Madelines (2022) Poster

(2022)

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Who wouldn't want more Brea Grant
staunton-gary3 April 2022
First thought was yeah, more of Brea Grant, that would be awesome. However, as the movie progressed, the more I realised that there should only be one Brea Grant! It's a fun little movie, a bit slow on the pace and comedic value, but worth a watch.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Good concept idea, but not a great movie...
paul_haakonsen1 April 2022
I stumbled upon the 2022 sci-fi horror comedy "Madelines" without ever having heard about it. So of course I sat down to watch it and see what writers Brea Grant and Jason Richard Miller had to offer, because I will admit that the movie's synopsis definitely sounded interesting.

And while the concept idea behind this movie actually was interesting and clever enough, then director Jason Richard Miller just didn't manage to put out a movie that was overly entertaining to me. The movie's narrative was just too slow paced and too little of any worth or interest happened as the movie made snail pace. So it was a difficult movie to endure and sit through.

As I mentioned above, then I liked the concept of the storyline, but one thing was script and idea, while another thing was transition to screen and bringing the story to life. I just have to say that "Madelines" was a swing and a miss for me.

The acting performances in the movie were adequate. It was a really, really small cast ensemble, so the performers had to do exceptionally well to carry the movie. Unfortunately they had the script and the narrative working against them.

Visually then "Madelines" was mediocre. It wasn't, however, a movie that was relying too much on special effects. And a good thing actually, because the special effects weren't exactly outstanding or grand.

I am sure that there is an audience out there for a movie such as "Madelines". I just happened to not be a part of that audience.

My rating of "Madelines" lands on a generous three out of ten stars.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Good idea though
shadowofhero-465192 April 2022
The implementation is very slow and boring.

If you only have 2-3 actors and do everything on a small scale, they have to be completely convincing.

But nobody does that, and you torment yourself through the film.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stolen trope done badly
gerwynpetty2 April 2022
The writers watched Primer and went "Ok, let's steal this, but make it dumber, so nobody notices." It's slow, the plot goes nowhere, and it's unoriginal. Even by low budget, indie standards, it's bad.

Seriously, rather watch the original they plagiarised this from.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What did I just watch?
jeremy_steines2 April 2022
If you watch this film you will hate yourself at the end for having wasted so much time. The concept was interesting, the execution, writing, directing, special effects were AWFUL. The ending made no sense and they even tried to show an end scene to attempt to explain part of it but again the execution was terrible and you are left with more questions than answers.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
If you watch this movie, you will want to travel back in time to stop you from watching this movie
the_mikatu3 April 2022
The worst about this movie is the hope that you need to have, that at the end everything will make sense. Spoiler alert: it doesn't!

This movie is not bad per se. I was able to watch it until the end, unlike many other movies. The concept and the idea are great.

The execution however is quite poor.

The movie is confusing, but not in the sense that you missed something and you can rewatch and get it. No, the whole movie is messy and confusing because that was how this movie was designed.

Seriously, if you haven't watch it yet, save yourself a time travel back in time and skip it. You will get confused, not about the plot but about why did you just watch this instead of watching a good movie about time travel. They even suggest two better alternatives: Back To The Future and Timecop.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very Stupid
rotini-525862 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
3500 Madelines....kill em all !? What a ridiculous concept . Man o man...I guess people are just running out of ideas. Who comes up with this s*hit ? Just put them all in the closet. No one will notice the stentch. Avoid at all cost.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Could it be anymore boring ?
sayandg-286677 April 2022
It's like watching a sci-fi/horror movie directed by Joey(The handsome guy). Rest you know. It's the same low budget sci-fi movies . You can finish the movie by skipping the boring part, if you are a pro .
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clever no-budget time traveling film
lincolnx4 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Despite having no budget, this film delivers a good story.

At first it seems pretty clunky but after a bit I was fully engaged and no longer cared about the lack of budget.

One caveat (spoiler): At no point was it mentioned or realized they've effectively made a matter copying device and could have created immense wealth just from the diamond ring alone.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Writers Too Lazy To Write An Ending
nixflixnpix23 April 2022
No ending, goes nowhere, 3 different endings happening at the same time without fluidity or explanation, so the whole ending makes no sense.

Don't pay for it! If you watch it for free, you'll still want a refund!

Feels like first-time director and 3rd-grade acting, and everything from action to dialogue is painfully lackluster.

I want my 2 dollars back!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Indie flick on par with Happy Death Day and Tucker and Dale
scary-art3 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
If you like dark comedies, gore, science fiction and yearn for a Land of the Lost full of knife wielding women, check it out! So much fun! It's kinda amazing what you can do with a tiny cast and twisted imagination.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This movie had heart but the ending didn't match the message
lwalt-7505812 April 2022
Everyone who rated this movie below a 5 obviously hasn't seen the rest of the movies rated below 5. The movie has heart and has a message that I won't iterate because it would be a spoiler. The ending, I believe was chosen so that it would be unexpected or a surprise. The surprise ending spoils the message because it doesn't deliver the intended message. I mean it could but maybe it doesn't because the ending leaves the time beyond a certain point as a mystery. Therefore any message you believe to be there is just uncertain to be the author's intent. Brea did a great job of acting. Those who love movies with heart and Brea Grant will definitely enjoy it. And the body double was fantastic too.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Kinda dark comedy
christianfagrell3 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This was a bit weird I must say. You have a couple inventing a time machine in their garage where no one of these persons seems rather intelligent/intellectual/thoughtful or methodical in any form, which you expect from an inventor/scientist right?

Then they have a discussion about testing on organic life or not. The woman clearly say she does not want to while the man insists. Because she is upset with the man she tries the time machine on her self! There is some wrong logic here...

They quickly realize there is something wrong and it takes like one second for the female to find out why looking at the computer screen. They show a simple programmatic loop, which like every dummy programmer can write. So the person who invented a time machine cannot write a simple code loop?

I know every human can make mistakes and she was drunk while she was setting up the test, but come on. If I was to go in the future I would have thought at least something like that through.

Then the problem starts when copies of the woman starting appear in the garden. They end up deciding after a very short discussion that they must kill the copies. The woman having trouble killing herself so the task lands on the man. This part is kinda disturbing to me when they actually makes fun of killing the copies. Maybe this is suppose to be the horror part of the movie... When I watch this part of the movie I thought to myself: would not some neighbor react to like 50 people killed in the garden every day at the same time? I mean their house was not that isolated and you could clearly see the garden from above.

Also they show that the man get rid of the bodies using some acid in the bathtub, but later when they have an argue about the killing he claims the police are gonna put them in jail for all the killing and at the same time he shows that the bodies are stored in a room in the house! You would not be able to live in that house if you have 50 dead bodies in a room. Can you imagine the smell that would cause?

There is also a third person involved in this movie, the financer. He comes around from time to time and states he wants some results, always in a awkward manner. Later on they explains the situation for him and he kinda drops out of the story.

The ending is fine and what you can expect from a time machine movie.

Overall the acting/directing is ok, but in some scenes the special effects are pretty bad. But the conversations between the woman copies are pretty well done.

I was gonna give this a 4 but since it is a comedy I rated it higher to a 5.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another worst horror film! Full of boring conversation, and annoying overuse scene! Avoid at all cost!
kwenchow11 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This film start with a couple doing experiment at their garage, and they running out from the garage scene! As turnout, this film is about a husband "Owen" need to travel back to the past to fix the time travel mistake make by his wife "Madeline"! Entire film full of boring conversation, and annoying overuse scene! Such as, overuse of the arguing scene, overuse of the staring scene, overuse of the calling names scene, overuse of the blackout scene, overuse of the drinking scene, overuse of the experiment scene, overuse of the alarm clock ringing scene, overuse of the cleaning dead body scene, overuse of the stabbing scene, overuse of the walking scene, overuse of the searching scene, and overuse of the time transporting scene! Make the film unwatchable! At the end, Owen fail to travel back to the past, and he end up following by myriad of Madelines to kill him! That's it! Wasting time to watch!
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Gremlins Did it Better without a Time Machine
arfdawg-116 May 2022
The movie looks more like a made for TV film than a real motion picture.

It's poorly done. Everytihing about it is reminiscent of the 80's and do we really want to remember the 80's?

I was truly bored out of my mind. The acting is HORRIBLE.

The soundtrack is synthesized garbage that will get on your nerves.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Plat holes aside, poor casting finished it
mldardar9 May 2022
Brea Grant played her part well, but Parry Shen was out of place as both husband & co-inventer. He was mostly annoying, & ruined any chance of just rolling with the plot holes & silliness of this sci-fi comedy turned slasher project. I'd like to see Grant in a better production. Shen is more suited for run-of-the-mill corny sit-coms.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good concept terrible execution
formookitty18 April 2022
Never heard of the movie or actors or directors until I watched it. Honestly not as bad as how many people here say. Owens actor was terrible thought numerous times, I wasn't convinced of what was happening. The music was good but the tropes were over done. Too many drinking scenes too many alarm rings. It could have gone a funnier way with how they started. The first 30 minutes gave me a fun with Dick and Jane vibe. Maybe it'll be about their crazy adventurous trying to get rid of their mistake. Maybe it'll have hilarious scenes of them two finding ways to get the job done! But nope it tried taking a serious direction that ultimately lead it to a very confusing ending. I won't spoil the movie but imagine if Marty from Back To The Future ended up landing in a different dimension completely leaving us wondering what just happened. No build to that just a completely random ending.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Funish But full of holes
Ckn483 May 2022
OK Low budget but still... 100+ bodies dead but no explanation as to what they do with those bodies before the benefactor provides a dump truck.

All new madalines are created from a single incidence. The protagonists are moving through time one day at a time, supposedly the madalines returning from the future have been into the future and are returning to the protagonist timeline, each one, one day later than the previous one. It doesnt make sense that each new madeline is returning one day later. It doesnt make sense that some madalines die in the future but each new day a new madeline turns up. It doesnt make any sense that each madeline returning from the future returns one day later even though the new madalines were created 60 seconds apart.

If there are 3600 in the future and each one has to wait an extra day than the previous before returning, what are all those future madalines eating.

The Script has holes The sound is OK The Photography is ok The Acting is hammy

Its a passable watch 👍👎
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amateur and likeable ...
m-ramanan24 April 2022
RATED 7/10 Language: English

Bit amateur sci-fi drama mixed with horror actions. Its childish st some places and master class in some paces. Kind of mixed bag with some good idea. It was bit slow in the beginning but the pace is watchable after that. Liked the climax very well.

One time watchable.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nice twist on a common theme
johnjag-21-7945532 April 2022
Most people who saw this movie did not seem to like it. It does not have endless special effects like action sci-fi movies. Perhaps that is what they were looking for. When you see the word comedy with sci-fi you should expect that. Most comedy /horror or comedy /sci-fi movies miss the mark. This one does not. It is not laugh out loud funny. It poses some real questions if something goes wrong with time travel and then shows the would be scientists dealing with the problem in a humorous way.

I would definitely watch this movie again. I cannot understand why it has such a low rating.
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Explaining the complicated ending
jhausler318 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie gets pretty poor reviews, and a lot of that seems to be connected with the broad sentiment among reviewers that the ending doesn't make sense. I'll grant that it's complicated, and I had to rewatch the last 15 minutes a time or two to work it out in my head, but I think I finally understand it well enough to explain it. It *does* make sense for the most part. It's just quite convoluted.

**SPOILERS** Most people's confusion (understandably) begins about the time that Madeline 51 rescues Owen and the two agree on the plan to send Owen back to the past to stop Original Madeline before she ever starts the time loop. From there, Owen is shocked to find himself instead sent to the bleak, desert "future zone" the Madelines kept spawning to and got stuck in until they finally made their round trips to the present. He walks into their camper to find Madeline 115 (the mean/villain one) waiting for him with a knife, saying she'd been warned he was killing her and the other time-clones, so she wants to kill him first. She stabs Owen, but not before receiving the facial scar that we first met her with when she appeared in the present. Then Owen *himself* respawns in an injured state right outside the camper. He sees to his horror an entire army of Madelines marching toward him in the desert to presumably kill him. Then, we get a slip-away to a "BEFORE" scene where a Madeline clone seems to stop Original Madeline from ever creating the loop, ending with an arial shot and a gasp right before the credits.

"What-the-huh?!", right? I had a lot of questions initially. How did Madeline 115 "leave herself a note" when she presumably only made the one round trip through time? Why did she want to kill Owen, anyway? Why did the time machine misfire like that, and who was behind the "override" briefly mentioned onscreen? Who was the Madeline that showed up in the "before" scene at the end? Well... here's what I believe is going on that (mostly) explains the ending.

Right as Madeline 51 is pressing the button to send Owen to the past as intended, the screen on the computer turns red and the words "Madeline Override Sequence" appear on the screen. Earlier, in the present-day after multiple Madelines started arriving and took Owen prisoner and took over the house, we saw that Madeline 115 (the villain) was spending a lot of time alone in the lab or in the camper with the time machine by herself. Specifically, she was messing around with some of the code in the USB drive. I believe she knew herself (or rather, the other versions of her) well enough to think there was a reasonable chance that one of them would do exactly what they did -- rescue Owen and try to use the time machine to alter the past and end the loop.

As a failsafe for that contingency, Madeline 115 did two things. First, she traveled to the "future zone" herself in secret in the dead of night and briefly left a message before making a return trip to the present, writing on the camper's counter that "He's killing us" to rile up the slightly-past version of 115 and to convince her and the other Madelines to punish Owen's interference (if he ever came there) with death. Second, she reprogrammed the time machine itself with an override sequence so that if Owen ever *did* attempt to correct the past, he'd be sent to the future zone instead, where past-future-her and the other Madelines would deal with him. In a bit of poetic revenge, she apparently created some sort of respawn sequence so the Madelines still there could even kill him over and over, as he did her.

The scene with the army of Madelines was impressive, but I suspect the director or writer might have thought it was too bleak an ending. Therefore we got Madeline 51 -- who you as the viewer are supposed to know because she's the only one with a twin-bun hairstyle and who was shown wearing that particular scarf earlier in the film -- saving the day by travelling to the past herself and stopping Original Madeline from ever pressing the button. We know she's clearly smart enough to fix the code, and she was right there with the machine and (by that point in the movie) seemed sincere about wanting to help Owen end the miserable cycle of clonings and killings. Ergo, we get a happy... ending?

Look, I'm not going to completely justify the convoluted ending, because it still does contain some logical holes no matter how you look at it. There's no explanation for how or why Owen would respawn outside of the camper after being stabbed without benefit of the time machine -- none of the many Madeline clones did that after their demises. If original-him, armed with a knife, had been the one to respawn like that, that would have been a different story but also wouldn't have made much sense as a good evil plan for Madeline 115. The "good ending" with Madeline 51 also felt very tacked-on, and the gasp right before the credits doesn't seem to serve *any* purpose that would make in-world sense. (Unless, perhaps, it's Madeline 51 poofing into nonexistence after altering the timeline. I'm thinking more likely it was just a lame throwback jump-scare sound effect to recall the Madelines' first sound upon respawning earlier in the film.) It was also never exactly clear what Madeline 115 thought she was going to do with an army of herself, and the presence of the camper in the future zone was a permanent puzzle.

All told, there are much better ways this film could have ended. I think there was a real missed opportunity for a darkly funny and trippy "Multiplicity" ending with several good Madelines saving the day and deciding to share their life and lover, compromising between their identity as a collective "person" and as individuals (my preference), or they could have focused on a sweet "message" ending with Owen and Original Madeline having some sort of emotional thing to work through on dreams and what sacrifices are and aren't worth it (also acceptable). Instead, we got an EXTREMELY plot-heavy, mystery-style ending that played out like an Agatha Christie novel but with the loose ends much less neatly cinched-together.

But... yeah. The "true" ending was that Owen went through a harrowing time and possible murder in the future zone thanks to Madeline 115's masterful snare, but that Madeline 51 fixed the past on her own and saved the day.

And as a micro-review for the movie itself, I feel it's much better than its low IMDB score makes it look. I found it trippy, exciting, occasionally very funny, with special effects that weren't amazing but also were adequate and not-half-bad for this film's likely budget. The lighting and some of the cinematography were great, and I enjoyed the music, though it as a smidge too loud in some scenes. I also thought all three of the tiny cast of regulars did great jobs, and I actually kind of liked the ending (or at least appreciated it as an adequate wrap-up) once I finally understood it. The film just made things way too hard on themselves and their viewers by not shooting for an ending that was emotionally or thematically satisfying rather than trying to be too clever by half with an overly twisty finale. Worth watching at least once!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Definitely feels like pacing is off but it generates good intrigue...
coolzero-3891227 October 2022
I'm no film major, aside from my own film I made, but this film is interesting. Time travel and the multiverse is in this year, thanks to Rick and Morty (I think). So this film is good in my opinion, though pretty complex. Perhaps too complex for anyone, the base ideas are good, the characters are likable and flawed in ways... so if you like sci-fi and time travel you might like it.

If you need explanations for everything you might not like it... it seems to have no thread explanations. By that I mean there are a lot of people that who have written that it's poor in effects, and poor in concluding the ideas it gives... they are probably right... but I still like thinking about the movie and enjoying what it is.

In my own film I have myself in it, perhaps that's a good think and the director should be in it. Like if he's leaving things, according to other's, badly done like the effects and writing... perhaps he should be in the film to explain in some way. In my film I actually am killed by having my buttocks crushed, then I have my friend thrown down the stairs... not sure what he could do in the film to make people happy or if it's needed, but it is always fun to see the director in a movie. It sort of breaks the rules of film for some reason... as if none of the other actors/actresses in the film could have written or given direction suggestions at all... kinda of odd... it must be the way it's done usually... self aware to a degree...

Is this film self aware to some odd degree that makes people give it a low score, or like this review is it too self serving? Like he just really likes time travel ideas and well if you all don't like it... keep thinking about it perhaps you'll make a better conclusion. Not sure, it's kind of forward thinking to have my friends portrayed as such good method actor's, perhaps their fatal flaw (the creatives behind it) is that time travel isn't revealed as real and our imaginations can't ever piece together any film about time travel... hopefully you all still like Back to the Future with that notion, but whatever...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Could be better on rewatching but interesting on first watch...
richardperez-395203 April 2022
I assume you all watch movies a lot, well this one is good, I'll need to re-watch since it is pretty complex at times. But pretty cool ideas about space/time and travel... as well as how to deal with it.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed