24
Metascore
7 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 70Los Angeles TimesKevin ThomasLos Angeles TimesKevin ThomasMerola unleashes a barrage of information, including much testimony from grateful patients, but he could have made an even more effective film had he paused to summarize each phase in Burzynski's long ordeal.
- 50VarietyRonnie ScheibVarietyRonnie ScheibDespite its infotainment look, Burzynski ultimately proves convincing.
- 50The New York TimesJeannette CatsoulisThe New York TimesJeannette CatsoulisClogged with court transcripts, medical records and repetitive (if moving) patient testimony, Burzynski tickles the mind only at the cost of trampling the eyes.
- 20Time OutS. James SnyderTime OutS. James SnyderThrough all the fuzzy science, Merola sees a savior; you’ll see a dull editorial masquerading as objective reporting.
- 20Boxoffice MagazineMark KeizerBoxoffice MagazineMark KeizerBurzynski may have credibility in the eyes of some, but the movie about him has no credibility, so no one will be receptive to its message.
- 0Village VoiceElla TaylorVillage VoiceElla TaylorWho's the bigger charlatan--Burzynski or Merola--and why is this conspiratorial rubbish being released into theaters?
- 0New York PostV.A. MusettoNew York PostV.A. MusettoBurzynski is dull, dull, dull, even for an infomercial.