IMDb RATING
8.0/10
2.3K
YOUR RATING
This is the story of companies who engineered their products to fail.This is the story of companies who engineered their products to fail.This is the story of companies who engineered their products to fail.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 3 nominations
Photos
Thomas A. Edison
- Self - Inventor
- (archive footage)
Marcos López Merayo
- Self - Computer Expert
- (as Marcos López)
Brooks Stevens
- Self - Industrial Designer
- (archive footage)
- (voice)
Boris Knuf
- Self - Industrial Designer
- (as Dr. Boris Knuf)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- Alternate versionsShorter version, 52m52s long, edited for 1 hour slot on television. Has been broadcast on at least NRK (Norwegian Television).
- ConnectionsFeatures The Man in the White Suit (1951)
Featured review
Interesting - but Short Lifespan products may have advantages too
This film criticises the way manufacturers deliberately make short lasting products that continually have to be re-bought, increasing their profit.
A main focus is on how light bulbs were deliberately limited to 1000 hr lifespans in the Phoebus cartel arrangement between GE, Philips, Osram/Sylvania and others. A favorable comparison is made with long lasting Socialist Narva bulbs, during the cold war era.
This is a little too facile, kicking in open doors: The easy conclusion is that "Hey it's good to have Minimum lifespan standards"
Not true! Brightness and lifespan tend to be trade-offs. Ironically, USA minimum 1000 hr standard - from the Phoebus Cartel in the film - therefore still denies the use of short lasting bright bulbs. It is not Socialist Government standards that makes good life bulbs. Nor is it Capitalist Light Bulb Manufacturer cartels. It is Competition on the market - by helping new manufacturers and inventors (like mentioned Billinger, behind a long lasting bulb) launch their products, for people to choose.
All light bulb types have advantages, and energy saving and lifespan mandates compromise other advantages that light bulbs - or indeed other products mentioned in the film - may have.
A main focus is on how light bulbs were deliberately limited to 1000 hr lifespans in the Phoebus cartel arrangement between GE, Philips, Osram/Sylvania and others. A favorable comparison is made with long lasting Socialist Narva bulbs, during the cold war era.
This is a little too facile, kicking in open doors: The easy conclusion is that "Hey it's good to have Minimum lifespan standards"
Not true! Brightness and lifespan tend to be trade-offs. Ironically, USA minimum 1000 hr standard - from the Phoebus Cartel in the film - therefore still denies the use of short lasting bright bulbs. It is not Socialist Government standards that makes good life bulbs. Nor is it Capitalist Light Bulb Manufacturer cartels. It is Competition on the market - by helping new manufacturers and inventors (like mentioned Billinger, behind a long lasting bulb) launch their products, for people to choose.
All light bulb types have advantages, and energy saving and lifespan mandates compromise other advantages that light bulbs - or indeed other products mentioned in the film - may have.
helpful•757
- reipost-377-403154
- May 22, 2012
- How long is The Light Bulb Conspiracy?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Pyramids of Waste
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Light Bulb Conspiracy (2010) officially released in India in English?
Answer