Horns (2013) Poster

(2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
286 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Weird and Mesmerizing
claudio_carvalho20 April 2015
In a small town, Ig Perrish (Daniel Radcliffe) is accused by the inhabitants of killing his sweetheart Merrin Williams (Juno Temple). Even his parents believe that he is guilty and only his childhood friend and lawyer Lee Tourneau (Max Minghella) believes Ig is telling the truth. Out of blue, Ig sees horns sprouting on his forehead, but soon he finds that the horns are a blessing since people confess their sins and inner dark desires to him. Ig uses the horns to discover who the killer of his beloved girlfriend is.

"Horns" is a weird and mesmerizing movie that entwines several genres. The plot is unique and anything can happen in this original story. The conclusion could be better but does not totally disappoint. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Amaldiçoado" ("Cursed")

Note: On 06 July 2023, I saw this film again.
88 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fantastic
danrappitt1915 August 2015
I loved 'Horns', It isn't yet another recycled movie to keep you entertained while you eat your popcorn, what it is is completely different from anything you've seen before. The film has no specific genre, it's a jumble of ideas. And I like that.

The acting is fantastic all round, At the start it was strange hearing Daniel Radcliffe speaking in an American accent but he does it brilliantly and his performance all the way through is just brilliant. There isn't a single character in the film who isn't 100% believable and vital to the story.

Visually, the film is also terrific. I could watch the whole thing on mute and still enjoy it hugely.

As many people have said before this definitely is not a film for everyone. It's a 'Love it' or 'Hate it' film and I can understand why many people are gathering at the 'Hate it' end of the spectrum, although, in my opinion, those people are wrong. I'd love it if more filmmakers took risks like this instead of playing it safe by recycling previous tired-out ideas.

I strongly recommend you give this film a go.
78 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Love made devils of us both."
utgard1427 December 2014
Well this was pretty good, although it wasn't quite what I expected. It's not a horror movie, for those going into it expecting it to be. The backbone of it is a murder mystery but there are supernatural elements added to it, as well as a good bit of humor. The mystery part isn't the greatest. I figured out who the killer was immediately with little effort. I can only imagine most other viewers will, as well. But the other stuff with the horns and the way they make people act provides for some nice dark comedy. I was impressed with Daniel Radcliffe, although he needs to keep working on his accent. His pronunciation is a little too pointed at times. Juno Temple is always great to watch. Wish she was in this more. The rest of the cast is solid. Nice to see Heather Graham in a small but fun role. It's a good movie. It's not without flaws but it is pretty original and not pretentious, which is a rarity these days. Goes on a little longer than necessary but I was never bored. I liked the ending, too.
60 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Grab This One by the Horns.
TheReviewMaster6 May 2015
Daniel Radcliffe has come a long way since his stint as a wizard, and "Horns" is a great vehicle for him to continue to grow as an actor and expand his presence to those in the audience who gave the little Potter-head a miss.

Joe Hill, son of Stephen King, has crafted a tale here I can honestly say as far as I know, has never been done, and that's always a good start. The concept is fun, full of surprises, and never dulls.

The problem I am finding with great premises is that it's very hard to fully utilise them, to drain them for everything they are worth, and that is where Horns loses ratings; it could have pushed the boundaries in the fun department just a little bit more, but then, in hindsight, doing that risks spoiling some of the darker elements littered throughout the narrative.

It is a violent film at times, but if you can grow some horns and stomach a few graphic scenes, then you may enjoy it.
36 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated film that is worth a watch
KineticSeoul20 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I first passed on this movie because I thought it would be another art-house movie that has Daniel Radcliffe with horns. I will say Daniel Radcliffe fit his role in this really well. So the plot is about a guy that is going through major depression after the death of his girlfriend. Soo he starts to grow horns that grant him special powers. The momentum for this movie keeps building until he finds out who the killer is than it starts to drag a bit. But I did like the mystery and character interactions in this. Especially since it delves into the dark and twisted side of what the characters are thinking. This isn't really a horror movie, but more of a emotional mystery movie that revolves around love and revenge. With supernatural and dark comedic elements that play a huge factor in the story. For the most part this movie had my attention from start to finish. Mainly because I found the character interactions to be intriguing, sometimes humorous and because I actually cared about what was going to happen next. Overall this is actually a immersive and fun movie experience.

7.6/10
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid film with terrible ending
zippelflorian23 August 2020
The titles says it all. The first half of the movie was great, the second half was less good and the last 15 minutes were terribly bad, so bad actually that it if you'd watch it with friends it could be entertaining again. Thus, I'm torn with my rating. If they'd made the second half of the movie as good as the first half, it would've been easily a 8. However, with that ending, I get why people rated it a 5 or 6.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Expected a very little, but delivered very hugely.
Reno-Rangan14 March 2016
The first word I said after the watch was 'unbelievable'. That means the movie is not bad, but how come I missed it for this long. This is the best dark-fantasy movie I have seen recently. But earlier, I thought it would be like the movie 'Tusk' which made me a little uncomfortable to watch. So in the end, what's the difference between the tusk and/or the horn. Both come in a pair and animals have it to defend themselves from the threat. When I watched that movie, I lost interest in this. Yep, it is a silly reason and now I feel bad for that.

This movie dominated by the British cast, especially for having Daniel Radcliffe and Juno Temple I thought it was British film, actually it was not. It was a Canadian-US jointly produced, adapted from a book of the same name and directed by 'Mirror' director. The story was so good, not genuine, though explored the theme very well. For every few minutes later, the narration was taking a turn and that made the plot to get lot tighter before heading for the concluding part.

Maybe this the best movie of Radcliffe that I've seen after his goodbye to 'Harry Potter' movie series. I don't think he's a chocolate boy type, but this kind of movie suits him well. I think he should get muscles for more movie like this, but his height is another negative factor. The film was entirely shot in Canada, the photography was great, music as well as performances. Even those settings like woods, tree house feels kind of wet English and Scottish atmosphere that fits for a devilish mythical charactered movie like this. I regret for reviewing it so delayedly, but anyway I did it and over it, so I hope you watch it very soon as well if you haven't seen it yet.

7/10
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I can't believe this movie doesn't get more love
amandacarleyis21 July 2015
I give this movie a 10/10 for many reasons and here is three to keep it simple:

The first is the impeccable acting. This entire movie was cast perfectly, and Daniel Radcliffe broke the Harry Potter typecast and gave us a phenomenal performance in Horns. I definitely felt the chemistry between Radcliffe and Temple, both of them were outstanding and sexy.

The second is the book-to-screen adaption. Aside from leaving a few key points of Lee's back story out, the film kept the originality and humor that Joe Hill's novel blessed us with. I don't ever go into a book-to-film adaption expecting everything to math perfectly, and this movie did everything right!

The third is the cinematography. Such a beautiful and artful film, everything about the way this movie looks is delivered perfectly.

If you have not watched this movie or at least read the novel, please take the time to do so. It is such an original story and well worth it! It's disturbing, funny, sad, satisfying and so much more!
78 out of 100 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Should be more than enough to spike your interest, even if it's flawed.
Pjtaylor-96-1380442 November 2018
'Horns (2013)' is more a mystery than anything else and there thankfully is a nice, self-contained little story at the heart of the piece, one that doesn't really focus on the eponymous horns so much as use their abilities to see the story through to its end (in terms of both theme and plot). The eventual, albeit disappointing, reveal isn't necessarily obvious, either, as the film spends a lot of time successfully muddying the waters when it comes to whether or not our 'hero' might actually deserve the spiky things growing from his skull. While it's usually entertaining and not afraid to also be properly dark, the flick does have its fair share of quite severe tonal issues and a third act that doesn't really live up to what it could've been - bolstered by that disappointing reveal I mentioned earlier. This ultimately makes for an experience that's enjoyable but flawed, sometimes frustratingly so. 6/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It was lacking something!
SpannersGerm66919 March 2015
Horns is the latest film from Alexandre Aja, the French director responsible for such films as High Tension and the Maniac remake. He also made a very memorable remake of The Hills Have Eyes, which demonstrates that this guy really knows his stuff. Unfortunately along with the good he has also served up some mediocre stuff as well. Although Horns isn't a bad film, it is still well below what this guy is capable of. My problem with Horns lies in the characters! Their interactions with each other never really felt authentic and really took me out of the emotion that the film needed for it to carry. Therefore, as a result of lack of sympathy, the moments where the main character and his love come on screen, i was constantly looking at how much time was left in the movie. Having said this, the movie doesn't come without positives. I thought it was very funny in places and there is a moment of gore, but fans of Alexandre Aja, expecting a blood bath, will be disappointed. Lack of gore wouldn't have been a problem if the story worked on an emotional level, but sadly it didn't. Overall, Horns is very creative, but it lacked the interest it needed to succeed!
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Good And VERY Original
HorrorOverEverything3 October 2014
I'm a sucker for originality and for movies that try do something different. I get sick and tired of seeing the same thing over and over again and wish more filmmakers would take a chance instead doing the same old things. "Horns" is probably one of the most original movies I have ever seen and I loved that about it. It combines so many different movie genres into one fun, crazy, heart felt story that unfortunately is not going to be for everyone.

Right off the bat I could tell I was going to enjoy this. It starts off as what looks to be your run of the mill thriller flick then quickly spirals into some incredibly out there. Once the Horns are introduced things just take a shift into the bizarre, and I loved that. There are some truly hilarious and insane scenes. The film does a nice job of being cleverly light and rather dark at the same time.

The acting was excellent. Daniel Ratcliffe does a great job of being American, it was weird to hear him without the accent at first but he does such a good job that I eventually completely forgot that he was even British. The rest of the supporting cast did a great job, all the characters were extremely interesting and well written so that may have had something to do with it.

Overall I really enjoyed this. It definitely isn't for everybody and has a pretty long run time of 2 hours so I could see people getting bored with it if it isn't exactly there thing. But if you want to see something that you haven't seen before, something that tries to be original but not too overly artsy, something with heart then I suggest giving this a try.

8/10
277 out of 386 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
good until the end.
poetbard22 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Radcliffe is very convincing as Iggy Perish in this dark fantasy, in which he is accused of killing his girlfriend. In a series of flashbacks the plot is developed from childhood on to the tragic murder of his girlfriend and the subsequent investigation Radcliff grows devil-like horns. With these he develops a dark power that causes almost everyone he talks to reveal their innermost evil desires. The plot takes many unexpected and dark twists which Iggy discovers the dark side behind everyone he ever knew. The problem with this film is the ending. It is overdone and very predictable and thus seriously undermines the quality of the film. All the other actors were excellent in their roles. The direction was also good until the ending when is became ridiculous. The ending should have been another clever plot twist, had it been so this would have been a very original horror fantasy and I would have given it a 9 instead of a 7
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I can't believe I sat through that
navillusds-7360111 June 2020
This is quite possibly the worst movie I have ever seen. I didn't know anything about it at all, and only watched it because I wanted to see Daniel Radcliffe in a different role from Harry Potter. I must say I was impressed with His American accent and his acting, but otherwise it was a stinker. The screenwriters obviously have an extremely limited vocabulary, and although I attempted to keep an open mind and give it a chance, I found much of the movie offensive. The number of positive reviews this movie received is astounding, and I can't believe I stuck with it to the end. I kept thinking it had to get better at some point, but it never did.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underwhelming, but not a total loss.
gojiseb31 December 2014
I was excited for this flick. I thought it looked like it could be a fun, crazy supernatural whodunnit kind of story. So, I went in with some fairly high hopes. Did the film live up to them? Well...not exactly.

It's well acted (Radcliffe gives a solid performance when he's actually focusing on acting and not on his accent) and incredibly well shot. I could not get over how gorgeous some of the cinematography is. However, there are a few things that bog it down considerably for me. The voice-over narration feels very forced in there and I thought that some of the exposition dialogue really killed lots of the more dramatic moments. It also suffers from very uneven pacing and the story flows is too jumbled at times.

Overall, I recommend it. It's a fine flick that you won't regret watching at least once, but it ultimately didn't do much for me.
31 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Weird premise becomes surprisingly pleasant.
jake-law12313 February 2015
With that said, a lot of stuff in this film was stupid, from wtf dialog, to wtf sex scenes, to wtf moments in general, this film had its fair share of painfully bad and laughably bad. I did not expect to enjoy it as much as I did. I don't love it but I enjoyed it for the most part.

loosely based on Joe Hill's novel of the same name. Daniel Radcliffe stars as a man who is accused of raping and murdering his girlfriend (Juno Temple) and uses his newly discovered paranormal abilities to uncover the real killer.

I almost consider this film part comedy. Like seriously, there's no way everything in this film is supposed to be taken seriously, you just gotta take it for granted. At first that's what I was mostly enjoying, though a lot of scenes go nowhere, so it's still a really sloppy script overall. Later on, I was not expecting to become as invested in the relationship with him and his girlfriend as I was. I morally cared for their relationship overall. At first when it jumped to her being dead, I felt like they make us feel bad for somebody we don't know that well, but it actually does a good job of building up their relationship and the friends that go with it, and gives everybody an interesting motive for their actions. I found myself gasping to the romantic discovery near the end.

Like I said, a lot of scenes are stupid and the script is almost trying to suck, but it makes for some laughably bad moments where I was dying laughing. In the end, it isn't a good film, but it seems well adapted to the novel. Daniel Radcliffe is actually really good in it. He has comedic moments, dramatic moments, and he's up there with Matthew McConaughey in terms of being able to cry. I wasn't expecting to be so invested in the romance in the film, but like I said, it's actually well developed, and quite tragic near the end. I didn't love it for obvious reasons, but it's a better romantic novel adaptation than Twilight or something else, so there's no reason to hate it any more.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sometimes we pick the sin we're going to live with.
Hey_Sweden9 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Renowned author Stephen King obviously taught his son Joe, now a successful writer on his own, some good lessons. Here Joe came up with an odd but compelling story. It does take some getting used to, because it switches from a darkly comic tone to a dead serious one. As for the comedy, it's not always terribly funny, but it touches upon the intriguing idea of what many of us would do if we were EXTREMELY open and honest about our wildest and darkest desires.

People in this tale are compelled to voice their secret, selfish, crazy thoughts and do whatever the Hell they feel like doing, thanks to Ig Perrish (Daniel Radcliffe, doing a solid if not flawless American accent). Merrin (Juno Temple), the love of his life, was found murdered some time ago, and most people are convinced that Ig is the culprit. But, one day as he is nursing a hangover, some actual horns have sprouted from his head, and they have a profound influence on many of the people with whom he interacts. They just might come in handy as he attempts to solve the crime and clear his name.

Although it should be clear to most people (even this viewer) who the killer is early on, one shouldn't let that detract too much from the offbeat pleasures of this amusing horror drama. It's gorgeously shot in widescreen, with director Alexandre Aja filling the frame with lots of detail. There is some good gore and makeup effects by the prolific Gregory Nicotero and Howard Berger, as well as a plethora of snake imagery and a genuinely memorable finale. Just like his dad has done often, Joe spins a yarn that includes some effective childhood vignettes.

Radcliffe heads a solid cast - Max Minghella as his childhood friend turned lawyer, Joe Anderson as his pathetic brother, James Remar and Kathleen Quinlan as his parents, Heather Graham in a small but funny turn as a vain, self serving waitress, and David Morse as Merrins' angry, grief-stricken father.

While far from perfect, "Horns" is just interesting enough to make it a welcome deviation from blander contemporary genre fare.

Seven out of 10.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
good idea
SnoopyStyle10 January 2017
Ig Perrish (Daniel Radcliffe) and Merrin Williams are deeply in love since their early childhood. After her brutal murder, the town is outraged believing him to be guilty. Even his parents aren't sure. The evidence is against him. After sleeping with barmaid Glenna Shepherd, he wakes up the next morning with horns growing out of his head. Now, people confess to him their darkest thoughts, obey his command, and unleash their hidden desires. He can bring out their memories. He tries to piece together that fateful night and find Merrin's killer.

The premise brings out the darkness of humanity. It does struggle to settle on a specific level. It has too much silliness at times which threatens to make the movie a light weight. As for the murder mystery, it seems obvious from early on. There are probably too many hints. This movie has a good idea set up. Radcliffe is a fine lead. It stumbles once in awhile but manages to cross the finish line with plenty in the tank.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's own Genre, like nothing I've ever seen before.
misterphilipj21 April 2015
This film deserves an 11. I wish I didn't rate any of my other movies as a 10 because this deserves a score above all others.

It's so original, like nothing I've ever experienced before. It's like an adult themed fairy tale, a cross between Bridge to Terabithia and Martyrs. The symbolism and themes throughout spark deep reflection and thought. There are some rather disturbing scenes but they are so creative, so artistic.

See this and you will not be underwhelmed. Just keep an open mind or you will be completely freaked out and might want to stop watching, don't press that pause or stop button and you won't regret it.
46 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Horns: A pleasant if slightly flawed surprise
Platypuschow22 August 2017
I think Daniel Radcliffe has damaged his career, he IS Harry Potter he took a role made it his own and it is now very difficult to see him as anything else.

When I heard about this R rated title of his I had little interest but knew one day I'd get around to it. What I didn't realise was just how much I was going to enjoy it.

Horns is nothing particularly special, but it has it's merits and I can confidently say I walked away satisfied with what I had watched.

With a fantastic cast, a gripping storyline and a really quite neat ending I'm not entirely convinced Radcliffe will break free of the Potter curse but this was a good start.

The Good:

Excellent story

Juno Temple

David Morse

The Bad:

The "Potter" curse was certainly present

Things I learnt from this movie:

Where Is My Mind? is officially on every movies soundtrack

Juno Temple is allergic to clothing
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Drops off a cliff half-way through
begob4 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The best stories uncover well kept secrets.

This one starts out really well. It's witty and satiric, with the idea of seeking justice for a falsely accused man. He develops the power of getting dark secrets out of the people he meets, and the trail gradually grows warmer.

A lot hinges on the dead girl, who is remembered as an amazing person. Sadly her secret isn't really worth uncovering and her character isn't all that amazing.

Just over half way through the story loses the witty touch, and we end up with a mechanical work through of a second rate plot that relies on daft symbolism and half-baked religious notions as expressed through the wonders of special effects. To top it off the villain is laughably unimpressive, and the final conflict is pure cheese.

Oh dear. Two hours for this?
99 out of 167 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great Fantasy/Horror/Drama/Romance/Thriller
gregsrants9 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A few years back, I wrote that the future of horror films rests on the shoulders of three filmmakers – James Wan, Ti West and Eli Roth. While all three of these celebrity directors are still very much still the names expected to scare and thrill us for years to come, there is one other name that simply cannot be ignored – Alexandre Aja. Aja first came to our attention with High Tension (2003), a brilliant and bloody horror film that alienated audiences due to its surprise ending. The twist aside, High Tension was an intense and wonderful ride and Aja was able to leverage the interest in the French language horror film into a gig behind the camera for The Hills Have Eyes remake in 2006. Aja's next horror film, Mirrors starring Keifer Sutherland was a bit of a letdown, but he came back strong with 2010's Piranha and then stayed away from the directing chair and pounded out the screenplay for the still underrated Maniac (2013) which is one of those hidden gems that no everyone has caught onto just yet. Aja's latest is Horns, a horror, thriller, fantasy that was adapted from the Joe Hill book of the same name. In Horns, Daniel Radcliffe (The Woman in Black) plays Ig Perrish, a young man in a small town who is madly in love with the woman of his dreams named Merrin (Juno Temple). Merrin and Ig met as young kids and their love seemed unflinching. But when Merrin is murdered, Ig becomes accused in the court of public opinion and the townspeople show disfavor to Ig in all directions harassing and condemning him for an act that he has yet to be convicted. Ig professes his innocence. He was drunk the night of Merrin's death and cannot recall the events of the evening. But he is convinced that his love for Merrin would never allow his instincts to result in a brutal slaying. The next morning, Ig awakens with mysterious horns growing from his temples. Considering the town already considers him the devil, the horns would be an incredible inconvenience except for their seeming power they have over people which reveal their inner most and darkest secrets when the horns are in their presence. This too comes at an inconvenience. Ig learns that his mother wants him to leave and that his father thinks him guilty. But Ig is also able to use the horn's power to get answers from people around town in his own attempt to piece together the events of Merrin's last evening. As the hours pass, the horns atop Ig's heads become more pronounced and the Satan symbolism continues with inclusions of snakes, pitchforks and even a burned body before the movie hits its climax. For director Alexandre Aja best known for his horror and over the top violence, Horns is definitely a departure. But that doesn't mean that Aja can't infuse what he does best into the very involving love story. There are a few scenes of violence and nudity throughout Horns that will ensure the younger Harry Potter Fan Club will be refused entrance at the local movie theatre (Horns will be rated –R). Daniel Radcliffe was daring casting, but he has proved in The Woman in Black and now with Horns that he is going to be able to leave the boy wizard behind and we didn't think for one second that the man who beat Voldomort was the same person we were watching on screen. Surprising many of us who screened the film at the Toronto International Film Festival, Horns was an exceptional film that we keep our fingers crossed that the multiple dabbles in different genres will not deter or confuse the audience that this film richly deserves. Not only is it one of the best we have seen at the Festival this year, but it is also one of more original films we have seen in a while and fully expect Horns to end up in our Top 15 films of the year once the books are closed.
59 out of 109 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"The Ram of Justice"
Kamurai253 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Really good watch, would watch again, and can recommend.

Trigger warning: rape and murder.

It's in the premise, but certain information sources hide some things more than others.

Some movies are hurt by trying to be too many things, but this finds a wonderful balance between a murder mystery and religiously mythical. I think it is that they compliment each other. Regardless of why Daniel Radcliffe's character has been imbued with horns, the powers he gains serve toward revealing the mystery. I never felt like there was a dead spot where the story wasn't moving forward or we were re-hashing all the details: they do a good job of keeping the relevant information at the fore front and refreshing the information on pace.

Why it is a great premise, it is awfully sad one, but I do feel it helps humanize Daniel Radcliffe almost immediately, and he retains his like-ability throughout the film just for the shear insanity of his situation.

It is also a lot of fun to see how the power of the horns affect the different townsfolk.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Gets The Tone Of The Book Wrong, But Still Manages Respectability
zkonedog31 August 2018
In terms of adapting Joe Hill's book onto the big screen, there are a number of things that go right for "Horns". Sadly, this effort also does not seem to realize what the tone of the novel is all about, rendering it an adequate film and no more.

For a basic plot summary, "Horns" tells the story of Ig Parrish (Daniel Radcliffe), who wakes up one morning after a wicked bender with horns growing out of his head. Not only that, but these horns seem to have the power to influence other people based on Ig's conversations with them. Suspected in the recent death of longtime girlfriend Merrin (Juno Temple), Ig tries to put his life back together and reckon with his new protuberances at the same time. Interactions with best friend Lee (Mix Minghella) & brother Terry (Joe Anderson) help start connecting the dots as to what actually happened to Merrin.

The main problem with this Alexandre Aja-directed flick is that it doesn't understand that Hill's novel isn't really about the horns. I understand that they are obviously the visual standout of the story, and perhaps work better on the big screen than even in print, but they are not the driving force of the story. Rather, Hill constructs a story where the horns are little more than the impetus for Ig to figure out his shady past and move forward.

In this adaptation, however, it is very clear that Ig's interactions with the horns are paramount, and the character interactions are thrown in as best they can be. This leads to a film that technically adapts the nuts-and-bolts of Hill's novel pretty well, but loses most of its literary soul, if you will, in the process. Whereas the story should be absolutely brimming with deep character relationships and interesting observations, it instead is rather bland on that front because the focus is on the visual gags or off-beat humor.

Also, I'd only go so far as to call the acting in this one "so-so". Sometimes, Radcliffe nails the role (especially when he is in a drunken stupor). Other times, however, he seems far too goofy to be taken seriously. The auxiliary cast is okay, but again not really given much room to shine because the whole thing is built away from them.

I understand why this film was made in this particular fashion (it's the easiest way to do it), but I wish it would have built from the characters outward instead. Hill's novel is one of my favorites of all-time, and I wish this film could have given it a better cinematic reputation instead of a solid "meh".
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good concept and performance, let down ending
talwar_radhika20 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I've been interested in what child actors can do as they grow, and while I'm a fan of the Harry Potter books, not the movies as much. Daniel Radcliffe is definitely an actor to watch - great potential and decent performance (even held a decent American accent). The film has a great concept, looks are everyone's deep, dark secrets, and interesting dynamics with families and friends. It was even executed well. I just think it could've been about 20 minutes shorter, and wrapped up a lot quicker, the excessive violence was unnecessary.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A genre experiment with an awesome delivery.
InMyHonestOpinion31 December 2014
Sometimes a film will be released that has a unique idea, an idea that can be twisted but still beautiful in its delivery. Books are written and as we read them we get an idea of what each character, each scene, each word spoken should be like and who should be phrasing them on the big screen. I never actually read the book by Joe Hill whose book Horns is based upon but I wish I had. I can't really say whether what the director and stars of Horns the movie produced would be to his liking but I'm sure the book would have been a lot smoother in its delivery none-the-less. It is now on my personal "too read" list anyway.

Iggy Perish played by Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter, The Woman in Black) wakes one morning after what appears to be a very big night drinking, walks over to his vast record collection, pulls out a David Bowie album and plays "We can be heroes". He then walks over to the window and pulls back the shade to reveal a monster amount of reporters and their crew sitting out the front of his house with people holding banners stating things like; "Murderer", "You Should Hang" and so much more. Turns out Ig (as he is known about the town) is the prime suspect in his high school sweetheart Merrins murder played by Juno Temple. (Maleficent, the Dark Knight Rises) The town for obvious reason hates him and basically wish the case was solved and he was put away. One morning after another drunken night Ig wakes up with horns protruding from his temples, the way people begin to react around Ig suddenly changes….

I really enjoyed Horns I thought Daniel Radcliffe was amazing in his role, his cold stares and even his accent was pretty outstanding. He definitely has come a long way since Hogwarts. My only real problem with the film was its pace and it's absolutely no idea what it wanted to be genre. You could almost say the film has four different parts all shot by different directors and then edited together. Actually the film was directed by Alexandre Aja (Mirrors, The Hills Have Eyes) it's not that he's done a bad job I tend to more think he's tried to do too much with it and going for almost 2 hours in length it is rather long where I don't think it needed to be. The film is very dark, very twisted, it's a thriller who done it crossed with a horror and a little comedy all at once. A unique idea that's for sure. I'm not saying it doesn't work because with it being such a unique idea it keeps you entertained enough to not let go and wait for the next laugh or vital bit of information. There is some great locations used and some of the camera work is new in itself. The soundtrack was pretty awesome as well. (Can never go wrong using Bowie in my book) Unfortunately it never meets any of the genres its tries to be fully and in the end we are left a little disappointed with what we soon work out to be a very predictable conclusion.

I believe this film will appeal to a large audience not for the youngings though due to language and horror elements within, overall I believe it's enjoyable enough to recommend to those who want something different than than the usual trash Hollywood and its brothers deliver. When watching it, be prepared for something a little different.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed