"The Metropolitan Opera HD Live" Mussorgsky: Boris Godunov (TV Episode 2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A beautifully sung production of a Russian masterwork
TheLittleSongbird23 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Boris Godunov has always been one of my favourite operas. It is a structurally tight opera with some of Mussorgsky's most beautiful music and a titular character that is incredibly compelling. Also as much as I do love Eugene Onegin and Khovanschina(the latter also by Mussorgsky), Boris Godunov gets my vote as the greatest of all Russian operas. This Met production is beautifully sung and very powerful. For one thing, I love how cinematic the camera work and lighting are. Note the transition from Boris's Death scene to the final scene in the Kromi forest, seamlessly done. It is very interesting visually, with one scene where Feodor wears a map around him maybe to represent his inheritance, a large manuscript for Pimen to record his history. Coming back to the death scene-Kromi forest transition, I noticed that a lot of scenes in this production uses the technique of finishing quietly and flowing into the next, almost as if the stage director was mirroring the connective sound structure of Mussorgsky's music.

Musically, the orchestra are evocative and full in sound. You couldn't have had a more perfect conductor for the score than Valery Gergiev, whose musical direction was what made the 1990 Boris Godunov with Robert Lloyd as Boris such a treasure. Gergiev gives a restrained albeit still electrifying reading, the complete opposite of flamboyant as he can be thought of. The chorus are emotive, nuanced with a dark timbre sometimes. The production succeeds in showing the violence permeating Russia and its tyrannical rule. It also has a human touch like the opera, Boris is not the only cruel character, there are also monks, children and freedom fighters that steal and kill their opponents. Besides to his children, Boris is very warm and cares for his children.

As for the staging, I have talked about the cinematic lighting and camera work and the best scene change, but not yet about any effective scenes. There were a fair few, Boris' Coronation, big monologue and Death scenes are very well done on all counts, but two stand out. The opening of the last act and the Tarem Palace episode. The opening of the last act is often omitted, and I am so glad it was included, the chorus is wonderful and there is yet another human dimension to Boris as he asks the fool to pray for him instead of retaliating. The Tarem Palace scene is where you would hear the justifiably famous clock scene. This is unique for the fact that it doesn't use Rimsky Korsakov's orchestration, which is perhaps more characterful of a clock chiming and ticking but the bleaker and more sparse 1969 Mussorgsky version.

The singing is absolutely great. The only problematic spot was the Dimtri of the production Aleksandr Antonenko. The voice in the high register shows strain at the top and I didn't think he was romantic enough with Marina. Marina is played and sung by Ekaterina Semenchuk, the voice is resonant and sensual. She may just lack the chesty heft of a Borodina, Dunn or Arkhipova, but she does cope very well, but does even better in the upper range which is every bit as glamorous as how she looks on stage. Evgeny Nikitin is excellent as Rangoni, Andrey Popov appeals as the Fool and Mikhail Petrenko is a noble Pimen.

Rene Pape is just superb though. He has one of the more beautiful and warmer voices of any bass recently, and his Boris is towering and heart-wrenching, giving a psychological depth that I haven't seen done so exceptionally well since Nesterenko. Before I forgot, I liked the costumes, the aristocracy were clothed in rich-looking costumes and the masses were dressed in grungy colours, emphasising very well the difference between classes. The sets are simple but hardly non-existent either. All in all, beautifully sung and compelling. 9/10 Bethany Cox
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This is the day of reckoning for the sins of Boris
Gyran7 April 2012
My serious interest in opera started in 1999. It has been an exhilarating journey but one that has not yet arrived at a destination called Mussorgsky. I did catch the 2001 brutalist production from Saltzburg but I only persevered for about 20 minutes before being repelled by the ugly staging and difficult music.

This production by Stephen Wadsworth for the Met is much more user-friendly. He avoids the modern cliché of updating Tsarist operas to a Stalinist era. The glorious costumes are traditional, although not necessarily 16th century. With a cast of 200 and 600 costumes the stage is very crowded and, I imagine backstage is even more crowded. Sets are evocative rather than detailed so that, for instance, the first four scenes in a monastery, in the Kremlin, in a monk's cell and in an inn on the Lithuanian border can take place without a break.

The opera is based on a play by Pushkin and Mussorgsky presents a cross-section of Russian life in a series of loosely connected episodes, rather like a 16th century War and Peace. The opera exists in many versions. It was rejected by the Mariinsky Theatre in 1869, the main reason being that it lacked a female role. The revised, 1872 version was also criticised for being musically and dramatically inept. Several composers, including Rimsky-Korsakov and Shostakovich have produced their own versions in an attempt to remedy the perceived faults in the opera.

This Met production uses the 1872 version with one or two additions from 1869. In scale and structure it reminds me of Gotterdammerung although it is certainly less hummable than the Wagner. Rene Pape emotes well in his long soliloquies but left me largely unmoved. The huge choruses have a more immediate impact. I also enjoyed the tender music with which the Polish princess Marina seduces the Pretender Grigoriy. Marina, of course, is a role added to the 1872 version to give the opera more sex appeal. Ekaterina Semenchuk and Alexanders Antonenko are effective here in a cast that, with the exception of Rene Pape, seems to be authentically Russian.

The story traces Boris's guilt for having murdered the Tsarevich heir so that he could accede to the throne. In parallel there is the story of the monk, Grigoriy who pretends to be the dead Tsarevich in order snatch the throne. He is aided by sundry Poles, Lithuanians and even the Catholic Church, seeking to reclaim Russia from the heresy of orthodoxy. The Russian people, gripped by famine and deprivation are all too ready to believe in Grigoriy's unlikely claim. It's interesting how history repeated itself in the 20th Century with the woman who fraudulently claimed to be the dead Princess Anastasia.

I saw this production during the London mayoralty campaign with the incumbent Boris Johnson fighting off the challenge of Ken Livingstone. Many of the subtitles could readily be adapted as campaign slogans on one side or the other. How about: "this is the day of reckoning for the sins of Boris".
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed