Cold Creepy Feeling (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Wow, be careful
systemfixit29 January 2012
This movie was absolutely horrible, such amateur crap. Bad acting, no budget, terrible camera work and editing; there's really nothing redeeming at all. Entirely not scary. Nothing would save this film to make it work. Characters are unmemorable and perform mundane crap for the first 42 minutes of the movie.

Yet another amateur production trying to ride the coattails of Paranormal Activity and the lot.

Please don't waste your time by watching this like I did. The people who made this movie shouldn't quit their day jobs. Either that, or someone needs to go back to film school, perhaps part-take in free community center acting workshops.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
how does this get a 9.9 it should get a 0.0
jeremy-long-2730 January 2012
i do not understand IMDb's rating system. i wrote a review last night for this terrible awful movie and there were no other reviews. come back today to find four one star reviews and mine is nowhere to be found. as of yesterday this film was a 9.9 with six people who rated it. now there are ten people who rated it at i assume the last four are the four that gave it one star and left scathing reviews and is still at an 8.8.

as the other reviewers say, don't bother with this "film". it was literally 40 minutes of drivel before they even get to the haunted house and the movie is only 86 minutes total.

watch the trailer and you will wish you wouldn't have even wasted the 60 or so seconds doing that.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
D grade horror at its worst
heidiofbruns29 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Lets just say I gave this movie a 1 simply because I did not get the option to give it the minus 2 it deserves. Some filmmakers should NOT be encouraged. Sadly I will never get that hour and a half of my life back as is also the case with the 4 lead actors credibility. The plot has been done to death. Young couple move into dream house, but does something sinister also reside there?. The script feels as though it has parts missing in many places, and yet the filmmaker has time to slot in a pointless scene to plug the band that provides the music for the film. All in all a terrible film with some truly awful performances. Sadly even with a massive budget and talented actors I fear this is one film that could never be saved.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
First horror film I've hated in years
heart_in_ohio30 January 2012
I really am not sure where an appropriate place to start for this Title is. First of all, just to give a little perspective, I am a die-hard horror film fanatic. Perhaps its a natural inclination to the twisted and terrifying, or the elements of survival, or maybe the atmosphere. I have watched horror from every sub-genre, every decade, shot in every style, and from every country it seems like. In the last one/two year(s), I have watched 200+ horror films EASILY. Almost in every single case I have been able to find a redeeming quality or SOMETHING enjoyable about the film.

Not with "cold creepy feeling". Don't get me wrong, it was terrifying. I was terrified that I might gouge out my eyes after watching an hour and a half of this piece of garbage. I am really not trying to be mean either, like I said, I am the most generous horror movie fan you will ever meet.

The acting was terrible and forced. Especially from the lead actress, who was annoying and came off as fake and incompetent in her role.

The script was cheesy and absolutely juvenile.

The plot was old, tired, old, tired, old, and tired.

The camera quality and filming was the worst I have ever seen in any movie, including any other indie film.

And finally, the ending. I am not going to "give anything away" in the off chance that you make the horrible decision to waste your brain cells on this film that looks and feels like it was made by someone in prepubescence. However I will say is was the sour icing on this mud pie of a movie. It was rushed, didn't follow a logical train of thought, and was just plain awful.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
was I watching the same movie as the rest of you!
teamholmesdvds29 January 2012
I got really exited when I seen this film especially with a 9.9 rating (being the highest I've ever seen on IMDb) so I put it on and oh my god I would not even give it a 1 out of 10, I turned it off after 5 minutes probably not even that the acting was dreadful and it looked like it had bed shoot by a kid with a home video camera! sorry for being so blunt it just I was really looking forward to watching a good horror and I really thought it would be with it hight rating and instead I got this rubbish I was very disappointed :( I really would not wast your money or Your time on this movie if you can even call it that! Just watch the trailer it says it all!! wish I had before I wasted my time on it :(
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I didn't think movies could get this bad.
artpf16 October 2013
A young couple, Lisa Younger and Jared Vandenberg, escape the Los Angeles rat race for the quiet life in Joshua Tree, California but paranormal visions and voices turn the house of their dreams into a house of nightmares.

They enlist the help of a spiritualist, Alex Damiano, to help exorcise the premises but this only awakens and angers the demonic presence that lurks within.

When the town Sheriff, Dennis Woodruff, becomes involved, he discovers that another family mysteriously disappeared 10 years earlier without a trace and he also becomes entangled in the web of evil horror.

What is surprising about this movie is not how total bad it it. Nor how it appears to never rise above the quality of a 15 year old's home movie, but that some of the "actors" have actually gotten other film work! Look for them in Barely Legal and some other quasi porn flicks.

It's horrible. The plot drags on with really badly taped scenic shot of Joshua Tree and highways to no where.

OMG! The only consistent thing about the film is he horrible acting.

For artistic value a couple scenes are taped in sepia tone. Wow. Did you pull that out of film making book or just flip the wrong switch on your $200 camcorder?

Something all you home film makers have to really start thinking about - - you need to either get a better camera than the one from Costco you're using, OR you need to spend a couple bucks in post production to soften the harshness of your HD taping. It's not appealing. Especially in a movie about the supernatural.

The mystic in this movie truly cannot act her way out of a paper bag. The entire production feels like it was made on the fly. -- "Hey! I just got a new $200 video camera -- let's have another beer and make a movie!

Biggest prop cost in the film? Looks like the spent about $15 on candles! Don't expect much more!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
More idiot than savant
nogodnomasters7 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The film centers on a young couple in California. He writes "real" ghost stories from interviews, but needs to do a rewrite. She is a waitress who "can't buy a job" as an actress and during their first conversation, you will know why. He put in a bid on a secluded ranch which he got, and the next moment they are ready to occupy, driving off in the Bimmer with an air mattress.

They take turns filming stuff along the way and thank goodness the producers had enough insight to also use the old fashion motion picture camera mounted on a tripod. Their journey was a waste of our time as it failed to build any character. You can fast forward through this aspect, get popcorn etc. It is sufficient to know they are both shallow airheads. You can fast forward until they get to the ranch. Really, you won't miss anything at all.

The film moves fast when it should be slow and slow when it should be fast. If you read the Amazon review or the title, you know cold creepy feeling things happen in the house that require an exorcism. After the first night, they opt to call their psychic exorcist friend who can be there the next day. Instead of wasting all that film shooting California yucca plants, Kurlander should have build up the cold creepy feeling slowly. The time the couple spends on the Internet...way too long. Get yourself a real film editor. We know your Idiot-Savant group did the sound track from the credits, was the additional plug as part of the film necessary? Was that a trance or sleep walking Chloe was doing in her panties and boots? Did she sleep with those boots on? Looked a bit odd. Was that sunlight coming through the window in the night time bar scene or was the outdoor lighting nova bright?

I have dated women who have acted more possessed than Lisa Younger (sorry Terry, I told.) I was most shocked by the fact these people had other acting credits to their name. The scary part of the movie didn't last long and there was no explanation as to what happened, just bad hints. Keith Kurlander used himself and his own family as the ghost family, perhaps the most scary convincing thing on screen for all of 10 seconds. Keith Kurlander wrote, directed, acted in, produced, edited, etc. etc. this film. If you see Keith, he now owes me $2.

F-Bomb, sex, nudity (thank you Lisa Younger)
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Skip it.
tdcp1 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Trust me it's good advice: Don't watch this film. I have to be completely honest and admit I turned it off after I think around 10 minutes into the film, but from the start it is obvious that it is terrible. The acting is terrible, the camera work is terrible, everything is really terrible. Even shots of the scenery were lame. What came to mind while watching it was this: 'Think about all the badly made films you have seen and then watch this to see what's good about them.' It really is worth watching the first five minutes though....... It is hilarious, though it has been some hours now that I saw it and at first I was just upset that it wasn't something (at least) watchable. And to be fair: Who knows after 10 minutes it all might have fallen right into place.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fun For The Whole Group!
dmoorejdrf-3080227 November 2019
Before I get ripped for giving this a 9, let me say it is not for the quality or the intended scare factor. Rather, this is just the type of movie a group of friends would have fun shredding to pieces from the non existent story line, the horrible camera work and the acting. This movie, if you want to call it that, is a cinematic gift to group that enjoys finding the faults that make it so bad. So grab some beer and pizza, sit back and start ripping!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Good movie. I liked it.
MissJedahdyah14 February 2019
It's not a big budget hollywood movie but thats actually what I like about these movies. They are more realistic. The acting was good. The actress was supposed to be whiny so she was very good. A great story line. I think the actors and filmakers have great careers ahead of them.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed