those who've read A Scandal in Bohemia, which this is based upon), and that the story not so much takes a backseat but plays so well concurrently with it as a character piece that makes it such a smashing success (not just Holmes and Adler but little things between Holmes and Mycroft or Watson and his, uh, what's her name, the latest girlfriend, y'know). On top of this, because it's a sort of romantic piece, Moffat gets to have a lot of fun with little beats in the dialog, it's more than amusing about an emotionally-stunted man finding a romantic bond, and we have fun seeing where it could go. It's a lot of fun, but the filmmakers also never lose sight of making these characters matter deeply. The end is especially moving (albeit, yes, with one more twist, but hey why not).
120 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't lose time reading this, go and watch this movie immediately!
algodik16 April 2015
That, my friends, was beyond television. Maybe one movie a year (maybe!) comes out as good as this Sherlock episode. I am embarrassed to say that I've seen this only now in 2015, and my God, I'm still shaking. This is my first ever review on IMDb, bear with me..

The story, the acting, the editing, the music, the atmosphere, the scenery and camera angles, the twists and turns.. This movie/episode had all 10/10. There was not a single moment that I got bored or distracted. And it's not only the excitement; it's how every little piece in the story links to each other, the details, the emotions... If you pay attention, even the background music evolves during the whole episode, starting with just unplugged sounds from Sherlock's violin; and ending with a whole-out orchestra as the story concludes. Which movie does that???!!!

Thank you, whoever involved in this production. Seriously.
36 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic.
Sleepin_Dragon25 February 2020
After an excellent first series, the show returned with this magnificent opening episode, Incan remember hoping it would be good, and instead being blown away by it. I think this series was where the show peaked, all episodes are wonderful, and this opener will have you hooked. The direction is special, it's visually jaw dropping, and the writing is astonishing, it has a magnificent sense of cleverness, but it's not unbearable, nor is it smug. Lara Pulver is sensational as The Woman, her acting is first rate, plus she's visually dazzling.

Many great scenes, but those between Sherlock and Adler are arguably the best. This is ninety minutes of drama at its absolute best.

Love it, 10/10.
24 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Terrific Stuff
DaveFilmlover2 January 2012
After a splendid first (too short) series, I was really looking forward to this. Did it reach my expectations. No, it actually surpassed them. Brilliant writing, direction and acting from all the cast. Not one duff point. A superb story with lots of in-jokes for Holmes enthusiasts, but even if you are not familiar with Holmes you will love it. I like the way the writers utilise a previous story and bring it up to date and actually improve on it ten-fold. The devices used to point out the Holmes powers of deduction are very good and apt for the digital age. Really looking forward to upcoming stories. Let's hope there are many more to come. Even if there are not, what is on offer is so richly rewarding it will bear repeat viewings. After this the Beeb can be (almost) forgiven for the dross of "Bleak Old Shop Of Stuff". This is how to bring a classic up to date and make it relevant, exciting and funny. Deserves 20 stars
125 out of 144 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not Calling this A Movie would be a Scandal!!
FanFictionEngineer2 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I am absolutely in shock at how well written and well executed this episode is! Actually, I probably shouldn't be since season 1 was impressive. But this season opener is just glorious! Firstly, just the fact that Oona Chaplin was in this episode (unfortunately she doesn't stay long) gave me a smile. But the casting of Lara Pulver was epic. She was the perfect opposite to Sherlock, a woman that can actually go toe-to-toe with the great one. She pulled off her character flawlessly. Playing her so well that she never gave away anything, but just enough to keep us asking about her motives and character.

I love the character interactions in this episode. After a 1st season in the bag, the characters have pretty much been set as far as their nuances, personalities, etc. It's wonderful that the writers added more depth to the characters, and demanded more out of the actors, by developing their relationships with each other. The relationship between Mrs. Hudson and Sherlock is just beautiful. I like how the writer's used their relationship to give us more of a glimpse inside of Sherlock's head and actually prove to us that he is human :).

The wonderful character interplay between the Holmes brothers, as well as Watson was masterfully played. Each character contributing, filling each hole or weakness that there is.

Of course, who cannot forget about Sherlolly. To be honest, I was torn in this episode. I love Molly, but Lara played Irene Adler so well, and her character was so fitting that I may have been unfaithful a bit. But I love all the small Molly jealousy moments. Look out for those moments :) Then there's the high concept storyline. Each scene is masterfully planned and brought to a conclusion very cleverly. Each event is accounted for, and the premise and occurrences are pretty intertwined. I believe that I am just in so much shock because of how everything came together in the end. Especially in the end. I really don't want to say too much since I would want the same experience for all viewers.

This episode/movie is simply amazing. The character acting is impeccable, the plot line is inventive, and the script is just beautiful. I would have to say that one of the best TV episodes I have ever seen in a while.
37 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Steven Moffat Is the Real Genius of Baker Street
Oothoon1321 October 2013
As someone who has only recently stumbled onto this BBC/PBS series via Netflix, I have to say it has ruined me for US hour-long dramas. When compared to the craftsmanship of this episode--which is the most perfectly constructed of the uniformly engrossing first six--I feel as if American mystery script writers (don't even talk about the weak and 'Sherlock'-referential "Elementary"!)seem to throw plot misdirection randomly at the fictional wall, hoping something will stick. In the word-count I'm allowed here, I cannot (but wish I could--maybe I'll start a Moffat-babes blog) write an essay on how perfectly this episode is constructed. I don't even have a problem (as some here do) with how breezily the tense conflict with Moriarty left over from the first season is dismissed; in large part, since he's already shown himself as capricious--he wouldn't want to lose (not yet anyway) his 'dancing' partner--and because his exit fades so beautifully into the Irene Adler story, the shortness of the pool scene works perfectly for me. One of the real marvels of this episode comes from watching it more than once; it's only then that you catch how perfectly Moffat has set up his parallels--Sherlock is inappropriately naked in a formal setting at the beginning/ Irene, in her own drawing room. Sherlock peruses photos of the partially clad Irene provided by one 'archenemy' at the same time she scans through sheet-wrapped snaps of him sent by the other. "Battle dress", defrocking, the meaning of disguise, what Sherlock and Irene each know and learn about love--all these echo throughout the plot. But from the moment Sherlock is taken to the jet and Mycroft reveals, through two terse synopses, how his little brother has been played for a foolish young swain, we are entering deep dramatic territory indeed. Irene pushes by Sherlock; now the game is on for her, he seems to have become merely 'Junior' and 'the Virgin', someone she will keep on a leash for her own entertainment when she wins this final battle. He is relegated to a chair set away from Irene and Mycroft as the grown-ups play for keeps. So his brilliant deduction that her 'locked' camera phone reveals her heart, thereby making her vulnerable, is a moment of such high drama, mixing a weird kind of glee in the audience that he's back on his game and yet a true horror of how cold he is as he sacrifices her, that I have replayed it again and again. Moffat in the DVD commentary was worried that audiences would guess the 4-letter code that unlocked the phone from the beginning. Not only was that never true, but I find that, even knowing the solution, when I watch that section again (and again), I am freshly amazed by the writing, acting (Pulver's spilling eyes, Cumberbatch's shaded face), the score, and both the exaggerated hand movements (so intense, it moves through Cumberbatch's whole body) and the muffled crashes of doom as Sherlock types in each letter. (Kudos to director and editors as well.) The pause for a moment of (could it be?) honest emotion from Irene just before he types in the last letter and Sherlock's adamantine coldness as he says, "And this is just losing", as the last key rumbles ominously, is riveting at so many levels. I suppose the Kandahar ending is necessary to take this out of the realm of dark tragedy and remind us we must like Sherlock again in order to continue with the series. Moffat has said that, since they are both equally-matched games players, they likely just occasionally think back to that year when they had that flirtation fondly, as something gone by. I like to think that Sherlock's mysterious ability to keep track of her so as to be there to save her will continue; it is a measure of how Sherlock, like the Grinch, is beginning to grow a heart, even if belatedly.
36 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fabulous!
kikkapi2027 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Fabulous, fabulous, fabulous! I thought the ending was superb. The ratcheting up of emotional tension as Sherlock might be, gasp, in love (!) and then betrayed was great. So heart-breaking. And then he turns the tables on her. And then it turns out they're both besotted after all. Jeez. And after all that Watson tries to hide her death and no, Sherlock has actually saved her? Cumberbatch and Freeman remain a fantastic double act, with even more bickering and gags at their status as a couple this time around. There can't be a greater pleasure on telly at the moment than seeing the look of arch disdain on Cumberbatch's face dissolve into boyish giggles with Freeman on a sofa in Buckingham Palace, or in the back of a cab.

Absolutely amazing. I have whiplash. Great writing, great acting. Great directing. Why can't all TV be this good?
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the greatest things to see during your life.
kexutis-11 February 2012
One of the best things I have even seen in my life! Wonderfully, stunningly, incredibly, smartly, cunningly, shockingly, beautifully, fabulously, shiveringly, amazingly GOOD! If it is possible to have an orgasm while watching something this is as close as it gets!

This is great as a detective story. Wonderful as a drama. Pure as a research on human mind. This is incredible in so many ways it's hard to explain...

Technically perfect. Storytelling, editing, acting, directing, crafts - everything and every little details at its heights.

With no doubts one of the best adaptations of Arthur Conan Doyle's work ever made in history of Cinema and TV.

I can't believe I had shivers and tears while watching this...

Don't miss.
96 out of 118 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow...
wormyourhonor-529-24210315 November 2012
"i was hooked the entire way. man and when it ended i pulled my hair and said wow for minutes on end, m lips trembled, my heart raced. the best thing ever! wow! The best!"-that's what i said after i watched this episode which is by far the best episode of the season in my opinion. The only reason i even registered was because i wanted to rate and review this episode since this is a true genuine epic masterpiece! i seriously don't have words to express the awesomeness of it; probably because I've just watched it and I'm still shaking but even if just for the sake of watching this episode watch the show. wow! This might just be one of the best episodes in any TV show of all time. Maybe one of the best movies too!
47 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow.
Anonnamus2 February 2021
I have never watched British television, I honestly never knew much about it. My love for Benedict Cumberbatch and recommendations from friends are what drew me to finally begin watching Sherlock. I had heard great things for years but put it low on my priority list. I was hooked from the pilot episode. The first season was addicting and quite good but it is nothing compared to what I just watched. Over and over I was shocked. Twists and turns at every corner. Brilliant, brilliant writing and the chemistry between Irene and Sherlock is off the charts. I was thrilled to see that this show lasted for 7 years until I saw that there were only 15 episodes. If Sherlock is any indication of what British television is like, I will be watching so much more. This is one of my favorite episodes from any show ever. Deserving of a full 10.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Jolly good show :)
isil-fox2 January 2012
After a long wait, here finally is, the new Sherlock. And I must say it was worth the wait and a really good beginning of the year it is. So what to say about it? The answer is nothing because if I wanted to describe to you all the interesting points I would spoil it for you, and I am not going to do that. Just watch an be prepare not to blink the whole time. Because acting is superb, storyline so nicely thought out that incorporates the feel of the books, the energy of the actors so vivid and believable that you start to wish for Sherlock being real. BBC outdid themselves jet again. Next Sunday cant come faster :) And I will be waiting, glued to the chair.
72 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stayin' alive Warning: Spoilers
If you decide to resolve that big cliffhanger of your previous series simply by a phone call, normally, you ought to be prepared for a "witless use of clichés" tag on your work. But if it's Moriarty and his ringtone is the Bee Gees' Stayin' Alive, I just can't bring myself to hate it. In further compensating addition, the three of them staying alive also leads to the best one of the, as of then, four instalments of Sherlock.

Before the actual crime story commences though, Sherlock and John's status quo gets re-established: despite the fact that his writings are fairly bland, the latter's blog has made the detective duo an internet phenomenon, giving rise to droves of paparazzi pursuing them - mysteriously only doing so for as long as the plot requires it. Yet as it happens, I've always enjoyed "A Scandal in Bohemia" more than "The Adventure of the Creeping Man", so I appreciate writer Steven Moffat putting that thought to the torch. Then, after some amusing minutes of Sherlock - The Sitcom, "A Scandal in Belgravia" arrives at its crux, Irene Adler. Portrayed erotically and rememberably by Lara Pulver, a very welcome addition to the first-class cast of Sherlock, "The Woman" quickly joins in breakneck fast tête-à-têtes with Benedict Cumberbatch's ever brilliant protagonist, even causing the poker-faced consulting detective to mumble (though I surmise that her words weren't the only constituting factor in that).

The biggest plaudits here belong to Moffat, who has concocted the ingenious screenplay that lies at the heart of the episode and equips the cast with all the instances of quick-witted dialogue, while coming up with an intriguing plot and clever pieces of humour as well (the ambiance of Sherlock - The Sitcom never quite melts away). Not once in the episode's 90 minutes does a scene feel artificial or incongruous and even if the adaption of Arthur Conan Doyle's works has become less serious as opposed to the first series, there is the needed suspense remaining in big scenes. The foremost aspect of "A Scandal in Belgravia" naturally comes in the shape of Sherlock Holmes: his mind at work is a delight to watch and so are his relationships with John, his housekeeper Mrs Hudson, his brother Mycroft, and the aforementioned Miss Adler.

"A Scandal in Belgravia" further impresses with artful shots of London in the winter, skillful directing and editing, and a score that's particularly lovely with "Irene's Theme". Frankly, it's Sherlock at its highly enjoyable best.

My detective scribblings: During the slow-motion shooting at Irene Adler's residence, weren't you also expecting Sherlock to put on a pair of black sunglasses, jump in the air, and kick one of those Americans in the face? Also: is Irene Adler Spiderwoman? How else would she possibly have left Sherlock's flat? "Don't worry, she's just out cold." - "Well, she's used to that." - BDSM humour is reaching Sherlock and I can't say I disapprove. The scene with Sherlock in his bed is immeasurably funnier if you take it as him having had one over the eight for the first time. Sherlock is the quintessential person to say "You must be fun at parties" to and, as seen in this episode, that statement is a 100% correct. New in store: Sherlock Holmes playing your favourite holiday songs on the violin! "We Wish You a Merry Christmas", "Auld Lang Syne" - they're all included in this huge one-time-offer compilation! Best line of dialogue: "I always hear 'Punch me in the face.' when you're speaking, but it's usually sub-text." - We feel you, John, we do.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I just didn't buy it...
jmpshot1 May 2014
Don't get me wrong, I'm enjoying the series. I just didn't buy into the idea that Holmes would be that smitten and thrown off his game by the likes of "The Woman". I absolutely could not get behind the four letter code being what it was, or the ending (seriously, that was just dumb). The writing, acting and look of the show are all, for the most part, fabulous. But the story here fell flat and I just couldn't get on board with the relationship Holmes had with a dominatrix. A naked body and some flirting and all of his common sense goes out the window? And the 4-letter code to the phone?? Are wesupposed to believe she's that smitten with Holmes? Maybe someone can explain the reasoning behind what, to me, seems like a totally lame attempt at adding some sex appeal to the show. A failed attempt at that.
21 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Bitter Disappointment
tommmk16 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Wait a minute--so now, Sherlock is NOT gay after all? Ordinarily, he has no qualms about insulting women--including all of Watson's girlfriends--to their faces, but the sight of a naked and beautiful female villain is enough to fluster the usually unflappable detective and cause him to drop his defenses so foolishly that she is able to sneak up behind him and stab him with a syringe full of some narcotic? I enjoyed the first season of this BBC update of Conan Doyle's iconic detective, all the more for the amusingly and cheeky rendering of Holmes as sexually ambiguous. But now, some hottie whispers in his ear, or talks a little dirty to him, and he's instantly smitten, staring out the window, composing dirge-like melodies on his violin, and smoking cigarettes (huh?). He even fantasizes about saving her from Muslim terrorists. What a bore.
13 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Other reviewers have already expressed my feelings in every possible variant of the English language
snoozejonc18 September 2021
Holmes and Watson investigate a murder and get involved with a professional dominatrix involved in some dangerous dealings with the state.

This is an excellent episode and there is nothing new I can add to all the gushing reviews on IMDB.

I'll just say it has everything: story, dialogue, performances, and visuals. There are so many memorable funny and clever moments that you have to admire the craft on display.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Lovely
Littleman9528 January 2021
Wow, finally a very good episode with a lot of plot twists I was waiting from the beginning!

It's pretty much too bad that the beginning of every episode so far is quite slow and not so catchy.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Well acted which will keep your attention
glendem41 January 2012
The BBC now and again produce a show that is worth the license fee and this is one of them. Sherlock Holmes in the digital age with a plot that keeps you in suspense all the way. Holmes and Watson investigate a case of blackmail threatening to topple the monarchy and uncover links with international terrorism, rogue CIA agents and a conspiracy at the heart of government. However, the Baker Street sleuth finds himself involved on a more personal level when he becomes locked in a battle of wits with Irene Adler, a woman who is as cold, ruthless and brilliant as himself......Benedict Cumberbatch (Holmes) and Lara Pulver (Irene)ooze a hidden sexual chemistry that keeps the plot ticking along at a dramatic pace.....Looking forward to the next show on Sunday 8 January 2012.
42 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Possibly the best writing I have seen.
allondro-210 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Without any spoilers, let me say, this is simply the best story on television. Bringing Sherlock Holmes to the 21st century seemed impossible to me, but I completely believe Cumberbatch and Freeman in their roles. Holmes as a dysfunctional geek just seems natural. He reminds me of Sheldon Cooper on the Big Bang Theory. The writing on this episode is riveting, and I didn't want it to end, but when it did it left me soaring. Having read the original material, I believe that Moffat has, in adapting it to this episode, produced a masterpiece that exceeds Conan Doyle. I am pretty jaded when it comes to both literature and the media, and I am not ashamed to admit that I both cried and pumped my fist in the air for this episode. Well done, Mr Moffat, well done!
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Poetry
dnemeth-7473127 January 2016
Make no mistake, this is a movie, ladies and gentlemen. A very very very good movie.

A beautiful romantic violin melody between two souls. The speed and the camera movement is like the viewer is dancing around the characters right in the room. What in the room? Right 3 inches away from the characters. The camera is dancing around them. The connection between the actress and actor is rare and heartwarming.

Beautiful movie. It's better the second time. And the third time it's even better than the second time. Apparently.

Also no spoilers in this review, but boooooy those twist. And the end? You will be entertained for sure. Real quality entertainment of professional artists working with motion pictures. Enjoy!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I cried so much...
deleonmoshe-587516 April 2020
Perfect. Touching. I saw the end of it so many times... crying again and again and again. Wawoooooo!!!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great thriller
Bored_Dragon9 March 2017
This "episode" confirms my stance that this is more of a movie franchise than typical series. The only thing that divides this from, for example, "Harry Potter" franchise is that it's a TV production and not a theater movie. A "Scandal in Belgravia" is not only the best episode so far, but it is in every way individual thriller movie, and a great one.

8,5/10
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Just may rival the work of the late and brilliant "Jeremy Brett"....
goglo61414 July 2013
I have, since a child, been an enormous fan of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. His Sherlock Holmes character, along with the myriad of players within those enchanting stories, where endlessly entertaining and informative. Being, myself, a creature predicated on logical deduction, you can certainly understand my gravitational affinity for these wonderful tales. I have viewed most of the major theatrical portrayals of the famous Detective. Up till now the best on screen interpretation of Mr.Holmes, to me, was that of the brilliant Jeremy Brett..... he simply was Sherlock Holmes to me. But now with Mr. Cumberbatch's apt portrayal, all SH fans can rally around this new and innovative spin on the epic tales we've all come to adore.This first episode of season 2 is why i still have hope for specific television programming. To that,i say cheers to the BBC for giving us this gem of a show, also to all involved... well done!
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A brilliant detective solves another case
jennymoenk12 December 2016
A Scandal in Belgravia

A few years ago, on 1st January 2012, Paul Mc Guigan published a new episode of the crime drama from the BBC series "Sherlock Holmes". The episode, called "A Scandal in Belgravia", represents that Mc Guigan has a talent to write really exciting detective stories.

The episode is about the amazing detective Sherlock Holmes who tries to solve another difficult case. The setting takes place in Belgravia, a rich part of London. It's about the dominatrix Irene Adler who has some interesting photos which could destroy the royal family. The actors who are playing the main characters - Sherlock Holmes, Irene Adler and Dr. John Watson - do a really good job so that the viewers can put themselves into the situation. Especially Benedict Cumberbatch who's playing Holmes, does a brilliant screenplay, it seems as if he is made for this role. The episode is stuffed with classic music, sometimes from Sherlock himself, which reflects the tense of Holmes as an observing machine. There are also some weaknesses like the fast speech especially of Holmes and the plot is sometimes a little bit difficult to understand. Furthermore, it's really long for an episode (89 minutes).

Our opinion is that "A Scandal in Belgravia" is a fantastic episode to watch. Not a single minute is wasted even if we are no detective story fans. That's why we would definitely recommend to watch this series to all these people who love detective stories. The message for us is that a woman can be as good and intelligent as the brilliant observing machine Sherlock Holmes.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Paul McGuigan kill the last 49 seconds and you have a masterpiece
satori951201119 January 2012
As in the first series of Sherlock the job of directing has been given to two different directors and as in the first series Paul McGuigan is in a different class than his counterpart, this time Toby Haynes (episode: The Reichenbach Fall) last time Euros Lyn(Episode: The Blind Banker) and this one (A Scandal in Belgravia) is to my mind the best of them all. It is extremely close to a masterpiece, unfortunately he had to pamper to the American audience by putting a Hollywood ending on it the very last 49 second if he had resisted it would have deserved 10 stars no doubt instead he went a long way destroying it which is a tragedy. Since seeing it I just been annoyed over how he could have destroyed something that superb with such a half arced ending when what before it was so sublime.
13 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Scandal in Belgravia - Sherlock Holmes
helmutsonnenbrille9 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Scandal in Belgravia - Sherlock Holmes The film a Scandal in Belgravia falls into the category of crime and drama. The story written by Paul McGuigan was published on the first of January 2012 on BBC which is also the producer. It deals with Sherlock and John who are entrusted with a delicate case: According to information from the government, the dominatrix Irene Adler seems to possess piquant photos of a member of the royal family. She turns out to be a hard nut for Holmes who has very secret information.

The story mainly plays in London. The main settings in London are: 221B Bakerstreet (apartment of Sherlock and Watson), Irene Adler's house, Buckingham Palace, the Airport and an old industrial area. Sherlock Holmes and his friend Dr. John Watson are invited to Buckingham Palace to solve a case of national importance. Mycroft Holmes who is Sherlock's brother, tells them that Irene Adler has been in touch with Palace officials to tell them she has embarrassing photos on her mobile phone of one of the royals. She doesn't want money and there are no reasons to blackmail anyone. Holmes meets her and is surprised by her intellect and cleverness. The main roles are Sherlock Holmes played by Benedict Cumberbatch, Martin Freeman as Dr. John Watson, Lara Pulver as Irene Adler and they played their role very well because of their authentic performance. On the one hand the movie was quite good, because there is build up a tensed atmosphere which keeps up until the end. Furthermore it is unclear if Sherlock Holmes is the best detective of all times and if he is able to solve all cases. Besides it's thrilling that there are a lot of twists inside the plot line. On the other hand it's difficult to understand the fast speech between the main characters. Moreover you can't deduct if Irene Adler is good or bad and what she wants to achieve by playing this game. Additionally it's kind of confusing that the story directly starts with an interesting scene.

In conclusion we can't deny that the movie builds up a tense atmosphere and that the viewer can interpret every scene on his own. But it's uninteresting for people without interest in crime stories. If you don't like to interpret the movie you shouldn't watch it. That is the reason why we won't watch it again.
6 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed