Spirits for Sale (2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Engrossing, perceptive, and wholly credible
nafps15 February 2018
American Indian activists and their allies put together a strong award winning documentary on the danger of New Age imposters who pretend to be Native medicine people. The film was made and narrated by Annika Banfeld, who has over two decades of working with American Indian causes. The revered Arvol Looking Horse, the most respected of Lakota holy men, leads the charge against these abusers. How effective this documentary is shown by the vitriol of one reviewer who has never made a review before or since., and includes nothing but falsehood. One might even suspect he's one of the ones critiqued by the film.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A devastating look at whites who want to be Indian and the harm they do
HistoryFilmBuff24 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film at the South Dakota Film Festival, where it won Best International Film. The audience, both Native and white, was bowled over by it, cheering the Native activists, laughing at the foolishness of white wannabes, and booing the deception and abuse by pretenders.

The film follows American Indians in South Dakota, New Mexico, and Texas, giving us Lakota, Navajo, Cherokee, and Apache views on the phenomena of pay to pray and whiteshamanism or plastic shamanism, imposters who pose as Native spiritual leaders. We also see a group of European wannabes get taken by a white pretender, doing a fake sweatlodge and getting it comically wrong. (It's just plain dumb luck none of them were killed. Think of those poor people in Sedona who died.) There's some wonderful scenes where clueless New Age people say one foolish thing after another, only to be shown to be wrong time and again by Natives.

The film has some wonderful words of wisdom from Arvol Looking Horse, a spiritual leader of the Lakota, Gayle Ross, a descendant of Cherokee Chief John Ross, Andrew Thomas, a Navajo artist, and Al Carroll, an Apache historian. Looking online it seems some of the same New Age hucksters who worry about their bank accounts getting smaller have conducted a smear campaign against the film and its participants. That is probably the best compliment they could give, because it says just how worried they are abou8t the truth getting out.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
understandable and sympathetic
OttoStam16 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There is a lot of naivety in this film. A European lady got an eagle feather as a present from a friend. When she understands that an eagle feather is holy to Indians, she wants to give it back. She does not ask this friend where this feather came from - she takes an airplane to the USA. To me it seems obvious, that making the film was more important than giving the feather back. The Lakota elder to whom the feather is given in the end does not ask (in the film) where this feather came from in the first place. He is glad that a white lady does her best to respect his tradition. All in all, for me as a white European, the film does give an understandable and sympathetic picture of how deep the pain of Indians can be, seeing that the foreigners that came digging for gold now come digging for rituals. I hope and suppose, that the film helps wannabees to understand that digging for rituals is trespassing a sacred boundary.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed